nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | Supplement | Buchkapitel

26. Limitation Period

verfasst von : İlhan Helvacı

Erschienen in: Turkish Contract Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

As a rule, claims are subject to limitation periods. When an obligation becomes time-barred, it remains valid but becomes a natural obligation. Thus, the debtor may perform the time-barred obligation or raise a defence that the claim is time-barred. When the debtor asserts that the obligation is time-barred, the court must dismiss the case provided that this defence is not contrary to the principles of good faith (TCC art. 2 par. 2).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Extinguishment of Obligations

Nächstes Kapitel Joint and Several Debtors

Aybay (2011), pp. 162–169; Becker (1941), Vorbemerkungen zu art. 127-142, art. 127-142; Berger (2012), pp. 478–496; Engel (1997), pp. 795–824; Eren (2015), pp. 1281–1298; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 518–606; Gauch et al. (2008), pp. 217–239; Honsell et al. (2003), Vorbemerkungen zu art. 127-142, art. 127-142; Kılıçoğlu (2013), pp. 866–898; Nomer (2015), pp. 391–410; Oser and Schönenberger (1929), Vorbemerkung zu art. 127-142, art. 127-142; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 579–606; Reisoğlu (2014), pp. 424–440; Schwenzer (2009), pp. 519–533; Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 1030–1076; Tercier (2004), pp. 280–288; Tercier et al. (2016), pp. 480–495; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 127-142, and von Tuhr and Escher (1974), pp. 211–235.

Prescription, Verjährung. For further explanations see Akçay (2010), Erdem (2010).

Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 1030.

Eren (2015), p. 1298; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 602–603.

See Sect. 21.2.3.

Tercier (2004), p. 288; Berger (2012), p. 478; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 598.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 586.

Tercier et al. (2016), p. 485; Nomer (2015), p. 398; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 586.

See Sect. 18.2.

See Sect. 18.1.

Engel (1997), p. 803; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 130, N. 6; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 537; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 587; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 431, compare to Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 1044–1045.

See Sect. 29.2.

Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 538–539; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 587; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 432.

See Sect. 18.2.

Engel (1997), pp. 804–805; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 1043; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), pp. 588–589.

Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 130, N. 7.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 588; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 432.

Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 133, N. 2; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 605; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 602, on the contrary see Nomer (2015), pp. 398–399.

Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 604–605; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 601.

For further explanations see Helvacı (2008), pp. 305–310.

Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 134, N. 1; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 1052; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 589; Eren (2015), p. 1291.

Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 571–572; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 591.

Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 572; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 592.

For further explanations see Helvacı (2008), pp. 305–310.

For further explanations see Ergenekon (1960).

Déclaration de volonté, Willenserklärung.

Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 581; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 594; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 491.

Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 580–581; Eren (2015), p. 1293; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 594; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 491.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 594; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 434; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 581.

See Sect. 26.5.3.1.

See Sect. 15.3.

Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 1062; Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 596; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 437.

Péremption, Verwirkung.

In the case of a legal heir, the period runs from the date the heirs become aware of the death of the deceased, unless they can prove that they were not aware of their entitlement until a later time; and, in the case of a nominated heir, the period runs from the date on which they were officially notified of the disposition in their favour (TCC art. 606 par. 2). For further explanations see Helvacı (2014), p. 73 ff.

Engel (1997), p. 798.

For further explanation see Paksoy (2012).

See Chap. 27.

See Sect. 15.3.

Oğuzman and Öz (2015), p. 600, see and compare to, Oser and Schönenberger, Art. 141, N: 4.

Akçay E (2010) Türk borçlar kanunu’na göre zamanaşımı. On iki levha, İstanbul

Aybay A (2011) Borçlar hukuku dersleri genel bölüm. Filiz, İstanbul

Becker H (1941) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume VI, Obligationenrecht, 1. Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Art. 1-183. Stämpfli, Bern

Berger B (2012) Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Stämpfli, Bern

Engel P (1997) Traité des obligations en droit Suisse. Stämpfli, Bern

Erdem M (2010) Özel hukukta zamanaşımı. On iki levha, İstanbul

Eren F (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Yetkin, Ankara

Ergenekon Y (1960) Türk borçlar hukukunda müruruzamanın kat’ı. Ankara

Feyzioğlu FN (1977) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 2. Fakülteler, İstanbul

Gauch P, Schluep WR, Emmenegger S (2008) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

Helvacı İ (2008) Eski medenî kanunumuzla karşılaştırmalı olarak Türk medenî kanunu’na göre sözleşmeden doğan ipotek hakkı. On iki levha, İstanbul

Helvacı İ (2014) Eski medenî kanunumuzla karşılaştırmalı olarak Türk medenî kanunu’na göre mirasın reddi, (mk. m. 605 - mk. m.618). Filiz, İstanbul

Honsell H, Vogt NP, Wiegand W (eds) (2003) Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Obligationenrecht 1: Art. 1-529 OR. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Basel

Kılıçoğlu AM (2013) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Turhan, İstanbul

Nomer HN (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

Oğuzman K, Öz T (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 1. Vedat, İstanbul

Oser H, Schönenberger W (1929) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume V: Das Obligationenrecht, Erster Halbband: Art. 1-183. Schulthess, Zürich

Paksoy MS (2012) Zamanaşımından feragat (tbk 160). On iki levha, İstanbul

Reisoğlu S (2014) Türk borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

Schwenzer I (2009) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Schulthess, Bern

Tekinay SS, Akman S, Burcuoğlu H, Altop A (1993) Tekinay borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Filiz, İstanbul

Tercier P (2004) Le droit des obligations. Schulthess, Zurich

Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu HM (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. On iki levha, İstanbul

Thévenoz L, Werro F (éd) (2012) Commentaire romand code des obligations 1: art. 1-529 CO. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Bâle

von Tuhr A, Escher A (1974) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

Titel: Limitation Period
verfasst von: İlhan Helvacı
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Turkish Contract Law
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60060-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60061-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60061-1_26

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner