nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. Incorporating Organizational Ambidexterity in the Public Sector Through Servant Leadership

verfasst von : Miguel Martinez de Castro Pinto Luz, Milton Sousa

Erschienen in: Practicing Servant Leadership

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter aims to contribute toward a better understanding of servant leadership in a public administration context. We explore how servant leadership can contribute toward greater organizational ambidexterity, allowing public institutions to simultaneously achieve bureaucratic efficiency and increased innovation in response to an unprecedented changing environment. This coincides with Robert Greenleaf’s original appeal for servant responsibility in an ever-increasing bureaucratic society, such as to safeguard the institutions’ first and foremost obligation to serve, and ultimately their long-term viability.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Servant Leadership Pin: Bursting the Generational Bubble

Nächstes Kapitel Improving Health Care Organizations Through Servant Leadership

Aagaard, P. 2011. Organizational Ambidexterity: How to Be Both Innovative and Efficient in the Public Sector. Clips 5 (11): 1–14.

Adler, P. 2013. The Collaborative, Ambidextrous Enterprise. Universia Business Review 40: 34–51.

Alexiev, A.S., J.J.P. Jansen, F.A.J. Van den Bosch, and H.W. Volberda. 2010. Top Management Team Advice Seeking and Exploratory Innovation: The Moderating Role of TMT Heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies 47 (7): 1343–1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00919.x.CrossRef

Asag-Gau, L., and D. Van Dierendonck. 2011. The Impact of Servant Leadership on Organisational Commitment Among the Highly Talented: The Role of Challenging Work Conditions and Psychological Empowerment. European Journal of International Management 5 (5): 463–483.

Borgatti, S.P., and P.C. Foster. 2003. The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management 29 (6): 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4.CrossRef

Brown, S.L., and K.M. Eisenhardt. 1997. The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Based Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 1–34.CrossRef

Bryson, J.M., K.B. Boal, and H.G. Rainey. 2008. Strategic Orientation and Ambidextrous Public Organizations. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process: A Reflection on the Research Perspective of Raymond Miles and Charles Snow, no. December:1–24.

Burgess, N., K. Strauss, G. Currie, and G. Wood. 2015. Organizational Ambidexterity and the Hybrid Middle Manager: The Case of Patient Safety in UK Hospitals. Human Resource Management 54: s87–s109.

Cannaerts, N., J. Segers, and E. Henderickx. 2016. Ambidextrous Design and Public Organizations: A Comparative Case Study. International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (7): 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0210.CrossRef

Carmeli, A., and M.Y. Halevi. 2009. How Top Management Team Behavioral Integration and Behavioral Complexity Enable Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Contextual Ambidexterity. Leadership Quarterly 20 (2). Elsevier Inc.): 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011.CrossRef

Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Collins, J. 2001. Level 5 Leadership: The Triumph of Humility and Fierce Resolve. Harvard Business Review 79 (1): 66–76.

Correia de Sousa, M.J., and D. van Dierendonck. 2014. Servant Leadership and Engagement in a Merge Process under High Uncertainty. Journal of Organizational Change Management 27 (6): 877–899. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2013-0133.CrossRef

Dennis, R.S., and M. Bocarnea. 2005. Development of the Servant Leadership Assessment Instrument. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26 (8): 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633692.CrossRef

Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.CrossRef

Freedom House. 2017. Freedom in the World 2017 – Populists and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to Global Democracy, 28. https://doi.org/10.2307/20040588.

Gibson, C.B., and J. Birkinshaw. 2004. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Management 47 (2): 209–226.

Greenleaf, R.K. 1977. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.

Greenleaf, R. 2002. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.

Hood, C. 1996. The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.

Jansen, J.J.P., D. Vera, and M. Crossan. 2009. Strategic Leadership for Exploration and Exploitation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism. Leadership Quarterly 20 (1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008. Elsevier Inc.

Konczak, L.J., D.J. Stelly, and M.L. Trusty. 2000. Defining and Measuring Empowering Leader Behaviors: Development of an Upward Feedback Instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement 60 (2): 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420.CrossRef

Largacha-Martínez, C. 2011. What Is Your Calling? SEMCO’s Invitation to Participatory Management. In Humanistic Management in Practice, 215–230. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Lavie, D., U. Stettner, and M.L. Tushman. 2010. Exploration and Exploitation within and across Organizations. Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 109–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003691287.CrossRef

March, J. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational. Learning 2 (1): 71–87.

Morris, J.A., C.M. Brotheridge, and J.C. Urbanski. 2005. Bringing Humility to Leadership: Antecedents and Consequences of Leader Humility. Human Relations 58 (10): 1323–1350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705059929.CrossRef

O’Reilly, C.A., and M.L. Tushman. 2008. Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002.CrossRef

O’Reilly, G.A., and M.L. Tushman. 2011. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action. California Management Review 53 (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5.CrossRef

O’Reilly, C., and M. Tushman. 2013. Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. The Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (4): 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025.CrossRef

Palm, K., and J. Lilja. 2017. Key Enabling Factors for Organizational Ambidexterity in the Public Sector. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 9 (1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0038.CrossRef

Patterson, K. 2003. Servant Leadership: A Theoretical Model. Regent University.

Pearce, C.L., and H.P. Sims. 2002. Vertical Versus Shared Leadership as Predictors of the Effectiveness of Change Management Teams: An Examination of Aversive, Directive, Transactional, Transformational, and Empowering Leader Behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 (2): 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172.CrossRef

Peterson, C., and M.E.P. Seligman. 2004. In Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification, ed. American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.

Raisch, S., and J. Birkinshaw. 2008. Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management 34 (3): 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058.CrossRef

Russel, R. 2001. The Role of Values in Servant Leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 22 (2): 76–83.CrossRef

Smith, E., and T. Umans. 2015. Organizational Ambidexterity at the Local Government Level: The Effects of Managerial Focus. Public Management Review 17 (6). Routledge): 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.849292.CrossRef

Smith, W.K., M.L. Tushman, W.K. Smith, and M.L. Tushman. 2005. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams. Organization Science 16 (5): 522–536.CrossRef

Smith, W.K., A. Binns, and M.L. Tushman. 2010. Complex Business Models: Managing Strategic Paradoxes Simultaneously. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3). Elsevier Ltd.): 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003.CrossRef

Turner, N., J. Swart, and H. Maylor. 2013. Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (3): 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x.CrossRef

Tushman, M.L., and C.A. O’Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review 38 (4): 8–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852.CrossRef

Tushman, M., and E. Romanelli. 1985. Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation. Research in Organizational Behaviour 7: 171–222.

Tushman, M.L., C. O’Reilly, and B. Harreld. 2013. Leading Strategic Renewal: Proactive Punctuated Change Through Innovation Streams and Disciplined Learning. Harvard Business School: 1–42.

Van Dierendonck, D. 2011. Servant Leadership : A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management 37 (4): 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462.CrossRef

van Dierendonck, D., and I. Nuijten. 2011. The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure. Journal of Business and Psychology 26 (3): 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1.CrossRef

Weber, M. 1946. Bureaucracy, ed. H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills. New York. https://archive.org/stream/frommaxweberessa00webe/frommaxweberessa00webe_djvu.txt.

Titel: Incorporating Organizational Ambidexterity in the Public Sector Through Servant Leadership
verfasst von: Miguel Martinez de Castro Pinto Luz
Milton Sousa
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Practicing Servant Leadership
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75643-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-75644-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75644-8_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner