nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. James Buchanan and the “New Economics of Order” Research Program

verfasst von : Stefan Kolev

Erschienen in: James M. Buchanan

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This essay pursues one historical and one conceptual task. The historical task is to reconstruct the “thinking-in-orders” tradition in political economy as a contextual approach to socio-economic reality, a tradition in which James Buchanan was socialized and to which he was a life-long contributor. The historical mainline extends from classical political economy to ordoliberalism, and shows how contextual economics has gained relevance in periods of transformation and transition. Living today in a world of fundamental transformation, the essay’s conceptual task is to depict how a recent research program, “New Economics of Order”, revitalizes the ordoliberal tradition by complementing it with Virginia School impulses of James Buchanan and Bloomington School impulses of Elinor and Vincent Ostrom. This new contextual research program conceptualizes the balance between the fragility stemming from the dynamics of globalization and digitalization, and the provision of statics through the state and civil society as demanded by the citizen.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel James Buchanan and the Properly Trained Economist

Nächstes Kapitel Emergence, Equilibrium, and Agent-Based Modeling: Updating James Buchanan’s Democratic Political Economy

Aligica, P. D., Lewis, P., & Storr, V. H. (2017). Austrian Economics and the Bloomington School: An Introduction and Overview. In P. D. Aligica, P. Lewis, & V. H. Storr (Eds.), The Austrian and Bloomington Schools of Political Economy (pp. ix–xxi). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.CrossRef

Anter, A. (2007). Die Macht der Ordnung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Beck, T., & Kotz, H.-H. (Eds.). (2017). Ordoliberalism: A German Oddity? London: CEPR Press.

Biebricher, T., & Vogelmann, F. (Eds.). (2017). The Birth of Austerity. German Ordoliberalism and Contemporary Neoliberalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity. The History of a Dangerous Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.

Boettke, P. J. (2012a). Methodological Individualism, Spontaneous Order, and the Research Program of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis: Vincent and Elinor Ostrom. In Living Economics. Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow (pp. 139–158). Oakland: Independent Institute.

Boettke, P. J. (2012b). Is the Only Form of “Reasonable Regulation” Self-Regulation? Elinor Ostrom. In Living Economics. Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow (pp. 159–171). Oakland: Independent Institute.

Braunberger, G. (2014, November 23). Deutsche und amerikanische Ökonomen leben nicht in getrennten Welten Gespräch mit Rüdiger Bachmann, in: Fazit - das Wirtschaftsblog. http://blogs.faz.net/fazit/2014/11/23/xxx-3-4938.

Brunnermeier, M. K., James, H., & Landau, J.-P. (2016). The Euro and the Battle of Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Buchanan, J. M. (1979). Notes on Hayek (Unpublished manuscript). Fairfax: Center for Study of Public Choice.

Buchanan, J. M. (1987). Economics: Between Predictive Science and Moral Philosophy. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

Buchanan, J. M. (2010, June 2). Chicago School Thinking: Old and New. Presentation at the 2010 Summer Institute for the History of Economic Thought, Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_atDse06r4.

Buchanan, J. M. (2011, June 24). Economists and the Great Recession. Presentation at the 2011 Summer Institute for the History of Economic Thought, Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SXhW9ucEW8.

Buchanan, J. M. (2012, June 29). Institutional Sources of America’s Fiscal Tragedy. Presentation at the 2012 Summer Institute for the History of Economic Thought, Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAu1gUbE0uc.

Caldwell, B. (2001). There Really Was a German Historical School of Economics: A Comment on Heath Pearson. History of Political Economy, 33, 649–654.CrossRef

Caspari, V., & Schefold, B. (Eds.). (2011). Wohin steuert die ökonomische Wissenschaft? Ein Methodenstreit in der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Frankfurt: Campus.

Dekker, E. (2016). The Viennese Students of Civilization: The Meaning and Context of Austrian Economics Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Economist. (2016, July 30). Globalisation and Politics: The New Political Divide, Editorial.

Eichhorst, W., & Rinne, U. (2017). Digital Challenges for the Welfare State (IZA Policy Paper 134). Bonn: IZA—Institute of Labor Economics.

Eucken, W. (1938 [2005]). Nationalökonomie – wozu? Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Eucken, W. (1940 [1992]). The Foundations of Economics. History and Theory in the Analysis of Economic Reality. Berlin: Springer.

Evensky, J. (2005). Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and the Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feld, L. P., & Köhler, E. A. (2016). Ist die Ordnungsökonomik zukunftsfähig? In J. Zweynert, S. Kolev, & N. Goldschmidt (Eds.), Neue Ordnungsökonomik (pp. 69–95). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Frey, B., & Kirchgässner, G. (1994). Demokratische Wirtschaftspolitik. Munich: Franz Vahlen.

Gander, H.-H., Goldschmidt, N., & Dathe, U. (2009). Phänomenologie und die Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Würzburg: Ergon.

Giersch, H. (1986). Weltwirtschaftliches Wachstum durch Liberalisierung. Kyklos, 39, 518–536.CrossRef

Giordano, A. (2018). The Making of the “Third Way”: Wilhelm Röpke, Luigi Einaudi, and the Identity of Neoliberalism. In P. Commun & S. Kolev (Eds.), Wilhelm Röpke (1899–1966): A Liberal Political Economist and Conservative Social Philosopher (pp. 41–64). Cham: Springer.CrossRef

Goldschmidt, N., & Dörr, J. (2018). Wilhelm Röpke on Liberalism, Culture, and Economic Development. In P. Commun & S. Kolev (Eds.), Wilhelm Röpke (1899–1966): A Liberal Political Economist and Conservative Social Philosopher (pp. 203–217). Cham: Springer.CrossRef

Goldschmidt, N., Grimmer-Solem, E., & Zweynert, J. (2016). On the Purpose and Aims of the Journal of Contextual Economics. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 136, 1–14.CrossRef

Goldschmidt, N., Wegner, G., Wohlgemuth, M., & Zweynert, J. (2009, June 19). Was ist und was kann Ordnungsökonomik? Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 12.

Grimmer-Solem, E., & Romani, R. (1998). The Historical School, 1870–1900: A Cross-National Reassessment. History of Economic Ideas, 24, 267–299.CrossRef

Haselbach, D. (1991). Autoritärer Liberalismus und soziale Marktwirtschaft. Gesellschaft und Politik im Ordoliberalismus. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Haucap, J., & Heimeshoff, U. (2018). Ordnungspolitik in der digitalen Welt. In H. J. Thieme & J. Haucap (Eds.), Wirtschaftspolitik im Wandel: Ordnungsdefizite und Lösungsansätze (pp. 79–132). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Hayek, F. A. (1983 [1992]). The Rediscovery of Freedom: Personal Recollections. In The Fortunes of Liberalism. Essays on Austrian Economics and the Ideal of Freedom (pp. 185–195). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hesse, J. O. (2010). Wirtschaft als Wissenschaft. Die Volkswirtschaftslehre in der frühen Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt: Campus.

Hien, J., & Joerges, C. (Eds.). (2017). Ordoliberalism, Law and the Rule of Economics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Hodgson, G. M. (2001). How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Janssen, H. (2009). Nationalökonomie und Nationalsozialismus. Die deutsche Volkswirtschaftslehre in den dreißiger Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts. Marburg: Metropolis.

Kirchgässner, G. (1988). Wirtschaftspolitik und Politiksystem: Zur Kritik der traditionellen Ordnungstheorie aus der Sicht der Neuen Politischen Ökonomie. In D. Cassel, B.-T. Ramb, & H. J. Thieme (Eds.), Ordnungspolitik (pp. 53–75). Munich: Franz Vahlen.

Köhler, E. A., & Kolev, S. (2013). The Conjoint Quest for a Liberal Positive Program: “Old Chicago”, Freiburg, and Hayek. In S. J. Peart & D. M. Levy (Eds.), F. A. Hayek and the Modern Economy (pp. 211–228). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kolev, S. (2015). Ordoliberalism and the Austrian School. In P. J. Boettke & C. J. Coyne (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics (pp. 419–444). New York: Oxford University Press.

Kolev, S. (2017). Neoliberale Staatsverständnisse im Vergleich. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRef

Kolev, S. (2018a, April 16). Freiburger Austerität? Der Ordoliberalismus und die Euro-Krise. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 16.

Kolev, S. (2018b). Zur Einführung: Was ist und was kann Ordnungsökonomik? In N. Goldschmidt & M. Wohlgemuth (Eds.), Soziale Marktwirtschaft. Grundtexte zur Ordnungsökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Kolev, S. (2018c). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter von Globalisierung und Digitalisierung. In G. Kubon-Gilke (Ed.), Gestalten der Sozialpolitik. Theoretische Gundlegungen und Anwendungsbeispiele (pp. 646–659). Marburg: Metropolis.

Kolev, S., Goldschmidt, N., & Hesse, J.-O. (2014). Walter Eucken’s Role in the Early History of the Mont Pèlerin Society (Discussion Paper 14/02). Freiburg: Walter Eucken Institut.

