Skip to main content

2017 | Buch

Understanding and Analysis: The California Air Resources Board Forest Offset Protocol

verfasst von: Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana  B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Buchreihe : SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book is a product of the initial phase of a broader study evaluating the voluntary and regulatory compliance protocols that are used to account for the contributions of forests in U.S.-based greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation programs. The research presented here is particularly concerned with these protocols’ use of the USDA Forest Service’s Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data to describe forest conditions, ownership, and management scenarios, and is oriented towards providing regulators and other interested parties with an objective comparison of the options, uncertainties, and opportunities available to offset GHG emissions through forest management. Chapters focus on the protocols for recognizing forest carbon offsets in the California carbon cap-and-trade program, as described in the Compliance Offset Protocol; U.S. Forest Projects (California Air Resources Board, 2011).
Readers will discover the protocols used for quantifying the offset of GHG emissions through forest-related project activity. As such, its scope includes a review of the current methods used in voluntary and compliance forest protocols, an evaluation of the metrics used to assign baselines and determine additionality in the forest offset protocols, an examination of key quantitative and qualitative components and assumptions, and a discussion of opportunities for modifying forest offset protocols, in light of the rapidly changing GHG-related policy and regulatory environment. Finally, the report also discusses accounting and policy issues that create potential barriers to participation in the California cap-and-trade program, and overall programmatic additionality in addressing the needs of a mitigation strategy.




Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction
Abstract
Biogenic carbon sinks, such as forests, perform a vital role in the global carbon cycle by extracting carbon from the atmosphere as they grow and providing for carbon storage over time. Four primary mechanisms through which forests contribute to managing atmospheric carbon are: storing carbon in the biosphere, storing carbon in forest products, displacing fossil fuels with forest-based biofuel, and substituting wood products in place of fossil-fuel-intensive products (see, for example, Schlamadinger and Marland 1996).
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Chapter 2. Overview of the Compliance Offset Protocol for U.S. Forest Projects
Abstract
The Forest Offset Protocol lays out the requirements and methods for quantifying the net GHG emission and removals resulting from voluntary project activities undertaken on forested land. The ARB’s compliance offset protocol was built off of the Climate Action Reserve’s Forest Project Protocol Version 3.2 (CAR 2010). The Forest Offset Protocol covers three types of project activities, the carbon pools included in each project type, and requirements for project eligibility, monitoring, and commitments.
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Chapter 3. Flow of Calculations for Quantifying Net GHG Reductions and Removals
Abstract
Calculation of offset credits requires a chain of measurements, estimates, and modeling exercises. It requires measuring what did happen, estimating what likely happened, and modeling what might have happened. It requires dealing with uncertainty and risk. It differs importantly from conventional inventory processes in that it deals with some things that can be counted and some that cannot. And the California offset program deals with these calculations in a conservative way so that errors are on the side that credits are unlikely to be given for offsets not produced but there are likely to be offsets created for which credit is not given. This section describes the core details of what goes into the calculation process and indicates some of the ancillary data that are required. It does not discuss the physical measurements required to document the amount of carbon actually stored on site in the forest ecosystem as these have been widely discussed and the California requirements are consistent with popularly accepted procedures.
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Chapter 4. Adherence to Accounting Principles
Abstract
With considerable reliance on somewhat qualitative judgments, estimates, models, and assumed factors, the quality of a forest carbon accounting system can be reviewed by examining the extent to which the processes, procedures, and methods prescribed by the offset protocol adhere to its underlying accounting principles. We can examine the extent to which increased adherence to one principle results in a tradeoff of diminished adherence to another principle, and consider how the implementation of these underlying principles impacts achievement of the offset protocol’s stated objective.
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Chapter 5. Challenging Issues
Abstract
Prior to implementation of California’s cap-and-trade policy the U.S. had no compliance market for management and mitigation of GHG emissions featuring offsets as a significant mechanism for compliance. The ARB’s offset program and protocols were developed based largely on lessons learned and methodologies developed in the Climate Action Reserve’s voluntary market offset program. Although the ARB has successfully adapted these voluntary market mechanisms for use in California’s compliance market, the transition from a voluntary market to a compliance-based market presents an opportunity to formalize a substantially increased role for forest-based biogenic carbon sequestration in GHG mitigation and management policies.
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Chapter 6. Some Strategic Alternatives to Program Design, Management, and Implementation
Abstract
In the forest offset program, sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere has quite a number of factors that are uncertain or pose a risk. The uncertainty among the different factors can vary by region or by project. The uncertainty can also be reduced using a variety of strategies. The risks may be different under a variety of circumstances and may be reduced by one of several actions.
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Chapter 7. Role of Forest Service Data and Methodologies
Abstract
Calculating forest offset credits under the California Forest Offset Protocol is heavily dependent on data from the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and on methodologies developed by the USFS. The USFS data include both archived data and continuing data compilations. They include both published and unpublished data. The driving data source for calculating forest offset credits is, in fact, the U.S. Forest Service. The Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program (USDA Forest Service 2016) within the Forest Service, employs a multi-phase inventory of U.S. forest attributes, with each phase contributing to the subsequent phase. To quote from the FIA web site: “The Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program of the U.S. Forest Service provides the information needed to assess America’s forests. As the Nation’s continuous forest census, our program projects how forests are likely to appear 10 to 50 years from now. This enables us to evaluate whether current forest management practices are sustainable in the long run and to assess whether current policies will allow the next generation to enjoy America’s forests as we do today. FIA reports on status and trends in forest area and location; in the species, size, and health of trees; in total tree growth, mortality, and removals by harvest; in wood production and utilization rates by various products; and in forest land ownership.” USFS historic and continuing data and methods compilations are integral to the calculations in the ARB offset protocol and many are directly linked from the California Air Resources Board web site (California ARB 2015a).
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Chapter 8. Conclusion and Recommendations
Abstract
There are many ideas presented in this document but here we highlight some of the major points. There is much still to be learned for implementing a forest offset program and what works for one market is likely to be emulated or adapted in other markets. Goldstein and Nayland (2015) note that “there are a few key compliance carbon-pricing policies to watch” and “California represents the most certain source of demand for forest carbon in the next few years.” Challenges that are met can be modified and improved in other markets and in new iterations of existing markets. A key objective is to maintain fungibility among markets and between emissions and offsets (Lee et al. 2013).
Eric Marland, Grant Domke, Jason Hoyle, Gregg Marland, Laurel Bates, Alex Helms, Benjamin Jones, Tamara Kowalczyk, Tatyana B. Ruseva, Celina Szymanski
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Understanding and Analysis: The California Air Resources Board Forest Offset Protocol
verfasst von
Eric Marland
Grant Domke
Jason Hoyle
Gregg Marland
Laurel Bates
Alex Helms
Benjamin Jones
Tamara Kowalczyk
Tatyana B. Ruseva
Celina Szymanski
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Electronic ISBN
978-3-319-52434-4
Print ISBN
978-3-319-52433-7
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52434-4