nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Towards AI Assisted Domain Modeling

verfasst von : Christophe Feltus, Qin Ma, Henderik A. Proper, Pierre Kelsen

Erschienen in: Advances in Conceptual Modeling

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A domain model provides an explicit knowledge representation of (selected aspects of) some domain of interest. The transition to the digital age results in an increased need for domain models that are machine understandable. We posit that, at the same time, there is an increasing need for non-experts (in modeling) to be able to create such models, or at least be able to understand the created models, and take ownership of their meaning and implications. This situation causes a ‘modeling bottleneck’ in that it is not reasonable to expect all non-experts to become modeling experts. This is where we turn to AI as an enabling technology to support non-experts in domain modeling related tasks; i.e. AI Assisted Domain Modeling. We foresee a symbiotic collaboration between human intelligence, symbolic AI and subsymbolic AI; essentially resulting in a triple-helix of human, symbolic, and subsymbolic intelligence.

The aim of this workshop paper is to structurally explore the potential role of (symbolic and subsymbolic) AI to support domain conceptualization. To do so, we will combine three perspectives on domain modeling: (1) a framework relating the different conceptions (harbored in the mind of a modeler) regarding the domain to be modeled, and the model itself, (2) the role of normative frames towards modeling activities, and (3) modeling as a structured dialogue between an (automated) system analyst and a domain expert.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Inter-Generational Family Reconstitution with Enriched Ontologies

Nächstes Kapitel The Notion of “System” as a Core Conceptual Modeling Construct for Life Sciences

Not all domain models are conceptual models. As discussed in e.g. [38], a distinction could be made between conceptual domain models and computational design models, where the latter involve ‘compromises’ needed to support computational (design) considerations to e.g. support simulation, animation, or even execution of the model.

But this does not necessarily imply that these models should be executable.

https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.decomposition.PCA.html.

https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/clustering.html.

https://scikit-learn.org/stable/supervised_learning.html.

Agt-Rickauer, H.: Supporting domain modeling with automated knowledge acquisition and modeling recommendations. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Germany (2020)

Agt-Rickauer, H., Kutsche, R.D., Sack, H.: Domore - a recommender system for domain modeling. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, MODELSWARD 2018, Funchal, Madeira - Portugal, 22–24 January 2018, pp. 71–82. SciTePress (2018)

Ahmed, J., Huang, M.: Classification of role stereotypes for classes in UML class diagrams using machine learning (2020). https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/67955

Albawi, S., Mohammed, T.A., Al-Zawi, S.: Understanding of a convolutional neural network. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET), pp. 1–6 (2017)

Band, I., et al.: ArchiMate 3.0 specification. The Open Group (2016)

Baqais, A., Alshayeb, M.: Automatic refactoring of single and multiple-view UML models using artificial intelligence algorithms. In: Doctoral Consortium (MODELSWARD 2016), pp. 3–8. INSTICC, SciTePress (2016)

Bjeković, M., Proper, H.A., Sottet, J.-S.: Embracing pragmatics. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 431–444. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_37CrossRef

Bjeković, M., Sottet, J.S., Favre, J.M., Proper, H.A.: A framework for natural enterprise modelling. In: IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2013, Vienna, Austria, 15–18 July 2013, pp. 79–84. IEEE Computer Society Press (2013)

van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.P.: Exploring modelling strategies in a meta-modelling context. In: Meersman et al. [34], pp. 1128–1137

10.

Cruz-Lemus, J.A., et al.: The impact of structural complexity on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams. Inf. Sci. 180(11), 2209–2220 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRef

11.

Feltus, C.: A I’s contribution to ubiquitous systems and pervasive networks security- reinforcement learning vs. recurrent Networks. J. Ubiquit. Syst. Pervasive Netw. 15(02), 1–9 (2021)CrossRef

12.

Fettke, P.: Conceptual modelling and artificial intelligence: overview and research challenges from the perspective of predictive business process management. In: Companion Proceedings of Modellierung 2020 Short, Workshop and Tools & Demo Papers co-located with Modellierung 2020, Vienna, Austria, 19–21 February 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2542, pp. 157–164 (2020)

13.

Flasiński, M.: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRef

14.

Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley Professional (2018)

15.

Frederiks, P.J.M., van der Weide, T.P.: Information modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data Knowl. Eng. 58(1), 4–20 (2006)CrossRef

16.

Gilby, T.: St. Thomas Aquinas Philosophical Texts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1951)

17.

Gosala, B., et al.: Automatic classification of UML class diagrams using deep learning technique: convolutional neural network. Appl. Sci. 11(9), 4267 (2021)CrossRef

18.

Guizzardi, G., Prince Sale, T.: “As simple as possible but not simpler”: towards an ontology model canvas. In: Borgo, S., Kutz, O., Loebe, F., Neuhaus, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops 2017 - Episode 3: The Tyrolean Autumn of Ontology, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy (2017)

19.

Hake, P., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Automatic pattern mining in repositories of graph-based process models. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinf, pp. 1143–1154 (2016)

20.

Haugeland, J.: Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA (1985)

21.

