nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.03.2016 | Original Article

Index-based groundwater vulnerability mapping using quantitative parameters

verfasst von: Satiprasad Sahoo, Anirban Dhar, Amlanjyoti Kar, Durjoy Chakraborty

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

To evolve a proper management scenario for groundwater utilization, identification of groundwater vulnerability zones is a critical step. In the present study, an attempt has been made to identify plausible groundwater vulnerability zones based on DRASTIC, Agricultural DRASTIC, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC methods in the Hirakud command area. The main objective is to determine vulnerability zones for groundwater pollution based on quantitative parameters with the help of geographic information system (GIS) platform. DRASTIC model is an integrated GIS based tool used to evaluate the groundwater vulnerability mapping. DRASTIC models use seven hydrogeological parameters: depth to water table (D), recharge rate (R), aquifer media (A), soil media (S), topography (T), impact of vadose zone (I) and hydraulic conductivity (C). Modified DRASTIC model is used to assess the groundwater vulnerability considering land use/land cover (LULC). Finally, vulnerability map is validated using water quality parameters (EC, Cl⁻, Mg²⁺ and SAR) over the study area. Moreover, DRASTIC vulnerability map indicate that the northern part of the study area is more vulnerable for groundwater pollution. Groundwater vulnerability is an important environmental concern that needs to be assessed for proper groundwater management. This analysis demonstrates the potential applicability of the methodology for a general aquifer system.

Vorheriger Artikel Environmental aspects and potential impacts of proposed water transfer scheme on sustainable water management in eastern Herzegovina

Nächster Artikel Hunza river watershed landslide and related features inventory mapping

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahmed A (2009) Using Generic and Pesticide DRASTIC GIS-based models for vulnerability assessment of the Quaternary aquifer at Sohag. Egypt Hydrogeol J 17:1203–1217CrossRef

Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ (1985) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. In: Robert SK (ed) Environmental Research Laboratory office of Research and Development. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma. EPA/600/2-85/018

Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. In: Robert SK (ed) Environmental Research Laboratory office of Research and Development. U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma. EPA/600/2-87/035

Almasri M (2008) Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability to contamination for Gaza coastal aquifer, Palestine. J Environ Manag 88:577–593CrossRef

Alonso J, Lamata T (2006) Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 14(4):445–459CrossRef

Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2007) Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece. J Hydrol 333:288–304CrossRef

Arthur JD, Wood HA, Baker AE, Cichon JR Raines GL (2007) Development and implementation of a bayesian-based aquifer vulnerability assessment in Florida Nat Resour Res 16(2), DOI: 10.1007/s11053-007-9038-5

Baalousha H (2010) Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. Agric Water Manag 97(2):240–246CrossRef

Babiker IS, Mohamed MAA, Hiyama T, Kato K (2005) A GISbased DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345(1–3):127–140CrossRef

Beynen PE, Niedzielski MA, Jelinska B, Alsharif K, Matusick J (2012) Comparative study of specific groundwater vulnerability of a karst aquifer in central Florida. Appl Geogr 32:868–877CrossRef

Bojorquez-Tapia LA, Cruz-Bello GM, Luna-Gonzalez L, Juarez L, Ortiz-Perez MA (2009) V-DRASTIC: using visualization to engage policymakers in groundwater vulnerability assessment. J Hydrol 373:242–255CrossRef

Brindha K, Elango L (2015) Cross comparison of five popular groundwater pollution vulnerability index approaches. J Hydrol 524:597–613CrossRef

Central Groundwater Board (CGWB) (1998). Studies on conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources in Hirakud irrigation project Odisha Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India

Chandoul IR, Bouaziz S, Dhia HB (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GIS-based DRASTIC models in shallow aquifer of Gabes North (South East Tunisia). Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-014-1702-6

Chen SK, Jang CS, Peng YH (2013) Developing a probability-based model of aquifer vulnerability in a agricultural region. J Hydrol 486:494–504CrossRef

Dhar A (2013) Geostatistics-based design of regional groundwater monitoring framework. ISH J Hydraul Eng 19(2):80–87CrossRef

Dhar A, Sahoo S, Dey S, Sahoo M (2014) Evaluation of recharge and groundwater dynamics of a shallow alluvial aquifer in central ganga basin, Kanpur (India). Nat Resour Res 23(4):409–422CrossRef

Dhar A, Sahoo S, Mandal U, Dey S, Bishi N, Kar A (2015a) Hydro-environmental assessment of a regional ground water aquifer: Hirakud command area (India). Environ Earth Sci 73:4165–4178CrossRef

Dhar A, Sahoo S, Sahoo M (2015b) Identification of groundwater potential zones considering water quality aspect. Environ Earth Sci 74:5663–5675 doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4580-7 CrossRef

Dixon B (2004) Prediction of groundwater vulnerability using integrated GIS-based neuro-fuzzy techniques. J Spat Hydrol 4(2):1–38

Ettazarini S (2006) Groundwater pollution risk mapping for the Eocene aquifer of the Oum Er-Rabia basin, Morocco. Environ Geol 51:341–347CrossRef

Fijani E, Nadiri A, Moghaddam AA, Tsai FTC, Dixon B (2013) Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh-Bonab plain aquifer, Iran. J Hydrol 503:89–100CrossRef

Foster S, Garduno H, Kemper K, Tuinhof A, Nanni M, Dumars C (2003) World Bank sustainable groundwater management: Concepts and tools, groundwater quality protection defining strategy and setting priorities. GW-MATE Briefing Note Series, World Bank, Washington, DC

Ghazavi R, Ebrahimi Z (2015) Assessing groundwater vulnerability to contamination in an arid environment using DRASTIC and GOD models. Int J Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13762-015-0813-2

Guo Q, Wang Y, Gao X, Ma T (2007) A new model (DRARCH) for assessing groundwater vulnerability to arsenic contamination at basin scale: a case study in Taiyuan basin, northern China. Environ Geol 52:923–932CrossRef

Hailin Y, Ligang X, Change Y, Jiaxing X (2011) Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability with improved DRASTIC method. Proc Environ Sci 10:2690–2695CrossRef

Hallaq A, Elaish B (2012) Assessment of aquifer vulnerability to contamination in Khanyounis Governorate, Gaza Strip—Palestine, using the DRASTIC model within GIS environment. Arab J Geosci 5:833–847CrossRef

Huan H, Jinsheng W, Yanguo T (2012) Assessment and validation of 10 groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. Sci Total Environ 440:14–23CrossRef

Iqbal J, Gorai AK, Katpatal YB, Pathak G (2015) Development of GIS-based fuzzy pattern recognition model (modified DRASTIC model) for groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment. Int J Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13762-014-0693-x

Jang CS, Chen SK (2015) Integrating indicator-based geostatistical estimation and aquifer vulnerability of nitrate–N for establishing groundwater protection zones. J Hydrol 523:441–451CrossRef

Jasrotia AS, Singh R (2005) Groundwater pollution vulnerability using the DRASTIC model in a GIS environment, Devak-Rui watershed, India. J Environ Hydrol 13:11

Junior RF, Varandas SGP, Fernandes LFS (2015) Multi Criteria Analysis for the monitoring of aquifer vulnerability: a scientific tool in environmental policy. Environ Sci Policy 48:250–264CrossRef

Katta B, Fares W, Charideh AR (2010) Groundwater vulnerability assessment for the Banyas Catchment of the Syrian coastal area using GIS and the RISKE method. J Environ Manage 91:1103–1110CrossRef

Kazakis N, Voudouris, K (2011) Comparison of three applied methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping: a case study from the Florina basin, Northern Greece. In: Lambrakis N, Stournaras G, Katsanou K (eds) Advances in the research of aquatic environment. Environment Earth Sciences, pp 359–367

Kazakis N, Voudouris K (2015) Groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment of porous aquifers to nitrate: modifying the DRASTIC method using quantitative parameters. J Hydrol 525:13–25CrossRef

Kumar P, Bansod BKS, Debnath SK, Thakur PK, Ghansyam C (2015) Index-based groundwater vulnerability mapping models using hydrogeological settings: a critical evaluation. Environ Impact Assess Rev 51:38–49CrossRef

Liggett LE, Talwar S (2009) Groundwater vulnerability assessments and integrated water resource management. Watershed Manag Bull 13(1):18–29

Lima ML, Zelaya K, Massone H (2011) Groundwater vulnerability assessment combining the drastic and Dyna-Clue model in the argentine pampas. Environ Manage 47:828–839CrossRef

Mair A, El-Kadi AI (2013) Logistic regression modeling to assess groundwater vulnerability to contamination in Hawaii, USA. J Contam Hydrol 153:1–23CrossRef

Mohammadi K, Niknam R, Majd V (2009) Aquifer vulnerability assessment using GIS and fuzzy system: a case study in TehranKaraj aquifer. Iran Environ Geol 58:437–446CrossRef

Neshat A, Pradhan B, Dadras M (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:74–86CrossRef

Odling NE, Serrano RP, Hussein MEA, Riva M, Guadagnini A (2015) Detecting the vulnerability of groundwater in semi-confined aquifers using barometric response functions. J Hydrol 520:143–156CrossRef

Pacheco FAL, Pires LMGR, Santos RMB, Sanches Fernandes LF (2015) Factor weighting in DRASTIC modeling. Sci Total Environ 505:474–486CrossRef

Pathak DR, Hiratsuka A (2011) An integrated GIS based fuzzy pattern recognition model to compute groundwater vulnerability index for decision making. J Hydroenviron Res 5:63–77

Pathak D, Hiratsuka A, Awata I, Chen L (2009) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer of Kathmandu Valley using GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ Geol 57:1569–1578CrossRef

Prasad R, Singh VS, Krishnamacharyulu SKG, Banerjee P (2011) Application of drastic model and GIS: for assessing vulnerability in hard rock granitic aquifer. Environ Monit Assess 176:143–155CrossRef

Rahman A (2008) A GIS Based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28(1):32–53CrossRef

Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York

Sahoo S, Dhar A, Kar A (2016) Environmental vulnerability assessment using Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process based model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 56:145–154CrossRef

Secunda S, Collin M, Melloul A (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel’s Sharon region. J Environ Manag 54:39–57CrossRef

Shekhar S, Pandey AC, Tirkey AS (2014) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in hard rock granitic aquifer. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-014-1285-2

Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S (2012) GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: a review. J Risk Res 15(8):991–1011CrossRef

Yang YS, Wang L (2010) Catchment-scale vulnerability assessment of groundwater pollution from diffuse sources using the DRASTIC method: a case study. Hydrol Sci J 55:1206–1216CrossRef

Zhou J, Li G, Liu F, Wang Y, Guo X (2010) DRAV model and its application in assessing groundwater vulnerability in arid area: a case study of pore phreatic water in Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, Northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 60:1055–1063CrossRef

Titel: Index-based groundwater vulnerability mapping using quantitative parameters
verfasst von: Satiprasad Sahoo
Anirban Dhar
Amlanjyoti Kar
Durjoy Chakraborty
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5395-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Efficient bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated sediment in batch method coupled with the assistance of heterotrophic microorganisms

Constraining the groundwater flow system and aquifer properties using major ions, environmental traces and a simple physical model in China’s Jilantai Basin

Simulating seismic chimney structures as potential vertical migration pathways for CO2 in the Snøhvit area, SW Barents Sea: model challenges and outcomes

Groundwater geochemical evolution under the influence of polymetallic deposit in Czarnów (Western Sudetes, SW Poland)

Sedimentary record of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Songhua River, China

Investigation of geological and soil influence on natural gamma radiation exposure and assessment of radiation hazards in Western Region, Peninsular Malaysia