Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Introduction

verfasst von : Kyriazis Pitilakis, Paolo Franchin

Erschienen in: SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter outlines the SYNER-G project, its objectives and structure. A short literature review of the vulnerability and risk assessment of infrastructural systems and their components highlights the framework of the past works and the challenges anticipated. The main issues for the systemic risk analysis are shortly described including the SYNER-G taxonomy, the seismic hazard estimates, the intensity measures and fragility curves, the systemic analysis methods and performance indicators, the treatment of uncertainties and socio-economic issues of the analysis. Finally, the applications that have been performed to test the SYNER-G methodology and tools are also outlined.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel A Computational Framework for Systemic Seismic Risk Analysis of Civil Infrastructural Systems
Fußnoten
1
The references cited in this section by no means intend to be an exhaustive review of the relevant literature, and they represent only a subjective selection for illustrative purposes.
 
Literatur
Adachi T, Ellingwood BR (2006) Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:78–88CrossRef
Adachi T, Ellingwood BR (2008) Service ability of earthquake-damaged water systems: effects of electrical power availability and power back up systems on system vulnerability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(1):78–88CrossRef
Arianos S, Bompard E, Carbone A, Xue F (2009) Power grid vulnerability: a complex network approach. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlin Sci 19(1):013119CrossRef
ATC-25 (Applied Technology Council) (1992) A model methodology for assessment of seismic vulnerability and impact distribution of water supply systems. Report no: ATC-25-1, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA
Awumah K, Goulter I, Bhatt S (1991) Entropy-based redundancy measures in water distribution network design. J Hydraul Eng 117(3):595–614CrossRef
Bal IE, Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ, Crowley H, Pinho R (2010) The influence of geographical resolution of urban exposure data in an earthquake loss model for Istanbul. Earthq Spectra 26(3):619–634CrossRef
Ballantyne DB, Berg E, Kennedy J, Reneau R, Wu D (1990) Earthquake loss estimation modelling of Seattle water system. Technical report. Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton, Federal Way, 139p
Benoît R, Sabourin J-P, Glaus M, Petit F, Senay M-H (2003) Chapter 17: A new structural approach for the study of domino effects between life support networks. In: Kreimer A, Arnold M, Carlin A (eds) Building safer cities. The future of disaster risk. The World Bank, Disaster Management Facility, Washington, DC
Bompard E, Wu D, Xue F (2011) Structural vulnerability of power systems: a topological approach. Electr Power Syst Res 81(7):1334–1340CrossRef
Buritica JA, Tesfamariam S, Sánchez-Silva M (2012) Seismic vulnerability assessment of power transmission networks using complex-systems based methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal
Bush B, Giguere P, Holland J, Linger S, McCown A, Salazar M, Unal C, Visarraga D, Werley K, Fisher R, Folga S, Jusko M, Kavicky J, McLamore M, Portante E, Shamsuddin S (2003) Interdependent Energy Infrastructure Simulation System (IEISS) technical reference manual, Version 1.0. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-03-1318
Cagno E, De Ambroggi M, Grande O, Trucco P (2011) Risk analysis of underground infrastructures in urban areas. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(1):139–148CrossRef
Cardellini V, Casalicchio E, Galli E (2007) Agent-based modeling of interdependencies in critical infrastructures through UML. In: Proceedings of Agent-Directed Simulation Symposium (ADS’07) of spring simulation multiconference, Norfolk, VA, March 2007
Cardona OD, Ordaz MG, Reinoso E, Yamín LE, Barbar AH (2012) CAPRA – comprehensive approach to probabilistic risk assessment: international initiative for risk management effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference of earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 Sept 2012
Chang L, Song J (2007) Matrix-based system reliability analysis of urban infrastructure networks: a case study of MLGW natural gas network. In: Proceedings of the 5th China-Japan-US trilateral symposium on lifeline earthquake engineering, Haikou, China, 26–28 Nov
Chang SE, Svekla WD, Shinozuka M (2002) Linking infrastructure and urban economy: simulation of water disruption impacts in earthquakes. Environ Plan B 29(2):281–301CrossRef
