Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Why Regulate the ICT Sector? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Intellectual Property or Creative Commons?

verfasst von : V. Sridhar

Erschienen in: Emerging ICT Policies and Regulations

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are one of the arsenals of the ICT firms to attain competitive advantage. About 250,000 patents have been granted by the US Patent and Trademark office to just 5 ICT firms (IBM, Cisco, Microsoft, Google, and Apple). Software has been traditionally copyrighted and the accompanying exclusive rights created near monopolies such as Microsoft and Apple in the ICT space. However, there are movements such as Free and Open-Source Software, Copyright and patent commons have disrupted the IPR regime and have created compulsively newer methods of nurturing creativity and innovation. This chapter will address the following questions, in the ever-evolving field of IPR.
  • Should the IP policies encourage patenting?
  • How can market power of patent holder be regulated?
  • Should software programs be allowed to be patented?
  • What should be the policies regarding integration of IPR and standardization?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Spectrum Regulation: Case of V-Band
Nächstes Kapitel Who Governs the Internet?
Fußnoten
2
Details of the case are available at: https://​indiankanoon.​org/​doc/​61302183/​.
 
Literatur
Asongu, S. A., Singh, P., & Le Roux, S. (2018). Fighting software piracy: Some global conditional policy instruments. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 175–189.CrossRef
Band, J. (2018). The global API Copyright conflict. Harvard JL & Technology, 31, 615.
Brown, T., & Martin, R. (2015, September). Design for action. Harvard Business Review, 56–57.
Cohen, A. B. (1986). Masking copyright decision making: The meaninglessness of substantial similarity. UC DAViS l. Review, 20, 719.
Copyright Office, Government of India (GoI). (1957). The copyright act 1957 (14 of 1957).
Danaher, B., Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2017). Copyright enforcement in the digital age: Empirical evidence and policy implications.
Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), Government of India. (2016). Discussion paper on standard essential patents and their availability on FRAND terms.
Duan, R. (2019). Antonick v. Electronic arts: Expert witnesses ad Software Copyright Infringement. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 33(4), 1147.
Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2006). Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1057–1071.
Government of India (GoI). (1957). The Copyright Act 1957.
Government of India (GoI). (2000). The Designs Act 2000.
Government of India (GoI). (2015). Indian Patent Act 1970 (Amended 2015).
Government of India (GoI). (2016). Guidelines for examination of computer related inventions.
Indian Institute of Patent and Trademark Attorney (IIPTA). (2019). Patent landscape of LTE technology. Available at www.​iipta.​com. Accessed on May 16, 2019.
International Telecommunications Union (ITU). (2014). Understanding patents, competition & standardization in an interconnected world.
Koski, H. A. (2005). OSS production and licensing strategies of software firms. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2(2), 111–125.
Landy, G. (2008). The IT/digital legal companion. Syngress.
Lee, P., & Sunder, M. (2016). The law of look and feel. Santa Clara Law Review, 90, 529.
Lehmann, S., & Buxmann, P. (2009). Pricing strategies of software vendors. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(6), 452.CrossRef
Mankiw, G. (2012). Principles of microeconomics (6th ed.). Cengage Learning (Low cost Edition).
Mani, S. (2014, December 6). Emergence of India as the world leader in computer and information services. Economic & Political Weekly, xlix(49), 51–61.
Ministry of Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India. (2018, December). The information technology [Intermediary guidelines (Amendment) rules] 2018.
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India. (2019). Draft National e-Commerce Policy.
Ministry of Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India. (2008). The Information Technology Act 2008.
Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, Government of India (GoI). (2016). Guidelines for the examination of computer related inventions.
Sameulson, P. (2009). Are business methods patentable? Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 28–30.CrossRef
Sameulson, P. (2013). Is software patentable? Communications of the ACM, 56(11), 23–25.CrossRef
Samuelson, P. (2016). Apple v. Samsung and the upcoming design patent wars? Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 22–24.
Samuelson, P., & Asay, C. D. (2018). Saving software’s fair use future. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Forthcoming, 18–19.
Spence, M. (2007). Intellectual property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sridhar, V. (2012). Telecom revolution in India: Technology, regulation and policy. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press. ISBN-13: 978-0-19-807553-0; ISBN-10: 0-19-807553-7.
Wen, W., & Forman, C. (2016). Do patent commons and standards-setting organizations help navigate patent thickets? Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 42–43.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intellectual Property or Creative Commons?
verfasst von
V. Sridhar
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Emerging ICT Policies and Regulations

Print ISBN: 978-981-329-021-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-329-022-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9022-8_5

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise