nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Freedom of Information in France: Law and Practice

verfasst von : Yseult Marique, Emmanuel Slautsky

Erschienen in: The Laws of Transparency in Action

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In France, a legislation on freedom of information (FOI) granted every person the right to obtain communication of documents held by an administration within the framework of its public service mission, regardless of their form or medium, in 1978. This marked a stark break away from a tradition of administrative secrecy and sought to improve the relations between the French State and its citizens.

The French FOI act aims to find a balance between the right to access public information (a democratic requirement and a prerequisite for the exercise of fundamental rights), and other competing interests (privacy, competition, and public order and security). This equilibrium is constantly reshaped under the influence of technological developments and an increasing commodification of public information.

Changes and adaptation occur through legislative changes (such as the 2016 statute on ‘Republique numérique’) and through practice, for example, through the combined interaction of an independent authority—the Commission d’accès aux documents administratifs (CADA)—and the French administrative judge, the Council of State.

This chapter seeks to provide an assessment of how the law works in practice, thanks to interviews with senior practitioners in this matter such as legislators, judges, and information commissioners and the analysis of empirical data such as CADA’s annual reports, opinions, and advice. Three main issues emerge from this assessment: firstly, administrative inertia is still very strong nearly 40 years after the first FOIA was adopted; secondly, the exceptions to the principle of access to administrative documents have grown over time, reducing the actual scope of FOI; thirdly, fragmentation of the special regimes may lead to more confusion than transparency.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Freedom of Information in the European Union: Legal Challenges and Practices of EU Institutions

Nächstes Kapitel Access to Information in Belgium

We are grateful to Professor Bénédicte Delaunay for her comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of this chapter. All errors remain ours.

For instance: http://www.lemonde.fr/election-presidentielle-2017/article/2017/05/05/la-france-a-quitte-le-monde-de-l-opacite-de-la-connivence-et-de-la-complaisance_5123121_4854003.html; https://transparency-france.org/actu/interpelle-les-candidats-presidentielle-2017/ All links were last accessed on 27 July 2017.

Davet and Lhomme (2016).

Garin (2017), pp. 38–39. See also Debbasch in Debbasch (ed.) (1990), p. 12.

Art. 7 Charter for the Environment 2004. Art. 15 French Déclaration des droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen provides that ‘Society has the right to ask a public official for an accounting of his administration’ (Transparence administrative, p. 46 (F. Moderne)). All legislative and executive acts mentioned in this chapter can be found on the official website of the French official journal: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/.

CE, 29 April 2002, no 228830. The Conseil d’État has two databases: http://www.conseil-etat.fr/Decisions-Avis-Publications/Decisions/ArianeWeb (database comprising its case law) and http://www.conseil-etat.fr/Decisions-Avis-Publications/Avis/ConsiliaWeb (database comprising its opinions).

For example: Haute Autorité pour la transparence de la vie publique (see Acts nos 2013-906 and 2013-907 of 11 October 2013); Haut Comité pour la transparence et l’information sur la sécurité nucléaire (Act no 2006-686 of 13 June 2006 (art. 23-27, today codified in art. L125-24- L125-40 environmental code)).

The Open Government Partnership is a multilateral initiative that aims to secure concrete commitments from governments to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance (https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/about-ogp).

Act no 2016-1321 of 7 October 2016 (called hereafter French Digital Republic Act or FDRA).

FDRA, Legislative proposal, p. 14.

See for early assessment of this dimension: Chevallier (1988).

We thank our interviewees who generously gave us their time to answer our questions: Mrs C. Bouchoux, Senate member (2011–2017) and CADA member (interview with Yseult Marique); Mr M. Dandelot, CADA Chair; Mrs C. Guichard, CADA Secretary General; Mrs C. Drèze, CADA Communication Officer; Mrs M. Perrière, CADA General Rapporteur; Mr P. Lemoine, CADA member (interviews with Emmanuel Slautsky).

Available at http://www.cada.fr/ (official website—comprises CADA annual reports) and http://cada.data.gouv.fr/ (database comprising all CADA’s opinions and advices).

Transparence administrative, pp. 21–28 (Moderne); Lallet (2014), at 3–5.

Lasserre et al. (1987), pp. 13–53; Transparence administrative, pp. 29–32 (Moderne); Lallet (2014), at 8–17.

The debates within the Council of Europe led to the adoption, in 1981, of the Rec No R (81) 19 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the access to information held by public authorities. In 2009, the Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents was adopted. It will enter into force when ten states have expressed their consent to be bound by the Convention (this is not the case yet). France has not signed or ratified it. It is the first binding international treaty that contains a general right to access administrative documents (Garin (2017), p. 27).

Chevallier (1988), pp. 243–246.

Chevallier (1988), p. 246.

A few months before, a Decree no 77-127 of 11 February 1977 had paved the way for the adoption of the FOIA, but its scope remained limited: notably, it did not establish as a default rule the possibility of gaining access to administrative documents (CADA, Annual report 1979–1980, pp. 5–6). See also, a few months after the Act of 17 January 1978, Act no 79-18 of 3 January 1979 on archives.

Act no 2000-321 of 12 April 2000; Ordinance no 2005-650 of 6 June 2005.

Lallet (2014), at 24.

Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the reuse of public sector information. See also Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the reuse of public sector information. European law is only concerned with the reuse of public information, not access to administrative documents (see art. 1 Directive 2003/98/EC).

Art. 10 Ordinance no 2005-650 of 6 June 2005.

Art. L330-1 CRPA.

Art. R330-4 CRPA.

CADA, Annual report 2009, p. 80.

See, for example, CADA, Guide des personnes responsables de l’accès aux documents administratifs et de la réutilisation des informations publiques, 2007, available on http://www.cada.fr/IMG/pdf/Guide_PRADA_.pdf and CADA, Annual report 2016, p. 66.

Interview with M. Perrière. See Senate report, volume 1, p. 149. There were 1642 PRADAs in 2016 (CADA, Annual report 2016, p. 66). The CADA considers that more than 5000 PRADAs should be appointed if the obligations under the FOIA are to be respected (CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 107).

Although it is only in 2005 that the CADA was explicitly classified as an independent administrative authority (art. 10 Ordinance no 2005-650 of 6 June 2005). Currently, the CADA also falls within the scope of a 2017 Act which regulates independent administrative authorities (Act no 2017-55 of 20 January 2017).

Lallet (2014), at 379.

Interviews with M. Dandelot et al. and M. Perrière.

See organigram: http://www.cada.fr/IMG/pdf/organigramme_janvier_2017.pdf.

Interview with M. Perrière. See also, for example, CADA, Annual report 2012, p. 59.

Interviews with M. Dandelot et al. and M. Perrière. See also Delaunay (1993), pp. 557–558. The limited means of the CADA are also regularly highlighted in its annual reports (e.g. CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 52). The CADA is not the only French authority acting as a guardian of administrative transparency with very limited means. Another example is the Commission consultative du secret de la défense nationale (see Rapport de la Commission consultative dusecretde la défense nationale 2013–2015, Paris, La Documentation française, 2016, p. 95). On this commission, see Sect. 6.3.4.

Interviews with M. Dandelot et al. and M. Perrière. For example, CADA, Annual report 2001, p. 2; Annual report 2007, p. 55.

Art. L342-4, art. R342-4-1, and art. R342-5 CRPA.

For example, CADA, Documents administratifs. Droit d’accès et réutilisation, Paris, La Documentation française, 2008.

The FOIA also applies to some private entities and does not apply to all public bodies. The details of its scope of application will be discussed below. For reasons of convenience, we use the expressions‘public bodies’ or ‘public authorities’ to refer to the entities bound by the FOIA and only specify the nature of those entities when necessary for a correct understanding of the situation.

Art. L342-1 CRPA, art. R343-1 CRPA. See also CE, 19 February 1982, no 24215; CE, 20 February 1985, no 55194.

Art. R343-3 CRPA.

In 2016, for example, the CADA took on average 69 days to issue its opinions (CADA, Annual Report 2016, p. 67). Over the years, the numbers have evolved as follows: 39.9 days (2011), 39.1 days (2012), 40.3 days (2013), 50.1 days (2014), and 58 days (2015).

Art. R343-3 CRPA.

Lallet (2014), at 391. See also Table 3.1.

Art. R343-4 and art. R343-5 CRPA.

Interview with M. Dandelot et al. The numbers have been high since the start (e.g. CADA, Annual report 1986–1987, p. 16; Annual report 1988–1989, pp. 24–27). Add CADA, Annual report 2013, pp. 7–15 (in-depth analysis of 120 refusals by the authority to follow the opinion of the CADA).

No response in 57.2% of cases in 2015, 36.85% in 2014, 52.85% in 2013 (CADA, Annual Report 2015, p. 70). The 2016 Annual report mentions that the CADA tends to receive increasingly less information about the ways in which public bodies follow its opinions. It identifies gaining more information on this area as one key area for future work (p. 65).

Transparence administrative, p. 96 (Chevallier).

Art. L211-1 Code of administrative justice. See also Tribunal des conflits, 2 July 1984, nos 02324 and 02325 and CE, 13 November 2002, no 225908.

CE, 27 April 1983, no 46476.

Between 1990 and 2002, refusals to grant access to administrative documents were submitted for advice to the CADA 42,000 times but were challenged only 1000 times before the judge (Puybasset (2003), p. 1308). Add, for example, CADA, Annual report 2004, p. 22; Annual report 2005, p. 69; Annual report 2010, p. 49 and p. 81; Annual report 2012, p. 80.

CADA, Annual report 2010, p. 50.

CE, 23 December 1988, no 95310.

CE, 14 March 2003, no 231661.

Lallet (2014), at 427–429.

Art. L911-1 Code of Administrative Justice.

CE, 12 July 1995, no 161803; CE, 5 May 2008, no 294645; CE, 6 October 2008, no 289389.

Art. R811-1 Code of Administrative Justice.

See book V Code of Administrative Justice.

CE, 29 April 2002, no 239466.

Lallet (2014), at 441–444.

CE, 25 July 2008, no 296505.

Report (2015), 16.

Art. L300-1 CRPA.

Art. L311-6 CRPA. See Sect. 6.4.1.

Transparence administrative, p. 43 (Moderne).

Art. 8. See also Lasserre et al. (1987), p. 106.

Art. 1 FDRA.

CADA, Annual report 2015, p. 65.

There are no centralised statistics on the number or identity of people requesting access to administrative documents. The only statistics available concern applicants to the CADA.

CADA, Annual report 2016, p. 13.

See CADA, Annual report 2001, p. 3 (contains the statistics for all years between 1979 and 2001).

CADA, Annual report 1982–1983, p. 8; CADA, Annual report 1986–1987, p. 9.

This has been the case from early on: see, for example, CADA, Annual report 1982–1983, pp. 12–14; Annual report 1984–1985, p. 6.

Transparence administrative, p. 14 (Denoix de Saint Marc), p. 104 (Delaunay).

Transparence administrative, p. 14 (Denoix de Saint Marc), pp. 49–50 (Moderne).

CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 86.

See, for example, CADA, Annual report 2000, p. 57 (numbers for 1999 and 2000); Annual report 2005, p. 19 (numbers for 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005); Annual report 2009, p. 60 (numbers for 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009); Annual report 2013, p. 85 (numbers for 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. In 2013, however, the requests were equally split between natural and legal persons).

CADA, Annual report 2012, p. 68; Annual report 2013, p. 87.

Art. L300-2 CRPA.

The exclusion of judicial documents is a result of the case law (Lallet (2014), at 78). See, for example, CE, 7 May 2010, no 303168. On judicial documents related to civil status, see Lallet (2014), at 88–90. For parliamentary documents, see art. L300-2 CRPA.

Art. L300-2 CRPA.

CADA, Le lien avec la mission de service public, available on http://www.cada.fr/le-lien-avec-la-mission-de-service-public,6096.html.

CE, 26 July 1985, no 35067; see art. 10 FDRA.

Art. L300-2 CRPA. See Lallet (2014), at 50–60.

CE, 17 April 2013, no 342372; CE, 24 April 2013, no 338649.

For example, in 1988, the CADA estimated that a municipality of 30,000 inhabitants would receive 20–50 requests per week for access to documents on average (CADA, Annual report 1986–1987, p. 10). See also Transparence administrative, pp. 99–110 (Delaunay).

Annual report 2015, p. 67 (our translation).

Annual report 2013, p. 89; Annual report 2014, p. 59; Annual report 2015, p. 68.

Lallet (2014), at 235.

Art. L311-2 CRPA. This duty applies to both public and private bodies subjected to the CRPA. See CE, 15 October 2014, nos 365058 and 365063. A 2003 study in one French region showed that in a majority of the cases this duty was not respected (Transparence administrative, pp. 105–106) (Delaunay).

Interview with M. Perrière.

Delaunay (1993), p. 550.

Art. R322-7 CRPA. For an example of a register, see http://www.bayonne.fr/la-mairie/repertoire-des-donnees-publiques/902-donnees-publiques.html (Bayonne municipality).

Lallet (2014), at 461.

See Delaunay (1993), p. 554.

CADA, 8 June 2006, opinion no 20062173.

Art. L311-2 CRPA.

Between 2009 and 2013, 7% (2009), 11.3% (2010), 3.2% (2011), 5.3% (2012), and 1.94% (2013) of the unfavourable opinions issued by the CADA were justified by the abusive character of the requests (the numbers are not available in more recent years) (CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 98).

CADA, Les demandes abusives, available on http://www.cada.fr/les-demandes-abusives,6147.html

100

See, for example, CE, 25 July 2013, no 348669.

101

See, for example, CE, 28 November 2014, no 373127.

102

See, for example, CADA, 23 December 2008, opinion no 20084654.

103

See, for example, CADA, 6 December 2007, opinion no 20074652.

104

Art. R311-12 and R311-13 CRPA.

105

See Sects. 3.2 and 3.3.

106

Art. L311-14 CRPA.

107

CE, 15 November 2006, no 264636 (per analogy).

108

Art. L232-4 CRPA.

109

See, for example, CADA, Annual report 1999–2000, p. 7; Annual report 2002, p. 18; Annual report 2003, p. 2; Annual report 2005, p. 26; Annual report 2013, p. 83. See also Transparence administrative, p. 87 (Chevallier).

110

Interview with M. Dandelot et al. See also, for example, CADA, Annual report 2012, p. 62.

111

Interview with M. Dandelot et al. See art. L312-1-1 CRPA.

112

Interview with M. Dandelot et al.

113

Interview with M. Dandelot et al. See Table 3.1.

114

Roux in Debbasch (ed.) (1990), p. 91.

115

Interview with C. Bouchoux.

116

Lasserre et al. (1987), p. 199; Roux in Debbasch (ed.) (1990), pp. 91–92; Delaunay (1993), pp. 575–576; Puybasset (2003), p. 1308; Transparence administrative (2003), p. 107 (Delaunay). See also, for example, CADA, Annual report 2003, p. 2.

117

Lallet (2014), at 63.

118

CE, 16 January 1985, no 46591; CE, 30 September 1987, no 66573.

119

CE, 9 March 1983, no 43438; CE, 27 September 1985, no 56543; CE, 30 September 1987, no 66573.

120

Lallet (2014), at 65. As explained in Sect. 7.2, the situation differs in environmental matters.

121

Art. L311-3 CRPA.

122

Art. L311-3-1 CRPA. The algorithms may also themselves qualify as administrative documents in the sense of the FOIA (CADA, Annual report 2016, p. 18).

123

FDRA, Legislative proposal, p. 11.

124

FDRA, Legislative proposal, p. 14.

125

Interview with M. Perrière; interview with C. Bouchoux.

126

Interview with P. Lemoine. See also CADA, Annual report 2016, p. 19.

127

Interview with P. Lemoine.

128

Art. L321-4 and R321-5 CRPA. The conditions for reusing public information are examined in Sect. 5.6. See also art. L312-1 CRPA, art. L312-1-1 CRPA, art. L312-1-3 CRPA, and art. L312-2 CRPA (these provisions list documents and data that must be made publicly available).

129

http://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/.

130

Interview with P. Lemoine.

131

CADA, Annual report 2016, pp. 20–21.

132

CE, 15 May 2006, no 278544.

133

See, for example, CADA, 3 May 2007, advice no 20071782.

134

Art. L311-9 CRPA.

135

See, for example, CE, 4 August 2006, no 263299.

136

Art. R311-11 CRPA.

137

Decree of 1 October 2001. It should be updated to take into account new technological developments (Lallet (2014), at 249), but this has not been the case yet.

138

Art. 2 Decree of 1 October 2001.

139

CADA, 25 January 2007, opinion no 20070331.

140

CADA, 19 January 2006, opinion no 20060472.

141

Art. 10 Act no 78-753 of 17 July 1978 as originally enacted.

142

Title II of book III CRPA.

143

Art. L300-4 CRPA.

144

Senate report, volume 2, pp. 69–72.

Art. L321-2 CRPA.

Art. L322-2 CRPA.

Art. L322-1 CRPA.

Lallet (2014), at 446 ff.; Cluzel-Métayer (2017), p. 343.

149

Art. L324-1 CRPA. See also art. L324-2 CRPA (digitalisation of cultural collections).

150

Art. L323-1 and art. L323-2 CRPA. A licence for reuse can be imposed in other cases as well.

151

Art. L326-1 and art. L342-3 CRPA.

152

Art. L325-1 and art. L325-2 CRPA.

153

Section 5.3.

154

Lallet (2014), at 140.

155

6.5% (1990), 7.5% (1995), 4.1% (2005), 9.2% (2010), 9.8% (2015).

156

CADA, Annual report 1984–1985, p. 7.

157

See Sect. 5.1.

158

Art. L311-2 CRPA. See Sect. 5.5. Add to these exclusions abusive requests.

159

To be contrasted with the special regime applicable for environmental information (see Sect. 7.2).

160

CADA, Annual report 1999–2000, pp. 19–20.

161

For example: peak for preparatory documents of 39.8% in 1992 (CADA, Annual report 1992, p. 33) while now the statistics average 10% (CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 98).

162

Lallet (2014), at 110–122.

163

Ordinance no 2014-1328 of 6 November 2014 (now Art. L311-2 al 2 CRPA).

164

Art. L311-2 al 3 CRPA.

165

Lallet (2014), pp. 109–139.

166

For example, art. 15 TFEU.

167

Art. 7 Act no 2000-321 of 12 April 2000.

168

Art. L311-5, 1° CRPA.

169

http://www.conseil-etat.fr/Decisions-Avis-Publications/Avis/ConsiliaWeb.

170

http://www.vie-publique.fr/actualite/alaune/gouvernement-rend-publics-avis-du-conseil-etat-20150319.html.

171

Art. 40 Act no 2000-1257 of 23 December 2000.

172

See Sect. 4.2 and Art. 2, 2° Ordinance no 2009–483 of 29 April 2009.

173

Art. 50 Act no 2011-525 of 17 May 2011.

174

Art. 20 Act no 2013-907 of 11 October 2013.

175

CADA, Délibérations du Gouvernement, available on http://www.cada.fr/le-secret-des-deliberations-du-gouvernement-et,6099.html.

176

CADA, 7 June 2007, n° 20072239.

177

CE, 30 March 2016, no 383546.

178

CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 67. Similar results in CADA, Annual report 1999–2000, p. 71 (1995–2000) and CADA, Annual report 2004, p. 16 (2001–2004). The situation was, however, different earlier on: for example, in 1993, 3.6%, and in 1994, 2.7% (CADA, Annual report 1993–1994, p. 76).

179

Lallet (2014), at 164–165.

180

CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 67.

181

CADA, Annual report 2004, p. 16.

182

Guillaume (1998), 1223.

183

Act no 98-567 of 8 July 1998, now Art. L2312-1 ff. Defense Code.

184

Respectively, Art. L231-2, I, 3° and 5° Defense Code.

185

CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 67.

186

CADA, Annual report 2004, p. 16.

187

CADA, Annual report 1982–83, pp. 15–16.

188

Cinquième rapport de la Commission consultative du secret de la défense nationale, Paris, La Documentation française, 2010, p. 8 (for 2005, 2006, and 2007, average of 20 opinions a year). Despite variations across the years, the overall trend is confirmed in the following years (Rapport de la Commission consultative du secret de la défense nationale 2013–2015, 2016, p. 85).

189

Rapport de la Commission consultative du secret de la défense nationale 2013–2015, 2016, p. 85.

190

Art. 11 Act no 2009-928 of 29 July 2009. Legislative elaboration: https://www.senat.fr/dossier-legislatif/pjl97-297.html; opinion from the commission, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichSarde.do?reprise=true&page=1&idSarde=SARDOBJT000007104682&ordre=null&nature=null&g=ls; more information on this commission is available in the Projet de loi relatif à la programmation militaire pour les années 2009 à 2014 et portant diverses dispositions concernant la défense.

191

On the events see https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/may/09/pakistan.rorymccarthy.

192

Crim., 31 August 2011, no 11-90.065.

193

CC, 10 November 2011, no 2011-192 QPC (official translation on the website of the CC).

194

CADA’s statistics only refer to public security and give the following figures: 4.9% (2009), 1.5% (2010), 2% (2011), – (sic–2012), 1.94% (2013) (CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 98).

195

Exception added by Act no 2000-321 of 12 April 2000, art 7-V.

196

Lallet (2014), at 167–171.

197

Art. 2, II, 1° FDRA.

198

Lallet (2014), at 174.

199

CADA, Annual report 2004, p. 16.

200

CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 67.

201

CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 98.

202

See Sect. 4.2.

203

1.2% (2009), 0.9% (2010), 2.4% (2011), 3.8% (2012) and 1.23% (2013) (Annual report 2013, p. 98).

204

Lallet (2014), at 177–178.

205

CE, 28 September 2016, no 390760.

206

Lallet (2014), at 179.

207

Lallet (2014), at 180–183.

208

CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 98.

209

CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 67.

210

Art. 2, II, 2° FDRA.

211

On this directive see Sect. 7.2.

212

CADA, Autres secrets protégés par la loi, available on http://www.cada.fr/autres-secrets-proteges-par-la-loi,6229.html.

213

When it had dipped from slightly higher levels the previous years (CADA, Annual report 2004, p. 16).

214

CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 67.

215

CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 98.

216

Art. L311-6 CRPA.

217

Art. 9 Act no 79-587 of 11 July 1979.

218

It is mentioned in art. L311-6 CRPA but refers to a special regime detailed elsewhere (art. L111-7 public health code). Medical information is disclosed to the person concerned directly or through a doctor, according to her wish (art. L311-6 last alinea CRPA). CADA, Informations à caractère médical, available on http://www.cada.fr/informations-a-caractere-medical,6092.html.

219

Lallet (2014), at 191–212.

220

CE, 17 April 2013, no 344924.

221

CE, 8 June 2016, no 386525.

222

http://www.cada.fr/protection-de-la-vie-privee,6111.html.

223

Art. 7, 7° Act no 2000-321 of 12 April 2000. For details, CADA, Appréciation, jugement de valeur et comportement, available on http://www.cada.fr/appreciation-jugement-de-valeur-et-comportement,6113.html.

224

CE, 20 January 1988, no 68506.

225

CE, 10 March 2010, no 303814.

226

Lallet (2014), at 206.

227

CADA, Annual report 2013, p. 98.

228

Art. L311-6, al.1, 1° CRPA (our translation) as inserted by the FDRA, art. 6, 1°.

229

CADA, Annual Report 2016, p. 29. For the detail of what each aspect includes, CADA, Les documents couverts par le secret en matière commerciale et industrielle, available on http://www.cada.fr/les-documents-couverts-par-le-secret-en-matiere,6069.html.

230

CADA, 22 September 2016, advice no 20163396.

231

CE, 21 April 2017, no 394606.

232

CADA, Annual report 2016, pp. 31–32.

233

CADA, Annual report 2008, p. 67; Annual report 2013, p. 98. Before 2006, the statistics had always been below the 10% threshold.

234

For an account of the facts in English: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/24/areva-creusot-nuclear-forge-france-hinkley-point; https://www.economist.com/news/business/21711087-electricit-de-france-has-had-shut-down-18-its-58-nuclear-reactors-frances-nuclear-energy.

235

CADA, 6 October 2016, opinion no 20163114.

236

Ordinance no 2005-650 of 6 June 2005, introducing a III in art. 6 FOIA.

237

Lallet (2014), at 232.

238

CE, 22 May 1995, no 152393.

239

CADA, 25 May 2000, opinion no 20001636.

240

CE, 7 November 1990, no 95084; CE, 11 December 2006, no 279113.

241

Lallet (2014), at 64.

242

See Table 3.1.

243

Lallet (2014), at 393; interview with M. Dandelot et al.

244

For the first systematic discussion of the articulation between the FOIA and special regimes, see CADA, Annual report 1995, chapter 1.

245

See interview with M. Dandelot et al.

246

http://www.cada.fr/les-dispositions-legislatives-nationales,6145.html.

247

Act no 2008-696 of 15 July 2008 (now art. L211-1 ff Code du patrimoine).

248

For an overview of the time limits, see Senate report, volume I, p. 39.

249

Requests in relation to electoral lists are increasing. The CADA ensures that access to electoral lists is limited to a specific use, namely, ensuring that the electoral lists are correctly established. Purely commercial uses (art. R16 last alinea electoral code) are not allowed (CADA, Annual report 2016, pp. 35–36). CE, 2 December 2016, no 388979 (concl. Rapporteur public A. Bretonneau) took a stricter approach: the mere serious risk that the person requesting access to electoral lists might use them at least partly for commercial purposes was enough to justify the mayor rejecting the request.

250

Article L342-2 CRPA.

251

Art. 10-V Act no 95-73 of 21 January 1995.

252

Art. L147-1 ff Code of social action and families.

253

Saison (2016). 556. Add. CADA, Annual report 2007, p. 41: Combinaison de la loi du 17 juillet 1978 avec des régimes spéciaux.

254

CE, 27 March 2015, no 382083. For the available objections to this solution, see Lessi and Dutheillet de Lamothe (2015), p. 981.

255

Rambaud (2015), p. 598.

256

CADA, Annual report 1982–83, pp. 8–9 noted the different strategies used by environmental associations. Some targeted specific issues (e.g. access to documents pertaining to emissions in the environment) while others focused on gaining access to local projects (e.g. urban projects or road building). For an overview of the situation before a special regime was developed, see CADA, Annual report 1988, second part.

257

See Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention, 1998), as well as the EU legislation, especially the Directive 2003/4/EC on Public Access to Environmental Information.

258

Act no 95-101 of 2 February 1995 (Prieur 1988).

259

France was found in breach of first European Council Directive 90/313/EEC of 7 June 1990 on the freedom of access to information on the environment (CJEU, 26 June 2003, C-233/00).

260

Senate report, volume I, 42.

261

‘Everyone has the right, in the conditions and to the extent provided for by law, to have access to information pertaining to the environment in the possession of public bodies and to participate in the public decision-taking process likely to affect the environment’ (translation from the Constitutional Council).

262

CC, 19 June 2008, no 008-564 DC; confirmed in CC, 13 July 2012, no 2012-262 QPC; CC, 27 July 2012, no 2012-270 QPC; and CE, 3 October 2008, no 297931.

263

Art. L124-1 environmental code.

264

Lallet (2014), at 328.

265

Art. 124-4-II-1° environmental code.

266

CADA, 27 November 2008, no 20084434.

267

CADA, 26 September 2013, no 20133131.

268

CE, 24 April 2013, no 337982.

269

CE, 21 November 2007, no 280969.

270

CJEU, 17 February 2009, C-552/07.

271

CE, 9 December 2009, no 280969.

272

CADA, Annual report 1982–83, pp. 11–12.

273

Delaunay (1993), 570.

274

See hearings of various journalists: Senate report, volume II, pp. 63 ff, 69 ff, 73 ff, and 79 ff.

275

CE, 27 March 2015, no 382083.

276

These administrative documents do not have to be communicated immediately. The different appeal possibilities that are available during the validation process of the electoral accounts need to have been exhausted or time to introduce them needs to have lapsed.

277

Robitaille-Froidure (2015).

278

Interview with C. Bouchoux.

Bouchoux, C. (2014). Report of the Mission commune d’information sur l’accès aux documents administratifs et aux données publiques. French Senate. 2 volumes [referenced as Senate report].

Chevallier, J. (1988). Le mythe de la transparence administrative. In Information et transparence administratives (pp. 239–275). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Cluzel-Métayer, L. (2017). La loi pour une République numérique: l’écosystème de la donnée saisi par le droit. Actualité Juridique – Droit Administratif 340.

Davet, G., & Lhomme, F. (2016). Un président ne devrait pas dire ça. Paris: Stock.

Debbasch, C. (Ed.). (1990). La Transparence administrative en Europe. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.

Delaunay, B. (1993). L’amélioration des rapports entre l’administration et les administrés – Contribution à l’étude des réformes administratives entreprises depuis 1945. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.

Garin, A. (2017). Le droit d’accès aux documents: en quête d’un nouveau droit fondamental dans l’Union européenne. Paris: Pedone.

Guillaume, M. (1998). La réforme du droit du secret de la défense nationale. Revue Française de Droit Administratif 1223.

Lallet, A. (2014). Documents administratifs: accès et réutilisation. Répertoire de contentieux administratif [last updated in 2017].

Lasserre, B., Lenoir, N., & Stirn, B. (1987). La transparence administrative. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Lessi, J., & Dutheillet de Lamothe, L. (2015). Les documents relatifs à l’élection présidentielle sont communicables. Actualité Juridique – Droit Administratif 981.

Prieur, M. (1988). Le droit à l’environnement et les citoyens: la participation. Revue Juridique de l’environnement 397.

Puybasset, M. (2003). Le droit à l’information administrative. Actualité Juridique – Droit Administratif 1307.

Rambaud, R. (2015). L’accès aux documents administratifs et l’élection présidentielle. Revue Française de Droit Administratif 598.

Robitaille-Froidure, A. (2015). Le Conseil d’Etat s’engage vers plus de transparence quant aux documents relatifs aux comptes de campagne des candidats à l’élection présidentielle – Droit d’accès aux documents administratifs et financement politique (Loi no 78–753 du 17 juillet 1978). Revue des droits de l’homme. https://revdh.revues.org/1086?lang=en

Saison, J. (2016). Le juge administratif et l’adage lex specialis derogat generalis – Réflexions sur la liberté de l’interprète. Revue Française de Droit Administratif 556.

X. (2015). Seminar organised by Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic and ACA-Europe, Supreme administrative courts and evolution of the right to publicity, privacy and information. Brno, 18 May 2015 – Answers to Questionnaire: France [referenced as Report (2015)].

X. (2003). Transparence et secret. Colloque pour le XXVème anniversaire de la loi du 17 juillet 1978 sur l’accès aux documents administratifs. Paris. La documentation française [referenced as Transparence administrative].

Titel: Freedom of Information in France: Law and Practice
verfasst von: Yseult Marique
Emmanuel Slautsky
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: The Laws of Transparency in Action
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76459-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-76460-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76460-3_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner