nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Innovationspolitik und Netzwerke

verfasst von : Tom Brökel, Holger Graf

Erschienen in: Handbuch Innovative Wirtschaftsförderung

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Kooperationen werden allgemeinhin als vorteilhaft für Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaktivitäten und damit als positiv für den langfristigen Erfolg von Unternehmen angesehen. Entsprechend ist die Unterstützung von Kooperations- und Netzwerkaktivitäten zu einem populären Instrument der Innovationspolitik geworden.

Der vorliegende Beitrag diskutiert dieses Instrument aus Sicht des Proximity-Ansatzes. Es wird dabei kritisch hinterfragt, wann eine solche Förderung gerechtfertigt ist und in welchen Situationen sie wahrscheinlich den größten Nutzen stiftet. Hierauf aufbauend werden beispielhaft die traditionelle Clusterpolitik und die EU-Forschungsrahmenprogrammme aus theoretischer Sicht bewertet und praktische Implikationen für die Innovationspolitik abgeleitet.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Wirtschaft fördern und fordern: Die Gemeinwohl-Ökonomie als Impuls für nachhaltige Wirtschaftsförderung

Nächstes Kapitel Innovationen und Innovationsmanagement für Unternehmen

Wir konzentrieren uns im Folgenden auf Kooperationen als eine Art der Wissensaustauschbeziehungen. Die gleiche Argumentation kann aber auf andere Interaktionen, bei denen es zu kollektiven Lernprozessen kommt, übertragen werden.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.CrossRef

Autant-Bernard, C., Billand, P., Frachisse, D., & Massard, N. (2007). Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x.CrossRef

Balland, P.-A. (2011). Proximity and the evolution of collaborative networks: Evidence from R&D projects within the GNSS industry. Regional Studies, 46(6), 741–756.CrossRef

Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2014). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598.CrossRef

Barajas, A., & Huergo, E. (2010). International R&D cooperation within the EU framework programme: Empirical evidence for Spanish firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(1), 87–111.CrossRef

Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa.CrossRef

BMBF. (2014). Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2014. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).

Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRef

Boschma, R., Neffke, F., & Henning, M. (2010). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions, 0095. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ron_Boschma/publication/46454619_How_do_regions_diversify_over_time_Industry_relatedness_and_the_development_of_new_growth_paths_in_regions/links/00b7d522efd6244bd9000000/How-do-regions-diversify-over-time-Industry-rel.

Brakman, S., & Van Marrewijk, C. (2013). Reflections on cluster policies. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst001.CrossRef

Brenner, T., & Schlump, C. (2011). Policy measures and their effects in the different phases of the cluster life-cycle. Regional Studies, 45(10), 1363–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030601135936.CrossRef

Breschi, S., & Cusmano, L. (2004). Unveiling the texture of a European research area: Emergence of oligarchic networks under EU framework programmes. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(8), 747–772.CrossRef

Breschi, S., & Lenzi, C. (2015). The role of external linkages and gatekeepers for the renewal and expansion of US cities’ knowledge base, 1990–2004. Regional Studies, 49(5), 782–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.954534.CrossRef

Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439–468.CrossRef

Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(January 2001), 69–87.CrossRef

Broekel, T. (2012). Collaboration intensity and regional innovation efficiency in Germany – A conditional efficiency approach. Industry and Innovation, 19(2), 155–179. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13662716.2012.650884.CrossRef

Broekel, T. (2013). Do cooperative Research and Development (R&D) subsidies stimulate regional innovation efficiency? Evidence from Germany. Regional Studies, (September), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.812781.CrossRef

Broekel, T. (2015). The co-evolution of proximities – A network level study. Regional Studies, 49(6), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.1001732.CrossRef

Broekel, T. (2016). Wissens- und Innovationsgeographie in der Wirtschaftsförderung – Grundlagen für die Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.CrossRef

Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr010.CrossRef

Broekel, T., & Graf, H. (2012). Public research intensity and the structure of German R&D networks : A comparison of 10 technologies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(4), 345–372.CrossRef

Broekel, T., Fornahl, D., & Morrison, A. (2015). Another cluster premium: Innovation subsidies and R&D collaboration networks. Research Policy, 44(8), 1431–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.002.CrossRef

Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 587–600.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463–480.CrossRef

Cantner, U., & Meder, A. (2007). Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partners. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-007-0018-y.CrossRef

Cassi, L., & Plunket, A. (2013). Research collaboration in co-inventor networks: Combining closure, bridging and proximities. Regional Studies, (October 2014), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.816412.CrossRef

Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). {R&D} cooperation and spillovers: Some evidence from Belgium. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169–1184.CrossRef

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.CrossRef

Colombo, M. G. (1995). Firm size and cooperation: The determinants of cooperative agreemetns in information technology industries. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/758521094.CrossRef

Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2016). Network structural properties for cluster long-run dynamics: Evidence from collaborative R&D networks in the European mobile phone industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv032.CrossRef

Czarnitzki, D., Doherr, T., Fier, A., Licht, G., Rammer, C., & Niggemann, H. (2002). Öffentliche Förderung der Forschungs- und Innovationsaktivitäten von Unternehmen in Deutschland. (November).

David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or a substitute for private R&D? A review of econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 497–529.CrossRef

Dohse, D. (2000). Technology policy and the regions – The case of the BioRegio contest. Research Policy, 29(9), 1111–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00077-3.CrossRef

Duranton, G. (2011). California dreamin’: The feeble case for cluster policies. Review of Economic Analysis, 3, 3–45.

Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2016). Handbook of innovation policy impact (Eu-SPRI forum on science, technology and innovation policy series). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.CrossRef

Ejermo, O., & Karlsson, C. (2006). Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships. Research Policy, 35, 412–430.CrossRef

Engel, D., Eckl, V., & Rothgang, M. (2017). R&D funding and private R&D: Empirical evidence on the impact of the leading-edge cluster competition. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9609-5.

Expertenkomission Forschung und Innovation (EFI). (2017). Gutachten 2017 zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Efi.

Feldman, M. P., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210–229.CrossRef

Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D. F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. Handbook of the economics of innovation (Bd. 1). Amsterdam/Boston/Heidelberg: Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7.CrossRef

Fier, A., & Harhoff, D. (2002). Die Evolution der bundesdeutschen Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik: Rückblick und Bestandsaufnahme. Perspektiven Der Wirtschaftspolitik, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2516.00092.

Fisher, R., Polt, W., & Vonortas, N. (2009). The impact of publicly funded research on innovation. CE. https://doi.org/10.2769/14877.

Fontagné, L., Koenig, P., Mayneris, F., & Poncet, S. (2013). Cluster policies and firm selection: Evidence from france. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 897–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12050.CrossRef

Foray, D. (2004). The economics of knowledge. Cambridge/Massachusetts/London: MIT Press.CrossRef

Fornahl, D., Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2011). What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00361.x.CrossRef

Frenken, K., van Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.CrossRef

Fritsch, M., & Graf, H. (2011). How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00364.x.CrossRef

Giuliani, E. (2011). Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters : Evidence from chile role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters: Evidence from chile, (March 2012), 37–41.

Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1), 47–68. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v34y2005i1p47-68.html.CrossRef

Grabher, G. (Hrsg.). (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In The embedded firm – On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (S. 255–277). Routledge, London/New York, Reprinted in 1994.

Graf, H. (2011). Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(1), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beq001.CrossRef

Graf, H., & Krüger, J. J. (2011). The performance of gatekeepers in innovator networks. Industry and Innovation, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.528932.CrossRef

Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477–492.CrossRef

Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6.CrossRef

Heidenreich, M. (1997). Zwischen Innovation und Institutionalisierung. Die soziale Strukturierung technischen Wissens. In B. Blättel-Mink & O. Renn (Hrsg.), Zwischen Akteur und System. Die Organisierung von Innovation (S. 177–206). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRef

Hinzmann, S., Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2017). The role of geographical proximity for project performance: Evidence from the German leading-edge cluster competition. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9600-1.

Hippel, E. von. (1987). Cooperation between Rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research Policy, 16(6), 291–302.CrossRef

Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.CrossRef

Kesteloot, K., & Veugelers, R. (1995). Stable R&D cooperation with spillover. Journal of Economics and Management, 4, 651–672.

Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., & Tucker, I. (2013). Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1374–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755832.CrossRef

Luukkonen, T. (2000). Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 29(6), 711–724.CrossRef

Maggioni, M. A., Nosvelli, M., & Uberti, T. E. (2007). Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00130.x.CrossRef

Marín, P. L., & Siotis, G. (2008). Public policies towards research joint venture: Institutional design and participants’ characteristics. Research Policy, 37(6–7), 1057–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.007.CrossRef

Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5.CrossRef

Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011). Public support to clusters: A firm level study of French „Local Productive Systems“. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.09.001.CrossRef

Moodysson, J., & Zukauskaite, E. (2014). Institutional conditions and innovation systems : On sectors institutional conditions and innovation systems: On the impact of regional policy on firms in different sectors, (February), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.649004.CrossRef

Morrison, A. (2008). Gatekeepers of knowledge within industrial districts : Who they are, How they interact, (789545737). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701654178.CrossRef

Mukherjee, S., Romero, D. M., Jones, B., & Uzzi, B. (2017). The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow’s breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot. Science Advances, 3(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601315.CrossRef

Neffke, F., & Henning, M. (2013). Skill relatedenss and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 297–316.CrossRef

Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). Subsidy and networking: The effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy. Research Policy, 40(5), 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.011.CrossRef

Njøs, R., & Jakobsen, S. E. (2016). Cluster policy and regional development: Scale, scope and renewal. Regional Studies, Regional Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094.CrossRef

Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation and inter-firm linkages: New implications for policy. Research Policy, 28, 793–805.CrossRef

Nooteboom, B. (2000a). Learning and innovation in organizations and economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nooteboom, B. (2000b). Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4, 69–92.CrossRef

Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034.CrossRef

Paier, M., & Scherngell, T. (2010). Determinants of collaboration in European R & D networks : Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model determinants of collaboration in European R & D networks: Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model, (September 2011), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.528935.CrossRef

Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443.CrossRef

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20111451.CrossRef

Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.CrossRef

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.CrossRef

Rothgang, M., Cantner, U., Dehio, J., Engel, D., Fertig, M., Graf, H., Töpfer, S., et al. (2017a). Cluster policy : Insights from the German leading edge cluster competition, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0064-1.

Rothgang, M., Dehio, J., & Lageman, B. (2017b). Analysing the effects of cluster policy: What can we learn from the German leading-edge cluster competition? The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9616-6.

Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2009). Spatial interaction modeling of cross-region R&D collaboration. Empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 531–546.CrossRef

Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2011). Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the fifth EU framework programme. Annals of Regional Science, 46(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0334-3.CrossRef

Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349.CrossRef

Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2013). The dynamics of the inventor network in german biotechnology: Geographic proximity versus triadic closure. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(3), 589–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs063.CrossRef

Töpfer, S., Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2017). Structural dynamics of innovation networks in German Leading-Edge Clusters. Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9642-4.

Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59.CrossRef

Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2016). The impact of cluster policy on innovation. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök & P. Shapira (Hrsg.), Handbook of innovation policy impact (S. 196–225). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.CrossRef

Witt, U., Broekel, T., & Brenner, T. (2012). Knowledge and its economic characteristics: A conceptual clarification. Handbook of knowledge and economics. Cheltenham/Northampton. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001028.00024.

Woolthuis, R. K., Hillebrand, B., Nooteboom, B., & Klein, R. (2005). Organization studies trust, contract and relationship development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054594.CrossRef

Zúñiga-Vicente, J. A., Alonso Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galàn, J. I. (2012). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.x.CrossRef

Titel: Innovationspolitik und Netzwerke
verfasst von: Tom Brökel
Holger Graf
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Buch: Handbuch Innovative Wirtschaftsförderung
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21403-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-21404-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21404-3_28

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner