nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Characterizing Conceptual Modeling Research

verfasst von : Lois M. L. Delcambre, Stephen W. Liddle, Oscar Pastor, Veda C. Storey

Erschienen in: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The field of conceptual modeling continues to evolve and be applied to important modeling problems in many domains. With a goal of articulating the breadth and depth of the field, our initial work focused on the many implicit and explicit definitions of conceptual modeling, resulting in the Characterizing Conceptual Modeling (CCM) framework. In this paper, we focus on conceptual modeling research, presenting a Characterizing Conceptual Model Research (CCMR) framework and a series of evaluations to assess the coverage and usability of CCMR, the utility and independence of the individual fields in the framework, and likelihood of consistent use.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Personalised Exploration Graphs on Semantic Data Lakes

Nächstes Kapitel MapSDI: A Scaled-Up Semantic Data Integration Framework for Knowledge Graph Creation

As examples of philosophical grounding, Wand and Weber take an ontological perspective to understanding information systems from a conceptual modeling perspective [44]. Guizzardi provides another kind of ontological foundation for conceptual models [11]. Guarino has long argued for the role of ontologies in conceptual modeling [10].

Note that our characterizations of these and the other \(3+6\) papers have not been vetted by the original authors of the research work. We, and not the original authors, are solely responsible for these characterizations.

We use the term metadata fields here as used in the digital library field: metadata describes the library item of interest. Typical metadata fields include such items as author and subject.

Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.B.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Comput. Surv. 18(4), 323–364 (1986)CrossRef

Brodie, M., Mylopoulos, J., Schmidt, J. (eds.): On Conceptual Modelling, Perspectives from Artificial Intelligence, Databases, and Programming Languages. Topics in Information Systems. Springer, New York (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5196-5CrossRefMATH

Chen, P.: The entity-relationship model–toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1(1), 9–36 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRef

Delcambre, L.M.L., Liddle, S.W., Pastor, O., Storey, V.C.: Characterizing conceptual modeling workshop call for participation (2018). http://conceptualmodeling.org/er2018/ccm.pdfCrossRef

Delcambre, L.M.L., Liddle, S.W., Pastor, O., Storey, V.C.: A reference framework for conceptual modeling. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 27–42. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_4CrossRef

Delcambre, L.M.L., Liddle, S.W., Pastor, O., Storey, V.C.: A reference framework for conceptual modeling: focusing on conceptual modeling research. Technical report (2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331653768

Embley, D.W., et al.: Conceptual-model-based data extraction from multiple-record web pages. Data Knowl. Eng. 31(3), 227–251 (1999)CrossRef

Embley, D., Thalheim, B. (eds.): Handbook of Conceptual Modeling-Theory, Practice, and Research Challenges. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15865-0CrossRefMATH

Flynn, M.J.: Some computer organizations and their effectiveness. IEEE Trans. Comput. 21(9), 948–960 (1972)CrossRef

10.

Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceedings of FOIS 1998, pp. 3–15 (1998)

11.

Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente (2005)

12.

Guizzardi, G., Fonseca, C.M., Benevides, A.B., Almeida, J.P.A., Porello, D., Sales, T.P.: Endurant types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling: towards OntoUML 2.0. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 136–150. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_12CrossRef

13.

Guizzardi, G., Herre, H., Wagner, G.: On the general ontological foundations of conceptual modeling. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol. 2503, pp. 65–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45816-6_15CrossRef

14.

Hai, R., Quix, C., Kensche, D.: Nested schema mappings for integrating JSON. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 397–405. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_28CrossRef

15.

Halpin, T.: Modeling of reference schemes. In: Nurcan, S., et al. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2013. LNBIP, vol. 147, pp. 308–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_22CrossRef

16.

Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)CrossRef

17.

Hull, R., King, R.: Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues. ACM Comput. Surv. 19(3), 201–260 (1987)CrossRef

18.

Ishikawa, F.: Concepts in quality assessment for machine learning - from test data to arguments. ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 536–544. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_39CrossRef

19.

Kitchenham, B.A., Brereton, P.: A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(12), 2049–2075 (2013)CrossRef

20.

Kitchenham, B.A., Dybå, T., Jørgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering. In: 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2004), 23–28 May 2004, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp. 273–281 (2004)

21.

de Leoni, M., Felli, P., Montali, M.: A holistic approach for soundness verification of decision-aware process models. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 219–235. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_17CrossRef

22.

Lin, L., Lin, C., Lai, Y.: Realtime event summarization from tweets with inconsistency detection. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 555–570. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_41CrossRef

23.

Maass, W., Shcherbatyi, I.: Inductive discovery by machine learning for identification of structural models. ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 545–552. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_40CrossRef

24.

March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)CrossRef

25.

Maté, A., Trujillo, J., Mylopoulos, J.: Key performance indicator elicitation and selection through conceptual modelling. In: Comyn-Wattiau, I., Tanaka, K., Song, I.-Y., Yamamoto, S., Saeki, M. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9974, pp. 73–80. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_6CrossRef

26.

Mylopoulos, J.: Conceptual modeling and Telos. conceptual modelling. In: Databases and CASE: An Integrated View of Information Systems Development, pp. 49–68. Wiley, New York, NY (1992)

27.

Nguyen, H., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Multi-perspective comparison of business process variants based on event logs. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 449–459. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_32CrossRef

28.

Olivé, A.: Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems. Springer, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39390-0CrossRefMATH

29.

Pastor, O., Gómez, J., Insfrán, E., Pelechano, V.: The OO-method approach for information systems modeling: from object-oriented conceptual modeling to automated programming. Inf. Syst. 26(7), 507–534 (2001)CrossRef

30.

Pastor, O., Levin, A.M., Casamayor, J.C., Celma, M., van der Kroon, M.: A conceptual modeling approach to improve human genome understanding. In: Embley, D., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Handbook of Conceptual Modeling - Theory, Practice, and Research Challenges, pp. 517–541. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15865-0_16CrossRef

31.

Peckham, J., Maryanski, F.J.: Semantic data models. ACM Comput. Surv. 20(3), 153–189 (1988)CrossRef

32.

Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2008, 26–27 June 2008. University of Bari, Italy (2008)

33.

Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., Kuzniarz, L.: Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an update. Inf. Softw. Technol. 64, 1–18 (2015)CrossRef

34.

Ruiz, M., Costal, D., España, S., Franch, X., Pastor, O.: GoBIS: an integrated framework to analyse the goal and business process perspectives in information systems. Inf. Syst. 53, 330–345 (2015)CrossRef

35.

Sales, T.P., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 121–135. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_11CrossRef

36.

Santos, M., Gralha, C., Goulão, M., Araújo, J.: Increasing the semantic transparency of the KAOS goal model concrete syntax. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 424–439. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_30CrossRef

37.

Storey, V.C.: Understanding semantic relationships. VLDB J. 2(4), 455–488 (1993)CrossRef

38.

Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J., Liddle, S.W.: Research on conceptual modeling: themes, topics, and introduction to the special issue. Data Knowl. Eng. 98, 1–7 (2015)CrossRef

39.

Teorey, T.J., Yang, D., Fry, J.P.: A logical design methodology for relational databases using the extended entity-relationship model. ACM Comput. Surv. 18(2), 197–222 (1986)CrossRef

40.

Terwilliger, J.F., Delcambre, L.M.L., Logan, J.: The user interface is the conceptual model. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 424–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_32CrossRef

41.

Thalheim, B.: The science and art of conceptual modelling. Trans. Large-Scale Data Knowl.-Centered Syst. 6, 76–105 (2012)

42.

Thalheim, B.: Conceptual model notions–a matter of controversy: conceptual modelling and its Lacunas. Enterp. Modell. Inf. Syst. Architect. 13, 9–27 (2018)

43.

Tsoury, A., Soffer, P., Reinhartz-Berger, I.: A conceptual framework for supporting deep exploration of business process behavior. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 58–71. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_6CrossRef

44.

Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the deep structure of information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 5(3), 203–223 (1995)CrossRef

45.

Wieringa, R.J.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8CrossRef

46.

Wieringa, R.J., Maiden, N.A.M., Mead, N.R., Rolland, C.: Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requir. Eng. 11(1), 102–107 (2006)CrossRef

47.

Zave, P.: Classification of research efforts in requirements engineering. ACM Comput. Surv. 29(4), 315–321 (1997)CrossRef

Titel: Characterizing Conceptual Modeling Research
verfasst von: Lois M. L. Delcambre
Stephen W. Liddle
Oscar Pastor
Veda C. Storey
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33245-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-33246-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner