Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 3/2020

Open Access 09.03.2020

Kinetics of Slag Reduction in Silicomanganese Production

verfasst von: Vincent Canaguier, Merete Tangstad

Erschienen in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B | Ausgabe 3/2020

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this study, the reduction of three silicomanganese charges prepared from industrial raw materials was investigated under isothermal conditions between 1783 K and 1933 K (1510 °C and 1660 °C). The main reactions examined are MnO and SiO2 slag reduction following the chemical equations MnO(l) + C = Mn(l) + CO(g) and SiO2(l) + 2C = Si(l) + 2CO(g). The charges containing a combination of Assmang ore, Comilog ore, high-carbon FeMn slag with quartz were pre-reduced, melted to a MnO-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO-CaO quinary slag and reduced in presence of coke using a thermogravimetric set-up. The reduced slags were further analyzed using electro-probe micro-analysis to evaluate their MnO and SiO2 contents. It is observed that the reduction pathway occurred in two stages: a first slow and stable stage was followed by a rapid rate increase during the second stage. The rate change shift between the two stages was found to depend on the initial charge’s composition and the extent of reduction, but not on the temperature. Using an established rate equation, the kinetics of MnO and SiO2 reduction were modeled over the first stage. A good fit was obtained between simulated and experimental data.
Hinweise
Manuscript submitted on August 2, 2019.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Silicomanganese is produced from mixtures of Mn-sources (ores and ferromanganese slag), quartz, fluxes, reductants as well as remelts and off-grade products, all in variable amounts. In Norway, many different ores are employed as sources of manganese, each exhibiting distinct properties.[1] As the composition of the charge has a great influence on the production of silicomanganese, a better knowledge of the ores can lead to substantial process improvements. However, silicomanganese slags are complex systems formed of many oxides, and the study of a wide range of compositions is demanding.
From the MnO-SiO2 binary system to the quinary system including CaO, MgO and Al2O3, various works investigated on the thermodynamics of silicate slags, often to determine the activities of the slag components.[25] The thermodynamic data found experimentally was also assessed using models.[6] Zhao and coworkers treated the phase equilibria in a pseudo-ternary “MnO”-(CaO + MgO)-(SiO2 + Al2O3) phase diagram, broadening from the classical MnO-CaO-SiO2 system.[7] They evidenced the influence of MgO and Al2O3 on the liquidus temperatures and the primary phase fields, underlining that these oxides present in natural ores cannot be overlooked.
The distribution of manganese and silicon between slag and metal phases has been studied by equilibration.[8,9] Ding et al. have evidenced the role of the R-ratio = (CaO + MgO)/Al2O3, the content of silicon in the metal increasing dramatically with increases of the R-ratio for a given silica content. In addition, they named temperature and silica content in the slag as key factors to reach low MnO content.
The reduction kinetics of MnO in silicate slags has been looked upon in a few studies.[10,11] Kinetics of simultaneous MnO and SiO2 reduction has been investigated by Berg and Olsen.[12] Through their work, they could not evidence a connection between MnO and SiO2 reduction kinetics, the reaction in Eq. [1] not being at equilibrium. Besides, they suggested that gaseous SiO could act as an intermediate during the reduction reaction
$$ 2{\text{MnO}} + {\text{Si}} = 2{\text{Mn}} + {\text{SiO}}_{2} . $$
(1)
A kinetic model has been established by Ostrovski et al. to describe the reduction of MnO in a ferromanganese production context.[13] The reduction reaction of MnO, following Eq. [2], was convincingly modeled by Eq. [3]. There, “A” is the reaction interface area, “k” the reaction rate constant following the Arrhenius equation and \( (a_{\text{MnO}} - a_{\text{Mn}} /K_{\text{eq}} ) \) the driving force for the reaction.
$$ {\text{MnO}}\left( {\text{l}} \right) + {\text{C}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) = {\text{Mn}}\left( {\text{l}} \right) + {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right), $$
(2)
$$ R = k\cdot A\cdot (a_{\text{MnO}} - a_{\text{Mn}} /K_{\text{eq}} ). $$
(3)
This kinetic model was extended to silicomanganese by Kim and coworkers[14,15] to conform to silica reduction according to Eq. [4]. Next, the model, given by Eq. [5], was applied to experimental work carried out under non-isothermal conditions to estimate kinetic parameters
$$ {\text{SiO}}_{2} \left( {\text{l}} \right) + 2{\text{C}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) = {\text{Si}}\left( {\text{l}} \right) + 2{\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right), $$
(4)
$$ R = k\cdot A\cdot (a_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} - a_{\text{Si}} /K_{\text{eq}} ). $$
(5)
Recently, Jamieson et al. studied the kinetics of the silicothermic reduction of MnO from slags. They evidenced the preponderant role of the mass transport of MnO in limiting the rate. In addition, they also showed how SiO bubbles, formed at the slag–metal interface, can dramatically inhibit further reaction by covering most of the interface.[16]
Finally, the ore composition, beyond the MnO and SiO2 contents alone, contributes significantly to the reduction mechanism and kinetics. Pilot scale experiments comparing ore sources pointed out the correlation between melting temperature of the Mn-ore and pct Si in the metal phase: the use of Mn-sources with low melting temperature appeared to overall decrease the pct Si in the metal.[17] Essentially, improvements of industrial yields are expected by tailoring the charge to a given process.
The present aim is to find how different ore mixtures affect the reduction mechanism, to discriminate MnO and SiO2 reduction and to evaluate the kinetic parameters. This study addresses the isothermal reduction of three SiMn charges, using three different manganese sources. First, a thermogravimetric set-up is used to graph the mass loss during reduction. Second, the chemical composition of the remaining slag is used to evaluate the respective reduction of MnO and SiO2. The reduction path identified for each charge is finally used in combination with the mass loss curves to evaluate the kinetic parameters based on the models given in Eqs. [3] and [5].

Experimental

The present study focuses on the carbothermic reduction of silicomanganese slags under isothermal conditions. The experimental work includes the preparation of charges from industrial materials, the complete pre-reduction of high manganese oxides and iron oxides during heating (MnO2, Mn2O3, Mn3O4 to MnO and Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FeO to Fe), the isothermal reduction at high temperature and finally the analysis of the final slag composition by electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA). The procedure is analogous to what was done under non-isothermal conditions in a previous work.[15]
Three charges were prepared using manganese ores (Assmang and Comilog), high-carbon ferromanganese slag (HCS), Snekkevik quartz and Polish coke. The raw material composition and dimensions are provided in Table I. The material input was calculated to aim for 18 wt pct Si in the metal phase and 5 wt pct MnO and 40 wt pct SiO2 in the slag phase if reaching equilibrium at 1873 K (1600 °C). The detail of the composition of the charges is given in Table II. The raw materials were initially positioned as layers in graphite crucibles (i.d. Ø = 30 mm and depth h = 61 mm) ordered by melting temperature, the first to melt being placed on the top, to ensure complete mixing.
Table I
Raw Material Chemical Composition (Weight Percent) and Size
Material
MnO
MnO2
SiO2
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
Al2O3
S
C
CO2
H2O
BaO
Total (Wt Pct)
Size (mm)
Assmang
31.28
35.50
6.37
13.66
6.17
1.08
0.49
0.14
3.1
0.04
0.45
98.28
0.5 to 1.36
Comilog
3.91
69.40
6.50
6.47
0.29
0.13
6.9
0.02*
0.1
5
0.21*
98.70
0.5 to 1.36
HCS
35.23
0.00
24.45
0.00
18.45
7.53
12.30
0.46
0.46
98.88
0.5 to 1.4
Quartz
0.14
93.85
0.09
0.05
1.19
95.32
0.5 to 1.4
Coke
0.04
5.6
0.86
0.42
0.22
2.79
87.68
0.03
97.64
0.5 to 1.4
*These measurements were carried out on a different batch of the same ore
Table II
Composition of the Three Material Charges
Mn-Source
Mass (g)
Assmang
Comilog
HCS
Quartz
Coke
Total
Assmang (Asm)
7.00
1.96
2.20
11.16
Comilog (Com)
7.00
1.71
2.40
11.11
Assmang+HCS (A/HCS)
4.00
4.00
1.73
2.50
12.23
The pre-reduction and reduction reactions were carried out in a vertical graphite tube furnace. The filled graphite crucibles were suspended in the hot zone of the furnace by a Mo wire and hook, themselves hanging from a weighing balance. The atmosphere was evacuated from the furnace using a vacuum pump and was replaced by a high-purity Ar gas stream. Upon reaching 773 K (500 °C), the Ar stream was replaced by CO; Ar was reintroduced upon cooling at temperatures lowering to 1173 K (900 °C). The temperature was recorded in two locations: in the hot zone just below the crucible (B-type thermocouple) and at the furnace’s wall (S-type thermocouple). The samples studied were first heated up to pre-reduction temperature, 1473 K (1200 °C), and kept there for 30 minutes. Next, they were rapidly heated up (60 °C/min) to the reduction temperature in the range of 1783 K to 1933 K (1510 °C to 1660 °C) for a chosen duration under isothermal conditions. The reduction temperatures and durations investigated for each charge are summarized in Table III.
Table III
Experimental Parameters of the 27 Experiments of the Study
Mn-Source
Temperature (°C)
Reduction Duration (min)
Assmang (Asm)
1540
0; 30; 60; 120
1610
0; 30; 45*; 60
1660
25; 30
Comilog (Com)
1540
0; 30; 60; 300
1610
0; 30; 60; 120; 180
1660
30; 60
Assmang+HCS (A/HCS)
1510
30; 180
1540
0; 15; 60
1610
60
*This experiment was carried out with 60 min pre-reduction instead of 30 min
Further in this study, experiments will be named using the aforementioned experimental parameters with the following format: (Mn-source)-(Temperature)-(Reduction duration) as e.g. Asm-1610-60.
After cooling, the crucible was casted in epoxy resin. The slag phase was mounted and polished for analysis with a JEOL JXA-8500F EPMA. For the analyses, 15 kV acceleration voltage and a 20 nA beam current were used. For homogeneous slag areas, the beam diameter was 2 µm. For non-homogeneous areas, the beam diameter was increased to 30 µm to get a mean value. The samples were analyzed for MnO, SiO2, CaO, Al2O3, MgO, FeO, BaO and SO3. Mineral standard mounts from Astimex were used as follows: Si—Quartz, Mg—Chlorite, S—Pyrite, Mn—Rhodonite, Al—Plaglioclase, Ca—Apatite, Fe—Bustamite and Ba—Barite. For two-phased slags, point analysis was carried out on both phases. The volume fraction of each phase was determined based on pixel counting on back-scattered electron micrographs as well as using the measured mass losses. Examples of the microstructure observed and of a picture used for pixel counting are given in Figure 1.

Results and Discussion

Pre-reduction and Melting

This study investigates the MnO and SiO2 slag reduction reactions, therefore, one seeks to control other potentially simultaneous processes such as pre-reduction and melting.
Maintaining the samples at a heating plateau of 1473 K (1200 °C) for 30 minutes was found sufficient to ensure full pre-reduction. This was confirmed by experiment Asm-1610-45* for which the pre-reduction duration was doubled to 60 minutes. The isothermal section of the mass loss curves of Asm-1610-45* overlapped with that of Asm-1610-30, showing that longer pre-reduction had no significant effect on the subsequent reduction process. Besides, the pre-reduction stage showed excellent reproducibility as observed in Figure 2. For each type of charge, the average of the mass loss during the temperature ramp-up and pre-reduction is indicated in red, and the values within three standard deviations of the mean (μ ± 3σ) are shown in gray.
Although the chemical analyses occasionally indicated the presence of iron oxides, these were likely reduced. The measured FeO in pre-reduced samples is further treated as being metallic iron prills trapped within the slag phase, similarly to what was concluded in studies on ferromanganese.[18]
Concerning the melting, and despite high melting temperature of the raw materials taken separately,[1921] a single slag phase was consistently observed for all samples reacted for 0 minute. This indicate that complete melting was achieved prior slag reduction. This result is in agreement with what was found in earlier works.[14]

Isothermal Reduction

The isothermal reduction mass loss curves for the three charges considered are given in Figure 3. On the graphs, each line is associated to one experiment and its end-state is indicated by a marker. The end-state mass loss is also reported in Table IV. The mass loss during reduction is defined as the mass loss during the isothermal stage, minus the pre-reduction mass loss from the experiments of reference (0 minute of reduction). Note that the reduction mass loss in Figure 3 and Table IV comprises the loss of carbon, oxygen leaving the system as CO gas.
Table IV
Starting Mass, Total Mass Loss and Mass Loss During Reduction for Each Experiment
Experiment
Starting Mass (g)
Mass Loss (g)
Reduction Mass Loss (g)
Asm-1540-0
11.16
1.54
0.00
Asm-1540-30
1.97
0.43
Asm-1540-60
2.33
0.79
Asm-1540-120
3.97
2.43
Asm-1610-0
1.58
0.00
Asm-1610-30
2.40
0.82
Asm-1610-45*
3.17
1.59
Asm-1610-60
5.20
3.62
Asm-1660-25
4.11
2.54
Asm-1660-30
5.33
3.75
Com-1540-0
11.11
2.04
0.00
Com-1540-30
2.24
0.20
Com-1540-60
2.53
0.49
Com-1540-300
3.51
1.47
Com-1610-0
2.06
0.00
Com-1610-30
2.52
0.46
Com-1610-60
2.98
0.92
Com-1610-120
4.18
2.12
Com-1610-180
5.95
3.89
Com-1660-30
2.94
0.88
Com-1660-60
3.72
1.66
A/HCS-1510-30
12.23
1.79
0.93
A/HCS-1510-120
2.89
2.03
A/HCS-1540-0
0.86
0.00
A/HCS-1540-15
2.02
1.16
A/HCS-1540-60
3.33
2.47
A/HCS-1610-60
5.58
4.72
The samples reacted for 0 min are used as reference to calculate the mass loss from reduction
The reduction mass loss curves obtained at similar experimental conditions overlapped remarkably. The good fit between these illustrated the reproducibility of the experimental work. Only Asm-1610-60, represented with a dashed line in Figure 3, differed notably with similar experiments and was further considered as an outlier.
From the mass loss curves, one should notice the existence of two stages during the isothermal reduction, the transition between these two stages being marked by a rapid increase of the mass loss rate. This transition shift between slow and fast reduction, the rate change shift, is indicated by a dashed line: it is well defined for Assmang and Comilog charges but can only be conjectured for Assmang+HCS. The rate change shift was quicker at higher temperatures and happened earlier in time, however, it appeared to be constant relative to mass loss for a given charge. Thus, the shift could be linked to chemical and/or physical properties of the slag in this range. Foaming, which was observed occasionally, could be linked to the rate increase. However, the lack of knowledge on this process made it impossible to conclude whether it was a cause or a consequence of the rate increase, or even in relation with it. Thus, foaming was not addressed in this work.
The temperature of the isothermal stage had a significant influence on the reaction rate and on the extent of reduction. Temperature increases between 1813 K and 1933 K (1540 °C and 1660 °C) for Assmang and Comilog charges, and 1783 K to 1883 K (1510 °C to 1610 °C) for the Assmang+HCS charge consistently led to increases of the mass loss rate. This directly translates to a loss of oxygen in the form of CO gas due to reduction of the slag. The extent of reduction was also increased with an increase of temperature, as can be observed for Assmang and Assmang+HCS series. Note that the measured mass loss for experiment A/HCS-1610-60 is skewed due to material losses, the slag falling from the crucible after foaming.

Slag Analysis

The compositions of the slag phase after reduction investigated by EPMA are presented in Table V. It was considered that during pre-reduction, all the iron and manganese oxides reduced to metallic iron and MnO, respectively. The concentrations of BaO, FeO, and SO3 being consistently lower than 1 pct, they were not reported in the table.
Table V
Experimental Results from EPMA
Experiment
Slag Composition (Wt Pct)
SiO2
MgO
MnO
Al2O3
CaO
Asm-1540-0
33.89
1.39
57.24
0.81
6.57
Asm-1540-30
38.15
1.35
51.65
0.98
7.86
Asm-1540-60
38.95
1.76
49.48
1.00
8.81
Asm-1540-120
49.76
2.86
29.86
3.32
14.19
Asm-1610-0
33.62
1.49
57.49
0.75
6.64
Asm-1610-30
40.81
1.50
47.34
1.15
9.20
Asm-1610-45*
47.84
2.31
37.91
1.96
9.98
Asm-1610-60
41.11
7.18
2.99
9.00
39.71
Asm-1660-25
53.15
3.75
19.84
3.93
19.32
Asm-1660-30
49.71
6.96
6.20
6.17
30.96
Com-1540-0
30.31
0.15
60.59
8.73
0.22
Com-1540-30
31.68
0.18
58.60
9.28
0.25
Com-1540-60
34.45
0.18
54.96
10.14
0.27
Com-1540-300
40.94
0.33
46.64
11.84
0.46
Com-1610-0
30.92
0.17
61.63
7.06
0.23
Com-1610-30
35.78
0.23
55.25
8.49
0.25
Com-1610-60
37.43
0.31
51.13
10.88
0.25
Com-1610-120
47.99
0.48
34.21
16.79
0.52
Com-1610-180
30.18
3.22
5.25
55.37
5.97
Com-1660-30
37.54
0.27
52.34
9.41
0.45
Com-1660-60
44.00
0.37
42.29
12.91
0.43
A/HCS-1510-30
41.17
1.42
38.65
5.48
13.37
A/HCS-1510-120
47.93
1.96
23.80
7.82
18.48
A/HCS-1540-0
34.02
1.33
49.63
4.32
10.71
A/HCS-1540-15
44.06
1.57
33.18
6.25
14.94
A/HCS-1540-60
49.28
2.38
17.77
8.94
21.62
A/HCS-1610-60
43.48
3.59
5.19
13.99
33.75
The sum of all oxides is normalized to 100 wt pct
Assuming unreducible oxides remain in the slag phase, the contents of MgO, Al2O3 and CaO were used to evaluate the mass of slag reduced. Together with the mass losses from Table IV, the amounts of MnO and SiO2 reduced after each experiment were plotted in Figure 4. For each charge, the obtained data points formed a curve. Trend lines were drawn to illustrate these reduction paths, i.e., the composition changes during reduction.
Although the three charges differed in terms of chemistry, the reduction paths were similar. The reduction of MnO and SiO2 happened simultaneously at all experimental conditions. At the start of the reduction, mostly Mn was produced while only little Si was obtained, particularly for the Ass/HCS charge. As indicated by the trend lines of Figure 4, there was a steady increase of the Si/Mn ratio in the newly produced metal as the reduction progressed.
The existence of such reduction paths having little to no dependence on temperature could indicate that MnO and SiO2 reduction processes are linked. Previous works suggested a connection between MnO and SiO2 through Eq. 1,[22] the slag-metal equilibrium reaction, presumed to be faster than reduction reactions. However, Berg and Olsen did not evidence this mechanism in their work.[12] For the current study, the slag-metal equilibrium curves at 1883 K (1610 °C), which were calculated using FactSage 7.1, contrasted with the reduction path determined experimentally as shown in Figure 4. This indicates that the slag-metal reaction was not at equilibrium, although it may be taking place, the experimental data exhibiting a higher Mn/Si ratio in the produced metal compared to the slag-metal equilibrium.
Although the trend lines drawn in Figure 4 do not represent slag-metal equilibrium, they still indicate a relationship between MnO and SiO2 reduction, with temperature not affecting the reduction path. In fact, the use of the trend line constrains the temperature dependence of the reduction reactions: the overall mass loss is determined by temperature, while the disparity between MnO and SiO2 reduction is decided by the driving force.
The composition of the slag at the rate shift was determined using the reduction path curves. The shift was thus determined to occur at 47 wt pct MnO and 41 wt pct SiO2 for Asm, at 42 wt pct MnO and 44 wt pct SiO2 for Com and at 48 wt pct MnO and 35 wt pct SiO2 for A/HCS.

Reaction Kinetics, Modeling and Analysis

The rate models given in Eqs. 3 and 5 were used to study the reaction kinetics in the first reduction step, before the rapid increase of reduction rate. These rate models were studied previously for SiMn[15] and FeMn production.[13] The activities in the slag and metal phases were calculated using FactSage 7.1 for each composition along the reduction paths of Figure 4. For the slag phase, the FToxid database was used, and activities of SiO2 and MnO were calculated considering a slag containing SiO2, MgO, MnO, Al2O3 and CaO. For the metal phase, a carbon saturated mixture of Fe, Mn and Si was considered, and the FSstel database was used. Next, the driving forces for both reactions were deduced from the calculated activities and the equilibrium constants at each temperature.
The changes in the reaction driving forces in Eqs. 2 and 4 caused the increase of the Si/Mn ratio during reduction. This was confirmed by the changes in the activities calculated along the reduction paths. Figure 5 shows the activities of MnO and SiO2 for the Assmang charge during reduction as well as the activities of Mn and Si in the metal phase. The quick impoverishment of MnO in the slag due to reduction led to a decline of the activity of MnO together with a jump of the activity of SiO2.
The changes of the driving force did not affect the overall rate significantly during the first stage of reduction, as seen from the initial stable reduction rate for Assmang and Comilog charges. In addition, assuming a constant reaction interface and neglecting the decrease of \( a_{\text{MnO}} \), the increase of \( a_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} \) alone cannot justify the sudden rate increase observed.
The time dependency was added in the model using recorded mass loss measurements during slag reduction from the thermogravimetric set-up. The good reproducibility of the experimental work permitted the use of the longest curve only for each couple of temperature and charge. Experiment Asm-1610-60 is replaced by Asm-1610-45* as the former was considered being an outlier.
Finally, the reaction surface area was calculated assuming that the slag is a shrinking cylinder of revolution whose half the surface is in contact with carbon reductants. This assumption was based on the visual observations of the slag during reduction as shown in Figure 6. The slag cylinders were considered to keep their ratio of height to radius during the reduction, which was chosen equal to 2/3 based on the picture in Figure 6. As the mass loss is known, the mass of the slag left is known. Its density was assumed to be constant and equal to 3000 kg/m3 in all cases and thus the volume and surface area of the slag can be calculated. The approach used here contrasts with that of Ostrovski et al.[13] and Kim et al.[15] who considered the reaction surface to be governed by the shrinking coke particles’ surface area. As there was no clear penetration of the coke particles within the slag phase, this approach was not retained.
The rate constants \( k_{\text{MnO}} \) and \( k_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} \), respectively for MnO and SiO2 reduction reactions, were calculated at each step along the reduction path. Figure 7 shows an example of the calculated rate constant values for Asm-1610-45* as a function of time. The rapid increase of the rate constants marks the rate change shift, and hence the limit of the current model’s validity. The average rate constants are indicated as a blue-dashed bar in Figure 7, the length of the bar indicating the range over which it was calculated.
The rate constants \( k_{\text{MnO}} \) and \( k_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} \) used for calculations were taken as the average of the rate constants in the stable domain prior the rate change. The apparent activation energies \( E_{\text{a,MnO}} \) and \( E_{{{\text{a,SiO}}_{2} }} \), were calculated by graphing \( \ln (k_{\text{MnO}} ) \) and \( { \ln }\left( {k_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} } \right) \)vs\( 1/T \) for each charge in accordance with the Arrhenius law.
In the present study, the apparent activation energy for SiO2 reduction was consistently higher than that for MnO reduction. Besides, the choice of raw materials directly affected those activation energies: for both MnO and SiO2 reduction, the Asm charge exhibited the smallest energies, followed by Com and A/HCS. Thus, the present results for Asm and A/HCS contrast with the non-isothermal work from Kim et al.[15] albeit a similar set-up and charge, as his model included both the slow and high reduction stage. Based on the activation energies of Table VI, the model was confronted to the experimental data as graphed in Figure 8. A good fit was obtained prior the rate change shift. The frequency factors of the rate constants used for modeling, \( k_{{0,{\text{MnO}}}} \) and \( k_{{0,{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} \), are given in Table VII. The modeled rate constants of MnO and SiO2 reduction are plotted as a function of temperature in Figure 9. It appears that the rate of MnO reduction is always higher than that of SiO2, but the magnitude of the difference varies with the charge used. For the charge A/HCS in particular, the rate of MnO reduction is much higher than that of SiO2 reduction.
Table VI
Apparent Activation Energies for MnO and SiO2 Reduction
Charge
\( E_{\text{a,MnO}} \) (kJ/mol)
\( E_{{{\text{a,SiO}}_{2} }} \) (kJ/mol)
Asm
185
230
Com
210
340
A/HCS
325
380
Table VII
Frequency Factor for MnO and SiO2 Reduction Reaction
Charge
\( k_{{0 , {\text{MnO}}}} \) (gCO/min/cm2)
\( k_{{0 , {\text{SiO}}_{2} }} \) (gCO/min/cm2)
Asm
1.8 × 103
9.7 × 103
Com
7.3 × 103
4.4 × 106
A/HCS
3.5 × 107
8.5 × 107
The model employed started to deviate from the experimental data when the reaction rate increased abruptly at the rate change shift. This correlates with the steep increase of the calculated rate constants observed in Figure 7. However, the rate constants are not the origin of this change, nor are the changes of the driving force. The simultaneous increase of both reduction processes could be due to an increase of the reaction interface not factored in the model.

Conclusions

Silicomanganese is a high-quality alloy vital for the steelmaking industry. To prepare for variations in the raw material supply for its production, research work is conducted to assess the behavior of three charge types during slag reduction.
The reduction of the slag charges was a two-step mechanism. The reduction was initially stable and the rate constant until a sudden increase of the rate marking the change to a second stage. During this phase, the rate rapidly peaked and subsequently decreased towards the end of the reduction.
The conditions for the rate shift were found independent of temperature but a function of the mass loss, hence of the slag composition. The shift was observed at 47 wt pct MnO and 41 wt pct SiO2 for the Asm charge, 42 wt pct MnO and 44 wt pct SiO2 for the Com charge and 48 wt pct MnO and 35 wt pct SiO2 for the A/HCS charge.
The reduction kinetics were handily modeled for the first stage of reduction. Based on the measured mass losses and the chemical analysis of the slag, the activity and hence the driving force for reduction were obtained. The reaction interface was estimated considering no penetration of the slag within the coke layer, as observed.
The kinetic parameters k0 and Ea were determined for MnO and SiO2 reduction during the stable initial stage. Disparities were found between the manganese sources: the reduction of MnO and SiO2 from the Asm charge was faster than for the Com charge. The A/HCS charge was significantly faster concerning MnO reduction, but one must bear in mind the modest extent of the first stage for this charge.

Acknowledgments

Open Access funding provided by NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology (incl St. Olavs Hospital - Trondheim University Hospital). This publication has been funded by the SFI Metal Production, (Centre for Research-based Innovation, 237738). The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Research Council of Norway and the partners of the SFI Metal Production.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Tangstad, P. Calvert, H. Brun, and A.G. Lindseth: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 10th, 2004, pp. 213–22. M. Tangstad, P. Calvert, H. Brun, and A.G. Lindseth: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 10th, 2004, pp. 213–22.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat K.P. Abraham, M.W. Davies and F.D. Richardson: J. Iron Steel Inst. London, 1960, vol. 196, pp. 82–89. K.P. Abraham, M.W. Davies and F.D. Richardson: J. Iron Steel Inst. London, 1960, vol. 196, pp. 82–89.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat S.R. Mehta and F.D. Richardson: J. Iron Steel Inst. Lond., 1965, vol. 203, pp. 524–28. S.R. Mehta and F.D. Richardson: J. Iron Steel Inst. Lond., 1965, vol. 203, pp. 524–28.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat B.K.D.P. Rao and D.D.R. Gaskell: Metall. Trans. B, 1981, vol. 12B, pp. 311–17.CrossRef B.K.D.P. Rao and D.D.R. Gaskell: Metall. Trans. B, 1981, vol. 12B, pp. 311–17.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat H. Ohta and H. Suito: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1996, vol. 27B, pp. 943–53.CrossRef H. Ohta and H. Suito: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1996, vol. 27B, pp. 943–53.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Y.-B. Kang, I.-H. Jung, S.A. Decterov, A.D. Pelton, and H.-G. Lee: ISIJ Int., 2004, vol. 44, pp. 965–74.CrossRef Y.-B. Kang, I.-H. Jung, S.A. Decterov, A.D. Pelton, and H.-G. Lee: ISIJ Int., 2004, vol. 44, pp. 965–74.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat B. Zhao, E. Jak and P.C. Hayes: ISIJ Int., 2005, vol. 45, pp. 1019–26.CrossRef B. Zhao, E. Jak and P.C. Hayes: ISIJ Int., 2005, vol. 45, pp. 1019–26.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat H. Cengizler and R.H. Eric: Int. Conf. Molten Slags, Fluxes Salts, 10th, 2016, pp. 1309–17. H. Cengizler and R.H. Eric: Int. Conf. Molten Slags, Fluxes Salts, 10th, 2016, pp. 1309–17.
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat T.-A. Skjervheim and S.E. Olsen: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 7th, 1995, pp. 631–39. T.-A. Skjervheim and S.E. Olsen: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 7th, 1995, pp. 631–39.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat V. Olsø, M. Tangstad, and S.E. Olsen: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 8th, 1998, pp. 279–83. V. Olsø, M. Tangstad, and S.E. Olsen: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 8th, 1998, pp. 279–83.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat K. Berg and S.E. Olsen: Report STF24 A04531, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway, 2004. K. Berg and S.E. Olsen: Report STF24 A04531, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway, 2004.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat O. Ostrovski, S.E. Olsen, M. Tangstad and M. Yastreboff: Can. Metall. Q., 2002, vol. 41, pp. 309–18.CrossRef O. Ostrovski, S.E. Olsen, M. Tangstad and M. Yastreboff: Can. Metall. Q., 2002, vol. 41, pp. 309–18.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat P.P. Kim: Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2018. P.P. Kim: Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2018.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat P.P. Kim and M. Tangstad: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2018, vol. 49B, pp. 1185–96.CrossRef P.P. Kim and M. Tangstad: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2018, vol. 49B, pp. 1185–96.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat B. Jamieson, Y. Tabatabaei, M. Barati and K. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2019, vol. 50B, pp. 192–203.CrossRef B. Jamieson, Y. Tabatabaei, M. Barati and K. Coley: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2019, vol. 50B, pp. 192–203.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Ringdalen and M. Tangstad: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 13rd, 2013, pp. 197–206. E. Ringdalen and M. Tangstad: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 13rd, 2013, pp. 197–206.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Tranell, S. Gaal, D. Lu, M. Tangstad, and J. Safarian: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 11th, 2007, pp. 231–40. G. Tranell, S. Gaal, D. Lu, M. Tangstad, and J. Safarian: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 11th, 2007, pp. 231–40.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Gaal, D. Lou, S. Wasbø, B. Ravary, and M. Tangstad: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 11th, 2007, pp. 247–57. S. Gaal, D. Lou, S. Wasbø, B. Ravary, and M. Tangstad: Int. Ferro-Alloys Congr., 11th, 2007, pp. 247–57.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Ringdalen, S. Gaal, M. Tangstad and O. Ostrovski: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2010, vol. 41B, pp. 1220–29.CrossRef E. Ringdalen, S. Gaal, M. Tangstad and O. Ostrovski: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2010, vol. 41B, pp. 1220–29.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Ringdalen and M. Tangstad: Int. Conf. Molten Slags, Fluxes Salts, 10th, 2016, pp. 43–51. E. Ringdalen and M. Tangstad: Int. Conf. Molten Slags, Fluxes Salts, 10th, 2016, pp. 43–51.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat S.E. Olsen, M. Tangstad, and T. Lindstad: Production of Manganese Ferroalloys, Tapir Akademisk Forlag, Trondheim, Norway, 2007, pp. 182–83. S.E. Olsen, M. Tangstad, and T. Lindstad: Production of Manganese Ferroalloys, Tapir Akademisk Forlag, Trondheim, Norway, 2007, pp. 182–83.
Metadaten
Titel
Kinetics of Slag Reduction in Silicomanganese Production
verfasst von
Vincent Canaguier
Merete Tangstad
Publikationsdatum
09.03.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1073-5615
Elektronische ISSN: 1543-1916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01801-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.