Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Innovations in Serious Games for Future Learning Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2011 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Operation ARIES!: A Serious Game for Teaching Scientific Inquiry

verfasst von : Keith Millis, Carol Forsyth, Heather Butler, Patty Wallace, Arthur Graesser, Diane Halpern

Erschienen in: Serious Games and Edutainment Applications

Verlag: Springer London

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Operation ARIES! is a serious game that teaches critical thinking about scientific inquiry. The player must help to identify aliens on Earth who are intentionally publishing bad research. The game combines aspects of video games and intelligent tutors in which the player holds conversations with animated agents using natural language. The player first takes a training course with a virtual trainee, followed by a module in which the player identifies flaws in research cases. In the third and final module, the player interviews suspected alien scientists on their research. Operation ARIES! is designed for high school seniors and adults.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Enhancing Learning in Distributed Virtual Worlds through Touch: A Browser-based Architecture for Haptic Interaction
Nächstes Kapitel From Global Games to Re-contextualized Games: The Design Process of TekMyst
Literatur
Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn. Sci. 26, 147–179 (2002)CrossRef
Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. J Learn. Sci. 4, 167–207 (1995)CrossRef
Atkinson, R.K.: Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. J. Educ. Psychol. 94, 416–427 (2002)CrossRef
Baylor, A.L., Kim, Y.: Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 15, 95–115 (2005)
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L., Kucan, L.: Questioning the Author: An Approach for Enhancing Student Engagement with Text. International Reading Association, Delaware (1997)
Benyon, D., Turner, P., Turner, S.: Designing Interactive Systems. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2005)
Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt.: Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Appl. Artif. Intell. 19, 363–392 (2005)CrossRef
Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R.: Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a Teachable Agent environment. Res. Pract. Technol.-Enhanced Learn. 5, 123–152 (2010)CrossRef
Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals – Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. McKay, New York (1956)
Bransford, J.D., Sherwood, R.S., Hasselbring, T.S., Kinzer, C.K., Williams, S.M.: Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In: Nix, D., Spiro, R. (eds.) Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology, pp. 115–141. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1990)
Bryant, J., Fondren, W.: Psychological and communicological theories of learning and emotion underlying serious games. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, pp. 103–116. Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York and London (2009)
Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S.A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., Hausmann, R.G.: Learning from human tutoring. Cogn. Sci. 25, 471–553 (2001)CrossRef
Craig, S.D., Sullins, J., Witherspoon, A., Gholson, B.: Deep level reasoning questions effect: The role of dialog and deep-level reasoning questions during vicarious learning. Cogn. Instruct. 24, 563–589 (2006)CrossRef
Craig, S.D., Chi, M.T.H., VanLehn, K.: Improving classroom learning by collaboratively observing human tutoring videos while problem solving. J. Educ. Psychol. 101, 779–789 (2009)CrossRef
Csikszenthimhalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. Random House, London (2002)
D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.C.: Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features. User Model.User-adapted Interact. 20, 147–187 (2010)CrossRef
Gee, J.P.: What Video Games Teach Us About Language and Literacy. Palgrave/Macmillan, New York (2003)
Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., & Magliano, J.P.:  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring.  Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 359.1–359.28 (1995)CrossRef
Graesser, A.C., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Kreuz, R., the TRG: Auto Tutor: A simulation of a human tutor. J. Cogn. Syst. Res. 1, 35–51 (1999)CrossRef
Graesser, A.C., Person, N., Harter, D., the Tutoring Research Group: Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 12, 257–279 (2001)
Graesser, A.C., Lu, S., Jackson, G.T., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., Louwerse, M.M.: AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput. 36, 180–193 (2004)CrossRef
Graesser, A.C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B.C., Olney, A.: AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48, 612–618 (2005a)CrossRef
Graesser, A.C., Lu, S., Olde, B.A., Cooper-Pye, E., Whitten, S.: Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down. Mem. Cognit. 33, 1235–1247 (2005b)
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., VanLehn, K.: Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educ. Psychol. 40, 225–234 (2005c)CrossRef
Graesser, A.C., D’Mello, S.K., Craig, S.D., Witherspoon, A., Sullins, J., McDaniel, B., Gholson, B.: The relationship between affective states and dialog patterns during interactions with AutoTutor. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 19, 293–312 (2008)
Graesser, A.C., Chipman, P., Leeming, F., Biedenbach, S.: Deep learning and emotion in serious games. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, pp. 83–102. Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York and London (2009a)
Graesser, A., Ozuru, Y., Sullins, J.: What is a good question? In: McKeown, M.G., Kucan, L. (eds.) Threads of Coherence in Research on the Development of Reading Ability, pp. 112–141. Guilford, New York (2009b)
Griffin, T.D., Wiley, J., Thiede, K.W.: Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy. Mem. Cogn. 36, 93–103 (2008)CrossRef
Halpern, D.F.: Teaching for critical thinking: A four-part model to enhance thinking skills. In: Davis, S., Buskist, W. (eds.) The Teaching of Psychology: Essays in Honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer, pp. 91–105. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2002)
Harackiewicz, J.: The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 1352–1363 (1979)CrossRef
Hartmann, T.: Gender differences in the use of computer-games as competitive leisure activities. Paper presented at Digital Games Research Association (DIGRA), November 4–6, 2003, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2003)
Heeter, C., Egidio, R., Punya, M., Winn, B., Caywood, J.: Alien games: Do girls prefer games designed by girls? Games Cult. 4(1), 74–100 (2007). doi: 10.1177/1555412008325481CrossRef
Hynd, C., Alverman, D.E.: Overcoming misconceptions in science: An on-line study of prior knowledge activation. Reading Res. Instr. 84, 12–26 (1989)
Ketelhut, D.J.: The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment.  J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 16, 99–111 (2007)CrossRef
King, A.: Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. Am. Educ. Res. J. 31, 338–368 (1994)CrossRef
Kopp, K., Britt, A., Millis, K., Graesser, A.: Improving the efficiency of dialogue in tutoring. J. Learn. Instr. (in press)
Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C-L.C.: Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 58, 79–97 (1988)CrossRef
Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T.: A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 104, 211–240 (1997)CrossRef
Linn, M.C., Davis, E.A., & Bell, P.: Internet Environments for Science Education. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey (2004)
Maki, R.H.: Test predictions over text material. In: Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 117–144. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1998)
Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.R.: Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude Learning and Instruction, Vol. 3, pp. 223–253. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1987)
McNamara, D.S., O’Reilly, T., Rowe, M., Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I.: iSTART: A web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In: McNamara, D.S. (ed.) Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies, pp. 397–420. Erlbaum, New York (2007)
Meyer, B.J.F., Wijekumar, K.: A web-based tutoring system for the structure strategy: Theoretical background, design, and findings. In: McNamara, D.S. (ed.) Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies, pp. 347–374. Erlbaum, New York (2007)
National Science Education Standards (NSES): The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (1996)
Oxland, K.: Gameplay and Design. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2004)
Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L.: Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring Activities. Cogn. Instr. 1, 117–175 (1984)CrossRef
Ratan, R., Ritterfeld, U.: Classifying serious games. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, pp. 10–24. Routledge, New York (2009)
Rieber, L.: Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 44, 42–58 (1996)
Roediger, H.L., Karpicke, J.D.: Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol. Sci., 17, 249–255 (2006)CrossRef
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., Chapman, S.: Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Rev. Educ. Res., 66, 181–221 (1996)CrossRef
Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design and Fundamentals. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2004)
Shute, V.J.: Focus on formative feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 78, 153–189 (2008)CrossRef
Taboada, A., Guthrie, J.T.: Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. J. Literacy Res. 38, 1–35 (2006)CrossRef
Van Eck, R.: Building artificially intelligent learning games. In: Gibson, D., Aldrich, C., Prensky, M. (eds.) Games and Simulations in Online Learning Research & Development Frameworks, pp. 271–307. Idea Group, Hershey, PA (2007)
VanLehn, K., Graesser, A.C., Jackson, G.T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., Rose, C.P.: When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cogn. Sci. 31, 3–62 (2007)
Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Functions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1978)
Wang, H., Shen, C., & Ritterfeld, U.: Enjoyment of digital games: What makes them “seriously” fun? In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Serious Games: Mechanisms And Effects, pp. 25–47. Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York and London (2009)
Whitton, N.: Learning with Digital Games: A Practical Guide to Engaging Students in Higher Education. Routledge, New York (2010)
Wisher, R.A., Graesser, A.C.: Question asking in advanced distributed learning environments. In: Fiore, S.M., Salas, E. (eds.) Toward a Science of Distributed Learning and Training, pp. 209–234. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2007)
Yee, N.: Motivations of play in online games. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9, 772–775 (2006)CrossRef
Yeomans, J.: Dynamic assessment practice: Some suggestions for ensuring follow up. Educ. Psychol. Pract. 24, 105–114 (2008)CrossRef
Gee, J. (ed.): Games, Learning, Assessment. MIT Press, Boston, MA (in press)
Gibson, D., Aldrich, C., Prensky, M. (eds.): Games and Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA (2006)
Halpern, D.F. (ed.): Undergraduate Education in Psychology: A Blueprint for the Future of the Discipline. American Psychological Association Books, Washington, DC (2010)
Mayer, R.E., Alexander, P.A. (eds.): Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. Routledge Press, New York, NY (2011)
Mayrath, M., Robisnon, D., Clarke-Midura, J. (eds.): Technology-Based Assessments for 21st Century Skills: Theoretical and Practical Implications from Modern Research. Information Age Publications, Charlotte, NC (2011)
Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., Vorderer, P. (eds.): Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, Mahwah, NJ (2009)
Shaffer, D.W.: How Computer Games Help Children Learn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2006)CrossRef
Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Driscoll, M.P. (eds.): Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Taylor & Francis, London (2008)
Van Eck, R.: Interdisciplinary Models and Tools for Serious Games: Emerging Concepts and Future Directions. Information Science Reference, Hershey, NY (2010)
Aleven, V.: An intelligent learning environment for case-based argumentation. Technol. Inst. Cogn. Lear. 4(2), 191–241 (2006)
Bagley, E., Shaffer, D.W.: When people get in the way: Promoting civic thinking through epistemic gameplay. Int. J. Gaming Comput. -Mediated Simul. 1, 36–52 (2009)CrossRef
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., Britt, M.A.: Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Res. Q. 44, 6–28 (2009)CrossRef
Gee, J.P.: Why game studies now? E-video games: a new art form. Games Cult. 1, 1–4 (2006)CrossRef
Graesser, A.C., Jeon, M., Dufty, D.: Agent technologies designed to facilitate interactive knowledge construction. Discourse Process. 45, 298–322 (2008)CrossRef
Millis, K., Magliano, J., Todaro, S.: Measuring discourse-level processes with verbal protocols and latent semantic analysis. Sci. Stud. Reading 10, 225–240 (2006)CrossRef
Nash, P., Shaffer, D.W.: Mentor modeling: The internalization of modeled professional thinking in an epistemic game. J. Comput. Assis. Lear. 27, 173–189. (2011)CrossRef
Shute, V.J.: Focus on formative feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 78, 153–189 (2008)CrossRef
VanLehn, K., Graesser, A.C., Jackson, G.T., Jordan, P., Olney, A.M., Rose, C.: When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cogn. Sci. 31, 3–62 (2007)
Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K., Hemmerich, J.A.: Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. Am. Educ. Res. J. 46, 1060–1106 (2009)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Operation ARIES!: A Serious Game for Teaching Scientific Inquiry
verfasst von
Keith Millis
Carol Forsyth
Heather Butler
Patty Wallace
Arthur Graesser
Diane Halpern
Copyright-Jahr
2011
Verlag
Springer London
Buch
Serious Games and Edutainment Applications

Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2160-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4471-2161-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2011

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_10

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise