nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Is Intra-industry Trade Gainful? Evidence from Manufacturing Industries of India

verfasst von : Sagnik Bagchi

Erschienen in: Globalisation of Technology

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Considering a range of both static and dynamic indices to measure magnitude of intra-industry trade (IIT), this paper demonstrates that the liberalization process has led to increase in dominance of India’s trade in products of similar or different technologies. According to OECD classification of industries, we find major share of India’s IIT has evolved from industries of India that are categorized into high, medium-high and medium-low technology groups. Decomposing IIT of these industries into its varied forms, we find that India’s export of low technological products to be more dominant in India’s IIT than export of similar or high technological goods—indicating a downward trend in the terms of trade. Econometric estimates reveal that product differentiation representing consumer’s preference for range of varieties turn out to positively affect trade in both similar and different technologies of the same product. Furthermore, we also find increased competition from imports have resulted in the shift of specialization by industries of India from low technological products (yet dominant) to high and similar technological products. Our result also suggests that the magnitude of total IIT has gained impetus with the shift in productive resources from inefficient to efficient product lines within an industry. However, with disentangling total IIT one observes that much of the explanation behind the result is owed to dominance of India’s export of low technological product. Alongside, we also identify that protectionism in the form of anti-dumping initiations initiated by foreign firms allows them to leapfrog Indian firm’s export of superior technological variant.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Impact of R&D Spillovers on Firm-Level R&D Intensity: Panel Data Evidence from Electronics Goods Sector in India

Nächstes Kapitel What Makes Enterprises in Auto Component Industry Perform? Emerging Role of Labour, Information Technology, and Knowledge Management

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

For instance, empirical studies on Australia, India, Spain, and other cross-country comparisons have shown that trade reforms have a positive impact on the magnitude of total IIT; see, Balassa and Bauwens (1987), Veeramani (2002), Sharma (2004) and Ito and Okubo (2012).

The study argues that the rise in IIT has largely been vertical in nature because of two main reasons: (i) India’s growing GNP with a wide income gap gave rise to country’s demand for varieties of the same product; and (ii) the co-existence of both traditional and modern methods of production in the country gave way to production of different technological variant of the same product.

In the facet of import competition, firms compete by specializing and producing a subset of varieties within an industry so as to exploit internal scale economies such as to reduce adjustment cost.

Considering alternative indices allow us to counter the problem of biasedness occurring from ‘trade imbalances’ on the measurement of IIT. Different levels of data disaggregation conducts the ‘categorical aggregation’ test.

Both GL _ij and GLC _ij would have downward and upward bias, respectively for their measurements of IIT. GL _ij would have a downward bias because trade imbalance is associated with each commodity. GLC _ij would be upward biased since each commodity (or industry) does not have equiproportional trade imbalance.

Theoretically, Aquino (1978) finds his index to be exactly equal to the index of Michaely (1962).

The average size of the bias at HS-2, 4 and 6 digit classification levels for GL _ij and GLC _ij are 6.86, −1.64, 1.47 and −7.81, −13.69, −13.84, respectively.

In the paper we report only the values obtained using Greenaway et al. (1994) measure at α = 0.15. We also check the sensitivity of our results by considering α at 10, 25 and 35%. In all such cases our results did not change qualitatively from that reported.

In order to avoid problem of multicollinearity, Net Exports and Trade Share are taken alternatively in different model specifications.

Considering Pesaran (2007) panel unit root test, we find the reported variables are all stationary.

The average growth rate for share of products engaged in low vertical IIT has been around 1.28% while for high vertical and horizontal IIT it is around 16 and 13%, respectively.

Our result also indicates that anti-dumping initiations made by Indian firms are not being sufficient for them to leapfrog the foreign firm’s technologically superior good.

Aquino A (1978) Intra-industry trade and intra-industry specialization as concurrent sources of international trade in manufactures. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Rev World Econ 114(2):275–295CrossRef

Azhar MKA, Elliott RJR (2006) On the measurement of product quality in intra-industry trade. Rev World Econ 142(3):476–495CrossRef

Bagchi S, Bhattacharyya S, Narayanan K (2015) Anti-dumping initiations in Indian manufacturing industries. South Asia Econ J 16(2):278–294CrossRef

Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage. Manchester Sch 33(2):99–123CrossRef

Balassa B (1966) Tariff reductions and trade in manufactures among the industrial countries. Am Econ Rev 56(3):466–473

Balassa B, Bauwens L (1987) Intra-industry specialization in a multi-country and multi-industry framework. Econ J 97(388):923–939CrossRef

Baleix MJ, Egido AIM (2010) The asymmetric effect of endowments of vertical intra-industry trade. World Econ 33(5):746–777CrossRef

Bhattacharyya R (1991) India’s intra-industry trade: an empirical analysis. Indian Econ J 42(2):54–74

Bown CP, Tovar P (2011) Trade liberalization, antidumping, and safeguards: evidence from India’s tariff reform. J Dev Econ 96(1):115–125CrossRef

Brülhart M (1994) Marginal intra-industry trade: measurement and the relevance for the pattern of industrial adjustment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Rev World Econ 130(3):600–613CrossRef

Burange LG, Chaddha SJ (2008) Growth in India’s intra-industry trade. Working paper no. UDE 24/2/2008, University of Mumbai

Caves RE (1981) Intra-industry trade and market structure in the industrial countries. Oxford Econ Pap 33(2):202–223CrossRef

Caves RE, Frankel JA, Jones RW (2008) World trade payments: an introduction. Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River

Clark DP, Stanley DL (1999) Determinants of intra-industry trade between developing countries and the United States. J Econ Dev 24(2):79–94

Corden WM (1979) Intra-industry trade and factor proportions theory. In: Giersch H (ed) On the economics of intra-industry trade: symposium 1978 Mohr, Tubingen

Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560CrossRef

Falvey RE (1981) Commercial policy and international trade. J Int Econ 1(4):495–511CrossRef

Falvey R, Kierzkowski H (1987) Product quality, intra-industry trade and (im)perfect competition. In: Kierzkowski H (ed) Protection and competition in international trade: essays in honor of W.M. Corden. Oxford, Basil-Blackwell

Finger MJ (1975) Trade overlap and intra-industry trade. Econ Inq 13(4):581–589CrossRef

Flam H, Helpman E (1987) Vertical product differentiation and north-south trade. Am Econ Rev 77(5):810–822

Greenaway D, Hine R, Milner CR (1994) Country-specific factors and the pattern of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in the UK. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Rev World Econ 130(1):77–100

Greenaway D, Hine R, Milner CR (1995) Vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade: a cross industry analysis for the United Kingdom. Econ J 105(433):1505–1518CrossRef

Grubel HG, Lloyd PJ (1971) The empirical measurement of intra-industry trade. Econ Rec 47(4):494–517CrossRef

Grubel HG, Lloyd PJ (1975) Intra-industry trade: the theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products. MacMillan, London

Helpman E (1981) International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: a Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin approach. J Int Econ 11(3):305–340CrossRef

Helpman E (1990) Monopolistic competition in trade theory. Special papers in international finance, Department of Economics, Princeton University,

Ito T, Okubo T (2012) New aspects of Intra-industry trade in EU Countries. World Econ 35(9):1126–1138CrossRef

Krugman P (1979) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. J Int Econ 9(4):469–479CrossRef

Lancaster K (1980) Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition. J Int Econ 10(2):150–175CrossRef

Martini PR (1997) Intra-industry trade and revealed comparative advantage in the central american common market. World Dev 26(2):337–344CrossRef

Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6):1695–1725CrossRef

Michaely M (1962) Concentration in international trade. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

Moraga-Gonzàlez Josè L, Viaene JM (2015) Antidumping, intra-industry trade and quality reversals. Int Econ Rev 56(3):777–803CrossRef

Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3):703–708CrossRef

Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-sectional dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312CrossRef

Sharma K (2004) Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in Australian manufacturing: does trade liberalization have any impact? Appl Econ 36(15):1723–1730CrossRef

Thorpe M, Zhang Z (2005) Study of the measurement and determinants of intra-industry trade in East Asia. Asia Econ J 19(2):231–246CrossRef

Veeramani C (2002) Intra-Industry trade of India: trends and country specific factors. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Rev World Econ 138(3):509–33

Veeramani C (2004) Growing intra-industry trade in manufacturing: implications for policy. Econ Polit Wkly 39(41):4556–4559

Veeramani C (2009) Trade barriers, multinational involvement and intra-industry trade: panel data evidence from India. Appl Econ 41(20):2541–2553CrossRef

Vona S (1991) On the measurement of intra-industry trade: some further thoughts. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Rev World Econ 127(4):678–699CrossRef

Titel: Is Intra-industry Trade Gainful? Evidence from Manufacturing Industries of India
verfasst von: Sagnik Bagchi
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Globalisation of Technology
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5423-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-5424-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5424-2_10

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner