nach oben

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Erschienen in:

09.11.2017 | Original Article

Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study

verfasst von: Zeynep Gümrükçü, Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz

Erschienen in: Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the stress values, created in peri-implant region as a consequence of loading on fixed hybrid dentures that was planned with different implant numbers, lengths, or tilting angulations. Thirteen three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis models were generated with four, five, or seven implants (group A, B, and C). Except the distal implants, all implants were modeled at 4.1 mm (diameter) and 11.5 mm (length) in size. Distal implants were configured to be in five different lengths (6, 8, 11.5, 13, and 16 mm) and three different implant inclination degrees (0°, 30°, and 45°). A 150-N load was applied vertically on prosthesis. Released stresses were evaluated comparatively. The lowest von Mises stress values were found in group C, in the 11.5-mm implant model. Tilting the distal implants 30° caused higher stress values. In 45°-tilting implant models, lower stress values were recorded according to the 30°-tilting models. The ideal implant number is seven for an edentulous maxilla. Tilting the implants causes higher stress values. A 45° inclination of implant causes lower stress values according to the 30° models due to a shorter cantilever. The ideal implant length is 11.5 mm.

Vorheriger Artikel New complexity measures reveal that topographic loops of human alpha phase potentials are more complex in drowsy than in wake

Nächster Artikel EEG indices correlate with sustained attention performance in patients affected by diffuse axonal injury

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Chou HY, Muftu S, Bozkaya D (2010) Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant. J Prosthet Dent 104(5):293–300CrossRefPubMed

Chang SH, Lin CL, Hsue SS, Lin YS, Huang SR (2012) Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Med Eng Phys 34(2):153–160CrossRefPubMed

Woo I, Le BT (2004) Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent 13(1):28–32CrossRefPubMed

Graziani F, Donos N, Needleman I, Gabriele M, Tonetti M (2004) Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 15(6):677–682CrossRefPubMed

Li T, Yang X, Zhang D, Zhou H, Shao J, Ding Y, Kong L (2012) Analysis of the biomechanical feasibility of a wide implant in moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region with finite element method. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114(2):1–8CrossRef

Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas Junior AC, Anchieta RB, Poveda R, Gupta N, Coelho PG (2015) Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17(1):332–342CrossRef

Saleh Saber F, Ghasemi S, Koodaryan R, Babaloo A, Abolfazli N (2015) The comparison of stress distribution with different implant numbers and inclination angles in all-on-four and conventional methods in maxilla: a finite element analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 9(4):246–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hernandez-Alfaro F, Sancho-Puchades M, Guijarro-Martinez R (2013) Total reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with intraoral bone grafts and biomaterials: a prospective clinical study with cone beam computed tomography validation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28(1):241–251CrossRefPubMed

Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M (2009) Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(7):237–259PubMed

10.

Zampelis A, Rangert B, Heijl L (2007) Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 97(6):35–43CrossRef

11.

Regev E, Smith A, Perrott DH, Pogrel MA (1995) Maxillary sinus complications related to endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10(4):451–461PubMed

12.

Malo P, Nobre M, Rangert B (2007) Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent and Relat Res 9(1):15–21CrossRef

13.

Das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, Do Prado CJ, Neto AJ (2006) Short implants. An analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21(1):86–93PubMed

14.

Van Assche N, Michels S, Quirynen M, Naert I (2011) Extra short dental implants supporting an overdenture in the edentulous maxilla: a proof of concept. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(5):567–576CrossRefPubMed

15.

Romeo E, Bivio A, Mosca D, Scanferla M, Ghisolfi M, Storelli S (2010) The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: literature review. Minerva Stomatol 59(1–2):23–31PubMed

16.

Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Kebir M, Etienne D, Tecucianu JF (2001) Wide-diameter implants: new concepts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 21(2):149–159PubMed

17.

Cavalli N, Barbaro B, Spasari D, Azzola F, Ciatti A, Francetti L (2012) Tilted implants for full-arch rehabilitations in completely edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study. Int J Dent 2012(2012):e180379

18.

Rossetti PH, Bonachela WC, Rossetti LM (2010) Relevant anatomic and biomechanical studies for implant possibilities on the atrophic maxilla: critical appraisal and literature review. J Prosthodont 19(6):449–457CrossRefPubMed

19.

Drago CJ (1992) Rates of osseointegration of dental implants with regard to anatomical location. J Prosthodont 1(1):29–31CrossRefPubMed

20.

Viceconti M, Baleani M, De Lollis A, Toni A (1998) An FEA-based protocol for the pre-clinical validation of custom-made hip implants. J Med Eng Technol 22(6):257–262CrossRefPubMed

21.

Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR (2001) Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 85(6):585–598CrossRefPubMed

22.

Moriwaki H, Yamaguchi S, Nakano T, Yamanishi Y, Imazato S, Yatani H (2016) Influence of implant length and diameter, Bicortical anchorage, and sinus augmentation on bone stress distribution: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 31(4):84–91CrossRef

23.

YJ L, Chang SH, Ye JT, Ye YS, YS Y (2015) Finite element analysis of bone stress around micro-implants of different diameters and lengths with application of a single or composite torque force. PLoS One 10(12):e0144744CrossRef

24.

Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolama M, Maceri F, Vairo G (2008) The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 100(6):422–431CrossRefPubMed

25.

Assuncao WG, Barao VA, Tabata LF, Gomes EA, Delben JA, dos Santos PH (2009) Biomechanics studies in dentistry: bioengineering applied in oral implantology. J Craniofac Surg 20(4):1173–1177CrossRefPubMed

26.

Bourauel C, Aitlahrach M, Heinemann F, Hasan I (2012) Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implants: extensive study of commercial implants. Biomed Tech (Berl) 57(1):21–32CrossRef

27.

Silva GC, Mendonca JA, Lopes LR, Landre J (2010) Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(2):239–246PubMed

28.

Gümrükçü Z, Korkmaz YT, Korkmaz FM (2017) Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study. Comput Biol Med 86(2017):47–54CrossRefPubMed

29.

Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (1985) Patient selection and preparation. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Chicago Quintessence Int:199–209

30.

Correa S, Ivancik J, Isaza JF, Naranjo M (2012) Evaluation of the structural behavior of three and four implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations by finite element analysis. J Prosthodont Res 56(2):110–119CrossRefPubMed

31.

Misch CE (2009) Dental implant prosthesis, 2nd edn. Nobel, İstanbul, pp 281–308

32.

Kong L, Gu Z, Hu K, Zhou H, Liu Y, Liu B (2009) Optimization of the implant diameter and length in type B/2 bone for improved biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Adv Eng Softw 40(9):935–940CrossRef

33.

Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O (2005) Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant—a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 32(4):279–286CrossRefPubMed

34.

Pirner S, Tingelhoff K, Wagner I, Westphal R, Rilk M, Wahl FM, Bootz F, Eichhorn KW (2009) CT-based manual segmentation and evaluation of paranasal sinuses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(4):507–518CrossRefPubMed

35.

Tepper G, Haas R, Zechner W, Krach W, Watzek G (2002) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(6):657–665CrossRefPubMed

36.

Rismanchian M, Bajoghli F, Mostajeran Z, Fazel A, Eshkevari P (2009) Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. J Oral Implantol 35(4):196–200CrossRefPubMed

37.

Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM (2004) Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 31(1):18–22CrossRefPubMed

38.

Petrie CS, Williams JL (2005) Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 16(4):486–494CrossRefPubMed

39.

Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A (2004) Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent 92(6):523–530CrossRefPubMed

40.

Eraslan O, Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eslitascıoglu G (2005) Effects of cantilever design and material on stress distribution in fixed partial dentures—a finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 32(4):273–2788CrossRefPubMed

41.

Lin CL, Kuo YC, Lin TS (2005) Effects of dental implant length and bone quality on biomechanical responses in bone around implants: a 3-D non-linear finite element analysis. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 17(1):44–49CrossRef

42.

Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC (2006) Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 9(4):257–270CrossRefPubMed

43.

Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D (1992) Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 3(3):104–111CrossRefPubMed

44.

Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Calletti R, Lazzara R (2001) Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 12(5):423–432CrossRefPubMed

45.

Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A (2005) Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. J Prosthet Dent 93(1):38–44CrossRefPubMed

46.

Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T (2000) Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(1):66–75PubMed

47.

Iplikcioglu H, Akca K, Cehreli MC, Sahin S (2003) Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18(2):258–265PubMed

48.

Mansat P, Briot J, Mansat M, Swider P (2007) Evaluation of the glenoid implant survival using a biomechanical finite element analysis: influence of the implant design, bone properties, and loading location. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(3):79–83CrossRef

49.

Simsek B, Erkmen E, Yılmaz D, Eser A (2006) Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys 28(3):199–213CrossRefPubMed

50.

Mercian P, Borak L, Valasek J, Kaiser J, Florian Z, Wolff J (2014) Finite element analysis of dental implant loading on atrophic and non-atrophic cancellous and cortical mandibular bone—a feasibility study. J Biomech 47(16):3830–3836CrossRef

51.

Chun HJ, Park DN, Han CH, Heo SJ, Heo MS, Koak JY (2005) Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. J Oral Rehabil 32(3):193–205CrossRefPubMed

52.

Barao VA, Assuncao WG, Tabata LF, Delben JA, Gomes EA, De Sousa EA, Rocha EP (2009) Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. J Craniofac Surg 20(4):1066–1067CrossRefPubMed

53.

Takahashi T, Shimamura I, Sakurai K (2010) Influence of number and inclination angle of implants on stress distribution in mandibular cortical bone with All-on-4 concept. J Prosthodont Res 54(4):179–184CrossRefPubMed

54.

El-Anwar MI, El-Zawahry MM (2011) A three dimensional finite element study on dental implant design. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 9(1):77–82CrossRef

55.

Küçükkurt S, Alpaslan G, Kurt A (2017) Biomechanical comparison of sinus floor elevation and alternative treatment methods for dental implant placement. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 20(3):284–293CrossRef

56.

Francetti L, Romeo D, Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M (2012) Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14(5):646–654CrossRefPubMed

57.

Cehreli MC, Iplikcioglu H, Bilir OG (2002) The influence of the location of load transfer on strains around implants supporting four unit cement-retained fixed prostheses: in vitro evaluation of axial versus off-set loading. J Oral Rehabil 29(4):394–400CrossRefPubMed

58.

De Vico G, Bonin M, Spinelli D, Schiavetti R, Sannino G, Pozzi A, Ottria L (2011) Rationale for tilted implants: FEA considerations and clinical reports. J Oral Implantol 4:23–33

59.

Naini RB, Nokar S, Borghei H, Alikhasi M (2011) Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(4):776–781PubMed

60.

Ogawa T, Dhaliwal S, Naert I, Mine A, Kronstrom M, Sasaki K, Duyck J (2010) Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 37(7):525–531CrossRefPubMed

61.

Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M (2003) Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5(4):254–262CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study
verfasst von: Zeynep Gümrükçü
Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
Publikationsdatum: 09.11.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0140-0118
Elektronische ISSN: 1741-0444
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1737-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Needle-tissue interactive mechanism and steering control in image-guided robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a review

Assessment of the equivalent dipole layer source model in the reconstruction of cardiac activation times on the basis of BSPMs produced by an anisotropic model of the heart

Automatic localization of the left ventricular blood pool centroid in short axis cardiac cine MR images

Lossless medical image compression using geometry-adaptive partitioning and least square-based prediction

Automated 3D method for the construction of flexible and reconfigurable numerical breast models from MRI scans

A hybrid approach based on logistic classification and iterative contrast enhancement algorithm for hyperintense multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation