Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
The “contaminated land regime” is the main regulatory tool from the 1990s that has been given to enforcing authorities in the UK in order to deal with phenomenon of historical pollution. Recent figures, though, demonstrate that the majority of the contaminated sites are remediated through voluntary clean-up and via the planning system. In addition, historical pollution can be also tackled through private law remedies (such as negligence and private or public nuisance) triggered by individuals claiming damages for the injuries suffered as a consequence of the contamination . In this context, criminal law plays a very limited role. Only failing to comply with a remediation notice issued by the relevant authority under the contaminated land regime constitutes a criminal offence. However, there are no legal obstacles that prevent, at least in theory, the possibility of also applying the environmental criminal law framework to cases of historical pollution.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Ashworth, A. (2013). Positive obligations in criminal law. Oxford: Hart.
Ashworth, A., & Horder, J. (2013). Principles of criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Ashworth, A., & Redmayne, M. (2010). The criminal process (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Ashworth, A., Zedner, L., & Tomlin, P. (2013). Prevention and the limits of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Bishop, P., & Jenkins, V. (2011). Planning and nuisance: Revisiting the balance of public and private interests in land use development. Journal of Environmental Law, 285–310.
Carriage, R., & Ennis, O. (1990). Environmental Protection Act 1990 Part 2. Where does the National Grid case leave practitioners? Journal of Planning and Environmental Law, 1557–1563.
Catney, P., Henneberry, J., Meadowcroft, J., & Eiser, R. (2006). Dealing with contaminated land in the UK through ‘development managerialism. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning,6, 331–356. CrossRef
Brandon, E. (2013). Global approaches to site contamination law. Dordrecht et al.: Springer. CrossRef
Bell, S., McGillivray, D., & Pedersen, O. (2013). Environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
De Pret, P. (2000). Excuses, excuses: The ritual trivialisation of environmental prosecution. Journal of Environmental Law,12, 65–77. CrossRef
Eisen, J. B. (2012). Finality in brownfields remediation and reuse. Southwestern Law Review,41, 773–795.
Etherington, L. M. (2000). Environmental rule-making and public consultation: A case study of the development of a new legal regime to clean up contaminated land. Online thesis from British Library, Nottingham Trent University.
Faure, M., & Heine, G. (2000). Environmental criminal law in the European Union. Freiburg im Breisgau.
Fisher, E., Lange, B., & Scotford, E. (2013). Environmental law: Text, cases, and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Fogleman, V. (2005). Environmental liabilities and insurance in England and the United States. London: Witherby.
Fogleman, V. (2014). The contaminated land regime: Time for a regime that is fit for purpose (Part 2). International Journal of Law in the Built Environment,6, 129–151. CrossRef
Hamer, K. (2009). Environmental claims: A claimant’s perspective. http://www.hendersonchambers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/pdf/environmental-claims.pdf. Accessed May 2015.
Hamlin, C. (1990). A science of impurity: Water analysis in nineteenth century Britain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harris, M. R., & Denner, J. (1997). UK government policy and control. In R. E. Hester et al. (Eds.), Contaminated land and its reclamation. London: Thomas Telford.
Johnstone, D. W. M., & Horan, N. J. (1996). Institutional developments, standards and river quality: A UK history and some lessons for industrialising countries. Water Science and Technology, 212.
Lawrence, D., & Lee, R. (2003). Source permitting uncertainty: Owners, occupiers and responsibility for remediation. The Modern Law Review,66, 261–276. CrossRef
Lee, M. (2009). Personal injury, public nuisance and environmental regulation. King’s Law Journal,20, 129.
Lee, M. (2011). Tort law and regulation: Planning and nuisance. Journal of Planning Law, 8, 986–993.
Lees, E. (2012). The contaminated land regime—New guidance and a new philosophy? Environmental Law Review, 14, 267–278.
Lees, E. (2015). Interpreting environmental offences, the need for certainty. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
Lewis, O. (2012). Contaminated land and regulation. In K. E. Makuch & R. Pereira (Eds.), Environmental and energy law. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Luckin, B. (1986). Pollution and control. Bristol and Boston: Hilger.
Luo, Q., Catney, P., & Lerner, D. (2009). Risk-based management of contaminated land in the UK: Lessons for China? Journal of Environmental Management,90, 1123–1134. CrossRef
Markham, A. (1994). A brief history of pollution. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
McCullough, A. (2010). The year’s hottest cases reviewed—Part 3 access to justice and costs, nature conservation, nuisance, waste. Environmental Law and Management,2, 262–273.
McLaren, J. P. S. (1983). Nuisance law and the industrial revolution—Some lessons from social history. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,3, 163. CrossRef
Mosley, S. (2014). Environmental history of air pollution and protection. In M. Agnoletti & S. N. Serneri (Eds.), The basic environmental history. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mulheron, R. (2008). Reform of collective redress in England and Wales, A perspective of need, a research paper for submission to the Civil Justice Council of England and Wales (on file with the Author).
Norrie, A. (2014). Crime, reason and history, a critical introduction to criminal law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Pointing, J. (2010). Public nuisance re-visited? Paper presented to COBRA conference, Paris, available at http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/17671/1/Pointing-J-17671.pdf. Accessed May 2015.
Potter, G. (2014). The Criminogenic effects of environmental harm: Bringing a ‘green’ perspective to mainstream criminology. In T. Spapens, R. White & M. Kluin (Eds.), Environmental crime and its victims, perspectives within green criminology. Farnham: Ashgate.
Sheau, J. (1997). The sustainable management of industrial watercourses: An English historical perspective. Environmental History, 197–215.
Spapens, T., White, R., & Kluin, M. (Eds.). (2014). Environmental crime and its victims, perspectives within green criminology. Farnham: Ashgate.
Thornton, J. (2007). The year’s hottest cases: Part 2, 250–262 at http://www.ukela.org/content/doclib/99.pdf. Accessed May 2015.
Thorsheim, P. (2002). The paradox of smokeless fuels: Gas, coke, and the environment in Britain, 1813–1949. Environment and History, 381–401.
Tromans, S., & Turrall-Clarke, R. (2009). Contaminated land. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Wald, R. (2009). The year’s hottest cases reviewed—Part 2 nuisance, costs, nature conservation, 158–169 at http://www.ukela.org/content/page/2277/10-ELM-21-3%20Wald.pdf. Accessed May 2015.
Wells, C. (2001). Corporations and criminal responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Wohl, A. S. (1983). Endangered lives: Public health in Victorian Britain. London: Dent.
Wolf, S., & Stanley, N. (2014). Wolf and Stanley on environmental law. London and New York: Routledge.
Zhao, X. (2013). Developing an appropriate contaminated land regime in China: Lessons learned from the US and UK. Heidelberg et al.: Springer. CrossRef
Alphacell Ltd v Woodward  AC 824.
Corby Group Litigation, Re  EWHC 1944 (Technology and Construction Court).
Corby Group Litigation v Corby Borough Council  EWCA 463.
House of Lords: Judgments—R (on the application of National Grid Gas plc (formerly Transco plc)) (Appellants) v Environment Agency (Respondents) (Civil Appeal from Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice).
R (National Grid Gas plc (previously Transco plc)) v Environment Agency  EWHC 1083 (Admin).
R v Sellafield Ltd  EWCA Crim 49.
R v Thames Water Utilities Ltd  EWCA Crim 960.
The Queen on the Application of Redland Minerals Ltd. v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Environmental Agency; Crest Nicholson Residential Ltd.; Thames Water Utilities Ltd.; Veolia Water Central Ltd.  EWHC 913 (Admin);  Env LR 2.
A Consultation Paper from the Department of the Environment and the Welsh Office (1994).
Clarinet, Sustainable Management of Contaminated Land: An Overview (2002).
Communities and Local Government: London, Planning Policy Statement 3(PPS3) (2011).
Contaminated Land Strategy of London Borough of Hounslow (2008).
DEFRA, Public Consultation on Changes to the Contaminated Land Regime under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (2010).
DEFRA, Environmental Protection Act 1990: Part 2A Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance (2012).
DEFRA, Guidance on the Legal Definition of Contaminated Land (2008).
DEFRA and The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, “Local Authority Guide to the Application of Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990”—Extended to Cover Radioactive Contaminated Land (2007).
Evaluation Study on the Implementation of Directive 2008/99/EC on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal Law by Member States (2015).
Environment Agency, Environmental Management—Collection Land Contamination: Technical Guidance (2014).
Environment Agency, Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, Contaminated Land Report 11 (CLR11) (2004) (updated 2014).
European Commission, DG Environment, ‘Annex—Part A: Legal Analysis of the National Transposing Legislation’, Implementation Challenges and Obstacles of the Environmental Liability Directive (2013).
Environmental Agency, National Planning Policy Framework: Planning and Contaminated Land (2012).
Environmental Agency, Reporting the Evidence: Dealing with Contaminated Land in England and Wales—A Review of Progress from 2000–2007 with Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act (Bristol, Environmental Agency, 2009).
Environment Agency, Greener Business is Good Business, Spotlight on Business, Environmental Performance in 2003.
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, Corporate Environmental Crime Second Report of Session 2004-05 (2005).
Land Quality Management Ltd, SP1004 International Processes for Identification and Remediation of Contaminated Land Report No.: 1023-0 S (2013).
London Borough of Hillingdon, Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy (2013–2018).
Marion, H. (2010). The UK Regulatory Framework for Contaminated Land on Nuclear-Licensed Sites and Defence Sites Information Paper for the SAFEGROUNDS Learning Network (2010).
Planning Practice Guidance on Contaminated Land (updated 2014).
Planning Policy Statement 23, Planning and Pollution Control: Development of Land Affected by Contamination (2004).
The Environmental Audit Committee, Environmental Crime and the Courts: Sixth Report of Session 2003–04 (2004).
The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution: Setting Environmental Standards, 21st Report (1998).
The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution: A Review of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution’s Nineteenth Report: Sustainable Use of Soil, 19th Report (1996).
- Historical Pollution in the UK (England and Wales): The Residual Role Played by Criminal Law
- Chapter 9
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock, „Immer mehr Mittelständler entdecken Crowdlending“/© Kapilendo