nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.12.2011

Importance of patient satisfaction with care in predicting osteoarthritis-specific health-related quality of life one year after total joint arthroplasty

verfasst von: Cédric Baumann, Anne-Christine Rat, Didier Mainard, Christian Cuny, Francis Guillemin

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

After previous results observed with a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument, we aimed to confirm that immediate postoperative patient satisfaction with care predicts self-perceived health 1 year after total hip replacement/total knee replacement (THR/TKR), using an osteoarthritis (OA)-specific HRQoL questionnaire.

Methods

This was a French multicenter prospective cohort study of patients after THR/TKR. HRQoL was assessed by the OsteoArthritis Knee and Hip Quality Of Life (OAKHQOL) instrument before and after surgery and satisfaction with care by the Quality of Care Scale (QCS).

Results

A total of 189 patients were followed up 12 months after discharge (mean age 68.9 SD = 8.5; 41.9% male). After adjustment for relevant variables, patients satisfied with care postoperatively showed greater 1-year postoperative HRQOL than those less satisfied with care. Patients satisfied with medical information had a higher postoperative HRQoL score than patients less satisfied in 3 of 5 OAKHQOL dimensions (P < 0.001 to P = 0.02), and patients satisfied with relationships with staff and daily routine scored higher on all HRQoL dimensions than did less-satisfied patients (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions

These new findings with an OA-specific HRQOL questionnaire confirm that immediate postoperative satisfaction with care after THR/TKR for OA is a good predictor of self-perceived health status 1 year after surgery. Satisfaction with care therefore represents a relevant indicator of patient-reported health and is quickly accessible to clinicians.

Vorheriger Artikel What do people include when they self-rate their health? Differential associations according to health status in community-dwelling older adults

Nächster Artikel In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Hubert, H. B., Bloch, D. A., & Fries, J. F. (1993). Risk factors for physical disability in an aging cohort: The NHANES I epidemiologic followup study. Journal of Rheumatology, 20(3), 480–488.PubMed

Jordan, K. M., Arden, N. K., Doherty, M., Bannwarth, B., Bijlsma, J. W., Dieppe, P., et al. (2003). EULAR recommendations 2003: An evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a task force of the standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutic trials (ESCISIT). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 62(12), 1145–1155.PubMedCrossRef

Zhang, W., Doherty, M., Arden, N., Bannwarth, B., Bijlsma, J., Gunther, K. P., et al. (2005). EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: Report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (ESCISIT). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(5), 669–681.PubMedCrossRef

Carr, A. J., & Higginson, I. J. (2001). Are quality of life measures patient centred? BMJ, 322(7298), 1357–1360.PubMedCrossRef

Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ, 322(7297), 1297–1300.PubMedCrossRef

Aarons, H., Hall, G., Hughes, S., & Salmon, P. (1996). Short-term recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 78(4), 555–558.PubMed

Baumann, C., Rat, A. C., Osnowycz, G., Mainard, D., Cuny, C., & Guillemin, F. (2009). Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 10(1), 150.PubMedCrossRef

Kiebzak, G. M., Campbell, M., & Mauerhan, D. R. (2002). The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: But why should we use it? American Journal of Managed Care, 8(5), 463–474.PubMed

MacWilliam, C. H., Yood, M. U., Verner, J. J., McCarthy, B. D., & Ward, R. E. (1996). Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Services Research, 31(5), 623–638.PubMed

10.

Mainard, D., Guillemin, F., Cuny, C., Mejat-Adler, E., Galois, L., & Delagoutte, J. (2000). Quality of life assessment one year after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l’Appareil Moteur, 86(5), 464–473.PubMed

11.

Shields, R. K., Enloe, L. J., & Leo, K. C. (1999). Health related quality of life in patients with total hip or knee replacement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(5), 572–579.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Wiklund, I., & Romanus, B. (1991). A comparison of quality of life before and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 73(5), 765–769.

13.

Judge, A., Cooper, C., Williams, S., Dreinhoefer, K., & Dieppe, P. (2010). Patient-reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort. Arthritis Care Research (Hoboken), 62(4), 480–488.CrossRef

14.

Hirvonen, J., Blom, M., Tuominen, U., Seitsalo, S., Lehto, M., Paavolainen, P., et al. (2006). Health-related quality of life in patients waiting for major joint replacement. A comparison between patients and population controls. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 4, 3.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Rat, A. C., Coste, J., Pouchot, J., Baumann, M., Spitz, E., Retel-Rude, N., et al. (2005). OAKHQOL: A new instrument to measure quality of life in knee and hip osteoarthritis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(1), 47–55.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Meterko, M., & Rubin, H. R. (1990). Patient judgments of hospital quality. A taxonomy. Medical Care, 28(9 Suppl), S10–S14.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Donabedian, A. (1988). Quality assessment and assurance: unity of purpose, diversity of means. Inquiry, 25(1), 173–192.PubMed

18.

Salomon, L., Gasquet, I., Mesbah, M., & Ravaud, P. (1999). Construction of a scale measuring inpatients’ opinion on quality of care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 11(6), 507–516.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Baumann, C., Rat, A. C., Osnowycz, G., Mainard, D., Delagoutte, J. P., Cuny, C., et al. (2006). Do clinical presentation and pre-operative quality of life predict satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 88(3), 366–373.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Nguyen Thi, P. L., Briancon, S., Empereur, F., & Guillemin, F. (2002). Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care. Social Science and Medicine, 54(4), 493–504.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Altman, R., Asch, E., Bloch, D., Bole, G., Borenstein, D., Brandt, K., et al. (1986). Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and therapeutic criteria committee of the American rheumatism association. Arthritis Rheumatism, 29(8), 1039–1049.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Altman, R., Alarcon, G., Appelrouth, D., Bloch, D., Borenstein, D., Brandt, K., et al. (1991). The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 34(5), 505–514.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Rat, A. C., Pouchot, J., Coste, J., Baumann, C., Spitz, E., Retel-Rude, N., et al. (2006). Development and testing of a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for knee and hip osteoarthritis: OAKHQOL (OsteoArthritis of knee hip quality of life). Joint Bone Spine, 73(6), 697–704.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Charlson, M., Szatrowski, T. P., Peterson, J., & Gold, J. (1994). Validation of a combined comorbidity index. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47(11), 1245–1251.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Harris, W. H. (1969). Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 51(4), 737–755.

26.

Insall, J. N., Dorr, L. D., Scott, R. D., & Scott, W. N. (1989). Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 248, 13–14.PubMed

27.

Kellgren, J. H., & Lawrence, J. S. (1957). Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 16(4), 494–502.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Chapman, B. P., Shah, M., Friedman, B., Drayer, R., Duberstein, P. R., & Lyness, J. M. (2009). Personality traits predict emergency department utilization over 3 years in older patients. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(6), 526–535.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Abraham, N. E., Makarov, D. V., Laze, J., Stefanovics, E., Desai, R., & Lepor, H. (2010). Patient centered outcomes in prostate cancer treatment: Predictors of satisfaction up to 2 years after open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Journal of Urology, 184(5), 1977–1981.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Hush, J. M., Cameron, K., & Mackey, M. (2011). Patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal physical therapy care: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 91(1), 25–36.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Michel, G., Greenfield, D., Absolom, K., & Eiser, C. (2010). Satisfaction with follow-up consultations among younger adults treated for cancer: The role of quality of life and psychological variables. Psychooncology. doi:10.1002/pon.1783.

32.

Brennan, M., Houston, F., O’Sullivan, M., & O’Connell, B. (2010). Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 25(4), 791–800.PubMed

33.

Asplund, K., Jonsson, F., Eriksson, M., Stegmayr, B., Appelros, P., Norrving, B., et al. (2009). Patient dissatisfaction with acute stroke care. Stroke, 40(12), 3851–3856.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Cramm, J. M., Strating, M. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2010). Validation of the caregivers’ satisfaction with stroke care questionnaire: C-SASC hospital scale. Journal of Neurology. doi:10.1007/s00415-010-5871-2.

35.

Husson, O., Mols, F., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2010). The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Annals of Oncology, 22(4), 761–772.

36.

Nelson, E. C., Splaine, M. E., Godfrey, M. M., Kahn, V., Hess, A., Batalden, P., et al. (2000). Using data to improve medical practice by measuring processes and outcomes of care. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 26(12), 667–685.PubMed

37.

Bodenheimer, T. (1999). The American health care system—The movement for improved quality in health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(6), 488–492.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Rubin, H. R., Ware, J. E., Jr., Nelson, E. C., & Meterko, M. (1990). The patient judgments of hospital quality (PJHQ) questionnaire. Medical Care, 28(9 Suppl), S17–S18.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Angst, F., Aeschlimann, A., & Stucki, G. (2001). Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 45(4), 384–391.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Escobar, A., Quintana, J. M., Bilbao, A., Arostegui, I., Lafuente, I., & Vidaurreta, I. (2007). Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 15(3), 273–280.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Husted, H., Holm, G., & Jacobsen, S. (2008). Predictors of length of stay and patient satisfaction after hip and knee replacement surgery: fast-track experience in 712 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 79(2), 168–173.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Nunez, M., Lozano, L., Nunez, E., Segur, J. M., Sastre, S., Macule, F., et al. (2009). Total knee replacement and health-related quality of life: Factors influencing long-term outcomes. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 61(8), 1062–1069.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Rat, A. C., Guillemin, F., Osnowycz, G., Delagoutte, J. P., Cuny, C., Mainard, D., et al. (2010). Total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis: Mid- and long-term quality of life. Arthritis Care Research (Hoboken), 62(1), 54–62.CrossRef

Titel: Importance of patient satisfaction with care in predicting osteoarthritis-specific health-related quality of life one year after total joint arthroplasty
verfasst von: Cédric Baumann
Anne-Christine Rat
Didier Mainard
Christian Cuny
Francis Guillemin
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2011
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9913-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2011

Using latent trajectory analysis of residuals to detect response shift in general health among patients with multiple sclerosis article

Quality of life and emotional burden of primary caregivers: a case–control study of multiple sclerosis patients in Greece

Erratum to: Using structural equation modeling to detect response shift in performance and health-related quality of life scores of multiple sclerosis patients

Reliability and validity of the Taiwan (Mandarin Chinese) version of the chronic respiratory questionnaire

Application of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) among Taiwanese elderly

Quality of life and physical limitations in primary brain tumor patients

Premium Partner