Skip to main content

2016 | Buch

Integrated Spatial and Transport Infrastructure Development

The Case of the European North-South Corridor Rotterdam-Genoa

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

The challenge of growth in transport, especially in freight transport, and scarce resources in money, landscape and local opposition against new infrastructure investment require new solutions from transport policy. This book deals with these issues taking as an example the transport corridor Rotterdam-Genoa, one of the most heavily used in Europe. In 2010 the INTERREG project Code24 with partners from five European countries started with the aim to develop a transnational strategy to strengthen and to develop the corridor. The main objective was to accelerate and jointly develop the transport capacity of the entire corridor by ensuring optimal economic benefits and spatial integration while reducing negative impacts on the environment at local and regional level. These issues are highlighted in the book from an interdisciplinary perspective, taking into account spatial, economic, environmental and political aspects.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Introduction
From Sea to Sea: Changing a Trade Route and Transit Area into a Common European Living Space
Abstract
The Rhine axis and the adjoining trade routes southwards over the Alps to the Mediterranean are among the most important transport routes in Europe. The development and significance of this trading route has inspired the sciences as well as current policy-making. The French geographer Roger Brunet explains that this link has arisen from a fundamental ‘north-south dissymmetry’ of the European cultural landscape, starting as early as Roman times: the evil barbarians in the north facing the civilized cultures of the Mediterranean states. In economic terms, this inequality was manifested in the range of different resources: in the north amber, wool and wood and in the south spices, silk and precious stones, but also bronze weapons, often imported from Asia or the Near East. The resulting exchange of goods, technologies and culture began in the Bronze Age and was intensified up until the twelfth century CE on the shortest route between the Mediterranean and the North Sea. Between today’s North Sea ports of Antwerp, Rotterdam and Amsterdam and the ports of the Ligurian coast in northern Italy, one finds the highest concentrations of settlement activity and population, wealth, infrastructure and traffic in Europe, today called the Rhine–Alpine Corridor. This article illustrates the approach of the INTERREG project CODE24 dealing with direct negative consequences of the economic strength of the corridor, such as rising land prices, increased pollution, formidable traffic problems and further urban sprawl outside outside of the core cities.
Hansjörg Drewello, Bernd Scholl

Developing the Transport Corridor Rotterdam-Genoa Within Spaces of National and European Importance

Frontmatter
Spatial Planning and Development in a European and Macro-regional Context
Abstract
Throughout the entire history of Europe and its spatial development, the north-south corridor from Rotterdam to Genoa has formed a quasi ‘transport backbone’. The most densely settled areas of Europe are to be found here, together with diverse landscapes and urban regions of various sizes. It is also the area where the highest economic value is created. To a considerable extent, the economic power of this axis determines many European developments. Major investments of all kinds: airports, railway systems, distribution centres, industries, etc., are concentrated here.
The renovation and development of the regions along this corridor are a challenge for those involved. Global, European, national, regional, and local processes overlap each other and changes are plain to see. The serious conflicts within spatial development in this transit area also inevitably lead to addressing Europe’s cultural and political history, as well as its future and the future of its nations. What are the central questions, and what solutions are possible? In recent years, stakeholders from all the countries involved have formed, for the first time, a group for developing a spatial strategy in a European and macro-regional context. This contribution deals with the challenges and perspectives of one of the most important corridors in Europe and the need for an action-oriented European spatial programme.
Bernd Scholl
Reasoning in a Macro Level Spatial Context
Abstract
Dealing with problems in a macro level spatial context, such as the transnational corridor from Rotterdam to Genoa, requires a careful and thorough approach. Sheer size and an international composition means that the project cannot be grasped in its entirety all at once, that many different actors are involved, that most of the available information has to be translated, and since different countries often treat material fields differently, some form of consolidation will have to be arranged for the whole to operate. In such situations, it is important to be aware of an overall paradigm that can help with recognising and deciphering a series of possible difficulties (traps), which are often hidden or emerge only upon investigation. The paradigm includes a collection of helpful guidelines (maxims) for dealing with such large-scale and, at the same time, fragmented difficulties. Some of these traps and maxims will be explained and illustrated in this contribution.
Rolf Signer
Exploring the Affordances of Collaborative Problem-Solving Technologies in the Development of European Corridors
Abstract
Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) technologies are increasingly being used to support spatial planning processes. Despite these advances, published accounts of their use have largely failed to explain if and how uses of these technologies differ from other forms of spatial planning support. In this chapter, we adopt an affordance perspective to examine how the material features of CPS technologies can support stakeholder interactions. We illustrate our theorising by offering an empirical case vignette of the application of InViTo, a particular CPS technology designed and used to support the planning of Eurocorridor 24, which is now called the Rhine–Alpine Corridor. We conclude with a brief discussion of the implications of adopting an affordance lens for assessing the current use of CPS technologies in spatial planning processes. Directions for future research are also proposed.
Isabella M. Lami, L. Alberto Franco
Corridor Development from a Regional Perspective: The Case of the Frankfurt/Rhine-Main Region
Abstract
The metropolitan region Frankfurt/Rhine-Main is located in the heart of Europe and in the middle of the Rotterdam-Genoa corridor, also known as the Rhine-Alpine corridor, which is part of the EU transport core network. This central location, along with excellent transport (airport, highways, rail) and telecommunication infrastructure, attracts a highly skilled workforce and a large number of businesses from abroad. Substantial freight volumes are transhipped in the region, moving in all directions, and rail infrastructure plays a key part in this transport network. Rail is the backbone of the region’s development. It is key to regional and long-distance passenger and rail freight transport and must be promoted to prevent further increases in the volume of road transport as the main competitor of rail transport.
To achieve this, appropriate capacity increases in rail infrastructure are needed, and negative impacts on built-up areas, caused by rail noise, have to be prevented. Furthermore, integration into the trans-European corridor Rotterdam-Genoa is necessary. The area between Frankfurt and Mannheim is one of the key sections of the Rhine-Alpine corridor.
This paper outlines what form a bottom-up strategy to develop this segment of the corridor should take. It also shows that integration into the overall Rotterdam-Genoa corridor and coordination with other partners is necessary to handle both benefits and risks. Here, a comprehensive strategy is needed to reconcile both aspects. Furthermore, the paper emphasizes that the regional voice be heard by the competent European and national institutions.
Birgit Simon, Peter Endemann
Challenges for Corridors: Future Perspectives on European Corridor Development
Abstract
In many European policy documents, the integration of transport, spatial and economic dimensions in corridor development is advocated as a means to cope with challenges that occur within corridors. For many years, however, knowledge about corridors was only developed from a sector perspective and with a more or less technocratic approach—despite a growing call for a more integrated analysis of corridor issues. To address these challenges efficiently, the integration argument needs specific knowledge on the different problem areas. Therefore, the question remains as to what extent an integrated analysis would be beneficial in resolving persistent corridor issues, such as the existence of bottlenecks. This contribution aims to highlight the outcome of two related research projects in which the possible added value of an integrated perspective on corridor development is addressed. The evidence presented reflects the current state-of-the-art knowledge regarding integrated corridor development and the possible future challenges for European corridors that may result from this. Whether the added value of the integration argument in corridor development can be found in practice will be researched as well as whether this leads to restating the importance of corridors for present-day European policy objectives.
Patrick Witte, Tejo Spit

Regional Accessibility: An Important Locational Factor

Frontmatter
Bottlenecks and Regional Economic Impact: Simulations with the CODE24 Transport Model
Abstract
Bottlenecks in transport infrastructure will change the behavior of logistics companies because of increasing costs of transportation. If a bottleneck in a railway network occurs, railway freight transport will be shifted to roadways. Railway congestion causes, for example, a decrease in reliability and a considerable increase in transport costs, and thus road transport becomes less expensive. The CODE24 Transport Model supports decision-making about choice of transport modes. All available information potentially affecting those decisions, such as regions, transport networks, terminals and logistic services, costs as well as transport or monetary flows, are integrated into the model. The model tries to find the shortest or most efficient route, e.g. with regard to transport costs.
In this article, economic effects along the railway corridor Rotterdam-Genoa were analyzed in a simulation of three different types of bottlenecks on railways by using the CODE24 Transport Model. The simulation shows a shift of freight transport from rail to road or from rail to barge, depending on different transport distances. The change of intermodal behavior increases transport costs, which can be calculated within the model. The simulation allows a better insight into the regional and overall costs generated by transport bottlenecks. The analysis indicates that an increase in transport costs for one transport mode, due to a bottleneck, has an impact on all the regions along the corridor and even more so on specific regions outside the corridor.
Hansjörg Drewello, Marcel Huschebeck, Norbert Schick
Comparative Analysis of Accessibility for Freight Transport in Corridor Regions: Results of Two Case Studies
Abstract
Regional accessibility is the main ‘product’ of a transport system in a region. It determines the locational advantage of an area relative to other areas. To measure regional accessibility, various quantitative indicators were developed in the past. The idea of most of those indicators is that the accessibility of a region is directly proportional to the attractiveness or size of the region, and indirectly proportional to distance, travel time or cost. As those indicators are based exclusively on quantitative data, qualitative aspects as the quality of the infrastructure and the quality of the supply of logistic services are neglected.
Therefore, a logistics accessibility analysis is performed for regions along the corridor. A methodology is presented which allows the examination and evaluation of qualitative aspects of regional accessibility concerning freight transport. An important module of this methodology is an expert assessment which addresses terminal and infrastructure operators as well as important forwarders. The aim is to identify regional issues as well as to reach an overview about a region’s logistics accessibility that allows a comparison with other regions in the corridor.
Finally the results of the exemplary application of this accessibility analysis in the corridor regions ‘Technology Region Karlsruhe’ and ‘Liguria’ are presented.
Alessandro Africani, Roberta Delpiano, Hansjörg Drewello, Antonello Fontanili, Marcel Huschebeck, Daniela Taake
Towards an Integrated Railway Network along the Genoa–Rotterdam Corridor
Abstract
New scenarios arose with the development of high speed rail (HSR) services: their shorter travel times make them competitive against the car on short distances and the aeroplane on medium to long distances. HSR integration is best realised if a hierarchical system is conceived whereby cities not served by HSR lines are well connected by rail [Chen and Hall (J Transp Geogr 19:689–704, 2011)]. Such integration among the different railway services, e.g. HSR, long distance and regional trains, and freight, plays a crucial role in being able to take advantage of these new opportunities. Moreover, the integration with interregional and local services would help provide better regional accessibility to HSR, allowing people living in the hinterland along the corridor to travel easily between regions. Better use of existing tracks will also contribute to avoiding or alleviating the saturation of the lines, thus allowing railways to achieve a better level of service without large new infrastructural projects. This chapter focuses on the current provision of high speed and long distance services along the Rhine–Alpine Corridor and presents a new methodology developed to assess their integration.
Maurizio Arnone, Tiziana Delmastro, Peter Endemann, Noriko Otsuka, Stefano Pensa, Andrea Rosa

Logistic Processes: Organizing Efficient Freight Transport in the Corridor Rotterdam-Genoa

Frontmatter
Evaluation of Impacts of Logistics Clusters in the Corridor Rotterdam–Genoa
Abstract
The emergence of logistics clusters is an economic development which could be observed in particular locations during the last decade. These locations are primarily linked to the global trade or have the function of a hinterland hub for these global links. They are characterized by a very high amount of handled goods, an excellent infrastructure of intermodal transfer facilities and a large pool of specialized labor. These factors lead to high economic growth, which can be read on specific indicators.
While the concept of industry or production clusters is well recognized in academic research, analyses of logistics clusters are marked by a definitional ambiguity of spatial and economic delineation of the study area. Authors identify global, national or regional clusters. There is, however, no complete list of identified clusters in academic literature concerning application-oriented cluster concepts. This is partly grounded in the definitional dispute over fundamental cluster structures, which determines the discussion on cluster concepts of recent years. While it still lacks an empirical concept to identify these clusters: Is a location already a cluster if an above-average amount of companies out of a particular industry branch is in a particular location? Or is it a cluster if actors denote “from inside out” the location as a cluster?
The paper gives an overview of the approach used in the project CODE24 with regional examples from case study areas.
Rudolf Juchelka, Julian Brenienek
Linking Terminal Ports to the Hinterland
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to show a simplified but effective reading of Genoa’s and Rotterdam’s port performances and their potential hinterland economic power, depicting port catchment area size at the NUTS 2 and NUTS 3 levels. Developing a multi-criteria approach, a proper methodology is designed to produce a Port Performance Indicator (PPI) as a synthetic tool to assess port performance at each end of the CODE24 axis with reference to a panel of Mediterranean ports (La Spezia, Marseille and Barcelona) and a panel of North European ports (Antwerp, Bremen and Hamburg), where the two ports of Genoa and Rotterdam are placed, respectively. The analysis demonstrates how the combination of the rail and road transport mode may extend the hinterland’s potential and its competitiveness over both the short and the long haul. The strength of the hinterlands of Genoa and Rotterdam is the extent of their intensive industrial and commercial activity and their dense infrastructural network.
Today, the greater flow along the corridor is southbound, while considerable northbound capacities are available. Further analyses were put in place to check for suitable conditions to render the setting up of a shuttle linking the Ligurian ports to the European intermodal network feasible. Due to their geographical location, transport chains via Ligurian ports can have time, flexibility and environmental advantages compared to other transport chains.
Alessandro Africani, Roberta Delpiano, Antonello Fontanili, Andreas Deutsch, Johannes Kohlschütter
Online Rail Freight Exchange (ORFE): Better Rail Competitiveness and Acceptance
Abstract
In many European countries, rail freight demand has increased considerably during the last 10–15 years. A closer look at the German case reveals that—given a considerable amount of empty wagons and an untransparent market—there is still some potential to increase efficiency and competitiveness of rail freight and to overcome knowledge and information barriers in the rail freight market.
Embedded in the CODE24 strategy, an online rail freight exchange (ORFE) is a useful instrument to cope with these challenges. ORFE is a market platform where rail freight services are offered and requested on-line.
Besides some initial business and case studies, the market’s relevance of such a tool and the requirements of potential users—predominantly shipping companies, transport logistics providers and rail operators—had to be explored. Therefore, a workshop was held with these groups and other experts in 2011. Based on the outcome, potential operators had to be identified.
In September 2012, CODE24 identified two companies who were interested in cooperating with the CODE24 network and developing such an online rail market ready for commercialisation. CODE24 decided to support both companies and emphasize their neutrality. The first platform is “railcargo-online” (http://​www.​railcargo-online.​com), the second platform is “freit-one” (http://​www.​freit-one.​de). The latter uses the software prototype developed in CODE24.
Both platforms are available since October 2013 and were presented at a joint workshop with the INTERREG-IVB programme in November 2013. A preliminary appraisal by February 2014 showed that both platforms are working well and count up to 80 registered companies. This paper uses metric tons throughout.
Peter Endemann
Inland Port Development
Abstract
In this article, the results of two studies aimed at improving coordination of inland port activities are presented. The first study analyses port development in urban areas, focusing on the case of the port and city of Mannheim. The second study deals with optimising capacity use within a network of ports. The Upper Rhine ports are analysed in terms of market development, capacity needs and the complementarities of the platforms. The study has recently led to a common investment master plan.
Both studies draw the conclusion that inland ports are an important factor in the further development of multimodal transport, providing essential services for an intelligent transport system. Needed support and development opportunities can be found by a cooperation approach.
Manfred Rausch, Nina Marzioch, Kerstin Ruppenthal
On the Way to a better Interoperability in the Upper Rhine
Results of a Feasibility Study for a Logistics Service Centre Lahr
Abstract
The former military airfield, today the startkLahr Airport & Business Park Raum Lahr with its 600 ha lies in the border triangle of Switzerland, France and Germany. The region of Lahr is situated in the south-west of Germany where the intermodal traffic link of the future trans-European Transport Network is available: rail, waterway, road and airway. The city of Lahr and the development agency IGZ/startkLahr have commissioned a feasibility study, co-financed by the European Union, researching the potential of the combination from area and transport infrastructure and the establishment of a multimodal node in Lahr. This study analyzes the framework, the added value and the impacts of a multimodal logistics service centre in the starkLahr Airport & Business Park Raum Lahr. The analysis focuses on three main issues:
a)
Analysis of the market potential including a competitor analysis and an analysis of the potentially qualified area
 
b)
Economic effects in the region
 
c)
Analysis of a qualified operator model, layout model and operational concept
 
The quantitative analysis comes to the conclusion that the installation of an intermodal logistics terminal in the startkLahr Airport & Business Park is realizable. From the perspective of the economy, the study predicts an added value for the whole region resulting from the terminal operation and the improved regional logistics service.
Markus Ibert, Daniel Halter

Environmental Aspects of Railway Infrastructure Development

Frontmatter
Noise Reduction in the Railway Corridor Rotterdam-Genoa: Observations within the Project CODE24
Abstract
The noise emissions of railway traffic, especially of the freight traffic are of the main challenges to gain acceptance for projects to improve the capacity of the corridor—infrastructural projects as well as operational measures. Even decision makers, planners as well as many affected persons have a lack of basic knowledge regarding on the impacts of noise and especially on the ways of function of noise mitigation measures. Hence the decision making procedures have to be improved in the aspects of objectivity, transparency and traceability.
Therefore, CODE24 gave an overview on the approaches in the field of noise protection along the corridor. Some commonalities showed up. Particularly, despite the priority of noise reduction on the source in all legal regulations, in all countries “classic” noise mitigation measures are dominant, especially noise protection walls. The allocation of funds and activities hence does not correspond to the objectively given possibilities for reductions of the impacts of railway noise. The acceptance in the public in many cases is low. The workshops and the survey showed indications, that this can be explained by a lack of knowledge on the on the ways of function of the different noise mitigation measures. CODE24 showed possibilities to strengthen the knowledge basis (toolbox) and especially to give a new and innovative approach (auralisation) to the resulting effects of noise mitigation measures that is much more transparent, traceable and intuitive than conventional ways of providing information, e.g. maps or numerical studies.
All discussions with decision makers and planners within CODE24 showed that noise mitigation concepts in the future have to be considered in an open and fair dialogue with the affected persons and will contain different sets of specific measures that are optimised for the given, from region to region significantly different situations along the corridor. CODE24 showed that all these target groups expect substantial improvements by the application of auralisations in these planning and participation processes in the future. The different bottlenecks along the corridor are starting points for the implementation.
Sebastian Wilske
Management of Ecological Compensation Measures
Abstract
CODE24—Corridor Development Rotterdam–Genoa, a project approved under the Strategic Initiatives Framework of the INTERREG IVB program, indicates a future development of the major European north-south axis connecting the Dutch port of Rotterdam and the Italian port of Genoa. Fifty percent of the north-south rail freight is operated along this corridor where 70 million inhabitants are living in this highly populated catchment area. Within the overall project CODE24, one action is focusing on innovative methods and solutions to reduce the negative impact of the corridor’s development on the environment. In a European project context, a comparison has been done of planning methods and policies concerning environmental compensation management caused by building and infrastructure projects. Partners from the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland and Italy were involved in the evaluation of different policies. The main aim of this action is to show how development and infrastructure projects along the corridor could be harmonised with national and European regulations related to nature and environmental protection. The strong linkage between possible impact and compensation measures needs to be more adequately managed in the future. Although legal preconditions for pooling and stocking of real estate and other compensation measures for major infrastructure projects were accomplished, their realisation and the implementation of impact regulations are often ineffective in respect of sustainability.
As a result of questionnaires and interviews for new, innovative and successful approaches for managing ecological compensation measures, the main objective remains to encounter the problem of finding suitable sites for compensation measures. The diversity of existing regulations concerning ecological compensation has been found to be extremely high. Some partner countries currently discuss or even prepare common regulations for ecological compensation. This adoption of a legal framework can be seen as a positive development in nature conservation policy to enhance a wider acceptance and transparency for implementation. A large-scale impact, such as a linear infrastructure development, requires a large-scale compensation. Stakeholders on a regional level should use the opportunity for necessary large-scale nature conservation projects and compensation pool-building. Coherent compensation pool-building, managed within an overall planning concept, will bring forward strategies for coherent sites and effective and sustainable measures that will show visible effects and real habitat improvements.
Claus Peinemann

Regions Participating in Development Procedures of European Transport Infrastructure

Frontmatter
The Consideration of Local Preferences in Transport Infrastructure Development: Lessons from the Economics of Federalism
Abstract
The construction of large public infrastructure projects of national importance, such as nuclear power plants, wind farms, electricity, highway or railway lines, regularly leads to mass protests in the population. The main problem is the impact of negative external effects on the people living nearby, which are not taken into consideration during the planning process by the national builders. Democratic coordination processes fail in solving the challenge, for here the problem of ‘institutional incongruence’ usually arises. This means that the policy makers responsible for the provision of public infrastructure, its users or those affected by it as well as the taxpayers, who finance these services, are not the same people. If the competencies for decision-making, use and financing are separated from one another, then incentives arise to live at the expense of others. The article examines the case of the expansion of the Rheintalbahn on the southern Upper Rhine using the Coase Theorem, and analyses the conditions under which negotiations between the parties involved can lead to an efficient result when building public infrastructure.
Hansjörg Drewello
The Extension of the Betuweroute: The Competition of Ideas in the Wesel District
Abstract
The extension of the Betuweroute is needed for fluent freight transport on rail and also for a rising share of rail in freight-traffic. In addition to that, the impacts of rising freight-traffic on Betuweroute especially by rail transit passing NRW had to be considered carefully so that suggestions for reduction of emissions can be made.
In order to achieve this goal and to activate the needed consensus around the proposal, Regionalverband Rhein-Ruhr (RVR) applied an informal planning procedure in close cooperation with County Wesel. The informal planning procedure should give solutions for an improved handling of rail freight and consider rail specific, spatial and urban aspects.
From the beginning it had been clear that this project was not a singular RVR project but a project that could be carried out in close co-operation with the local authorities only. Two teams of external consultants were chosen to work separately on three exemplary sections as shown on the right map. A team of university graduates ETH Zurich, Politecnico di Torino, University Utrecht took an overview on the whole section and worked on a broader range of themes. Three regional workshops were carried out with regional stakeholder. The results of these workshops, presented in this article, show alternatives for the development of the corridor, which may be more expensive then solutions provided by German Rail.
Frank Joneit
European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation: Giving a Voice to Local and Regional Government in European Infrastructure Development
Abstract
Since the Rhine–Alpine Corridor can be considered a spatially coherent axis with a multitude of common interests and interrelationships between the individual regional areas of the Corridor, there is a wide scope for cooperation. It was already clear at the beginning of the strategic initiative CODE24 that not all of the complex challenges of this major European axis could be solved in the 5-year project period. Therefore, a solution for continuing cooperation beyond the funding period of CODE24 had to be found. Consequently, the preparation of an appropriate legal form for further cooperation became one major objective of the partnership.
The establishment of a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) became the aim as a means to enable the regions, cities and other stakeholders of the Rhine–Alpine Corridor area to continue their cooperation, to speak with one voice and to keep on developing the Corridor jointly. The EGTC is now called 0 the Interregional Alliance for the Rhine–Alpine Corridor and was established during CODE24’s final conference in November 2014 in Mannheim.
Jörg Saalbach
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Integrated Spatial and Transport Infrastructure Development
herausgegeben von
Hansjörg Drewello
Bernd Scholl
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Electronic ISBN
978-3-319-15708-5
Print ISBN
978-3-319-15707-8
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15708-5