Chang L, Elnashai AS, Spencer BF Jr, Song J, Ouyang Y (2011) Transportation system modelling and applications in earthquake engineering. Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, Report 10-03
Crowley H, Pinho R, Pagani M, Keller N (2013) Chapter 30: Assessing global earthquake risks: the Global Earthquake Model (GEM) initiative. In: Tesfamariam S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Philadelphia, pp 815–838CrossRef
Dudenhoeffer P, Permann D (2006) Critical infrastructure interdependency modelling: a survey of US and international research. Report INL/EXT-06-11464, Idaho National Laboratory
Dueñas-Osorio L, Kwasinski A (2012) Quantification of lifeline system interdependencies after the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 offshore Maule, Chile, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 28(S1):S581–S603CrossRef
Dueñas-Osorio L, Vemuru SM (2009) Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems. Struct Saf 31(2):157–167CrossRef
Dueñas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (2007a) Seismic response of critical interdependent networks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:285–306CrossRef
Dueñas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ, Bostrom A (2007b) Interdependent response of networked systems. ASCE J Infrastruct Syst 13:185–194CrossRef
FEMA (1999) HAZUS-99: earthquake loss estimation methodology, developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with the National Institute of Building Sciences
Franchin P, Lupoi A, Pinto PE (2006) On the role of road networks in reducing human losses after earthquakes. J Earthq Eng 10(2):195–206
Giannini R, Pinto PE, Vanzi I (1999) Earthquake hazard analysis software: ASKxELP. Assessment of Seismic risK for Electric Power networks and interaction with other indicators of seismic damage. National Information Service for Earthquake Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Goda K, Hong HP (2008) Estimation of seismic loss for spatially distributed buildings. Earthq Spectra 24(4):889–910CrossRef
Hancilar U, Taucer F (eds) (2013) Guidelines for typology definition of European physical assets for earthquake risk assessment. SYNER-G reference report 2, Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-28973-6
Helseth A, Holen AT (2006) Reliability modelling of gas and electric power distribution systems; similarities and differences. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems, Stockholm, Sweden, 11–15 June
Hernandez-Fajardo I, Dueñas-Osorio L (2011) Sequential propagation of seismic fragility across interdependent lifeline systems. Earthq Spectra 27(1):23–43CrossRef
Hernandez-Fajardo I, Dueñas-Osorio L (2013) Probabilistic study of cascading failures in complex interdependent lifeline systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:260–272CrossRef
Hoshiya M, Yamamoto K (2002) Redundancy index of lifeline systems. J Eng Mech ASCE 128(9):961–968CrossRef
Hoshiya M, Yamamoto K, Ohno H (2004) Redundancy index of lifeline for mitigation measures against seismic risk. Probab Eng Mech 19:205–210CrossRef
Hwang H, Lin H, Shinozuka M (1998) Seismic performance assessment of water distribution systems. ASCE J Infrastruct Syst 4(3):118–125CrossRef
Isoyama R, Katayama T (1981) Reliability evaluation of water supply systems during earth-quakes. Report of Institute of Industrial Science University at Tokyo, Feb, 30(1)
Javanbarg MB, Takada S (2009) Seismic reliability assessment of water supply systems. In: Proceedings 10th international conference on structural safety and reliability, Osaka, 13–17 Sept 2009
Javanbarg MB, Takada S, Kuwata Y (2006) Seismic vulnerability evaluation of water delivery system. In: Proceedings of the 12th Japan earthquake engineering symposium, Tokyo, Japan
Johansson J, Hassel H (2010) An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(120):1335–1344CrossRef
Kalungi P, Tanyimboh TT (2003) Redundancy model for water distribution system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 82:275–286CrossRef
Kameda H (2000) Engineering management of lifeline systems under earthquake risk. In: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, New Zealand society for earthquake engineering, Upper Hutt, NZ
Kang WH, Song J, Gardoni P (2008) Matrix-based system reliability method and applications to bridge networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:1584–1593CrossRef
Karaca E (2005) Regional earthquake loss estimation: role of transportation network, sensitivity and uncertainty, and risk mitigation. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA
Kawakami H (1990) Earthquake physical damage and functional serviceability of lifeline network models. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19:1153–1165CrossRef
Kim Y, Kang W-H (2013) Network reliability analysis of complex systems using a non-simulation-based method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 110:80–88CrossRef
Kim Y-S, Spencer BF Jr, Song J, Elnashai AS, Stokes T (2007) Seismic performance assessment of interdependent lifeline systems. Mid-America Earthquake Center report TR 07-16
Kiremidjian AS, Stergiou E, Lee R (2007) Chapter 19: Issues in seismic risk assessment of transportation networks. In: Earthquake geotechnical engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 939–964
Laprie J-C, Kanoun K, Kaâniche M (2007) Modelling interdependencies between the electricity and information infrastructure. In: 26th international conference on computer safety, reliability and security, SAFECOMP-2007, Nurenberg
Leung M, Haimes YY, Santos JR (2007) Supply- and output-side extensions to the inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructures. J Infrastruct Syst ASCE 13(4):299–310CrossRef
Li J, He J (2002) A recursive decomposition algorithm for network seismic reliability evaluation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(8):1525–1539CrossRef
Li J, Shulin W, Wei L (2006) Seismic reliability analysis of urban water distribution network. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 5(1):71–77CrossRef
Little RG (2002) Controlling cascading failure: understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. J Urb Technol 9(1):109–123CrossRef
Ma J, Huang Z, Wong PC, Ferryman T, Northwest P (2010) Probabilistic vulnerability assessment based on power flow and voltage distribution. In: Proceedings of the transmission and distribution conference and exposition, 2010 IEEE PES, pp 1–8
Macaulay T (2008) Critical infrastructure: understanding its component parts, vulnerabilities, operating risks, and interdependencies. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca RatonCrossRef
Mahsuli M, Haukaas T (2013) Computer program for multimodel reliability and optimization analysis. J Comput Civ Eng 27(1):87–98CrossRef
Markov IJ, Grigoriu M, O’Rourke TD (1994) An evaluation of seismic serviceability of water supply networks with application to San Francisco auxiliary water supply system, Technical report, NCEER-94-0001. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo
Matsuda EN, Savage WU, Williams KK, Laguens GC (1991) Earthquake evaluation of a substation network. In: Proceedings of 3rd U.S. conference technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering, ASCE, pp 295–317
Menoni S, Pergalani F, Boni MP, Petrini V (2002) Lifelines earthquake vulnerability assessment: a systemic approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(12):1199–1208CrossRef
Nojima N (2010) Earthquake damage assessment of multiple lifelines for system interaction analysis. In: 7th international conference on urban earthquake engineering (7CUEE) & 5th international conference on earthquake engineering (5ICEE), Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Nuti C, Rasulo A, Vanzi I (2007) Seismic safety evaluation of electric power supply at urban level. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(2):245–263CrossRef
O’Rourke TD, Palmer MC (1996) Earthquake performance of gas transmission pipelines. Earthq Spectra 20(3):493–527CrossRef
O’Rourke TD, Grigoriu MD, Khater MM (1985) Seismic response of buried pipes. In: Sundrarajan C (ed) Pressure vessel and piping technology – a decade of progress. ASME, New York, pp 281–323
Ouyang M, Dueñas-Osorio L (2011) Efficient approach to compute generalized interdependent effects between infrastructure systems. J Comput Civ Eng 25(5):394–406CrossRef
Ouyang M, Hong L, Mao Z-J, Yu M-H, Qi F (2009) A methodological approach to analyze vulnerability of interdependent infrastructures. Simul Model Pract Theory 17:817–828CrossRef
Parodi S, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S, Pagnini C (2010) Probabilistic seismic damage scenario by mechanical models: the case study of Sulmona (Italy), 14ECEE, MAEE
Peerenboom J, Fisher R, Whitfield R (2001) Recovering from disruptions of interdependent critical infrastructures. Workshop on mitigating the vulnerability of critical infrastructures to catastrophic failures, Lyceum, Alexandria, Virginia
Pires JA, Ang AH-S, Villaverde R (1996) Seismic reliability of electrical power transmission systems. Nucl Eng Des 160(3):427–439CrossRef
Pitilakis K, Crowley H, Kaynia A (eds) (2014) SYNER-G: typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk, vol 27, Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. ISBN 978-94-007-7871-9
Poljanšek K, Bono F, Gutiérrez E (2012) Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: the case of European gas and electricity networks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(1):61–79CrossRef
Rinaldi SM (2004) Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies. In: Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. doi:10.​1109/​HICSS.​2004.​1265180
Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK (2001) Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Syst Mag 21(6):11–25CrossRef
Rosato V, Issaacharoff L, Tiriticco F, Meloni S, De Porcellinis S, Setola R (2008) Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models. Int J Crit Infrastruct 4(1/2):63–79CrossRef
Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25(10):1241–1263CrossRef
Scawthorn C, O’Rourke TD, Balckburn FT (2006) The San Francisco earthquake and fire of 1906 – enduring lesson for fire protection and water supply. Earthq Spectra 22(S2):S135–S158CrossRef
Schläpfer M, Kessler T, Kröger W (2008) Reliability analysis of electric power systems using an object-oriented hybrid modeling approach. In: Proceedings of the 16th power systems computation conference, Glasgow, Scotland
Shi P, O’Rourke TD, Wang Y (2006) Simulation of earthquake water supply performance. In: Proceedings of 8th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, CA, Paper no. 1285
Shinozuka M, Tan RY, Koike T (1981) Serviceability of water transmission systems under seismic risk. The current state of knowledge. In: Proceedings of the ASCE specialty conference on lifeline earthquake engineering, Oakland, CA, pp 97–110
Shinozuka M, Hwang H, Murata M (1992) Impact on water supply of a seismically damaged water delivery system. In: Ballantyne DB (ed) Lifeline earthquake engineering in the central and eastern US, Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering monograph, no. 5. ASCE, Reston, pp 43–57
Shinozuka M, Murachi Y, Dong X, Zhou Y, Orlikowski M (2003a) Effect of seismic retrofit of bridges on transportation networks. Research progress and accomplishments 2001–2003. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, pp 35–49
Shinozuka M, Murachi Y, Dong X, Zhu Y, Orlikowski MJ (2003b) Seismic performance of high-way transportation networks. In: Proceedings of China-US workshop on protection of urban infra-structure and public buildings against earthquakes and man-made disasters, Beijing, China
Shiraki N, Shinozuka M, Moore JE II, Chang SE, Kameda H, Tanaka S (2007) System risk curves: probabilistic performance scenarios for highway networks subject to earthquake dam-age. J Infrastruct Syst 213(1):43–54CrossRef
Shizuma T, Nakamura T, Yoshikawa H (2009) Evaluation of outage time for a system consisting of distributed facilities considering seismic damage correlation. In: 10th international conference on structural safety and reliability, ICOSSAR, Osaka, Japan
Shumuta Y (2007) Practical seismic upgrade strategy for substation equipment based on performance indices. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(2):209–226CrossRef
Spence et al (2007) LESSLOSS report 2007/07. Earthquake disaster scenarios prediction and loss modelling for urban areas. (Note: risk scenarios in Lisbon, Istanbul and Thessaloniki)
Tang A, Wen A (2008) An intelligent simulation system for earthquake disaster assessment. Comput Geosci 35(5):871–879CrossRef
Taylor CE (1991) Seismic loss estimation for a hypothetical water system, Technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering monograph no. 2. ASCE, Reston
Vanzi I (1996) Seismic reliability of electric power networks: methodology and application. Struct Saf 18(4):311–327CrossRef
Vanzi I (2000) Structural upgrading strategy for electric power networks under seismic action. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29(7):1053–1073CrossRef
Wang Y, Siu-Kui A, Qiang F (2010) Seismic risk assessment and mitigation of water supply systems. Earthq Spectra 26(1):257–274CrossRef
Xingbin Y, Singh C (2004) A practical approach for integrated power system vulnerability analysis with protection failures. Power Syst IEEE Trans 19(4):1811–1820CrossRef
Yao B, Xie L, Huo E (2004) Study effect on lifeline interaction under seismic conditions. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Yeh CH, Loh CH, Tsai KC (2006) Overview of Taiwan earthquake loss estimation system. Nat Hazards 37(1–2):23–37CrossRef
Zhang P, Peeta S (2011) A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transp Res B Methodol 45(3):553–579CrossRef
Zhou Y, Murachi Y, Kim S, Shinozuka M (2004) Seismic risk assessment of retrofitted transportation systems. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction
verfasst von
Kyriazis Pitilakis
Paolo Franchin
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities

Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8834-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-017-8835-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8835-9_1