Skip to main content

2001 | Buch

Knowledge Unplugged

The McKinsey Global Survey of Knowledge Management

verfasst von: Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

Knowledge Unplugged announces the results of a major survey on knowledge management practice within the most influential companies in the world, by the most influential management consultancy group in the world. The McKinsey Knowledge Management team interviewed top executives and also investigated how far their plans were implemented in practise, in 40 companies in the US, Europe and Japan. In many companies they discovered a significant gap between the vision at the top and the reality on the shop floor. Knowledge Unplugged draws together their findings and presents a practical guide to improving knowledge building and sharing at all levels within an organisation, vividly illustrated with case studies of best practice and common pitfalls. It also goes further and challenges companies to abandon convention and to liberate Knowledge Management from the hands of the IT department! They argue that Knowledge management is much more than simply installing a new database and can only be successful when it is at the heart of everyday personal exchanges, personal incentives and personal responsibilities at every level of the firm.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter One. Why knowledge is important
Abstract
As industrialization swept through most of the world, individual entrepreneurs and global corporations have had to grapple constantly with the ebb and flow of factors of production. At various stages over the past few hundred years, a succession of factors have formed bottlenecks to efficiency, threatening to strangle growth or asphyxiate industries entirely.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Two. Knowledge pull required
Abstract
Many companies we visited had already tried to introduce knowledge management programs, and at times these efforts were quite substantial. But despite management commitment and healthy budgets, these programs often floundered or failed. In each case something was missing. A vital ingredient of the knowledge management recipe had not just been left in the cupboard; it was not even on the shopping list. All these companies lacked the right cultural context that would create and nurture reciprocal trust, openness and cooperation.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Three. Knowledge character building
Abstract
A strong corporate knowledge culture will fuel a successful knowledge program. But to make such a culture meaningful and productive rather than a mess of Brownian motion requires firm-handed steerage and a clear grasp of your craft’s characteristics. Just as a ship’s crew can become more adept sailors as the journey advances, your employees can gradually build their desire for knowledge even as other aspects of a knowledge management program are already underway. Even without a complete knowledge culture, your company should begin actively addressing the three main tasks of knowledge management: application, distribution, and cultivation.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Four. Subjectivity: reading from the same page
Abstract
In addressing knowledge management problems, the inherent subjectivity of knowledge can be like sand in the gearbox. On first inspection, everything looks fine, but still the machinery is not working quite right. If the machine must be used anyway, the results will be spotty at best, but most people will choose to abandon the machine altogether. Likewise, grains of subjectivity can spoil an otherwise well-designed initiative. Efforts to move in a common direction can be scuttled by misunderstandings, for instance, or readily available solutions may be ignored because employees do not see how they can be applied.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Five. Transferability: knowledge on the move
Abstract
We have just seen how communication is a key component of overcoming subjectivity. Communicating knowledge is only possible because knowledge can readily be transferred. This characteristic of knowledge allows companies to open new business fields or find new sources for value generation by detaching knowledge from its original context and applying it to a different one. This happens every day in business: an employee finds a successful way of performing a certain task, and, if the results are positive, the employee tries to replicate the success with other pending tasks. From small tasks to huge, business-changing tasks, this is how the transferability of knowledge is primarily exploited.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Six. Embeddedness: mining a rich vein
Abstract
Everyone recognizes that knowledge is not readily quantifiable. It has no line on a balance sheet, and we even lack the vocabulary to describe a quantity of knowledge, reverting to nuggets, chunks, pieces, and, more generically still, amounts. Mining your company’s knowledge is necessary, but it is difficult to know how rich the seam is because a core characteristic of knowledge is that it is embedded, hidden from view. Companies must come to terms with this if they are to have a successful knowledge management program.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Seven. Self-reinforcement: starting the chain reaction
Abstract
Knowledge is a more ethereal concept than money or any of the other traditional corporate assets. But it is precisely because it is unquantifiable that another characteristic comes into play. We call this trait self-reinforcement to emphasize that sharing knowledge does not normally lead to a decline in its use or value. Self-reinforcement is not a trait of other assets. A machine can only be in one place at one time, and sharing €100 means that you end up with less than €100. But sharing knowledge produces different results. The original knowledge holder keeps the knowledge even after it has been shared, and the knowledge receiver gains the knowledge, which means it can be applied more widely, creating value, or, combined with the recipient’s own knowledge, creating even more value.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Eight. Perishability: capturing value quickly
Abstract
The value of knowledge tends to decline over time. This trend can be interrupted by sudden and unpredictable bursts of value, but these spikes are rarely sustainable. While a company can garner windfall rewards from such sudden updrafts, measures in this area must concentrate on coping with the perishing value of your corporate knowledge base.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Nine. Spontaneity: sparking profits
Abstract
The outbreak of new knowledge cannot be scheduled or predicted accurately. Dispatching an individual or team to solve a problem or work toward a breakthrough innovation will likely result in some knowledge being formulated, but whether it is the right knowledge at the right time, the best solution, remains anyone’s guess until the process is well underway. That moment when an idea finally erupts or when a consistent picture emerges from seemingly disconnected thoughts is an individual experience. Neither the timing nor the content can be forced because the appearance of new knowledge is spontaneous. But it can be anticipated and encouraged, at least in broad terms. The mistake that companies make, however, is to equate spontaneity with randomness.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Ten. Kicking off a knowledge management program
Abstract
Design to cost, design to ease of manufacture, overhead value analyses … we could go on. The list of tools for improving operations and the profitability of a business is long. And for each one, a proven approach is readily available. Most use three or four distinct steps to solve the problem: there is typically diagnosis followed by program design, then implementation is started in a pilot before the concept is rolled out broadly. Some of these elements are well suited to improving a company’s knowledge management, but the broad approach differs significantly. Good knowledge management should certainly help to improve operations, but a fully fledged knowledge management program is more comparable to the development and implementation of company strategy than to a classic operational improvement program. A knowledge management program should be conducted with parallel, rather than linear, phases. This means implementing some measures very early in the diagnosis to capture the low hanging fruit. It also means continuing to do analyses of various aspects during the major period of implementation.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Chapter Eleven. Coming to terms with the knowledge economy
Abstract
Knowledge management has been a fashionable topic in business circles for more than a decade, but our survey showed that many companies can talk the talk, but few can walk the walk. This is probably because the theme has been surrounded by a general mystique that makes many dyed-in-the-wool business leaders uncomfortable. It is time to throw out the jargon. Soon, it will be useless to distinguish knowledge workers from non-knowledge workers or knowledge companies from non-knowledge companies.
Jürgen Kluge, Wolfram Stein, Thomas Licht, Alexandra Bendler, Jens Elzenheimer, Susanne Hauschild, Uwe Heckert, Jan Krönig, André Stoffels
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Knowledge Unplugged
verfasst von
Jürgen Kluge
Wolfram Stein
Thomas Licht
Alexandra Bendler
Jens Elzenheimer
Susanne Hauschild
Uwe Heckert
Jan Krönig
André Stoffels
Copyright-Jahr
2001
Verlag
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Electronic ISBN
978-0-333-97705-7
Print ISBN
978-1-349-42769-7
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333977057