Heinrich, B., Klier, M., Zimmermann, S.: Automated planning of process models: design of a novel approach to construct exclusive choices. Decis. Support Syst. 78, 1–14 (2015)CrossRef

22.

Hjaltason, J., Samúelsson, I.: Automatic classification of UML Class diagrams through image feature extraction and machine learning (2015)

23.

Hoppenbrouwers, S., Wilmont, I.: Focused conceptualisation: framing questioning and answering in model-oriented dialogue games. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 190–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16782-9_14CrossRef

24.

Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Lindeman, L., Proper, H.A.: Capturing modeling processes - towards the modial modeling laboratory. In: Meersman et al. [34], pp. 1242–1252

25.

Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A.E., van der Weide, T.P.: A fundamental view on the process of conceptual modeling. In: Delcambre, L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 128–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11568322_9CrossRef

26.

Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., Weide, T.P.v.d.: Towards explicit strategies for modeling. In: Halpin, T.A., Siau, K., Krogstie, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Evaluating Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2005), Held in Conjunction with the 17th Conference on Advanced Information Systems (CAiSE 2005), pp. 485–492 (2005)

27.

Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Rouwette, E.A.J.A.: A dialogue game for analysing group model building: framing collaborative modelling and its facilitation. Int. J. Organ. Design Eng. (IJODE) 2(1), 19–40 (2012)

28.

Hotelling, H.: Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J. Educ. Psychol. 24(6), 417 (1933)CrossRef

29.

Jones, D., Snider, S., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., Hicks, B.: Characterizing the digital twin: a systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 29, 36–52 (2020)CrossRef

30.

Kelsen, P., Ma, Q., Glodt, C.: A lightweight modeling approach based on functional decomposition. J. Object Technol. 19(2), 15:1–22 (2020). The 16th European Conference on Modelling Foundations and Applications (ECMFA 2020)

31.

Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1997)

32.

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2003)CrossRef

33.

Lloyd, S.: Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 28(2), 129–137 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRef

34.

Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.): On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops, OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWeSOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SeBGIS 2006, Montpellier, France, 29 October–3 November 2006. Proceedings, Part II. LNCS, vol. 4278. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

35.

Mussbacher, G., et al.: Opportunities in intelligent modeling assistance. Softw. Syst. Model. 19(5), 1045–1053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-020-00814-5CrossRef

36.

Proper, H.A., Bjeković, M.: Fundamental challenges in systems modelling. EMISA Forum 39(1), 13–28 (2019)

37.

Proper, H.A., Bjeković, M., van Gils, B., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A.: Towards a multi-stage strategy to teach enterprise modelling. In: Aveiro, D., Guizzardi, G., Guerreiro, S., Guédria, W. (eds.) EEWC 2018. LNBIP, vol. 334, pp. 181–202. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06097-8_12CrossRef

38.

Proper, H.A., Guizzardi, G.: On domain modelling and requisite variety. In: Grabis, J., Bork, D. (eds.) PoEM 2020. LNBIP, vol. 400, pp. 186–196. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63479-7_13CrossRef

39.

Proper, H.A., Guizzardi, G.: On domain conceptualization. In: Aveiro, D., Guizzardi, G., Pergl, R., Proper, H.A. (eds.) EEWC 2020. LNBIP, vol. 411, pp. 49–69. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74196-9_4CrossRef

40.

Proper, H.A., Weide, T.P.v.d.: Modelling as selection of interpretation. In: Mayr, H.C., Breu, H. (eds.) Modellierung 2006, 22.-24. März 2006, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria, Proceedings. LNI, vol. P82, pp. 223–232. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2006). https://tinyurl.com/y3h4uas9

41.

Riefer, M., Ternis, S.F., Thaler, T.: Mining process models from natural language text: a state-of-the-art analysis. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI-16), pp. 9–11, March 2016

42.

Saini, R., Mussbacher, G., Guo, J.L.C., Kienzle, J.: DoMoBOT: a bot for automated and interactive domain modelling. In: MODELS 2020: ACM/IEEE 23rd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Canada, 18–23 October 2020, Companion Proceedings, pp. 45:1–45:10. ACM (2020)

43.

Sandkuhl, K., et al.: From expert discipline to common practice: a vision and research agenda for extending the reach of enterprise modeling. Bus. Inform. Syst. Eng. 60(1), 69–80 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0516-yCrossRef

44.

Sherstinsky, A.: Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenomena 404 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306

45.

Van Otterlo, M., Wiering, M.: Reinforcement learning and Markov decision processes. In: Wiering, M., van Otterlo, M. (eds.) Reinforcement learning, vol. 12, pp. 3–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27645-3_1CrossRef

46.

Zapp, M., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Towards a software prototype supporting automatic recognition of sketched business process models. Wirtschaftsinformatik und Angewandte Informatik (2017)

47.

Zarwin, Z., Bjeković, M., Favre, J.M., Sottet, J.S., Proper, H.A.: Natural modelling. J. Object Technol. 13(3), 4:1–4:36 (2014)

Titel: Towards AI Assisted Domain Modeling
verfasst von: Christophe Feltus
Qin Ma
Henderik A. Proper
Pierre Kelsen
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Advances in Conceptual Modeling
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88357-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-88358-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88358-4_7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner