Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Assessing the Accuracy of Survey Research Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

19. Tackling Panel Attrition

verfasst von : Peter Lynn

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Over time, some respondents have been recruited to participate in longitudinal research may stop responding to survey requests. This phenomenon is known as panel attrition and it occurs when a longitudinal panel fails to retain all recruited members. While there are many potential causes of this attrition, there are a number of concrete steps that researchers that manage panels can take to tackle the problem of panel attrition. This chapter provides an overview of the causes and consequences of panel attrition. It also highlights strategies that may be effective in addressing this problem by reviewing innovations and best practices for minimizing panel attrition and also reducing the statistical impacts of attrition when it does occur.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Maintaining Respondent Trust and Protecting Their Data
Nächstes Kapitel Respondent Attrition Versus Data Attrition and Their Reduction
Literatur
Behr, A., Bellgardt, E., & Rendtel, U. 2005. “Extent and determinants of panel attrition in the European Community Household Panel.” European Sociological Review 21(5): 489–512.CrossRef
Bennett, D. J., & Steel, D. 2000. “An Evaluation of a Large-Scale CATI Household Survey using Random Digit Dialling.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 42(3): 255–270.CrossRef
Binder, D. 1998. “Longitudinal surveys: why are these surveys different from all other surveys?.” Survey Methodology 24: 101–108.
Calderwood, L., Cleary, A., Flore, G., & Wiggins, R. D. 2012. “Using response propensity models to inform fieldwork practice on the fifth wave of the Millenium Cohort Study.” Paper presented at the International Panel Survey Methods Workshop, Melbourne, Australia.
Campanelli, P., Sturgis, P., & Purdon, S. 1997. Can You Hear Me Knocking? An Investigation into the Impact of Interviewers on Survey Response Rates. The Survey Methods Centre at SCPR, London, GB. Available at http://​eprints.​soton.​ac.​uk/​80198/​.
Couper, M. P., & Ofstedal, M. B. 2009. “Keeping in Contact with Mobile Sample Members.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 183–203. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRef
De Leeuw, E. D. 2005. “To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 21(2): 233–255.
Duncan, G. J., & Kalton, G. 1987. “Issues of design and analysis of surveys across time.” International Statistical Review 55: 97–117.
Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, P. 1998. “The impact of attrition in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics on intergenerational analysis.” Journal of Human Resources 33(2): 300–344.CrossRef
Fumagalli, L., Laurie, H., & Lynn, P. 2013. “Experiments with Methods to Reduce Attrition in Longitudinal Surveys.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(2): 499–519.CrossRef
Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. 1992. “Understanding the decision to participate in a survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(4): 475–495.CrossRef
Groves, R. M., & Hansen, S. E., 1996. Survey Design Features to Maximise Respondent Retention in Longitudinal Surveys. Report to the National Center for Health Statistics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Hill, D. H., & Willis, R. J. 2001. “Reducing panel attrition: a search for effective policy instruments.” Journal of Human Resources 36(3): 416–438.CrossRef
Jäckle, A., Lynn, P., & Burton, J. 2015. “Going online with a face-to-face household panel: effects of a mixed mode design on item and unit nonresponse.” Survey Research Methods 9(1): 57–70.
Kalton, G., Lepkowski, J., Montanari, G. E., & Maligalig, D., 1990. “Characteristics of second wave nonrespondents in a panel survey.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, 462–467. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
Kaplowitz, M. D., Lupi, F., Couper, M. P., & Thorp, L. 2012. “The effect of invitation design on web survey response rates.” Social Science Computer Review 30(3): 339–349.CrossRef
Laurie, H., Smith, H., & Scott, L. 1999. “Strategies for reducing nonresponse in a longitudinal panel study.” Journal of Official Statistics 15(2): 269–282.
Laurie, H., & Lynn, P. 2009. “The use of respondent incentives on longitudinal surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 205–233. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRef
Lepkowski, J. M., & Couper, M. P. 2002. “Nonresponse in the second wave of longitudinal household surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little, 259–272. New York: Wiley.
Luiten, A., & Schouten, B. 2013. “Tailored fieldwork design to increase representative household survey response: An experiment in the survey of consumer satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(1): 169–189.CrossRef
Lynn, P. 2009. “Methods for longitudinal surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 1–19. Chichester UK: Wiley.CrossRef
Lynn, P. 2013. “Alternative sequential mixed mode designs: effects on attrition rates, attrition bias and costs.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 1(2): 183–205.CrossRef
Lynn, P., Kaminska, O., & Goldstein, H. 2014. “Panel attrition: how important is interviewer continuity?.” Journal of Official Statistics 30(3): 443–457.CrossRef
Lynn, P. 2014a. “Longer interviews may not affect subsequent survey participation propensity.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78(2): 500–509.CrossRef
Lynn, P. 2014b. “Targeted response inducement strategies on longitudinal surveys.” In Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research, edited by U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, & P. Sturgis, 322–338. Abingdon UK: Psychology Press.
Lynn, P., & Kaminska, O. 2010. “Criteria for developing non-response weight adjustments for secondary users of complex longitudinal surveys.” Paper presented at the International Workshop on Household Survey Nonresponse, Nürnberg, Germany.
McGonagle, K. A., Schoeni, R. F., & Couper, M. P. 2013. “The effects of a between-wave incentive experiment on contact update and production outcomes in a panel study.” Journal of Official Statistics 29(2): 261–276.CrossRef
Morton-Williams, J. 1993. Interviewer Approaches. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Nicoletti, C., & Buck, N. H. 2004. “Explaining interviewee contact and co-operation in the British and German household panels..” In Harmonisation of Panel Surveys and Data Quality, edited by M. Ehling & U. Rendtel, 143–166. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistiches Bundesamt.
Olsen, R. J. 2005. “The problem of respondent attrition: survey methodology is key.” Monthly Labour Review 128: 63–70.
Schouten, B., Cobben, F., Lundqvist, P., & Wagner, J. 2016. “Does more balanced survey response imply less non-response bias?.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 179(3): 727–748.CrossRef
Singer, E. 2002. “The use of incentives to reduce nonresponse in household surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little, 163–177. New York: Wiley.
Taylor, S., & Lynn, P., 1997. “The effect of time between contacts, questionnaire length, personalisation and other factors on response to the Youth Cohort Study,” Department for Education and Employment Research Series, no.8.
Tourangeau, R., Brick, J. M., Lohr, S., & Li, J. 2017. “Adaptive and responsive survey designs: a review and assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) 180(1): 203–223.
VanGeest, J. B., Johnson, T. P., & Welch, V. L. 2007. “Methodologies for improving response ates in surveys of physicians: A systematic review.” Evaluation and the Health Professions 30(4): 303–321.CrossRef
Zabel, J. E. 1998. “An analysis of attrition in the panel study of income dynamics and the survey of income and program participation with an application to a model of labour market behavior.” Journal of Human Resources 33(2): 479–506.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Tackling Panel Attrition
verfasst von
Peter Lynn
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54394-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-54395-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_19

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise