Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

11. Hurdles to an Asian Century of Public Administration

verfasst von : Kim Moloney

Erschienen in: Public Policy in the 'Asian Century'

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter suggests there is not yet a (modern) Asian Century of public administration. The public administration literature is dominated by Western theories, concepts, and practice. Utilisation of structure and value-based framework allows this chapter to unravel “how we know what we know” in public administration, which administrative histories are valued, and how concepts are modified in Asia. The chapter explores several hurdles to an Asian Century of public administration including how scholars are educated, where they publish, language, and the methods utilised. Fully bidirectional intellectual engagement (and not just a West-to-Asia engagement) is necessary for an Asian century of public administration.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Capabilities Framework for a Globalised Public Service
Nächstes Kapitel International Policy Coordination and its Impacts
Literatur
Appleby, P. (1946). Big democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Appleby, P. (1953). Public administration in India: Report of a survey. Delhi: Manager of Publications.
Aufrecht, S. E., & Bun, L. S. (1995). Reform with Chinese characteristics: The context of Chinese civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 175–182.CrossRef
Barnett, A. D. (1969). Mechanisms for party control in the government bureaucracy in China. In F. W. Riggs (Ed.), Frontiers of development administration (pp. 415–436). Durham: Duke University Press.
Behn, R. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55(4), 313–324.CrossRef
Berman, E. M., Moon, M. J., & Choi, H. (Eds.). (2010). Public administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. Taiwan: CRC Press.
Bowornwathana, B. (2000). Governance reform in Thailand: Questionable assumptions, uncertain outcomes. Governance, 13(3), 393–408.CrossRef
Braibanti, R. (1966). Research on the bureaucracy of Pakistan. Durham: Duke University Press.
Burns, J. P. (2013). Bidhya Bowornwathana. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 35(2), 135–136.CrossRef
Candler, G. G., Azevêdo, A., & Albernaz, R. O. (2010). Toward global scholarship in public affairs. Public Administration, 88(3), 836–850.CrossRef
Chan, H. B. (2004). Cadre personnel management in China: The Nomenklatura system 1990–1998. The China Quarterly, 179, 703–734.CrossRef
Chan, H. S., & Gao, J. (2013). Can the same key open different locks? Administrative values underlying performance measurement in China. Public Administration, 91(2), 366–380.CrossRef
Chen, X. (2010). State-generated data and contentious politics in China. In A. Carlson, M. E. Gallagher, K. Lieberthal, & M. Manion (Eds.), Contemporary Chinese politics: New sources, methods, and field strategies (pp. 15–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Cheung, A. B. L. (1997). Understanding public-sector reforms: Global trends and diverse agendas. International Review of Administrative Science, 63(4), 435–457.CrossRef
Cheung, A. B. L. (2005). The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance, 18(2), 257–282.CrossRef
Cooke, B. (2003). A new continuity with colonial administration: Participation in development management. Third World Quarterly, 24(1), 47–61.CrossRef
Cox, R. W. (2012). Power shifts, economic change and the decline of the west? International Relations, 26(4), 369–388.CrossRef
Drechsler, W. (2013). Three paradigms of governance and administration: Chinese, Western, and Islamic. Society and Economy, 35(3), 319–342.CrossRef
Esman, M. J. (1972). Administration and development in Malaysia: Institution building and reform in a plural society. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335–350.CrossRef
Frederickson, H. G. (2002). Confucius and the moral basis of bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Science, 33(6), 610–628.
Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich & E. S. Mason (Eds.), Public policy: A yearbook of the graduate school of public administration (pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
Gilman, S. C. (2005). Ethics codes and codes of conduct as tools for promoting an ethical and professional public service: Comparative successes and lessons. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Gulrajani, N., & Moloney, K. (2012). Globalizing public administration: Today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 78–86.CrossRef
Haggard, S. (2000). The political economy of the Asian financial crisis. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Haque, M. S. (2007). Theory and practice of public administration in Southeast Asia: Traditions, directions, and impacts. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(12–14), 1297–1326.CrossRef
Haque, M. S. (2013). Public administration in a globalized Asia: Intellectual identities, challenges, and prospects. Public Administration and Development, 33, 262–274.CrossRef
Heady, F. (2001). Public administration: A comparative perspective (6th ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Ibrahim, A. (1996). The next 50 years. Far Eastern Economic Review, p. 186.
Im, T., Campbell, J. W., & Cha, S. (2013). Revisiting Confucian bureaucracy: Roots of the Korean government’s culture and competitiveness. Public Administration and Development, 33, 286–296.CrossRef
Jun, J. S. (2006). Rethinking the theoretical perspective: Beyond the quest for indigenous theory of Korean public administration. International Review of Administrative Science, 10(2), 6–15.
Jun, J. S., & Sherwood, F. P. (2007). The social construction of public administration: Interpretative and critical perspectives. New York: SUNY Press.
Kilby, P. (2004). Is empowerment possible under a new public management environment? Some lessons from India. International Public Management Journal, 7(2), 207–225.
Kim, E. M. (1988). From dominance to symbiosis: State and chaebol in South Korea. Pacific Focus, 3(2), 105–121.CrossRef
Kim, E. M. (Ed.). (2010). Civil service system and civil service reform in ASEAN member countries and Korea. Seoul: Daeyoung Moonhwasa Publishing Company.
Kim, E. M. (Ed.). (2011). Public sector reform in ASEAN member countries and Korea. Seoul: Daeyoung Moonhwasa Publishing Company.
Kim, E. M. (2012). A historical overview of Korean public administration: Discipline, education, association, international cooperation and beyond indigenization. International Review of Administrative Science, 78(2), 217–238.CrossRef
Kim, H.-K., Muramatsu, M., Pempel, T. J., & Yamamura, K. (Eds.). (1995). The Japanese civil service and economic development. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kim, P. S. (Ed.). (2009). Public administration and public governance in ASEAN member countries and Korea. Seoul: Daeyoung Moonhwasa Publishing Company.
Kim, S. (2009). Revising Perry’s measurement scale of public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 149–163.
Kirlin, J. J. (2001). Big questions for a significant public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 140–143.CrossRef
Manning, N. (2001). The legacy of new public management in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Science, 67(2), 297–312.CrossRef
Merriam, L. (1928). The problem of Indian administration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Milner, A. (2000). What’s happened to Asian values? In D. S. G. Goodman & G. Segal (Eds.), Towards recovery in Pacific Asia (pp. 55–68). London: Routledge.
Moloney, K., & Chu, H.-Y. (2016). Public service motivation, ethics, and corruption: The Jamaican case. American Review of Public Administration, 46(4), 436–458.CrossRef
Painter, M., & Peters, B. Guy. (2010). Administration traditions in comparative perspective: Families, groups and hybrids. In Martin Painter & B. Guy Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 19–30). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Park, S. (2009). Analysis of Saemaul Undong: A Korean rural development programme in the 1970s. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 16(2), 113–140.CrossRef
Perry, J. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.CrossRef
Philippi, C. (2003). Between ‘Washington Consensus’ and ‘Asian Way’: Japanese newspaper authors discussing the East Asian financial and economic crisis of 1997/1998. InJapanstudien: Misunderstandings in the encounter with Japan (pp. 281–314). Munich: Iudicium Verlag.
Quah, J. S. T. (1980). The public bureaucracy and social change in Singapore. Hong Kong Journal of Public Administration, 2(2), 16–37.
Quah, J. S. T. (2003). Causes and consequences of corruption in Southeast Asia: A comparative analysis of Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 25(2), 235–266.CrossRef
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2008). Understanding government: Four intellectual traditions in the study of public administration. Public Administration, 86(4), 925–949.CrossRef
Rarick, C. A. (2007). Confucius on management: Understanding Chinese cultural values and managerial practices. Journal of International Management Studies, 2(2), 22–28.
Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in developing countries. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Riggs, F. W. (1966). Thailand—The modernization of a bureaucratic polity. Honolulu: East–West Center Press.
Riggs, F. W. (1967). The ‘Sala’ model: An ecological approach to the study of comparative administration. In N. Raphaeli (Ed.), Readings in comparative public administration (pp. 412–432). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2001). History lessons for reinventers. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 161–165.CrossRef
Ruthnaswamy, M. (1956). Principles and practice of public administration. Central Book Depot.
Sabharwal, M., & Berman, E. M. (Eds.). (2016). Public administration in South Asia: India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Samaratunge, R., Alam, Q., & Teicher, J. (2008). The new public management reforms in Asia: A comparison of South and Southeast Asian countries. International Review of Administrative Science, 74(1), 25–46.CrossRef
Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand reforms. World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131.CrossRef
Simon, H. A. (1946). Proverbs of administration. Public Administration Review, 6(1), 53–67.CrossRef
Su, T.-T., Walker, R. M., & Xue, L. (2013). Reform and transition in public administration theory and practice in greater China. Public Administration, 91(2), 253–260.CrossRef
Tummala, K. (1999). Policy of preference: Lessons from India, the United States, and South Africa. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 495–508.CrossRef
Tummala, K. (Ed.). (2003). Comparative bureaucratic systems. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Turner, M. (2002). Choosing items from the menu: New public management in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1493–1512.CrossRef
Turner, M., O’Donnell, M., Suh, C.-S., & Kwon, S.-H. (2013). Public sector management and the changing nature of the developmental state in Korea and Malaysia. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(4), 481–494.CrossRef
Vogel, E. F. (1969). Politicized bureaucracy: Communist China. In F. W. Riggs (Ed.), Frontiers of development administration (pp. 556–568). Durham: Duke University Press.
Waldo, D. (1984 (1948)). The administrative state (2nd ed.). New York: Ronald Press.
Walker, R., Brewer, G. A., & Choi, Y. (2013). Public administration research in East and Southeast Asia: A review of the English language evidence, 1999–2009. American Review of Public Administration, 44(2), 131–150.CrossRef
West, W. F. (2005). Neutral competence and political responsiveness: An uneasy relationship. The Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 147–160.CrossRef
Woo-Cummings, M. (2005). Back to basics: Ideology, Nationalism, and Asian values in East Asia. In E. Helleiner & A. Pickel (Eds.), Economic nationalism in a globalizing world (pp. 91–117). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wu, F. (2008). China’s great transformation: Neoliberalization as establishing a market society. Geoforum, 39, 1093–1096.CrossRef
Wu, J., Ma, L., & Yang, Y. (2011). Innovation in the Chinese public sector: Typology and distribution. Public Administration, 91(2), 347–365.CrossRef
Wu, X., He, Y.-L., & Yang, L. (2013). Public administration research in China and Taiwan: An assessment of journal publications 1995–2008. Public Administration, 91(2), 261–280.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Hurdles to an Asian Century of Public Administration
verfasst von
Kim Moloney
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Public Policy in the 'Asian Century'

Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60251-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-137-60252-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60252-7_11

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise