Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Using Augmented Reality Interactive System to Support Digital Electronics Learning Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Decision-Making for Interactive Systems: A Case Study for Teaching and Learning in Bioinformatics

verfasst von : Vanessa Stangherlin Machado, Walter Ritzel Paixão-Cortes, Osmar Norberto de Souza, Márcia de Borba Campos

Erschienen in: Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Technology in Education

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents the partial results of an evaluation procedure study in which satisfaction of use is a key factor in the selection of software aimed at Bioinformatics teaching and learning strategies. The objective of this research is to understand the attitudes, feelings, preferences and values that are involved in the selection of Bioinformatics resources with similar features and compare the results with usability and ergonomics criteria. To this end, we conducted a case study applying the following methods: user observation, questionnaire, interview and documental research. In this paper, we present the results of the analysis for two (2) types of tools: biological databases and sequences and macromolecule structures viewers.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Designing Tools that Allows Children in the Early Childhood to Program Robots
Nächstes Kapitel Preschool Learning with a Fingertip
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Magana, A.J., Taleyarkhan, M., Alvarado, D.R., Kane, M., Springer, J., Clase, K.: A survey of scholarly literature describing the field of bioinformatics education and bioinformatics educational research. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 13, 607–623 (2014)CrossRef
2.
Rigden, D.J., Fernández-Suárez, X.M., Galperin, M.Y.: The 2016 database issue of Nucleic Acids Research and an updated molecular biology database collection. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1–D6 (2016)CrossRef
3.
Pavlopoulos, G.A., Malliarakis, D., Papanikolaou, N., Theodosiou, T., Enright, A.J., Iliopoulos, I.: Visualizing genome and systems biology: technologies, tools, implementation techniques and trends, past, present and future. GigaScience 4, 38 (2015)CrossRef
4.
NCBI Resource Coordinators: Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D8–D20 (2013)CrossRef
5.
Javahery, H., Seffah, A., Radhakrishnan, T.: Beyond power: making bioinformatics tools user-centered. Commun. ACM 47, 58–63 (2004)CrossRef
6.
Shaer, O., Kol, G., Strait, M., Fan, C., Grevet, C., Elfenbein, S.: G-nome surfer: a tabletop interface for collaborative exploration of genomic data. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1427–1436. ACM (2010)
7.
Bolchini, D., Finkelstein, A., Perrone, V., Nagl, S.: Better bioinformatics through usability analysis. Bioinformatics 25, 406–412 (2009)CrossRef
8.
9.
Bishop, Ö.T., Adebiyi, E.F., Alzohairy, A.M., Everett, D., Ghedira, K., Ghouila, A., Kumuthini, J., Mulder, N.J., Panji, S., Patterton, H.-G., H3ABioNet Consortium, H3Africa Consortium: Bioinformatics education—perspectives and challenges out of africa. Brief. Bioinform. 16(2), 355–364 (2014). doi:10.​1093/​bib/​bbu022 CrossRef
10.
Veretnik, S., Fink, J.L., Bourne, P.E.: Computational biology resources lack persistence and usability. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000136 (2008)CrossRef
11.
Mirel, B.: Supporting cognition in systems biology analysis: findings on users’ processes and design implications. J. Biomed. Discov. Collab. 4, 2 (2009)CrossRef
12.
Al-Ageel, N., Al-Wabil, A., Badr, G., AlOmar, N.: Human factors in the design and evaluation of bioinformatics tools. Procedia Manuf. 3, 2003–2010 (2015)CrossRef
13.
Douglas, C., Goulding, R., Farris, L., Atkinson-Grosjean, J.: Socio-cultural characteristics of usability of bioinformatics databases and tools. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 36, 55–71 (2011)CrossRef
14.
Mirel, B.: Usability and usefulness in bioinformatics: Evaluating a tool for querying and analyzing protein interactions based on scientists’ actual research questions. In: 2007 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2007)
15.
Cybis, W.A., Betiol, A.H., Faust, R.: Ergonomia e Usabilidade: Conhecimentos, Métodos e Aplicações. Novatec, São Paulo (2007)
16.
Macaulay, C., Sloan, D., Jiang, X., Forbes, P., Loynton, S., Swedlow, J.R., Gregor, P.: Usability and user-centered design in scientific software development. IEEE Softw. 26, 96 (2009)CrossRef
17.
Rutherford, P., Abell, W., Churcher, C., McKinnon, A., McCallum, J.: Usability of navigation tools for browsing genetic sequences. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on User Interface, vol. 106, pp. 33–41. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2010)
18.
Rocha, L.C., Andrade, R.M., Sampaio, A.L.: Heurísticas para avaliar a usabilidade de aplicações móveis: estudo de caso para aulas de campo em Geologia. TISE (2014)
19.
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Elsevier (1994)
20.
ABNT, A.B.D.N.T.: NBR ISO 9241: ergonomia da interação humano-sistema. Parte 110: princípios de diálogo (2012)
21.
Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1997)
22.
Kinjo, A.R., Yamashita, R., Nakamura, H.: PDBj Mine: design and implementation of relational database interface for Protein Data Bank Japan. Database 2010, baq021 (2010)
23.
Velankar, S., Best, C., Beuth, B., Boutselakis, C.H., Cobley, N., Sousa Da Silva, A.W., Dimitropoulos, D., Golovin, A., Hirshberg, M., John, M., Krissinel, E.B., Newman, R., Oldfield, T., Pajon, A., Penkett, C.J., Pineda-Castillo, J., Sahni, G., Sen, S., Slowley, R., Suarez-Uruena, A., Swaminathan, J., van Ginkel, G., Vranken, W.F., Henrick, K., Kleywegt, G.J.: PDBe: protein data bank in Europe. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 308–317 (2010)CrossRef
24.
Zardecki, C., Dutta, S., Goodsell, D.S., Voigt, M., Burley, S.K.: RCSB protein data bank: a resource for chemical, biochemical, and structural explorations of large and small biomolecules. J. Chem. Educ. 93, 569–575 (2016)CrossRef
25.
Guex, N.: Swiss-PdbViewer: A new fast and easy to use PDB viewer for the Macintosh. Experientia 52, A26 (1996)
26.
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., Schulten, K.: VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996)CrossRef
27.
Schrödinger, LLC: The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3r1 (2010)
28.
Ouzounis, C.A., Valencia, A.: Early bioinformatics: the birth of a discipline—a personal view. Bioinformatics 19, 2176–2190 (2003)CrossRef
29.
Ranganathan, S.: Bioinformatics education—perspectives and challenges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, e52 (2005)CrossRef
30.
Welch, L.R., Schwartz, R., Lewitter, F.: A report of the curriculum task force of the ISCB education committee. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002570 (2012)CrossRef
31.
Welch, L., Lewitter, F., Schwartz, R., Brooksbank, C., Radivojac, P., Gaeta, B., Schneider, M.V.: Bioinformatics curriculum guidelines: toward a definition of core competencies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003496 (2014)CrossRef
32.
Welch, L.R., Schwartz, R., Lewitter, F.: Report from the ISCB Education Committee: a draft curriculum for bioinformatics [abstract]. In: Third annual RECOMB Conference on Bioinformatics Education (RECOMB-BE), An ISMB/ECCB 2011 (2011)
33.
Atwood, T.K., Bongcam-Rudloff, E., Brazas, M.E., Corpas, M., Gaudet, P., Lewitter, F., Mulder, N., Palagi, P.M., Schneider, M.V., van Gelder, C.W., GOBLET Consortium: GOBLET: the global organisation for bioinformatics learning, education and training. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004143 (2015)CrossRef
34.
Buttigieg, P.L.: Perspectives on presentation and pedagogy in aid of bioinformatics education. Brief. Bioinform. 11, 587–597 (2010)CrossRef
35.
Cummings, M.P., Temple, G.G.: Broader incorporation of bioinformatics in education: opportunities and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 11, 537–543 (2010)CrossRef
36.
Ojo, O.O., Omabe, M.: Incorporating bioinformatics into biological science education in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11, 784–787 (2011)CrossRef
37.
Dimitrov, R.A., Gouliamova, D.E.: Bioinformatics education: perspectives and challenges. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 23, 40–42 (2009)CrossRef
38.
Bruhn, R., Jennings, S.F.: A multidisciplinary bioinformatics minor. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 39, 348–352 (2007)CrossRef
39.
Gibas, C., Jambeck, P.: Desenvolvendo Bioinformática: ferramentas de software para aplicações em biologia. Campus (2001)
40.
Lesk, A.M.: Introdução à Bioinformática. Tradução de Ardala Elisa Breda Andrade et al. LABIO, FACIN, PUCRS (2008)
41.
Benson, D.A., Clark, K., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J., Sayers, E.W.: GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D30–D35 (2015)CrossRef
42.
Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering: Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering (2008)
43.
McWilliam, H., Li, W., Uludag, M., Squizzato, S., Park, Y.M., Buso, N., Cowley, A.P., Lopez, R.: Analysis Tool Web Services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W597–W600 (2013)CrossRef
44.
Johnson, M., Zaretskaya, I., Raytselis, Y., Merezhuk, Y., McGinnis, S., Madden, T.L.: NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W5–9 (2008)
45.
Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Higgins, D.G.: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 23, 2947–2948 (2007)
46.
Ansari, S.N., Iliyas, S.: A Comparative Study of Protein Structure Visualization Tools for Various Display Capabilities. Biosci. Discov. Int. J. Life Sci. 2, P222–P226 (2011)
47.
Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S., Thornton, J.M.: PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993)CrossRef
48.
Fiser, A., Šali, A.: Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. In: Carter Jr., C.W., Sweet, R.M. (ed.) Methods in Enzymology, pp. 461–491. Academic Press (2003)
49.
50.
Néron, B., Ménager, H., Maufrais, C., Joly, N., Maupetit, J., Letort, S., Carrere, S., Tuffery, P., Letondal, C.: Mobyle: a new full web bioinformatics framework. Bioinformatics 25, 3005–3011 (2009)CrossRef
51.
Shyr, C., Kushniruk, A., Wasserman, W.W.: Usability study of clinical exome analysis software: top lessons learned and recommendations. J. Biomed. Inform. 51, 129–136 (2014)CrossRef
52.
53.
Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256. ACM, New York (1990)
54.
de Matos, P., Cham, J.A., Cao, H., Alcántara, R., Rowland, F., Lopez, R., Steinbeck, C.: The Enzyme Portal: a case study in applying user-centred design methods in bioinformatics. BMC Bioinform. 14, 103 (2013)CrossRef
55.
Pavelin, K., Cham, J.A., de Matos, P., Brooksbank, C., Cameron, G., Steinbeck, C.: Bioinformatics meets user-centred design: a perspective. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002554 (2012)CrossRef
56.
Mount, D.W.: Bioinformatics: sequence and genome analysis. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (2004)
57.
Martí-Renom, M.A., Stuart, A.C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., Sali, A.: Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 291–325 (2000)CrossRef
58.
Santos Filho, O.A., de Alencastro, R.B.: Modelagem de proteínas por homologia. Quím. Nova 26, 253–259 (2003)CrossRef
59.
Sillitoe, I., Lewis, T.E., Cuff, A., Das, S., Ashford, P., Dawson, N.L., Furnham, N., Laskowski, R.A., Lee, D., Lees, J.G., Lehtinen, S., Studer, R.A., Thornton, J., Orengo, C.A.: CATH: comprehensive structural and functional annotations for genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D376–D381 (2015)CrossRef
60.
Fox, N.K., Brenner, S.E., Chandonia, J.-M.: The value of protein structure classification information—Surveying the scientific literature. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 83, 2025–2038 (2015)CrossRef
61.
Guex, N., Peitsch, M.C.: SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18, 2714–2723 (1997)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Decision-Making for Interactive Systems: A Case Study for Teaching and Learning in Bioinformatics
verfasst von
Vanessa Stangherlin Machado
Walter Ritzel Paixão-Cortes
Osmar Norberto de Souza
Márcia de Borba Campos
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Technology in Education

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58514-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-58515-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58515-4_8