1 Introduction and preliminaries
Let ω, c, \(c_{0}\), \(l_{\infty }\) denote sequence space, convergent, null and bounded sequences respectively, with norm \(\|x\|_{\infty }= \sup_{k\in \mathbb{N}}|x_{k}|\). The idea of difference sequence spaces was defined by Kizmaz as follows:
$$\lambda (\Delta )=\bigl\{ x=(x_{n})\in \omega :(x_{n}-x_{n+1}) \in \lambda \bigr\} ,\quad \mbox{for }\lambda \in \{l_{\infty },c, c_{0}\}. $$
Recently, many authors have made a new approach to construct sequence spaces using matrix domain [2, 3, 8, 10]. Lately, Kara [9] has investigated difference sequence space.
which is derived from the Fibonacci difference matrix \(\hat{F}= \hat{(f_{nk})}\) as follows:
where \((f_{n}), n\in \mathbb{N}\) is the sequence of Fibonacci numbers given by the linear recurrence relation as \(f_{0} = 1 =f_{1}\) and \(f_{n-1}+f_{n-2}= f_{n}\) for \(n\geq 2\). Quite recently, Khan et al. [13] defined the notion of I-convergent Fibonacci difference sequence spaces as \(c_{0}^{I}(\hat{F})\), \(c^{I}(\hat{F})\) and \(l_{\infty }^{I}(\hat{F})\). Fibonacci numbers have various applications in the fields of arts, science and architecture. For further details, refer to [4, 11].
$$l_{\infty }(\hat{F})= \biggl\{ x=(x_{n})\in \omega : \sup _{n\in \mathbb{N}} \biggl\vert \frac{f_{n}}{f_{n+1}}x_{n}- \frac{f_{n+1}}{f _{n}}x_{n-1} \biggr\vert < \infty \biggr\} , $$
$$\hat{f_{nk}}= \textstyle\begin{cases} -\frac{f_{n+1}}{f_{n}} &k=n-1, \\ \frac{f_{n}}{f_{n+1}} &k=n, \\ 0 &0\leq k< n-1\mbox{ or } k> n, \end{cases} $$
Anzeige
Fuzzy logic was first introduced by Zadeh in 1965 [24] and it found its applications in various fields like control theory, artificial intelligence, robotics. Later on many authors [7, 16] investigated fuzzy topology to define fuzzy metric space. As a generalisation of fuzzy sets, Atanassov [1] defined the view of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Intuitionistic fuzzy normed space [18] and 2-normed space [17] are the recent studies in fuzzy theory.
Kostyrko et al. [15] in 1999 generalised the idea of statistical convergence [6, 21] to ideal convergence. Further this idea was investigated by Salat, Tripathy and Ziman [19, 20], Tripathy and Hazarika [22, 23] and many others.
We recall certain definitions which will be useful in this paper.
Definition 1.1
([21])
Anzeige
A sequence \(x=(x_{n}) \in \omega \) is statistically convergent to \(\xi \in \mathbb{R}\) if for every \(\epsilon >0 \) the set \(\{n\in \mathbb{N}:|x_{n}-\xi |\geq \epsilon \}\) has asymptotic density zero. We write st-\(\lim x =\xi \). If \(\xi = 0\), then \(x=(x_{n})\) is called st–null.
Definition 1.2
A sequence \(x=(x_{n})\in \omega \) is called statistically Cauchy sequence if, for every \(\epsilon >0\), ∃ a number \(N=N(\epsilon )\) such that
$$\lim_{n} \frac{1}{n} \bigl\vert \bigl\{ j\leq n: \vert x_{j}-x_{N} \vert \geq \epsilon \bigr\} \bigr\vert =0. $$
Definition 1.3
([14])
An ideal means a family of sets \(I \subset P(X)\) satisfying the following conditions: An ideal is said to be non-trivial if \(I\neq 2^{X}\) and admissible if \(\{\{x\}:x\in X\}\subset I\).
(i)
\(\phi \in I\),
(ii)
\(C\cup D\in I\) for all \(C, D \in I\),
(iii)
for each \(C \in I\) and \(D \subset C\), we have \(D\in I\).
Definition 1.4
([13])
A family of sets \(\mathcal{F}\subset P(X)\) is called filter if and only if it satisfies the following conditions:
(i)
\(\phi \notin \mathcal{F}\),
(ii)
\(C, D\in \mathcal{F} \Rightarrow C\cap D\in \mathcal{F}\),
(iii)
for each \(C\in \mathcal{F}\) with \(C\subset D\), we have \(D\in \mathcal{F}\).
Definition 1.5
([15])
A sequence \(x=(x_{n})\) is called I-convergent to \(\xi \in \mathbb{R}\) if, for every \(\epsilon >0\), the set \(\{n\in \mathbb{N}:|x_{n}-\xi |\geq \epsilon \}\in I\). We write I-\(\lim x=\xi \). If \(\xi =0\), then \(x=(x_{n})\) is said to be I-null.
Definition 1.6
([13])
A sequence \(x=(x_{n})\) is said to be I-Cauchy if for every \(\epsilon > 0\) ∃ a number \(N=N( \epsilon )\) such that the set \(\{n\in \mathbb{N}:|x_{n}-x_{N}|\geq \epsilon \}\in \mathcal{I}\).
Definition 1.7
([14])
A sequence \(x=(x_{k})\) is convergent to ξ with respect to the intuitionistic fuzzy norm \((\mu ,\nu )\) if for every \(\epsilon , t >0\)
\(\exists N\in \mathbb{N}\) with \(\mu (x_{k}-\xi ,t)>1-\epsilon \) and \(\nu (x_{k}-\xi ,t)<\epsilon \) for all \(k\geq N\). We write \((\mu ,\nu )-\lim x = \xi \).
Definition 1.8
([5])
Consider intuitionistic fuzzy normed space (IFNS) \((X,\mu ,\nu ,\ast ,\diamond )\). A sequence \(x=(x_{k})\) is said to be Cauchy sequence with respect to norm \((\mu ,\nu )\) if, for each \(\epsilon >0\), \(t >0\), there exists \(N\in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(\mu (x_{k}-x_{l},t) > 1-\epsilon \) and \(\nu (x_{k}-x_{l})<\epsilon \) for all \(k,l\geq N\).
Definition 1.9
([12])
Let \((X,\mu ,\nu ,\ast , \diamond )\) be IFNS. A sequence \(x=(x_{k})\in \omega \) is called I-convergent to ξ with respect to the intuitionistic norm \((\mu ,\nu )\) if for every ϵ, \(t > 0\) if the set \(\{k\in \mathbb{N}: \mu (x _{k}-\xi ,t)\leq 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu (x_{k}-\xi ,t)\geq \epsilon \} \in I\). We write \(I^{(\mu ,\nu )}\mbox{-}\lim x=\xi \).
Definition 1.10
([13])
A sequence \(x=(x_{k})\in \omega \) is said to be Fibonacci I-convergent to \(\xi \in \mathbb{R}\) if, for every \(\epsilon >0\), the set \(\{k\in \mathbb{N}:|\hat{F}_{k}(x) -\xi | \geq \epsilon \}\in I\), where I is an admissible ideal.
Definition 1.11
([13])
Consider an admissible ideal I. Sequence \(x=(x_{k})\in \omega \) is Fibonacci I-Cauchy if, for every \(\epsilon > 0\), \(\exists N=N(\epsilon )\) such that \(\{k\in \mathbb{N}:|\hat{F}_{k}(x)-\hat{F}_{N}(x)|\geq \epsilon \}\in I\).
2 Intuitionistic fuzzy I-convergent Fibonacci difference sequence spaces
In the following section, we introduce a new type of sequence spaces whose F̂ transform is I-convergent with respect to the intuitionistic norm \((\mu ,\nu )\). Further we prove certain properties of these spaces such as hausdorfness, first countability. Throughout this paper, I is an admissible ideal. We define
$$\begin{aligned}& S_{0(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})= \bigl\{ x=(x_{k})\in l_{\infty }:\bigl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}:\mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x),t \bigr)\leq 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu \bigl( \hat{F_{k}}(x),t\bigr)\geq \epsilon \bigr\} \in I\bigr\} , \\& S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})=\bigl\{ x=(x_{k})\in l_{\infty }:\bigl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}:\mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-l,t \bigr)\leq 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu \bigl( \hat{F_{k}}(x)-l,t\bigr) \geq \epsilon \bigr\} \in I\bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
We introduce an open ball with centre x and radius r with respect to t as follows:
$$\begin{aligned} B_{x}(r,t) (\hat{F}) =&\{y=(y_{k})\in l_{\infty }:\\ &{} \bigl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}: \mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F_{k}}(y),t \bigr)> 1-r\mbox{ and }\nu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(y),t \bigr)< r\bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
Remark 2.1
(i)
For \(p_{1} ,p_{2}\in (0,1)\) such that \(p_{1} > p_{2}\), there exist \(p_{3} , p_{4}\in (0,1)\) with \(p_{1}* p_{3} \geq p_{2}\) and \(p_{1}\geq p_{4} \diamond p_{2}\).
(ii)
For \(p_{5}\in (0,1)\), there exist \(p_{6} ,p_{7}\in (0,1)\) such that \(p_{6}\ast p_{6} \geq p_{5}\) and \(p_{7}\diamond p_{7} \leq p_{5}\).
Theorem 2.1
The spaces
\(S_{0(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\)
and
\(S_{(\mu , \nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\)
are vector spaces over
\(\mathbb{R}\).
Proof
Let us show the result for \(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) and the proof for another space will follow on the similar lines. Let \(x=(x_{k})\) and \(y=(y_{k})\in S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\). Then by definition there exist \(\xi _{1}\) and \(\xi _{2}\), and for every ϵ, \(t > 0\), we have
where α and β are scalars.
$$\begin{aligned}& A=\biggl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}:\mu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi _{1}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert }\biggr) \leq 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi _{1},\frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert } \biggr)\geq \epsilon \biggr\} \in , \\& B=\biggl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}:\mu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(y)-\xi _{2},\frac{t}{2 \vert \beta \vert }\biggr) \leq 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(y)-\xi _{2},\frac{t}{2 \vert \beta \vert } \biggr) \geq \epsilon \biggr\} \in I, \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& A^{c}=\biggl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}: \mu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \xi _{1},\frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert }\biggr) > 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi _{1}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert } \biggr) < \epsilon \biggr\} \in \mathcal{F}(I), \\& B^{c}=\biggl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}: \mu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(y)- \xi _{2}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \beta \vert }\biggr) > 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(y)-\xi _{2},\frac{t}{2 \vert \beta \vert } \biggr) < \epsilon \biggr\} \in \mathcal{F}(I). \end{aligned}$$
Define \(E=A\cup B\) so that \(E\in I\). Thus \(E^{c}\in \mathcal{F}(I)\) and therefore is non-empty. We will show
Let \(n\in E^{c}\). Then
Consider
and
$$\begin{aligned} E^{c} \subset& \bigl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}: \mu \bigl(\alpha \hat{F_{k}}(x)+ \beta \hat{F_{k}}(y)-(\alpha \xi _{1}+\beta \xi _{2}),t\bigr)> 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or}\\ &{}\nu \bigl(\alpha \hat{F_{k}}(x)+\beta \hat{F_{k}}(y)-( \alpha \xi _{1}+ \beta \xi _{2}), t\bigr) < \epsilon \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \mu \biggl(\hat{F_{n}}(x)-\xi _{1}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert }\biggr) > 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or } \nu \biggl( \hat{F_{n}}(x)- \xi _{1}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert }\biggr)< \epsilon , \\& \mu \biggl(\hat{F_{n}}(y)-\xi _{2}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \beta \vert }\biggr)> 1-\epsilon \mbox{ or } \nu \biggl( \hat{F_{n}}(y)-\xi _{2},\frac{t}{2 \vert \beta \vert }\biggr)< \epsilon . \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \mu \bigl(\alpha \hat{F_{n}}(x)+ \beta \hat{F_{n}}(x)-( \alpha \xi _{1}+ \beta \xi _{2}), t\bigr) \\& \quad \geq \mu \biggl(\alpha \hat{F_{n}}(x)-\alpha \xi _{1},\frac{t}{2}\biggr) \ast \mu \biggl(\beta \hat{F_{n}}(y)-\beta \xi _{2},\frac{t}{2} \biggr) \\& \quad = \mu \biggl(\hat{F_{n}}(x)-\xi _{1}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert }\biggr) \ast \mu \biggl( \hat{F_{n}}(y)-\xi _{2},\frac{t}{ \vert \beta \vert }\biggr) \\& \quad > (1-\epsilon ) \ast (1-\epsilon )=1-\epsilon \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \nu \bigl(\alpha \hat{F_{n}}(y)+ \beta \hat{F_{n}}(y)-( \alpha \xi _{1}+ \beta \xi _{2})\bigr) \\& \quad \leq \nu \biggl(\alpha \hat{F_{n}}(x)-\alpha \xi _{1},\frac{t}{2}\biggr) \diamond \nu \biggl(\beta \hat{F_{n}}(y)-\beta \xi _{2},\frac{t}{2} \biggr) \\& \quad = \nu \biggl(\hat{F_{n}}(x)-\xi _{1}, \frac{t}{2 \vert \alpha \vert }\biggr) \diamond \nu \biggl( \hat{F_{n}}(y)-\xi _{2},\frac{t}{2 \vert \beta \vert }\biggr) \\& \quad < \epsilon \diamond \epsilon =\epsilon . \end{aligned}$$
Thus \(E^{c}\subset \{k\in \mathbb{N}: \mu (\alpha \hat{F_{k}}(x)+ \beta \hat{F_{k}}(y)-(\alpha \xi _{1}+ \beta \xi _{2}),t)>1-\epsilon \mbox{ or }\nu (\alpha \hat{F_{k}}(x)+\beta \hat{F_{k}}(y)-(\alpha \xi _{1} + \beta \xi _{2}),t)< \epsilon \}\). \(E^{c}\in \mathcal{F}(I)\), therefore by definition of filter, the set on the right-hand side of the above equation belongs to \(\mathcal{F}(I)\) so that its complement belongs to I. This implies \((\alpha x+ \beta y)\in S_{(\mu , \nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\). Hence \(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) is a vector space over \(\mathbb{R}\). □
Theorem 2.2
Every open ball
\(B_{x}(r,t)(\hat{F})\)
is an open set in
\(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\).
Proof
We have defined open ball as follows:
Let \(z=(z_{k})\in B_{x}(r,t)(\hat{F})\) so that \(\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(z),t)> 1-r\) and \(\nu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F_{k}}(z),t)< r\). Then there exists \(t_{0}\in (0,t)\) with \(\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(z),t_{0})>1-r \) and \(\nu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F_{k}}(z),t _{0})< r\). Put \(p_{0}= \mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F_{k}}(z),t_{0})\), so we have \(p_{0} > 1-r\), there exists \(s\in (0,1)\) such that \(p_{0}> 1-s> 1-r\). Using Remark 2.1(i), given \(p_{0}> 1-s\), we can find \(p_{1}, p_{2}\in (0,1)\) with \(p_{0}\ast p_{1} > 1-s\) and \((1-p_{0}) \diamond (1-p_{2})< s\). Put \(p_{3} = \max (p_{1}, p_{2})\). We will prove \(B_{z}(1- p_{3}, t-t_{0})(\hat{F})\subset B_{x}(r,t)(\hat{F})\). Let \(w=(w_{k})\in B_{z}(1-p_{3}, t - t_{0})(\hat{F})\). Hence
and
Hence \(w\in B_{x}(r,t)(\hat{F})\) and therefore \(B_{z}(1-p_{3},t- t _{0})(\hat{F})\subset B_{x}(r,t)(\hat{F})\). □
$$\begin{aligned} B_{x}(r,t) (\hat{F}) =& \{y=(y_{k})\in l_{\infty }:\\ &{}\bigl\{ k\in \mathbb{N}: \mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(y),t\bigr)> 1-r\mbox{ and }\nu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(y),t\bigr)< r\bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F_{k}}(w),t\bigr)\geq \mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(z),t_{0} \bigr)\ast \mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(z)-\hat{F_{k}}(w),t-t_{0} \bigr) \\& \quad > (p_{0}\ast p_{3})\geq (p_{0}\ast p_{1}) > 1- s > 1 - r, \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \nu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F_{k}}(w),t\bigr)\leq \nu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(z),t_{0} \bigr)\diamond \nu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(z)-\hat{F_{k}}(w),t-t _{0}\bigr) \\& \quad < (1-p_{0}))\diamond (1 - p_{3})\leq (1 - p_{0})\diamond (1 - p_{2}) < r. \end{aligned}$$
Remark 2.2
Let \(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F}\) be IFNS. Define \(\tau _{(\mu ,\nu )} ^{I}(\hat{F})=\{A\subset S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\mbox{: for given } x\in A\), we can find \(t>0\) and \(0 < r <1\) such that \(B_{x}(r,t)( \hat{F})\subset A\}\). Then \(\tau _{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) is a topology on \(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\).
Remark 2.3
Since \(\{B_{x}(\frac{1}{n},\frac{1}{n})(\hat{F}): n\in \mathbb{N}\}\) is a local base at x, the topology \(\tau _{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) is first countable.
Theorem 2.3
The spaces
\(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\)
and
\(S_{0(\mu , \nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\)
are Hausdorff.
Proof
Let \(x,y\in S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) with x and y to be different. Then \(0< \mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F}(y),t) <1\) and \(0<\nu (\hat{F}(x)-\hat{F}_{k}(y),t)< 1\). Put \(\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F}_{k}(y),t) = p_{1}\) and \(\nu (\hat{F}_{k}(x)-\hat{F}{k}(y),t) = p_{2}\) and \(r = \max (p_{1}, 1- p_{2})\). Using Remark (2.1(ii)) for \(p_{0}\in (r, 1)\), we can find \(p_{3}, p_{4}\in (0,1)\) such that \(p_{3} \ast p_{3} \geq p_{0}\) and \((1- p_{4})\diamond (1- p_{4}) \leq 1- p_{0}\). Put \(p_{5} = \max (p_{3}, p_{4})\). Clearly \(B_{x}(1- p _{5},\frac{t}{2})(\hat{F})\cap B_{y}(1- p_{5},\frac{t}{2})(\hat{F})= \phi \). Let on the contrary \(z\in B_{x}(1 - p_{5},\frac{t}{2})( \hat{F})\cap B_{y}(1 - p_{5},\frac{t}{2})(\hat{F})\). Then we have
and
which is a contradiction. Therefore \(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) is a Hausdorff space. The proof for \(S_{0(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) follows similarly. □
$$\begin{aligned} p_{1} =& \mu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\hat{F_{k}}(y),t \bigr) \geq \mu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(z), \frac{t}{2}\biggr) \ast \mu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(z)- \hat{F_{k}}(y), \frac{t}{2}\biggr) \\ \geq& p_{5} \ast p_{5} \geq p_{3} \ast p_{3}> p_{0} > p_{1} \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} p_{2} =& \nu \bigl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{y}},t\bigr) \leq \nu \biggl(\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \hat{F_{k}}(z),\frac{t}{2}\biggr) \diamond \nu \biggl( \hat{F_{k}}(z)-\hat{F_{k}}(y), \frac{t}{2} \biggr) \\ \leq& (1- p_{5})\diamond (1- p_{5}) \leq (1- p_{4})\diamond (1- p_{4}) \leq 1- p_{0} < p_{2}, \end{aligned}$$
Theorem 2.4
Let
\(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\)
be IFNS and
\(\tau _{(\mu , \nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\)
be a topology on
\(S_{\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\). A sequence
\((x_{k})\in S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\)
converges to
ξ
iff
\(\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t) \rightarrow 1\)
and
\(\nu ( \hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t) \rightarrow 0\)
as
\(k\rightarrow \infty \).
Proof
Suppose \(x_{k}\rightarrow \xi \), then given \(0< r < 1\) there exists \(k_{0}\in \mathbb{N}\) such that \((x_{k})\in B_{x}(r,t)(\hat{F})\) for all \(k\geq k_{0}\) given \(t>0\). Hence, we have \(1-\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)- \xi ,t)< r\) and \(\nu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi,t)< r\). Therefore \(\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi,t)\rightarrow 1\) and \(\nu ( \hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t)\rightarrow 0\) as \(k \rightarrow \infty \).
Conversely, if \(\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t)\rightarrow 1\) and \(\nu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t)\rightarrow 0\) as \(k\rightarrow \infty \) holds for each \(t>0\). For \(0< r< 1\), there exists \(k_{0}\in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(1-\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t)< r\) and \(\nu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t)< r\) for all \(k\geq k_{0}\), which implies \(\mu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t) > 1-r\) and \(\nu (\hat{F_{k}}(x)-\xi ,t) < r\). Thus \(x_{k}\in B_{x}(r,t)(\hat{F})\) for all \(k\geq k_{0}\) and hence \(x_{k}\rightarrow \xi \). □
3 Conclusion
In the present article, we have defined a new kind of sequence spaces \(S_{0(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) and \(S_{(\mu ,\nu )}^{I}(\hat{F})\) using Fibonacci difference matrix F̂. We studied certain elementary properties and topological properties like linearity, first countability, hausdorfness. These results will give new approach to deal with the problems in science and engineering. The present article is a useful tool to define ideal convergence of generalised Fibonacci difference sequence in intuitionistic fuzzy normed space given by
where \(\hat{F}(r,s)=\{f_{nk}(r,s)\}\) is a double generalised matrix defined as follows:
\(k,n\in \mathbb{N}\) and \(r,s\in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}\). We can study the topological properties of these spaces which will provide a better method to deal with vagueness and inexactness occurring in various fields of science, engineering and economics. Moreover, this theory can be helpful in dealing with problems in population dynamics, quantum particle physics particularly in connections with string and \(\epsilon ^{\infty }\) theory of El-Naschie.
$$\begin{aligned}& c_{0}\bigl(\hat{F}(r,s)\bigr)= \biggl\{ x=(x_{k})\in \omega : \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty } \biggl(r\frac{f_{n}}{f_{n+1}}x_{n}+s \frac{f _{n+1}}{f_{n}}x_{n-1} \biggr)=0 \biggr\} , \\& c\bigl(\hat{F}(r,s)\bigr)= \biggl\{ x=(x_{k})\in \omega : \lim _{n\rightarrow \infty } \biggl(r\frac{f_{n}}{f_{n+1}}x_{n}+s \frac{f _{n+1}}{f_{n}}x_{n-1} \biggr)=l \biggr\} , \end{aligned}$$
$$f_{nk}(r,s)= \textstyle\begin{cases} s\frac{f_{n+1}}{f_{n}}, &k=n-1, \\ r\frac{f_{n}}{f_{n+1}}, &k=n, \\ 0, &0\leq k< n-1\mbox{ or }k> n \end{cases} $$
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to record their gratitude to the reviewers for their careful reading and making some useful corrections which improved the presentation of the paper.
Authors’ information
Vakeel A. Khan received Ph.D degree in Mathematics from Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India. Presently he is an Associate Professor in the Dept. of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim University. His area of research is Sequence Spaces, and he has published his papers in national and international journals, namely Information Sciences (Elsevier), Applied Mathematics Letters (Elsevier), A Journal of Chinese Universities (Springer-Verlag, China). Emrah Evren Kara is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Duzce University, Duzce 602002, Turkey. Henna Altaf has done M. Sc. Mathematics from Aligarh Muslim University. Currently she is a research scholar in Aligarh Muslim University. Nazneen Khan is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia. Mobeen Ahmad has done M. Sc., M. Phil Mathematics from Aligarh Muslim University. Currently he is a research scholar in Aligarh Muslim University.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.