Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
An Introduction to Strategic Entrepreneurship: Perspectives on the Dynamics, Theories, and Practices Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

How Strategic Entrepreneurship Benefits Public Administration: A Potential Application of Complexity Theory

verfasst von : Nazak Nobari

Erschienen in: Strategic Entrepreneurship

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sustainable development is a tool to build shared prosperity for today and future societies. This chapter studies the correlation between features of public administration and sustainable development. The aim is to outline the role of strategic entrepreneurship in public administration through the lens of complexity theory from a critical perspective. From the perspective of the epistemological dimension of complexity, the multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis is used to assess the correlation between three features of public administration (effectiveness, accountability, and inclusiveness) and levels of prosperity delivered in 102 selected countries, as well as their correlation with entrepreneurship. Based on the findings, effectiveness and accountability are of great importance, and strategic entrepreneurship appears as an emergent attractor characterizing how an administration works to build up prosperity. The results will help public policymakers and planners build sustainable capacity to improve public administration performance and facilitate the path of prosperity for societies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Defining, Measuring, and Developing Social EntrepreneurshipSocial entrepreneurship Skills: A Crucial Element of Social EntrepreneurshipSocial entrepreneurship StrategyStrategies
Nächstes Kapitel The Strategic EntrepreneurshipStrategic entrepreneurship (SE) Pitching on Crowdfunding PlatformsCrowdfunding Platforms: A Traction Toward Emerging Advanced Technologies
Fußnoten
Literatur
Adejare, A., Olla, J. O., & Oluwafemi, J. (2014). Towards a theoretical definition of public administration. Journal of Business and Management, 16(3), 65–70.
Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177(4047), 393–396.CrossRef
Baeten, G. (2000). The tragedy of the highway: Empowerment, disempowerment and the politics of sustainability discourses and practices. European Planning Studies, 8(1), 69–86.CrossRef
Bartle, J. R., & Leuenberger, D. (2006). The idea of sustainable development in public administration. Public Works Manag Policy, 10(3), 191–194.CrossRef
Bouckaert, G., Loretan, R., & Troupin, S. (2016). Public administration and the sustainable development goals. Written statement by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Submitted to the 15th session of the United Nations Committee of Experts in Public Administration.
Burgelman, R. A. (1983). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Science, 29(12), 1349–1364.CrossRef
Carey, G., & Friel, S. (2015). Understanding the role of public administration in implementing action on the social determinants of health and health inequities. Int J Health Policy Manag, 4(12), 795–798.CrossRef
Christen, M., & Franklin, L. R. (2002). The concept of emergence in complexity science: Finding coherence between theory and practice. Proceedings of the Complex Systems Summer School, 4, 1–15.
Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 50–76.CrossRef
Dernbach, J. C. (2003). Achieving sustainable development: The Centrality and multiple facets of integrated decision making. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10, 247–285.CrossRef
Dixon, S., & Clifford, A. (2007). Ecopreneurship—A new approach to managing the triple bottom line. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 326–345.CrossRef
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. William Heinemann.
European Union. (2015). Quality of public administration: A toolbox for practitioners. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fidan, T., & Balci, A. (2017). Managing schools as complex adaptive systems: A strategic perspective. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 11–26.
Filser, M., Kraus, S., Tierno, N., Kailer, N., & Fischer, U. (2019). Entrepreneurship as catalyst for sustainable development: Opening the black box. Sustainability, 11(16), 1–18.CrossRef
Fiorino, D. J. (2010). Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration. Public Adm Rev, 70(1), S78–S88.CrossRef
Foss, N., Klein, P., Kor, Y., & Mahoney, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: Toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 73–94.CrossRef
Garud, R., Simpson, B., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). The emergence of novelty in organizations. In Perspectives on process organization studies. Oxford University Press.
Gautam, N. (2014). Governance’ beyond the boundaries of public administration. The Post, 52(190), 123–127.
Gerrits, L., & Marks, P. (2012). COMPACT I: Public administration in complexity. EMERGENT Publication.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Macmillan.
Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72.CrossRef
Gonzalez, W. J., & Jose Arrojo, M. (2015). Diversity in complexity in communication sciences: epistemological and ontological analyses. In D. Generali (Ed.), Le Radici della Rationalitá Critica: Saperi, Pratiche, Teleologiel (pp. 297–312). Mimesis Edizioni.
Heylighen, F. (2001). The science of self-organization and adaptivity. In L. D. Kiel (Ed.), Knowledge management, organizational intelligence and learning, and complexity. The encyclopedia of life support systems (pp. 126–146). Eolss Publishers.
Hitt, M. A., & Reed, T. (2000). Entrepreneurship in the new competitive landscape. In G. D. Meyer & K. A. Heppard (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as strategy (pp. 23–48). Sage.
Hjorth, D. (2004). Creating space for play/invention–concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 16, 413–432.CrossRef
Höglund, L., & Mårtensson, M. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a strategic management tool for renewal—The case of the Swedish public employment service. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 1–16.CrossRef
Holmes, W., & Rinaman, W. (2015). Multiple linear regression. Statistical literacy for clinical practitioners (pp. 367–396). Springer International.
Ibrahim, S. E., & El Ebrashi, R. (2017). How social entrepreneurship can be useful in long-term recovery following disasters. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 7(3), 324–349.CrossRef
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 49–63.
Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 371–376.CrossRef
Johnson, N. F. (2007). Two’s company, three is complexity: A simple guide to the science of all sciences. One world.
Kearney, C., & Meynhardt, T. (2016). Directing corporate entrepreneurship strategy in the public sector to public value: Antecedents, components, and outcomes. Int Public Manag J, 19, 543–572.CrossRef
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., Mcgahan, A. M., & Pitielis, C. H. N. (2013). Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7, 70–91.CrossRef
Klijn, E. H. (2008). Complexity theory and public administration: what’s new; key concepts in complexity theory compared to their counterparts in public administration. Public Manag Rev, 10(3), 299–317.CrossRef
Kokhanovskaya, I. I., Fatykhova, A. L., Khachaturyan, A. A., & Khachaturyan, K. S. (2019). Questions of the estimation of efficiency of public administration in modern conditions. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 62, p. 02002).
Krishna, I. V. M., & Manikam, V. (2017). Environmental management: science and engineering for industry. Chapter Two. In Sustainable development (pp. 5–21).
Kyrgidou, L. P., & Hughes, M. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship: Origins, core elements and research directions. European Business Review, 22(1), 43–63.CrossRef
Leuenberger, D. Z., & Wakin, M. (2007). Sustainable development in public administration planning: An exploration of social justice, equity, and citizen inclusion. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 29(3), 394–411.CrossRef
Lichtenstein, B. (2014). Generative emergence: A new discipline of organizational, entrepreneurial, and social innovation. Oxford Scholarship Online. Chapter 18. Enacting Emergence.
Lissack, M. R., & Gunz, H. P. (1999). Introduction. In M. R. Lissack & H. P. Gunz (Eds.), Managing complexity in organizations: A view in many directions (pp. 1–8). Quorum Books.
Matei, A., & Antonie, C. (2014). The new public management within the complexity model. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 109, 1125–1129.CrossRef
Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 10–29.CrossRef
Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–792.CrossRef
Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. Calif Manage Rev, 16(2), 44–53.CrossRef
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003a). Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. In E. Mitleton-Kelly (Ed.), Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations: The application of complexity theory to organizations. Advanced series in management (pp. 3–20). Elsevier Science.
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003b). Ten principles of complexity & enabling infrastructures. In E. Mitleton-Kelly (Ed.), Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives of Organisations: The application of complexity theory to organizations (pp. 23–50). Elsevier.
NAPCRG Resources. (2009). A complexity science primer: What is complexity science and why should I learn about it? Adapted from Zimmerman, B., Lindberg, C., & Edgeware, P. P. (1998). Lessons from complexity science for health care leaders. VHA Inc.
OECD. (2011). Government at a glance. OECD.
Opolski, K., Modzelewski, P., & Kocia, A. (2013). New approach to network in public administration. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 14(5), 99–109.
Ostrom, E. (1965). Public entrepreneurship: a case study in ground water basin management. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California.
Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. Am Rev Public Adm, 37(3), 306–323.CrossRef
Rescher, N. (1998). Complexity; a philosophical overview. Transaction Publishers.
Schindehutte, M., & Morris, M. H. (2009). Advancing strategic entrepreneurship research: The role of complexity science in shifting the paradigm. Enterp Theory Pract, 33(1), 241–276.CrossRef
Schlindwein, S. L., & Ison, R. (2004). Human knowing and perceived complexity: implications for systems practice. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 6(3), 27–32.
Shafritz, J., Russell, E. W., & Borick, C. (2017). Introducing public administration (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Starling, G. (2013). Managing the public sector. Longman/Pearson Press.
Svara, J. H., & Brunet, J. R. (2004). Filling in the skeletal pillar: Addressing social equity in introductory course in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 99–109.CrossRef
Teece, D. J. (2011). Dynamic capabilities: a guide for manager. Ivey Business Journal, 75(2), 29–33.
Teisman, G., & Gerrits, L. (2014). The Emergence of complexity in the art and science of governance. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1(1), 17–28.CrossRef
Thiele, L. P. (2013). Sustainability. Polity Press.
Trainer, F. E. (1997). The global sustainability crisis: The implications for community. International Journal of Social Economics, 24(11), 1219–1240.CrossRef
Tülüce, N. S., & Yurtkur, A. K. (2015). Term of strategic entrepreneurship and Schumpeter’s creative destruction theory, 11th International Strategic Management Conference. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 207, 720–728.CrossRef
Turner, J. R., & Baker, R. M. (2019). Complexity theory: An overview with potential applications for the social sciences. Systems, 7(1), 1–23.CrossRef
UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. United Nations.
UN General Assembly. (2016). Entrepreneurship for sustainable development; Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 21 December 2016. United Nations.
United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2013). Industrial development report: sustaining employment growth—the role of manufacturing and structural change.
WCED. (1978). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future (UN). Oxford University Press.
Zahedi, A., & Otterpohl, R. (2015). Towards sustainable development by creation of green social entrepreneur’s communities. Procedia CIRP, 196–201.
Metadaten
Titel
How Strategic EntrepreneurshipStrategic entrepreneurship (SE) Benefits Public AdministrationPublic administrations: A Potential Application of Complexity TheoryComplexity theory
verfasst von
Nazak Nobari
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Buch
Strategic Entrepreneurship

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86031-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-86032-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86032-5_9

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise