Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Nexus Approach as Tool for Achieving SDGs: Trends and Needs Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Games for Aiding Stakeholder Deliberation on Nexus Policy Issues

verfasst von : Junko Mochizuki, Piotr Magnuszewski, Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer

Erschienen in: Managing Water, Soil and Waste Resources to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Games can provide an effective and replicable space in which stakeholders learn skills necessary for deliberative and pluralist policymaking. These skills are especially important for “nexus” policy issues that are typically characterised by multiple, competing problem frames involving overlapping networks of stakeholders. In this position paper, we describe three serious games that serve as a space for players (stakeholders) and researchers to jointly explore alternative solutions to complex resource management issues: the Water-Food-Energy Nexus Game (Nexus Game); the Narubu Game of Many Voices (Narubu Game); and the Forest Governance Game (Forest Game). The games contain instructive and reflexive mechanisms that prompt players to self-discover common challenges associated with complex nexus issues, including conflicting institutional mandates, social dilemmas, contending worldviews, and plural interpretations of science.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Participatory Processes and Integrated Modelling Supporting Nexus Implementations
Nächstes Kapitel Governance of Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A Social Network Analysis Approach to Understanding Agency Behaviour
Fußnoten
1
For further discussions on gaming application in diverse stakeholder settings such as policy exercise and companion modelling, see for example, Ryan (2000), Barreteau et al. (2003), Bousquet (2005), Geurts et al. (2007), Mayer (2009), Duke (2011), Rumore et al. (2016).
 
3
Originally developed by Douglas (1978), cultural theory—a theory of cultural bias—introduces the notion of plural rationalities as a challenge to theories of rational choice and post-structuralism.
 
5
A series of capacity building activities are currently being developed and planned to be implemented in 2017.
 
6
There is an ongoing effort to expand the experimental setting to include specific governance regimes and their interactions with the participants’ worldviews. To this end, players are also classified using a short questionnaire that determines their identification with the TPR worldviews: hierarchy, individualism, and egalitarianism.
 
7
It goes beyond the scope of this article to provide comprehensive evaluation of gaming versus other stakeholder engagement methods. However, we generally have in our experience applying these tools that methods such as scenario building activities provide a broader opportunity for stakeholders to evaluate futures (i.e. alternative pathways to achieving them and their consequences), whereas simulation games engage them more intensively (i.e, emotionally) in the process of achieving a particular path towards future. These methods are often complementary and can be used in an integrated manner.
 
Literatur
Aldred J, Jacobs M (2000) Citizens and wetlands: evaluating the Ely citizens’ jury. Ecol Econ 34(2):217–232CrossRef
Allen CR, Gunderson LH (2011) Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. J Environ Manage 92(5):1379–1384CrossRef
Bachofen C, Suarez P, Steenbergen M, Grist N (2012) Can games help people manage the climate risks they face? The participatory design of educational games. Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre Working Paper Series 3
Barreteau O, Antona M, D’Aquino P, Aubert S, Boissau S, Bousquet F, Daré WS et al (2003) Our companion modelling approach. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 6:1
Bednarik P, Dieckmann U, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Magnuszewski P (forthcoming) A game of common-pool resource management: the effects of communication, shared benefits and worldviews
Boas I, Biermann F, Kanie N (2016) Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 16(3):449–464CrossRef
Bogost I (2008) The rhetoric of video games. In: The ecology of games: connecting youth, games, and learning. MIT Press, Cambrigde, pp 117–140
Bousquet F (2005) Companion modeling and multi-agent systems for integrated natural resource management in Asia. Int. Rice Res. Inst.
Conway D, van Garderen EA, Deryng D, Dorling S, Krueger T, Landman W, Lankford B et al (2015) Climate and southern Africa’s water-energy-food nexus. Nat Clim Change 5(9):837–846CrossRef
Cundill G, Rodela R (2012) A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management. J Environ Manage 113:7–14CrossRef
de Suarez JM, Suarez P, Bachofen C, Fortugno N, Goentzel J, Gonçalves P, Grist N et al (2012) Games for a new climate: experiencing the complexity of future risks. Pardee Center Task Force Report
Dietz T (2013) Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(Suppl 3):14081–14087CrossRef
Douglas M (1978) Cultural bias. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Occasional Paper, 35
Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1983) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press
Dryzek JS (2001) Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Polit Theory 29(5):651–669CrossRef
Duke RD (2011) Origin and evolution of policy simulation: a personal journey. Simul Gaming 42(3):342–358CrossRef
Elster J (1998) Deliberative democracy, vol 1. Cambridge University Press
Entholzner A, Reeve C (eds) (2016) Building climate resilience through virtual water and nexus thinking in the southern African development community. Springer
Fischhoff B (2013) The sciences of science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(Suppl 3):14033–14039CrossRef
Foran T, Ward J, Kemp-Benedict E, Smajgl A (2013) Developing detailed foresight narratives: a participatory technique from the Mekong region. Ecol Soc 18(4)
Garmendia E, Stagl S (2010) Public participation for sustainability and social learning: concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecol Econ 69(8):1712–1722CrossRef
Geels FW, Berkhout F, van Vuuren DP (2016) Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nat Clim Change 6(6):576–583CrossRef
Geurts JLA, Duke RD, Vermeulen PAM (2007) Policy gaming for strategy and change. Long Range Plan 40(6):535–558CrossRef
Harteveld C, Guimarães R, Mayer IS, Bidarra R (2009) Balancing play, meaning and reality: the design philosophy of LEVEE PATROLLER. Simul Gaming 41(3):316–340CrossRef
Hassenforder E, Smajgl A, Ward J (2015) Towards understanding participatory processes: framework, application and results. J Environ Manage 157:84–95CrossRef
Holling CS (2000) Theories for sustainable futures. Conserv Ecol 4(2)
Jackson S, Tan P-L, Nolan S (2012) Tools to enhance public participation and confidence in the development of the Howard East aquifer water plan, Northern Territory. J Hydrol 474:22–28CrossRef
Juhola S, Driscoll P, de Suarez JM, Suarez P (2013) Social strategy games in communicating trade-offs between mitigation and adaptation in cities. Urban Clim 4:102–116CrossRef
Kallis G, Hatzilacou D, Mexa A, Coccossis H, Svoronou E (2009) Beyond the manual: practicing deliberative visioning in a Greek island. Ecol Econ 68(4):979–989CrossRef
Kapp KM (2012) The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training an education. Wiley
Koster RA (2012) Theory of fund for game design. O’Reilly
Kristjanson P, Harvey B, Van Epp M, Thornton PK (2014) Social learning and sustainable development. Nat Clim Change 4(1):5–7CrossRef
Krolikowska K, Kronenberg J, Maliszewska K, Sendzimir J, Magnuszewski P, Dunajski A, Slodka A (2007) Role-playing simulation as a communication tool in community dialogue: Karkonosze Mountains case study. Simul Gaming 38(2):195–210CrossRef
Kurian M, Ardakanian R (2015) Governing the nexus. Springer International Publishing
Le Blanc D (2015) Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustain Dev 23(3):176–187CrossRef
Leck H, Conway D, Bradshaw M, Rees J (2015) Tracing the water–energy–food nexus: description, theory and practice. Geogr Compass 9(8):445–460CrossRef
Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J Econ Perspect 21(2):153–174CrossRef
Linnerooth-Bayer J, Vari A, Thompson M (2006) Floods and fairness in Hungary. In: Verweij M, Thompson M (eds) Clumsy solutions for a complex world: governance, politics and plural perceptions. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstok, pp 181–204CrossRef
Linnerooth-Bayer JA, Scolobig A, Ferlisi S, Cascini L, Thompson M (2016) Expert engagement in participatory processes: translating stakeholder discourses into policy options. Nat Hazards 81(1):69–88CrossRef
Lubans J Jr (2009) Leading from the middle: what? So what? Now what? Libr Leadersh Manage 23(3):140–142
Mayer IS (2009) The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: a review. Simul Gaming 40(6):825–862CrossRef
McGonigal J (2011) Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin
Meadows D (2002) Dancing with systems. Syst Thinker 13:2–6
Newell B, Wasson R (2002) Social system vs solar system: why policy makers need history. Confl Cooperation Relat Int Water Resour Hist Perspect 62:3ff
Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15181–15187CrossRef
Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419–422CrossRef
Parson EA (1996a) How should we study global environmental problems? A plea for unconventional methods of assessment and synthesis
Parson EA (1996b) What can you learn from a game. In: Wise choices: games, decisions, and negotiations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Plate R (2010) Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. Syst Dyn Rev 26(1):19–33CrossRef
Rasul G, Sharma B (2016) The nexus approach to water–energy–food security: an option for adaptation to climate change. Clim Policy 16(6):682–702CrossRef
Rayner S (2006) Wicked problems: clumsy solutions. Jack Beale Memorial Lecture. University of New South Wales, 25 July 2006
Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan
Ringler C, Bhaduri A, Lawford R (2013) The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): potential for improved resource use efficiency? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(6):617–624CrossRef
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169
Rowe G, Marsh R, Frewer LJ (2004) Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Sci Technol Human Values 29(1):88–121CrossRef
Rumore D, Schenk T, Susskind L (2016) Role-play simulations for climate change adaptation education and engagement. Nat Clim Change 6(8):745–750CrossRef
Ryan T (2000) The role of simulation gaming in policy-making. Syst Res Behav Sci 17(4):359CrossRef
Salen K, Zimmerman E (2004) Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT press
Salgado PP, Quintana SC, Pereira AG, del Moral Ituarte L, Mateos BP (2009) Participative multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of water governance alternatives. A case in the Costa del Sol (Malaga). Ecol Econ 68(4):990–1005
Scolobig A, Lilliestam J (2016) Comparing approaches for the integration of stakeholder perspectives in environmental decision making. Resources 5(4):37CrossRef
Scolobig A, Thompson M, Linnerooth-Bayer J (2016) Compromise not consensus: designing a participatory process for landslide risk mitigation. Nat Hazards 81(1):45–68CrossRef
Singleton BE (2016) Clumsiness and elegance in environmental management: applying cultural theory to the history of whaling. Environ Polit 25(3):414–433CrossRef
Smajgl A (2018) Participatory processes and integrated modelling supporting nexus implementations. In: Hülsmann S, Ardakanian R (eds) Managing water, soil and waste resources to achieve sustainable development goals: monitoring and implementation of integrated resources management
Smajgl A, Ward J (2015) Evaluating participatory research: framework, methods and implementation results. J Environ Manage 157:311–319CrossRef
Smajgl A, Ward JR, Foran T, Dore J, Larson S (2015) Visions, beliefs, and transformation: exploring cross-sector and transboundary dynamics in the wider Mekong region. Ecol Soc 20(2):15CrossRef
Stefanska J, Magnuszewski P, Sendzimir J, Romaniuk P, Taillieu T, Dubel A, Flachner Z, Balogh P (2011) A gaming exercise to explore problem-solving versus relational activities for river floodplain management. Environ Policy Governance 21(6):454–471CrossRef
Steiner, J (2012) The foundations of deliberative democracy: empirical research and normative implications. Cambridge University Press
Sterman JD (2006) Learning from evidence in a complex world. Am J Public Health 96(3):505–514CrossRef
Thompson M (2008) Organising and disorganising. A dynamic and non-linear theory of institutional emergence and its implication. Triarchy Press
Thompson M (2013) 36 Clumsy solutions to environmental change. In: A changing environment for human security: transformative approaches to research, policy and action, p 424
Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural theory. Westview Press
Umejesi I, Thompson M (2015) Fighting elephants, suffering grass: oil exploitation in Nigeria. J Organ Change Manage 28(5):791–811CrossRef
Van der Heijden, K (1996) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Wiley
Verweij M, Thompson M (eds) (2011) Clumsy solutions for a complex world: governance, politics and plural perceptions, 2 edn. Springer
Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15(5):443–463CrossRef
Webler T, Tuler S, Krueger ROB (2001) What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environ Manage 27(3):435–450
Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies. New York, pp 26–30
Yazdanpanah M, Thompson M, Hayati D, Zamani GH (2013) A new enemy at the gate: tackling Iran’s water super-crisis by way of a transition from government to governance. Prog Dev Stud 13(3):177–194CrossRef
Yazdanpanah M, Hayati D, Thompson M, Zamani GH, Monfared N (2014) Policy and plural responsiveness: taking constructive account of the ways in which Iranian farmers think about and behave in relation to water. J Hydrol 514:347–357CrossRef
Yillia PT (2016) Water-Energy-Food nexus: framing the opportunities, challenges and synergies for implementing the SDGs. Österr Wasser Abfallwirtsch 68(3–4):86–98CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Games for Aiding Stakeholder Deliberation on Nexus Policy Issues
verfasst von
Junko Mochizuki
Piotr Magnuszewski
Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Managing Water, Soil and Waste Resources to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75162-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-75163-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75163-4_5