Introduction
Method
Framework and Search Strategy
Population | LGBTQI + refugees/asylees/asylum seekers |
Context | Mental health, psychological condition |
Outcome | Experiences, needs, challenges, perception, perspectives, coping strategies, thoughts, feelings |
Examples of Database Search
Web of Science
Taylor & Francis Online
PubMed
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
LGBT/ LGBTQIA/ LGBTQ/LGBTQI | Refugees Asylum seeker(s) / Asylees Forced migrants | Mental health |
Lesbian | ||
Gay | ||
Bisexual | ||
Trans/transgender | ||
Intersex | ||
Sexual minority | ||
Homosexual | ||
Queer Gender-nonconform |
Criteria | Justification/ details |
---|---|
Published between January 2002 and April 2020 | From 2002 onward, UNHCR listed sexual orientation as a potential reason for international protection under guideline number 1, gender-related prosecution (UNHCR Guidline1, 2002) |
Examines all original qualitative data | All non-numerical data, including observation reports, case studies, oral history, and experience-based data, were included. Commentaries, editorials, conference abstracts, and discussion papers were excluded. Qualitative data from mixed-method studies were included |
Papers with a direct or indirect link to mental health. Primary data (e.g., participant quotes) on mental health and well-being (e.g., resiliency/coping strategies) or mental pressure (e.g., discrimination, violence), or mental healthcare (e.g., quality of care or access barriers) were included | Other health-related topics, such as HIV and STIs, were excluded |
About adult LGBTQI + forced migrants/refugees/asylees/ with tolerated/undocumented/ or withholding of removal status | LGBTQI + asylees aged 18 or older who seek (or want to seek) international protection based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression or sexual characteristics (SOGIESC), regardless of the asylum request result. Non-forced LGBTQI + migrants and minor LGBTQI + asylees were excluded. Studies that reflect service providers’ perspectives about LGBTQI + refugees were also eligible for inclusion |
Published in English in peer-reviewed journals | Due to limited resources for translation, studies in languages other than English were excluded. Also, grey literature was excluded |
Quality Assessment (Critical Appraisal)
Study author, publication year | Title | Study population | Selected sample Demographic Characteristics (age/ethnicity) | Sample size | Study design | Setting | Recruitment method | Analysis method | Strengths/weaknesses of Study | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Abramovich et al., 2020) | A transgender refugee woman experiencing posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and homelessness | Transgender refugee woman | 23 years old Transgender woman Born and raised in Saudi Arabia | 1 | Case study | USA Clinical setting, community health centre | Referral, convenience sampling | Case study | S: - Intersectional reporting, focus on pre- and post-flight traumatic stressors - Case involves multi-layered issues (refugee status, homelessness, gender identity, access to services) and also multi-centre intervention - Focus on social determinants of health - Recommendations for other clinicians - Important as a vessel for a PTSD patient to tell her story - Patient consent obtained W: - Clinical question not very well formulated - Psychotherapeutic intervention not clearly described (e.g. what type of psychotherapy), not clear how all interventions are connected - No clear quality control | 1. U 2. Y 3. U 4. Y 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. U 9. Y 10. Y T: 6.5 |
(Alessi et al., 2018a) | A Qualitative Exploration of the Integration Experiences of LGBTQ Refugees Who Fled from the Middle East, North Africa, and Central and South Asia to Austria and the Netherlands | a) LGBTQ refugees b) Service providers | a) Age 18 to 53 years old (M = 30.26) from Syria, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, Chechnya, Palestine, Somalia, Tajikistan asylum status granted, pending, subsidiary, denied identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender female, transgender male, queer/gender nonconforming b) Age 29–59 (M = 45) identify as cisgender female/gender queer, female, male, their sexual orientation as lesbian, gay, and straight | a) 38 b) 5 | Qualitative Interview | Austria and the Netherlands | Purposive, community based, snowballing (interview partners referral) | Thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) | S: - Clear research question - Clearly defined methodology (sampling, recruitment, participants, interview questions) - Well-described procedure - Strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour W: - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned but not delved into (e.g. prior bias) | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. N 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 8.5 |
(Alessi et al., 2018b) | Traumatic Stress Among Sexual and Gender Minority Refugees From the Middle East, North Africa, and Asia Who Fled to the European Union | LGBTQ refugees | Age 18 to 53 years old (M = 30.26) from Syria, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, Chechnya, Palestine, Somalia, Tajikistan asylum status granted, pending, temporary, denied identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender female, transgender male, queer/gender nonconforming | 38 | Mixed methods: Self-report PTSD measure, Qualitative semi-structured interview | Austria and the Netherlands | Purposive, community based, snowballing (interview partners referral) | Constructivist grounded theory (Charmaz, 2014) | S: - Clear research question - Clearly defined methodology (sampling, recruitment, participants, interview questions) - Detailed procedure - Strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour - Self-reflection considerations mentioned (e.g. prior bias) - Data triangulation W: - One paper out of many papers from the same study | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. U 7. Y 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 9.5 |
(Alessi et al., 2017) | A Qualitative Exploration of the Premigration Victimization Experiences of Sexual and Gender Minority Refugees and Asylees in the United States and Canada | LGBTQ asylees, refugees, or with withholding- of-removal status | Age: 21–49 (M = 33) Identity: gay, lesbian, transgender male, and transgender female from Barbados, Belarus, Jamaica, Iran, Kenya, Kosovo, Malaysia, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Peru, Russia, South Korea, Trinidad, Uganda, Ukraine, Venezuela Racially identified as Black, White, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, multiracial | 26 | Qualitative Interview (life history interview) | USA and Canada | Purposive, community based (from community events and Facebook), snowballing (interview partners referral) | Thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) | S: - The research question is well contextualised and clear - Methodology (sampling, recruitment, participants, interview questions well described) described clearly - Clear analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigor W: - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned but not delved into (e.g. data collection in researcher’s office, previous knowledge/relationship?) - One paper out of many papers from the same study | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. N 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 8.5 |
(Alessi, 2016) | Resilience in Sexual and Gender Minority Forced Migrants: A Qualitative Exploration | LGBTQ asylees, refugees, or with withholding- of-removal status | Age: 21–49 (M = 33) Identity: gay, lesbian, transgender male, transgender female from Barbados, Belarus, Jamaica, Iran, Kenya, Kosovo, Malaysia, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Peru, Russia, South Korea, Trinidad, Uganda, Ukraine, Venezuela Racially identified as Black, White, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, multiracial | 26 | Qualitative semi-structured Interview | USA and Canada | Purposive, sampling, snowball sampling | Thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) | S: - Clear research question - Clearly defined methodology (sampling, recruitment, participants, interview questions well described) - Procedure very clear, easy to replicate - Very strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour - Discussion of bias W: - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned but not delved into | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. N 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 8.5 |
(Alessi et al., 2016) | The darkest times of my life: Recollections of child abuse among forced migrants persecuted because of their sexual orientation and gender identity | LGBTQ asylees, refugees, or with withholding- of-removal status | Age: 21–49 (M = 33) Identity: gay, lesbian, transgender male, transgender female, gender non-conforming from Barbados, Belarus, Jamaica, Iran, Kenya, Kosovo, Malaysia, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Peru, Russia, South Korea, Trinidad, Uganda, Ukraine, Venezuela Racially identified as Black, White, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, multiracial | 26 | Qualitative Interview (life history interview) | USA and Canada | Purposive, community based (from community events and Facebook), snowballing (interview partners referral) | Thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) | S: - Well contextualised research question - Clearly defined methodology (sampling, recruitment, participants, interview questions well described) - Procedure also very clear - Strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour - Discussion of bias W: - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned but not delved into (e.g. trauma/re-traumatisation) - It is not clear how child protection is the right perspective here - One paper out of many papers from the same study - Because of above point, not clear if the research questions were formulated prior or after data collection, that is, whether they emerged from data | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. U 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 9 |
(Borges, 2019) | We have to do a lot of healing”: LGBTQ migrant Latinas resisting and healing from systemic violence | Queer Latina migrants | Age: Mid to late 20 s Queer Latina women Two undocumented – “undocuqueer” | 5 | Oral history interview | USA and Mexico | Purposive sampling | N/A | S: - Reflection of terms used - Positionality reflected upon - Clear recruitment strategy W: - No clear data analysis strategy - Lack of methodological rigour - Procedural ethics mentioned (e.g. consent), but no mention of institutional approval | 1. Y 2. Y 3. U 4. U 5. U 6. Y 7. U 8. U 9. Y 10. Y T: 7.5 |
(Chávez, 2011) | Identifying the Needs of LGBTQ Immigrants and Refugees in Southern Arizona | a) Service providers b) LGBTQ migrants c) Allies of LGBTQ migrants | N/A | a) 20 b) 7 c) 5 | Pilot study a) Short qualitative interview b & c) Structured qualitative interview | USA | Snowball sampling | N/A | S: - Clear research question - Question derived from community consultation - Reflection on positionality - Reflection on methodological difficulties (e.g. recruitment, translation) W: - No data analysis strategy reported - Lacking methodological rigour - No mention of procedural ethics (e.g. consent briefly mentioned) | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. U 5. U 6. Y 7. U 8. N 9. Y 10. U T: 7 |
(Cheney et al., 2017) | Living Outside the Gender Box in Mexico: Testimony of Transgender Mexican Asylum Seekers | MtF transgender asylum seekers from Mexico | Age 20–58 (M = 32) | 45 | Qualitative document review | USA | Secondary data | Grounded theory | S: - Clear data analysis strategy - Well-rounded discussion of results - Reflection on limitations W: - No clear research question, rather an explorative aim - No reflection on positionalities of those creating the documents - Mention of procedural ethics (e.g. general consent), but no further discussion of other forms of ethics - One paper out of many papers from the same study | 1. Y 2. Y 3. U 4. U 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. U T: 7 |
(Gowin et al., 2017) | Needs of a Silent Minority: Mexican Transgender Asylum Seekers | MtF transgender asylum seekers from Mexico | Age 20–58 (M = 32) | 45 | Qualitative document review | USA | Secondary data | Thematic analysis (not specified, only described) | S: - Clear discussion of results, with illustrations - Reflection on limitations of using secondary data W: - Data analysis strategy described but not specified - No clear research question, questions rather emerge from data - No reflection on positionalities of those creating the documents - Mention of procedural ethics (e.g. general consent), but no further discussion | 1. Y 2. Y 3. U 4. U 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. U T: 6.5 |
(Giametta, 2018) : [CASP low-score exclusion] | New asylum protection categories and elusive filtering devices: the case of ‘Queer asylum’ in France and the UK | a) LGBTI refugees b) Immigration lawyers c) Refugee support workers and volunteers | N/A | a) 30 b) 5 c) 5 | Qualitative Interviews and ethnographic fieldwork | UK and France | N/A | Ethnography | S: - Analysis across settings and roles W: - No recruitment strategy - No clear data analysis strategy - Lack of methodological rigour - No reflection on positionality - No discussion of ethical considerations | 1. Y 2. U 3. U 4. U 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. U 9. U 10. U T: 5 |
(Jordan, 2009) | Un/Convention(al) Refugees: Contextualizing the Accounts of Refugees Facing Homophobic or Transphobic Persecution | a) Refugee claimants b) Community organisation members | a) Ages 25–42 Transwomen, queer women, queer men from Middle East, Latin America, East Africa, Southeast Asia, South Asia b) predominantly men who identify as gay, bisexual, or queer, few women lesbian, or queer, and transwomen ethnoculturally diverse | a) 9 b) N/A | Participant observation, In depth narrative interviews | Canada | Purposive sampling, convenience sampling | Critical qualitative inquiry (content reading, dialogical reading, critical reading) | S: - Discussion of positionality - Clear research question - Detailed recruitment strategy - Clear analysis strategy - Discussion of iterative consent W: - Analysis of participant observation not always clear | 1. Y 2. Y 3. U 4. Y 5. Y 6. U 7. Y 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 9 |
(Kahn, 2015) | Cast Out: “Gender Role Outlaws” Seeking Asylum in the West and the Quest for Social Connections | Gender nonconforming asylum seekers persecuted in home countries for resisting gender-role norms | Between ages 25–50 (not exact range) African women fleeing the threat of FC to their daughters and of gay men from Islamic societies in the Middle East and Africa (Only gay men quotes was extracted) From Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Senegal, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Gambia, Chad | 7 (Gay participants) | Qualitative In-depth, semi-structured interview | USA | Purposive sampling | Grounded theory (open coding, axial coding and thematic development) (Charmaz, 2006) | S: - Clear research question and theoretical approach - Clearly defined methodology (sampling, recruitment) - Detailed procedure - Strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour (e.g. pilot interviews) W: - Although theoretically discussed, the sample may not represent gender nonconformity complimentarily - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned and strategies developed to achieve them but not delved into | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. U 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 7.5 |
(Kahn & Alessi, 2017) | Coming Out Under the Gun: Exploring the Psychological Dimensions of Seeking Refugee Status for LGBT Claimants in Canada | a) Service providers serving LGBT forced migrants b) LGBT forced migrants | a) Ages 26–51 legal providers, mental health providers, advocates, resettlement workers and private sponsors identify as male, female or gender non-conforming, sexual orientation as heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual b) Ages 22–40 identify as gay, lesbian, or transgender woman from the Bahamas, Bangladesh, Iran, Lebanon, the Arabian Peninsula and Ghana | a) 22 b) 7 | Qualitative In-depth, semi-structured interview | Canada | Purposive and snowball sampling | Grounded theory (open coding, axial coding and thematic development) (Charmaz, 2006) | S: - Clear research question - Detailed and rigorous methodology - Strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour W: - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned but not delved into | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. U 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 9 |
(Kahn et al., 2017) | Promoting the wellbeing of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender forced migrants in Canada: providers’ perspectives | a) Service providers serving LGBT forced migrants b) LGBT forced migrants | a) Ages 26–51 legal providers, mental health providers, advocates, resettlement workers and private sponsors identify as male, female or gender non-conforming, sexual orientation as heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual b) Ages 22–40 identify as gay, lesbian, or transgender woman from the Bahamas, Bangladesh, Iran, Lebanon, the Arabian Peninsula and Ghana | a) 22 b) 7 | Qualitative semi-structured interview | Canada | Purposive and snowball sampling | Grounded theory (open coding, axial coding and thematic development) (Charmaz, 2006) | S: - Clearly stated research question - Detailed methodology (sampling, recruitment, participants, interview questions) - Clear procedure, easy to replicate - Strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour (e.g. pilot interviews) W: - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned but not delved into - Analysing perspectives of providers and migrants together not fully justified - One paper out of two papers from the same study | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. U 6. N 7. Y 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 8.5 |
(Kahn et al., 2018) | Facilitating Mental Health Support for LGBT Forced Migrants: A Qualitative Inquiry | a) Service providers serving LGBT forced migrants b) LGBT forced migrants | a) Ages 26–51 legal providers, mental health providers, advocates, resettlement workers and private sponsors identify as male, female or gender non-conforming, sexual orientation as heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual b) Ages 22–40 identify as gay, lesbian, or transgender woman from the Bahamas, Bangladesh, Iran, Lebanon, the Arabian Peninsula and Ghana | a) 22 b) 7 | Qualitative In-depth, semi-structured interview | Canada | Purposive and snowball sampling | Thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) | S: - Clear research question - Clearly defined methodology (sampling, recruitment, participants, interview questions) - Detailed procedure - Strong analysis strategy, several strategies to ensure methodological rigour (e.g. pilot interviews) W: - Self-reflection and ethical considerations mentioned and strategies developed to achieve them but not delved into - Different perspectives of providers and migrants not fully justified - Analysing perspectives of providers and migrants together not fully justified - One paper out of two papers from the same study | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. Y 6. U 7. U 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 9 |
(Keuroghlian & Stem, 2017) : [CASP low-score exclusion] | Providing Care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Immigrants at Health Centers and Clinics | A gay man from Uganda | Age: 25 | 1 | Case study | USA | N/A | Case study | S: -Case presented with premigration experiences, postmigration difficulties and access barriers W: - No referral path, no information on sampling - No methodology clarified - No quality control | 1. U 2. Y 3. N 4. U 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. N 9. Y 10. Y T: 5 |
(Lee & Brotman, 2013) | SPEAK OUT! Structural Intersectionality and Anti-Oppressive Practice with LGBTQ Refugees in Canada | a) Sexual minority refugees b) Advocates & service providers | a) Identify as cis or gender nonconforming men, cis or gender nonconforming women, MtF trans women from Latin America, Caribbean, Middle East, Asia, and Africa status as accepted refugees, still in the claimant process, or refused refugee status Plus: Community advisory board of 15 people representing legal, social, political advocacy, and direct practice spheres, including refugees themselves | a) 20 b) 6 a + b) 2 | Community-based qualitative research, Qualitative interview | Canada | Snowball sampling, Stepwise iterative process of recruitment, interviewing and analysis | S: - Reflection on terminology used - Novel community-based methodology W: - Research question not explicit - Recruitment strategy named but not explained - Similarly, approach of community-based research named but not fully explained - Analysis strategy described but not clear - Results mixed with literature - One paper out of two papers from the same study | 1. U 2. Y 3. Y 4. U 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. U 9. Y 10. U T: 6 | |
(Lee & Brotman, 2011) | Identity, Refugeeness, Belonging: Experiences of Sexual Minority Refugees in Canada | a) Sexual minority refugees b) Advocates & service providers | a) Identify as cis or gender nonconforming men, cis or gender nonconforming women, MtF trans women from Latin America, Caribbean, Middle East, Asia, and Africa status as accepted refugees, still in the claimant process, or refused refugee status Plus: Community advisory board | a) 20 b) 6 a + b) 2 | Community-based qualitative research, Qualitative semi-structured interview | Canada | Snowball sampling, Stepwise iterative process of recruitment, interviewing and analysis | S: - Clear explanation of the community procedures - Novel community-based methodology - Reflection on procedural ethics - Analysis strategy explained W: - Research question not explicit, purpose exploratory - One paper out of two papers from the same study | 1. U 2. Y 3. Y 4. U 5. Y 6. U 7. Y 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 8.5 | |
(Logie et al., 2016) | “It’s for us –newcomers, LGBTQ persons, and HIV-positive persons. You feel free to be”: a qualitative study exploring social support group participation among African and Caribbean lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender newcomers and refugees in Toronto, Canada | LGBT African and Caribbean newcomers and refugees | Age: M = 30.5 Identify as heterosexual, bisexual, lesbian, gay, cisgender male, cisgender female, transgender From African and Caribbean regions | 29 | Community-based partnership, Qualitative semi-structured focus group interviews | Canada | Venue-based sampling | Thematic analysis | S: - Clear study aim - Study design explained in detail - Cleat analysis strategy - Reflection on the relationship between researcher and participants - Procedural ethics reflected upon W: - Methodology not fully justified | 1. Y 2. Y 3. U 4. U 5. Y 6. Y 7. Y 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 9 |
(Macdonell & Daley, 2015) | Examining the Development of Positive Space n Health and Social Service Organizations: A Canadian Exploratory Study | LGBTQ-positive community-based health and social service agencies | Key informants from a range of health and social service agencies to represent diverse sectors | 8 | Exploratory qualitative design, Qualitative semi-structured in-depth interviews | Canada | Purposive Sampling, maximum variation sampling | Conventional content analysis (Hsieh & Shannon, 2005) | S: - Ethical procedures clearly defined - Clear recruitment strategy - Clearly defined research questions - Methodological transparency (interview guide provided) - Clear data analysis strategy W: - No reflection on positionality | 1. Y 2. Y 3. U 4. Y 5. Y 6. N 7. Y 8. Y 9. Y 10. Y T: 8.5 |
(Nguyen et al., 2019) | A gay Nigerian man’s journey to asylum in the USA | A gay Nigerian man | Age: 35 Asylum seeker in detention | 1 | Case study | USA | Referral | Case study | S: - Clear case description, with relevant case background to explain current health presentation W: - Positionality not reflected upon - No explanation of method of examination besides clinical interview conducted - No clear quality control | 1. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. Y 5. U 6. N 7. U 8. N 9. Y 10. Y T: 7 |
(Ward, 2018) | ‘Prove it’ working with LBGTQ + Asylum seekers who must prove their sexuality to stay in the UK | Men seeking asylum based on SOGI | One in his 30 s, one in his 40 s From Africa Asylum claim rejected, facing deportation, in appeals process | 2 | Case study | UK | Convenience sampling | Case study, dramatherapy | S: - Progress of cases discussed - Reflection on the relationship between the therapist/researcher and therapy clients/participanyts W: - No reflection on limitations of the study - No clear quality control - Mention of procedural ethics (e.g. consent) but no further discussion | 1. Y 2. Y 3. U 4. U 5. U 6. Y 7. U 8. N 9. U 10. Y T: 6.5 |
Results
Themes | Studies |
---|---|
Discrimination and violence | |
Access barriers to mental healthcare | |
Challenges in the asylum system | |
Unaddressed mental health problems | |
Support resources | |
Coping strategies |