Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction to Maritime Energy Management Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

The Impact of SECA Regulations on Clean Shipping in the Baltic Sea Region

verfasst von : Eunice O. Olaniyi, Gunnar Prause, Jan Boyesen

Erschienen in: Trends and Challenges in Maritime Energy Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the European Parliament (EP) decided in 2005 and 2012 to establish Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA) in Northern Europe where operating ships from 2015 must use fuel with low sulphur content not exceeding 0.1%. Some of the first reactions were seen with vessels operating in the Baltic Sea, which had switched to low sulphur content fuel or LNG. Meanwhile, the SECA regulations have spurred intensive discussions concerning the economic disadvantages that seem to have been created for maritime stakeholders who must comply with strict regulations, which competitors in other parts of the world are not subjected to.
This paper presents the first results on measures taken by stakeholders towards sulphur emission reduction, and stakeholders’ impressions of the financial impact of SECA regulations on their businesses and Baltic Sea Region (BSR). Results show that the BSR is in the forefront of clean shipping campaigns and that the maritime stakeholders attribute significant SECA impacts to innovation and reputation of BSR. This contribution will improve the development of using the BSR as a test bed for future integrated knowledge for cleaner and more cost-effective shipping globally.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Energy Manager Role in Ports
Nächstes Kapitel Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Coatings Applied to Ship Hulls
Literatur
Alcamo, J., Amann, M., Hettelingh, J. P., Holmberg, M., Hordijk, L., Kämäri, J., Kauppi, L., Kauppi, P., Kornai, G., & Mäkelä, A. (1987). Acidification in Europe: A simulation model for evaluating control strategies. Ambio, 17, 232–245.
Bergqvist, R., Turesson, M., & Weddmark, A. (2015). Sulphur emission control areas and transport strategies - The case of Sweden and the forest industry. European Transport Research Review, 7(2), 10.CrossRef
Brynolf, S., Magnusson, M., Fridell, E., & Andersson, K. (2014). Compliance possibilities for the future ECA regulations through the use of abatement technologies or change of fuels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 6–18.CrossRef
Hämäläinen, E., Hilmola, O. P., Prause, G., & Tolli, A. (2016). Forecasting maritime logistics costs – Will the low oil price remain? In A. Serry & L. Lévêque (Eds.), Le transport maritime à courte distance (Short-Sea Shipping): Devport 2016 Conference (Le Havre, France) (pp. 19–34). Le Havre, France: EMS Geodif.
Holmgren, J., Nikopoulou, Z., Ramstedt, L., & Woxenius, J. (2014). Modelling modal choice effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 62–73.CrossRef
IMO. (2008). Revised MARPOL Annex VI: Regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships and NOx technical code. London: IMO Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC).
IMO. (2009). Prevention of air pollution from ships Second IMO GHG Study 2009 Update of the 2000 IMO GHG Study Final report covering Phase 1 and Phase 2: noted by Secretariat (MEPC 59/INF.10).
IMO. (2015). Guidance on the application of regulation 13 of MARPOL annex VI tier III requirements to dual fuel and gas-fuelled engines. MEPC.1/Circ.854. London.
Jiang, L., Kronbak, J., & Christensen, L. P. (2014). The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportation Research Part D, 28, 19–27.CrossRef
Karl-Heinz, B., Möller, M., & Wenske, C. (2013). Baltic maritime transport, its structure, competitive situation and economic weight. In K. Breitzmann, & M. Hytti (Eds.), Pan-Baltic manual of best practices on clean shipping and port operations. Turku, Finland: UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat, Vanha Suurtori 7, FIN-20500.
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: SAGE.
Mellqvist, J. (2016). SOx compliance monitoring, EnviSuM partner meeting, 26.10.2016, Copenhagen.
Notteboom, T. (2010). The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10(1), 63–95.CrossRef
NSF - North Sea Foundation. (2008). Clean shipping: Towards an integrated approach of sustainable shipping. Utrecht, The Netherlands: North Sea Foundation.
Nugraha, F. (2009). Effective implementation of emission control area towards cleaner shipping operations: Focusing on sulphur oxides (SOx) emission reduction. World Maritime University Dissertations, 186.
Panagakos, G. P., Stamatopoulou, E. V., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2014). The possible designation of the Mediterranean Sea as a SECA: A case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 74–90.CrossRef
Stipa, T. (2013). Clean shipping current. In K. Breitzmann, & M. Hytti (Eds.), Pan-Baltic manual of best practices on clean shipping and port operations. Turku, Finland: UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat, Vanha Suurtori 7, FIN-20500.
Wiśnicki, B., Czermański, E., Droździecki, S., Matczak, M., & Spangenberg, E. (2014). Sulphur regulation–technology solutions and economic consequences for the Baltic Sea Region shipping market. In E. Czermański (Ed.), Institute of maritime transport and seaborne trade. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods, revised edition. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5.
Metadaten
Titel
The Impact of SECA Regulations on Clean Shipping in the Baltic Sea Region
verfasst von
Eunice O. Olaniyi
Gunnar Prause
Jan Boyesen
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Trends and Challenges in Maritime Energy Management

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74575-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-74576-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74576-3_22