Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Introduction

verfasst von : Caroline Cauffman, Qian Hao

Erschienen in: Procedural Rights in Competition Law in the EU and China

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Procedural rights are an essential tool for guaranteeing that the rule of law is respected in competition cases. This applies both in merger cases, where the competition authority needs to clear the merger before it takes effect (ex ante cases), and in infringement cases, where the competition authority sanctions an infringement that already took place (ex post cases). In both cases, stakes for the undertakings are high. The clearance (or non-clearance) of a merger determines the future profit-making ability of an undertaking. In infringement cases, sanctions tend to be severe, which may be reflected in share value and may have an impact on the image of the undertaking. Differences in procedural rights may hamper international cooperation between competition authorities. Moreover, weak or non-existing procedural rights may have an impact on the readiness of international undertakings to enter the market in question.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Cf. infra, contribution by M. Albers.
 
2
See, e.g., Anderson and Cuff (2011), Andreangeli (2005), Andreangeli (2008), Bellamy (2012), Bronckers and Vallery (2011), Giannakopoulos (2004), Lenaerts and Vanhamme (1997), MacCulloch (2006), Nazzini (2005), Tran Thiet (2010), Wils (2004, 2011, 2012, 2014) and Veenbrink (2015).
 
3
See, e.g., Forrester (2009) and Venit (2009).
 
4
Kallay (2008).
 
5
See, e.g., Emch and Hao (2007) and Han and Wang (2014).
 
6
See, e.g., Han and Wang (2014); Harris (2014).
 
7
Zhang and Zhang (2010).
 
8
See, e.g., Case 33/76, Rewe v Landwirtschaftskammer Saarland, [1976] ECR 1989, para 5; Case 45/76, Comet v Produktschap voor Siergewassen, [1976] ECR 2043, para 13 and 16.
 
9
Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union, O.J. L 349, 5.12.2014, pp. 1–19.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson D, Cuff R (2011) Cartels in the European Union: procedural fairness for defendants and claimants. Fordham Int Law J 34:385–430 Anderson D, Cuff R (2011) Cartels in the European Union: procedural fairness for defendants and claimants. Fordham Int Law J 34:385–430
Zurück zum Zitat Andreangeli A (2005) The protection of legal professional privilege in EU law and the impact of the rules on the exchange of information within the European Competition Network on the secrecy of communications between lawyer and client: one step forward, two steps back? Competition Law Rev 2(1):31–54 Andreangeli A (2005) The protection of legal professional privilege in EU law and the impact of the rules on the exchange of information within the European Competition Network on the secrecy of communications between lawyer and client: one step forward, two steps back? Competition Law Rev 2(1):31–54
Zurück zum Zitat Andreangeli A (2008) EU competition enforcement and human Rights. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRef Andreangeli A (2008) EU competition enforcement and human Rights. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bellamy C (2012) ECHR and competition law post Menarini: an overview of EU and national case law. e-Competitions, N°47946, 5 July 2012 Bellamy C (2012) ECHR and competition law post Menarini: an overview of EU and national case law. e-Competitions, N°47946, 5 July 2012
Zurück zum Zitat Bronckers M, Vallery A (2011) No longer presumed guilty? The impact of fundamental rights on certain dogmas of EU competition law. World Competition 34(4):535–570 Bronckers M, Vallery A (2011) No longer presumed guilty? The impact of fundamental rights on certain dogmas of EU competition law. World Competition 34(4):535–570
Zurück zum Zitat Forrester IS (2009) Due process in EC competition cases: a distinguished institution with flawed procedures. Eur Law Rev 34:817 Forrester IS (2009) Due process in EC competition cases: a distinguished institution with flawed procedures. Eur Law Rev 34:817
Zurück zum Zitat Giannakopoulos T (2004) Safeguarding companies’ rights in competition and antidumping/anti-subsidies proceedings. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Giannakopoulos T (2004) Safeguarding companies’ rights in competition and antidumping/anti-subsidies proceedings. Kluwer Law International, The Hague
Zurück zum Zitat Han M, Wang J (2014) Due process in Chinese competition law regime. CPI Chronicle 6(1) Han M, Wang J (2014) Due process in Chinese competition law regime. CPI Chronicle 6(1)
Zurück zum Zitat Harris HS (2014) Due process and procedural rights under China Anti-Monopoly law. CPI Chronicle 6(1) Harris HS (2014) Due process and procedural rights under China Anti-Monopoly law. CPI Chronicle 6(1)
Zurück zum Zitat Lenaerts K, Vanhamme J (1997) Procedural rights of private parties in the community administrative process. Common Mark Law Rev 34:531–569CrossRef Lenaerts K, Vanhamme J (1997) Procedural rights of private parties in the community administrative process. Common Mark Law Rev 34:531–569CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacCulloch A (2006) The privilege against self-incrimination in competition investigations: theoretical foundations and practical implications. Leg Stud 26(2):211–237CrossRef MacCulloch A (2006) The privilege against self-incrimination in competition investigations: theoretical foundations and practical implications. Leg Stud 26(2):211–237CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nazzini R (2005) Some reflections on the dynamics of the due process discourse in EC competition law. Competition Law Rev 2(1):5–30 Nazzini R (2005) Some reflections on the dynamics of the due process discourse in EC competition law. Competition Law Rev 2(1):5–30
Zurück zum Zitat Tran Thiet J-P (2010) Les principes du process équitable face aux procédures de concurrence. Concurrences: 10–12 Tran Thiet J-P (2010) Les principes du process équitable face aux procédures de concurrence. Concurrences: 10–12
Zurück zum Zitat Veenbrink M (2015) The privilege against self-incrimination in EU competition law: a deafening silence? Leg Issues Econ Integration 42(2):119–142 Veenbrink M (2015) The privilege against self-incrimination in EU competition law: a deafening silence? Leg Issues Econ Integration 42(2):119–142
Zurück zum Zitat Venit JS (2009) Human all too human: the gathering and assessment of evidence and the appropriate standard of proof and judicial review in commission enforcement proceedings applying Articles 81 and 82. Eur Competition Law Annu: 191–253 Venit JS (2009) Human all too human: the gathering and assessment of evidence and the appropriate standard of proof and judicial review in commission enforcement proceedings applying Articles 81 and 82. Eur Competition Law Annu: 191–253
Zurück zum Zitat Wils WPJ (2011) EU Anti-trust Enforcement Powers and Procedural Rights and Guarantees: The Interplay between EU Law, National Law, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights. World Competition 34(2):189–213 Wils WPJ (2011) EU Anti-trust Enforcement Powers and Procedural Rights and Guarantees: The Interplay between EU Law, National Law, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights. World Competition 34(2):189–213
Zurück zum Zitat Wils WPJ (2012) The oral hearing in competition proceedings before the European Commission. World Competition 35(3):397–430 Wils WPJ (2012) The oral hearing in competition proceedings before the European Commission. World Competition 35(3):397–430
Zurück zum Zitat Wils WPJ (2014) The compatibility with fundamental rights of the EU Antitrust Enforcement System in which the European Commission acts both as investigator and as first-instance decision maker. World Competition 37(1):5–25 Wils WPJ (2014) The compatibility with fundamental rights of the EU Antitrust Enforcement System in which the European Commission acts both as investigator and as first-instance decision maker. World Competition 37(1):5–25
Zurück zum Zitat Wils WPJ (2004) The combination of the investigative and prosecutorial function and the adjudicative function in EC antitrust enforcement: a legal and economic analysis. World Competition 27(2):201–224 Wils WPJ (2004) The combination of the investigative and prosecutorial function and the adjudicative function in EC antitrust enforcement: a legal and economic analysis. World Competition 27(2):201–224
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Zhang VY (2010) Chinese merger control: patterns and limitations. J Competition Law Econ 6(2):477–496CrossRef Zhang X, Zhang VY (2010) Chinese merger control: patterns and limitations. J Competition Law Econ 6(2):477–496CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction
verfasst von
Caroline Cauffman
Qian Hao
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48735-8_1

Premium Partner