nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Strukturierung von Interviews

verfasst von : Prof. Dr. Christof Obermann, Prof. Dr. Marc Solga

Erschienen in: Jobinterviews professionell führen

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Die Standardisierung und Strukturierung der Befragungs- und Auswertungsprozedur eines Interviews ist der maßgebliche Treiber für dessen eignungsdiagnostische Qualität. Im Kapitel werden 18 Möglichkeiten zur Strukturierung von Interviews beleuchtet und anhand von aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen diskutiert.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Grundlagenwissen psychologische Eignungsdiagnostik

Nächstes Kapitel Wissenschaftliche Bewertung der Methode Interview

Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702.CrossRef

Campion, M. A. (2014). How to Develop Interview Questions and Anchored Rating Scales. Honolulu: SIOP, 29th Annual Conference.

Conway, J. M., Jako, R. A., & Goodman, D. F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2003). Situational and patterned behavior description interviews: comparison of their validity, correlates, and perceived fairness. Human Performance, 16, 25–47.

Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2003). Situational and patterned behavior description interviews: comparison of their validity, correlates, and perceived fairness. Human Performance, 16, 25–47.CrossRef

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.CrossRef

Hoevemeyer, V. A.. (2006). High-impact interview questions: 701 behavior-based questions to find the right person for every job. New York: AMACOM.

Hovland, C. I., & Wonderlic, E. F. (1939). Prediction of industrial success from a standardized interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 537–546.CrossRef

Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2013). Employment interview reliability: New meta-analytic estimates by structure and format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 264–276.CrossRef

Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2014). Moving forward indirectly: Reanalyzing the validity of employment interviews with indirect range restriction methodology. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 297–309.CrossRef

Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, J. W. (1994). Hunter & Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184–190.CrossRef

Kersting, M. (2006). DIN SCREEN: Leitfaden zur Kontrolle und Optimierung der Qualität von Verfahren und deren Einsatz bei beruflichen Eignungsbeurteilungen. Lengerich: Pabst.

Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293.CrossRef

Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview: Development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1638–1656.CrossRef

Lienert, G. A., & Raatz, U. (1994) Testaufbau und Testanalyse. 5., völlig neubearb. und erw. Aufl.Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.

Lievens, F., & De Paepe, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of interviewer-related factors that discourage the use of high structure interviews. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 29–46.CrossRef

Lievens, F., & Sanchez, J. I. (2007). Can training improve the quality of inferences made by raters in competency modeling? A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 812.CrossRef

McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616.CrossRef

Middendorf, C. H., & Macan, T. (2002). Note-taking in the employment interview: Effects on recall and judgements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 293–303.CrossRef

Schluter, J., Seaton, P., & Chaboyer, W. (2008). Critical incident technique: A user’s guide for nurse researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61, 107–114.CrossRef

Schmidt, W. V., & Conway, R. N. (1999). Results-oriented interviewing: Principles, practices, and procedures. Needham Hights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2002) Developing Management Skills. 5th edition.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.

Aguinis, H., Mazurkiewicz, M. D., & Heggestad, E. D. (2009). Using web-based frame-of-reference training to decrease biases in personality-based job analysis: An experimental field study. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 405–438.

Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422–427.

Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–582.

Conway, J. M., & Peneno, G. M. (1999). Comparing structured interview question types: construct validity and applicant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13 (4), 485–505.

Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Klehe, U. (2004). The impact of job complexity and study design on situational and behavior description interview validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 262−273.

Krajewski, H. T., Goffin, R. D., McCarthy, J. M., Rothstein, M., & Johnston, N. (2006). Comparing the validity of structured interviews for managerial level employees: Should we look to the past, or focus on the future? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 411–432.

Gibb, J. L., & Taylor, P. J. (2003). Past Experience Versus Situational Employment: Interview Questions in a New Zealand Social Service Agency. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41, 371–383.

Marchese, M.C., & Muchinsky, P.M. (1993). The validity of the employment interview: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, 18–26.

Klehe, U.-C., König, C. J., Richter, G. M., Kleinmann, M., & Melchers, K. G. (2008). Transparency in structured interviews: Consequences for construct and criterion-related validity. Human Performance, 21, 107–137.

Maurer, T. J., Solamon, J. M., & Lippstreu M. (2008). How does coaching interviewees affect the validity of a structured interview? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 355–371.

Sedikides, C., Herbst, K., Hardin, D. P., & Dardis, G. J. (2002). Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 592–605.

Brtek, M.D., & Motowidlo, S.J. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 185–191.

Maurer, S. D. (2002). A practitioner-based analysis of interviewer job expertise and scale format as contextual factors in situational interviews. Personnel Psychology, 55, 307−327.

Taylor, P. J., & Small, B. (2002). Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational versus past-behaviour employment interview questions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 277–294.

Reilly, N. P., Bocketti, S. P., Maser, S. A., & Wennet, C. L. (2006). Benchmarks affect perceptions of prior disability in a structured interview. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (4), 489–500.

Titel: Strukturierung von Interviews
verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Christof Obermann
Prof. Dr. Marc Solga
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Buch: Jobinterviews professionell führen
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18713-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-18714-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18714-9_8