Skip to main content

23.01.2019 | Research Paper

Interpersonal Offenses and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Forgiveness

verfasst von: Elena Gismero-González, Rafael Jódar, María Pilar Martínez, María José Carrasco, Virginia Cagigal, María Prieto-Ursúa

Erschienen in: Journal of Happiness Studies

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Despite increasing attention to the study of forgiveness, the links between forgiving real-life interpersonal hurts and psychological well-being have been overlooked. With a sample of 456 Spanish adults (aged 18–80 years), the aims of this study were to examine: (1) whether variables related with the victims’ appraisal of a specific offense (time elapsed, frequency, perceived severity, perceived intention) and their own beliefs about the nature of forgiveness (as either conditional or unconditional) are associated to their interpersonal forgiveness; (2) whether forgiveness plays a mediating role between the way in which victims appraise an offense and their levels of psychological well-being (PWB), and between their beliefs about the nature of forgiveness, and their levels of PWB; (3) the role that two different components of forgiveness (Absence of Negative and Presence of Positive feelings and thoughts about the hurt—“negF” and “posF”, respectively) might play on these relationships. We found that adults who forgive others tend to enjoy a greater sense of PWB than those who are less willing to forgive offenses. Frequency of the offense, its perceived severity and its perceived intention were associated with less forgiveness. Forgiveness mediated the relationship between the victims’ appraisal of the offense and their levels of PWB, specifically through negF (i.e., the victims’ ability to leave behind the negative thoughts and feelings associated with the transgression). Finally, the belief that forgiveness is unconditional or conditional has different relationships not only with forgiveness, but also with the victims’ PWB.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
As religion/spirituality has been found positively associated to specific forgiveness we included it among our controlled variables in this study: e.g., Davis et al. (2013), in their meta-analytic review of the literature on religion/spirituality (R/S) and forgiveness, found that R/S was positively related to specific forgiveness (r = .15); Fehr et al. (2010), in their meta-analysis also report significant correlations of religiosity and social desirability with forgiveness (\({\bar{r}}=19\); \({\bar{r}}=10\)).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Díaz, D., Rodríguez, R., Blanco, A., Moreno, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., et al. (2006). Adaptación española de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema,18(3), 572–577. Díaz, D., Rodríguez, R., Blanco, A., Moreno, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., et al. (2006). Adaptación española de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema,18(3), 572–577.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin,95, 542–575.CrossRef Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin,95, 542–575.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1), 71–75.CrossRef Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1), 71–75.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diener, E., Fujita, F., Tay, L., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2012). Purpose, mood, and pleasure in predicting satisfaction judgments. Social Indicators Research,105, 333–341.CrossRef Diener, E., Fujita, F., Tay, L., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2012). Purpose, mood, and pleasure in predicting satisfaction judgments. Social Indicators Research,105, 333–341.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Enright, R. D., Rique, J., & Coyle, C. T. (2000). The Enright Forgiveness Inventory (EFI) user’s manual. Madison: The International Forgiveness Institute. Enright, R. D., Rique, J., & Coyle, C. T. (2000). The Enright Forgiveness Inventory (EFI) user’s manual. Madison: The International Forgiveness Institute.
Zurück zum Zitat Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships,7, 1–23.CrossRef Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships,7, 1–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gunderson, P. R., & Ferrari, J. R. (2008). Forgiveness of sexual cheating in romantic relationships: Effects of discovery method, frequency of offense, and presence of apology. North American Journal of Psychology,10, 1–14. Gunderson, P. R., & Ferrari, J. R. (2008). Forgiveness of sexual cheating in romantic relationships: Effects of discovery method, frequency of offense, and presence of apology. North American Journal of Psychology,10, 1–14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guildford Press. Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guildford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminer, D., Stein, D. J., Mbanga, I., & Zungu-Dirwayi, N. (2000). Forgiveness: Toward an integration of theoretical models. Psychiatry,63(4), 344–357.CrossRef Kaminer, D., Stein, D. J., Mbanga, I., & Zungu-Dirwayi, N. (2000). Forgiveness: Toward an integration of theoretical models. Psychiatry,63(4), 344–357.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Krause, N., & Ellison, C. G. (2003). Forgiveness by God, forgiveness of others, and psychological well-being in late life. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,42(1), 77–94.CrossRef Krause, N., & Ellison, C. G. (2003). Forgiveness by God, forgiveness of others, and psychological well-being in late life. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,42(1), 77–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuyuki, M. (2011). An examination of the process of forgiveness and the relationship among state forgiveness, self-compassion, and psychological well-being experienced by Buddhists in the United States (Theses and Dissertations-Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology. Paper 1). http://uknowledge.uky.edu/edp_etds/1. Accessed 1 Dec 2016. Matsuyuki, M. (2011). An examination of the process of forgiveness and the relationship among state forgiveness, self-compassion, and psychological well-being experienced by Buddhists in the United States (Theses and Dissertations-Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology. Paper 1). http://​uknowledge.​uky.​edu/​edp_​etds/​1. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science,10, 194–197.CrossRef McCullough, M. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it? Current Directions in Psychological Science,10, 194–197.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., Luna, L. R., Berry, J. W., Tabak, B. A., & Bono, G. (2010). On the form and function of forgiving: Modeling the time-forgiveness relationship and testing the valuable relationship hypothesis. Emotion,10(3), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019349.CrossRef McCullough, M. E., Luna, L. R., Berry, J. W., Tabak, B. A., & Bono, G. (2010). On the form and function of forgiving: Modeling the time-forgiveness relationship and testing the valuable relationship hypothesis. Emotion,10(3), 358–376. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0019349.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.). (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.). (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 1586–1603.CrossRef McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 1586–1603.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 887–897.CrossRef McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 887–897.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(2), 321–326.CrossRef McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73(2), 321–326.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.CrossRef Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology,52, 141–166.CrossRef Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology,52, 141–166.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. I., Ali, M. A., Beck, G. L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., et al. (2001). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 17–40). New York: Guilford Press. Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. I., Ali, M. A., Beck, G. L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., et al. (2001). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 17–40). New York: Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRef Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schnell, T. (2014). An empirical approach to existential psychology: Meaning in life operationalized. In S. Kreitler & T. Urbanek (Eds.), Conceptions of meaning (pp. 173–194). New York: Nova Science. Schnell, T. (2014). An empirical approach to existential psychology: Meaning in life operationalized. In S. Kreitler & T. Urbanek (Eds.), Conceptions of meaning (pp. 173–194). New York: Nova Science.
Zurück zum Zitat Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Theoretical and empirical connections between forgiveness, mental health, and well-being. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 349–362). New York: Routledge. Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Theoretical and empirical connections between forgiveness, mental health, and well-being. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 349–362). New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2001). Unforgiveness, forgiveness, and reconciliation in societies. In R. G. Helmick & R. L. Petersen (Eds.), Forgiveness and reconciliation: Religion, public policy, and conflict transformation (pp. 161–182). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press. Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2001). Unforgiveness, forgiveness, and reconciliation in societies. In R. G. Helmick & R. L. Petersen (Eds.), Forgiveness and reconciliation: Religion, public policy, and conflict transformation (pp. 161–182). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Worthington, E. L., Jr., Witvliet, C., Lerner, A., & Scherer, M. (2005). Forgiveness in health research and medical practice. Explore,1, 169–176.CrossRef Worthington, E. L., Jr., Witvliet, C., Lerner, A., & Scherer, M. (2005). Forgiveness in health research and medical practice. Explore,1, 169–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Worthington, E. L., Jr., Witvliet, C., Pietrini, P., & Miller, A. J. (2007). Forgiveness, health, and well-being: A review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness, and reduced unforgiveness. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,30(4), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9105-8.CrossRef Worthington, E. L., Jr., Witvliet, C., Pietrini, P., & Miller, A. J. (2007). Forgiveness, health, and well-being: A review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness, and reduced unforgiveness. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,30(4), 291–302. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10865-007-9105-8.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Interpersonal Offenses and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Forgiveness
verfasst von
Elena Gismero-González
Rafael Jódar
María Pilar Martínez
María José Carrasco
Virginia Cagigal
María Prieto-Ursúa
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Happiness Studies
Print ISSN: 1389-4978
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7780
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-00070-x