Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Historical Development and Investment Rationale

verfasst von : Wolfgang Spiess-Knafl, Barbara Scheck

Erschienen in: Impact Investing

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter covers the phenomenon of impact investing. It will introduce the topic and discuss the rationales of investors to allocate part of their resources to impact investing. Those rationales vary for the different groups of investors who are contributing to the capital in the impact investing market.
There are different theoretical approaches to understanding investment decisions. One key consideration is the interplay between financial and social return requirements. Financial returns are easily quantifiable in the form of EBITDA, net profits or revenues, whereas social goals are not easily quantifiable. Both goals are interdependent and trade-offs can occur when capital providers with different return expectations are involved in the financing of a social enterprise. Traditional public sector funding usually comes with restrictions and has an impact on the financing structure of the organization. Similar restrictions can be observed for the different income streams. Crowding-out can occur when donors and public authorities support an organization.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The different tools and methods to assess the social impact are presented in later chapters of this book.
 
2
The motives of foundations and donors are also regularly criticized. Large foundations can influence entire fields and occasionally even control them and there are concerns about democratic legitimacy and governance issues.
 
3
Investor profiles can be found in Chap. 4.
 
4
Similar considerations are known for family firms that focus on socio-emotional issues when considering decisions (Berrone et al. 2012).
 
5
Donors and lenders without a claim to a return can also have a great influence on the orientation of the organization. In this case, they can be understood as principals.
 
6
The chapter on social impact assessment discusses the methodologies to monitor the performance of social enterprises.
 
7
Conflicts are all those situations in which interests are aligned.
 
8
Compartamos Banco’s and SKS’s initial public offerings have caused considerable criticism as part of the start-up financing has been provided through public funds and the profits have been distributed to private actors.
 
9
The public authorities act in the interests of the target group and ensures equivalent access to the service. Examples include school visits where parents’ contributions are deducted from the public contributions. The same applies in shelters where the homeless cannot contribute monetarily to the service. All additional revenues would be deducted from the public payments.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Achleitner, Ann-Kristin, Wolfgang Spiess-Knafl, and Sarah Volk. 2014. The Financing Structure of Social Enterprises: Conflicts and Implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 6 (1): 85–99. Achleitner, Ann-Kristin, Wolfgang Spiess-Knafl, and Sarah Volk. 2014. The Financing Structure of Social Enterprises: Conflicts and Implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 6 (1): 85–99.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreoni, James. 1990. Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal 100 (401): 464–477.CrossRef Andreoni, James. 1990. Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal 100 (401): 464–477.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2000. The Economics of Philanthropy. Wisconsin Madison-Social Systems. ———. 2000. The Economics of Philanthropy. Wisconsin Madison-Social Systems.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2015. Economics of Charity and Philanthropy. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier. ———. 2015. Economics of Charity and Philanthropy. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, Adrian, and Adam Swersky. 2012. The First Billion: A Forecast of Social Investment Demand. London: The Boston Consulting Group, Big Society Capital. Brown, Adrian, and Adam Swersky. 2012. The First Billion: A Forecast of Social Investment Demand. London: The Boston Consulting Group, Big Society Capital.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, Deborah A., and Keely Jones Stater. 2009. Revenue Diversification in Nonprofit Organizations: Does It Lead to Financial Stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (4): 947–966.CrossRef Carroll, Deborah A., and Keely Jones Stater. 2009. Revenue Diversification in Nonprofit Organizations: Does It Lead to Financial Stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (4): 947–966.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson, Jed. 2003. The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns. California Management Review 45 (4): 35–51.CrossRef Emerson, Jed. 2003. The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns. California Management Review 45 (4): 35–51.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama, Eugene F., and Michael C. Jensen. 1983. Agency Problems and Residual Claims. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 327–349.CrossRef Fama, Eugene F., and Michael C. Jensen. 1983. Agency Problems and Residual Claims. The Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 327–349.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foster, William, and Gail Fine. 2007. How Nonprofits Get Really Big. Stanford Social Innovation Review 5 (2): 46–55. Foster, William, and Gail Fine. 2007. How Nonprofits Get Really Big. Stanford Social Innovation Review 5 (2): 46–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Grabenwarter, Uli, and Heinrich Liechtenstein. 2012. In Search of Gamma. An Unconventional Perspective on Impact Investing. IESE Business School. Grabenwarter, Uli, and Heinrich Liechtenstein. 2012. In Search of Gamma. An Unconventional Perspective on Impact Investing. IESE Business School.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansmann, Henry B. 1980. The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. The Yale Law Journal 89 (5): 835–901.CrossRef Hansmann, Henry B. 1980. The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. The Yale Law Journal 89 (5): 835–901.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harbaugh, William T. 1998. What Do Donations Buy?: A Model of Philanthropy Based on Prestige and Warm Glow. Journal of Public Economics 67 (2): 269–284.CrossRef Harbaugh, William T. 1998. What Do Donations Buy?: A Model of Philanthropy Based on Prestige and Warm Glow. Journal of Public Economics 67 (2): 269–284.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Höchstädter, Anna Katharina, and Barbara Scheck. 2015. What’s in a Name: An Analysis of Impact Investing Understandings by Academics and Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 132 (2): 449–475.CrossRef Höchstädter, Anna Katharina, and Barbara Scheck. 2015. What’s in a Name: An Analysis of Impact Investing Understandings by Academics and Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 132 (2): 449–475.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat James, Estelle. 1998. Commercialism Among Nonprofits: Objectives, Opportunities, and Constraints. In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, 271–286. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef James, Estelle. 1998. Commercialism Among Nonprofits: Objectives, Opportunities, and Constraints. In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, 271–286. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Light, Paul C. 2009. The Search for Social Entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Light, Paul C. 2009. The Search for Social Entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Milligan, Katherine, and Mirjam Schöning. 2011. Taking a Realistic Approach to Impact Investing: Observations from the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Social Innovation. Innovations 6 (3): 155–166.CrossRef Milligan, Katherine, and Mirjam Schöning. 2011. Taking a Realistic Approach to Impact Investing: Observations from the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Social Innovation. Innovations 6 (3): 155–166.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Donohue, N., C. Leijonhufvud, Y. Saltuk, A. Bugg-Levine, and M. Brandenburg. 2010. Impact Investments: An Emerging Asset Class. JP Morgan. O’Donohue, N., C. Leijonhufvud, Y. Saltuk, A. Bugg-Levine, and M. Brandenburg. 2010. Impact Investments: An Emerging Asset Class. JP Morgan.
Zurück zum Zitat Segal, Lewis, and Burton A. Weisbrod. 1998. Interdependence of Commercial and Donative Revenues. In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, 105–127. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Segal, Lewis, and Burton A. Weisbrod. 1998. Interdependence of Commercial and Donative Revenues. In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, 105–127. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Slyke, David M. 2007. Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2): 157–187.CrossRef Van Slyke, David M. 2007. Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2): 157–187.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weisbrod, Burton A. 1998. Modeling the Nonprofit Organization as a Multiproduct Firm: A Framework for Choice. In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, 47–64. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Weisbrod, Burton A. 1998. Modeling the Nonprofit Organization as a Multiproduct Firm: A Framework for Choice. In To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, 47–64. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, Geoffrey. 2007. Some Determinants of the Socially Responsible Investment Decision: A Cross-Country Study. The Journal of Behavioral Finance 8 (1): 43–57.CrossRef Williams, Geoffrey. 2007. Some Determinants of the Socially Responsible Investment Decision: A Cross-Country Study. The Journal of Behavioral Finance 8 (1): 43–57.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Historical Development and Investment Rationale
verfasst von
Wolfgang Spiess-Knafl
Barbara Scheck
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66556-6_3

Premium Partner