Köster, R. (2011). Die Wissenschaft der Außenseiter. Die Krise der Nationalökonomie in der Weimarer Republik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRef

Kuhnert, S. (2008). The Man Who Heated Up Economic Discussion with a Stove: Walter Eucken’s Method of Institutional Design. In M. Sproule-Jones, B. Allen, & F. Sabetti (Eds.), The Struggle to Constitute and Sustain Productive Orders: Vincent Ostrom’s Quest to Understand Human Affairs (pp. 111–121). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

MacLean, N. (2017). Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America. Melbourne: Scribe.

Nientiedt, D., & Köhler, E. A. (2016). Liberalism and Democracy—A Comparative Reading of Eucken and Hayek. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40, 1743–1760.CrossRef

Pearson, H. (1999). Was There Really a German Historical School of Economics? History of Political Economy, 31, 547–562.CrossRef

Perlman, M., & McCann, C. R., Jr. (1998). The Pillars of Economic Understanding. Ideas and Traditions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef

Peukert, H. (2000). Walter Eucken (1891–1950) and the Historical School. In P. Koslowski (Ed.), The Theory of Capitalism in the German Economic Tradition (pp. 93–146). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

Popitz, H. (1992). Phänomene der Macht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Pribram, K. (1983). A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ptak, R. (2009). Neoliberalism in Germany: Revisiting the Ordoliberal Foundations of the Social Market Economy. In P. Mirowski & D. Plehwe (Eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin. The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective (pp. 98–138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Renner, A. (2002). Jenseits von Kommunitarismus und Neoliberalismus. Eine Neuinterpretation der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Grafschaft: Vektor.

Rieter, H., & Zweynert, J. (2006). Gustav Schmoller and Globalisation. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 126, 225–250.

Ritschl, A. (2009, March 16). Am Ende eines Sonderwegs. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 12.

Rolnik, G. (Ed.). (2018). Digital Platforms and Concentration. 2018 Antitrust and Competition Conference E-Book of the Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Schefold, B. (2003). Die deutsche Historische Schule als Quelle des Ordoliberalismus. In P. Commun (Ed.), L’ordolibéralisme allemand. Aux sources de l’Économie sociale de marché (pp. 101–117). Cergy-Pontoise: CIRAC.

Slobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Sproule-Jones, M., Allen, B., & Sabetti, F. (2008). Normative and Empirical Inquiries into Systems of Governance. In M. Sproule-Jones, B. Allen, & F. Sabetti (Eds.), The Struggle to Constitute and Sustain Productive Orders: Vincent Ostrom’s Quest to Understand Human Affairs (pp. 3–9). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Streit, M. E. & Wohlgemuth, M. (2000). The Market Economy and the State: Hayekian and Ordoliberal Conceptions. In P. Koslowski (Ed.), The Theory of Capitalism in the German Economic Tradition (pp. 224–271). Berlin: Springer.

Vanberg, V. J. (1988). “Ordnungstheorie” as Constitutional Economics: The German Conception of a “Social Market Economy”. ORDO Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 39, 17–31.

Vanberg, V. J. (1999). Markets and Regulation: On the Contrast Between Free-Market Liberalism and Constitutional Liberalism. Constitutional Political Economy, 10, 219–243.CrossRef

Vanberg, V. J. (2013). James M. Buchanan und der Ordoliberalismus. Orientierungen zur Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik, 135, 57–61.

Vanberg, V. J. (2014). Liberalismus und Demokratie: Zu einer vernachlässigten Seite der liberalen Denktradition. ORDO Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 65, 345–374.

Vanberg, V. J. (2015). Ordoliberalism, Ordnungspolitik, and the Reason of Rules. European Review of International Studies, 2, 27–36.CrossRef

Verde, A. (2017). Is Globalisation Doomed? The Economic and Political Threats to the Future of Globalisation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wagner, R. E. (2016). Politics as a Peculiar Business. Insights from a Theory of Entangled Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Weizsäcker, C. C. V. (2017). Die normative Ko-Evolution von Marktwirtschaft und Demokratie. ORDO Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 65, 13–43.

Wohlgemuth, M. (2005). Vorwort. In M. Wohlgemuth (Ed.), Spielregeln für eine bessere Politik (pp. 9–13). Freiburg: Herder.

Zweynert, J. (2013). How German is German Neo-Liberalism? Review of Austrian Economics, 26, 109–125.CrossRef

Zweynert, J., Kolev, S., & Goldschmidt, N. (2016). Neue Ordnungsökonomik. Zur Aktualität eines kontextualen Forschungsprogramms. In J. Zweynert, S. Kolev, & N. Goldschmidt (Eds.), Neue Ordnungsökonomik (pp. 1–17). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRef

Titel: James Buchanan and the “New Economics of Order” Research Program
verfasst von: Stefan Kolev
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: James M. Buchanan
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03079-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-03080-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_5