Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Hammer or Tongs: How Best to Build Agent-Based Models? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Multi-Agent Systems and Blockchain: Results from a Systematic Literature Review

verfasst von : Davide Calvaresi, Alevtina Dubovitskaya, Jean Paul Calbimonte, Kuldar Taveter, Michael Schumacher

Erschienen in: Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Complexity: The PAAMS Collection

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) technology is widely used for the development of intelligent distributed systems that manage sensitive data (e.g., ambient assisted living, healthcare, energy trading). To foster accountability and trusted interactions, recent trends advocate the use of blockchain technologies (BCT) for MAS. Although most of these approaches have only started exploring the topic, there is an impending need for establishing a research road-map, as well as identifying scientific and technological challenges in this scope. As a first necessary step towards this goal, this paper presents a systematic literature review of studies involving MAS and BCT as reconciling solutions. Aiming at providing a comprehensive overview of their application domains, we analyze motivations, assumptions, requirements, strengths, and limitations presented in the current state of the art. Moreover, discussing the future challenges, we introduce our vision on how MAS and BCT could be combined in different application scenarios.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Using Run-Time Biofeedback During Virtual Agent-Based Aggression De-escalation Training
Nächstes Kapitel A Model and Platform for Building Agent-Based Pervasive Mixed Reality Systems
Fußnoten
1
Smart contract and chaincode logic concepts are quite close, therefore, we use the former when talking about programmable contract, or a set of rules, when discussing BCT in general.
 
3
EC Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
 
Literatur
1.
Schatten, M., Ševa, J., Tomičić, I.: A roadmap for scalable agent organizations in the internet of everything. J. Syst. Softw. 115, 31–41 (2016)CrossRef
2.
Calvaresi, D., Sernani, P., Marinoni, M., Claudi, A., Balsini, A., Dragoni, A.F., Buttazzo, G.: A framework based on real-time OS and multi-agents for intelligent autonomous robot competitions. In: IEEE Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES), pp. 1–10 (2016)
3.
Calvaresi, D., Marinoni, M., Sturm, A., Schumacher, M., Buttazzo, G.: The challenge of real-time multi-agent systems for enabling IoT and CPS. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (2017)
4.
Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, pp. 294–301. ACM (2002)
5.
Ramchurn, S.D., Huynh, D., Jennings, N.R.: Trust in multi-agent systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 19(1), 1–25 (2004)CrossRef
6.
Hedin, Y., Moradian, E.: Security in multi-agent systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 60, 1604–1612 (2015). (In: Proceedings of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems 19th Annual Conference, KES-2015, Singapore, September 2015)
7.
Kvaternik, K., Laszka, A., Walker, M., Schmidt, D., Sturm, M., Dubey, A., et al.: Privacy-preserving platform for transactive energy systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1709.​09597 (2017)
8.
Qayumi, K.: Multi-agent based intelligence generation from very large datasets. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E), pp. 502–504. IEEE (2015)
9.
Norta, A., Othman, A.B., Taveter, K.: Conflict-resolution lifecycles for governed decentralized autonomous organization collaboration. In: EGOSE, pp. 244–257 (2015)
10.
Ponomarev, S., Voronkov, A.: Multi-agent systems and decentralized artificial superintelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1702.​08529 (2017)
11.
Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media Inc., Newton (2015)
12.
Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A.: Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Penguin, London (2016)
13.
Shermin, V.: Disrupting governance with blockchains and smart contracts. Strateg. Change 26(5), 499–509 (2017)CrossRef
14.
15.
Gattermayer, J., Tvrdik, P.: Blockchain-based multi-level scoring system for P2P clusters. In: International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, ICPPW, pp. 301–308. IEEE (2017)
16.
Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, pp. 111–114. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)
17.
Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008)
18.
Pass, R., Shi, E.: Hybrid consensus: efficient consensus in the permissionless model. In: LIPIcs-Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, vol. 91, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2017)
19.
20.
21.
O’Dwyer, K.J., Malone, D.: Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint. In: ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014, pp. 280–285. IET (2013)
22.
Gervais, A., Karame, G.O., Wüst, K., Glykantzis, V., Ritzdorf, H., Capkun, S.: On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains, pp. 3–16 (2016)
23.
24.
Kiayias, A., Panagiotakos, G.: On trees, chains and fast transactions in the blockchain. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive (2016)
25.
26.
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(1), 7–15 (2009)CrossRef
27.
Calvaresi, D., Cesarini, D., Sernani, P., Marinoni, M., Dragoni, A., Sturm, A.: Exploring the ambient assisted living domain: a systematic review. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 1–19 (2016)
28.
Calvaresi, D., Appoggetti, K., Lustrissimini, L., Marinoni, M., Sernani, P., Dragoni, A.F., Schumacher, M.: Multi-agent systems’ negotiation protocols for cyber-physical systems: results from a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of ICAART (2018)
29.
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D.: Refining the systematic literature review process-two participant-observer case studies. Emp. Softw. Eng. 15(6), 618–653 (2010)CrossRef
30.
Norta, A., Vedeshin, A., Rand, H., Tobies, S., Rull, A., Poola, M., Rull, T.: Self-aware agent-supported contract management on blockchains for legal accountability. White paper (2017)
31.
Kiyomoto, S., Rahman, M.S., Basu, A.: On blockchain-based anonymized dataset distribution platform. In: 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), pp. 85–92. IEEE (2017)
32.
Mariani, S., Omicini, A., Ciatto, G.: Novel opportunities for tuple-based coordination: XPath, the blockchain, & stream processing (2017)
33.
Leiding, B., Norta, A.: Mapping requirements specifications into a formalized blockchain-enabled authentication protocol for secured personal identity assurance. In: Dang, T.K., Wagner, R., Küng, J., Thoai, N., Takizawa, M., Neuhold, E.J. (eds.) FDSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10646, pp. 181–196. Springer, Cham (2017). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-70004-5_​13CrossRef
34.
Shen, J., Shen, J., Huang, Y., Huang, Y., Chai, Y., Chai, Y.: A cyber-anima-based model of material conscious information network. Int. J. Crowd Sci. 1, 9–25 (2017)CrossRef
35.
Bonino, D., Vergori, P.: Agent marketplaces and deep learning in enterprises: the composition project. In: Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, pp. 749–754 (2017)
36.
Fuller, T.R., Deane, G.E.: Anomaly detection and intelligent notification. In: Future of Information and Communications Conference (2018)
37.
Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F.: Coordination for internet application development. Auton. Agent. Multi-agent Syst. 2(3), 251–269 (1999)CrossRef
38.
McConaghy, T., Marques, R., Müller, A., De Jonghe, D., McConaghy, T., McMullen, G., Henderson, R., Bellemare, S., Granzotto, A.: Bigchaindb: a scalable blockchain database. White paper, BigChainDB (2016)
39.
Hull, R., Batra, V.S., Chen, Y.-M., Deutsch, A., Heath III, F.F.T., Vianu, V.: Towards a shared ledger business collaboration language based on data-aware processes. In: Sheng, Q.Z., Stroulia, E., Tata, S., Bhiri, S. (eds.) ICSOC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9936, pp. 18–36. Springer, Cham (2016). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-46295-0_​2CrossRef
40.
Androulaki, E., Karame, G.O., Roeschlin, M., Scherer, T., Capkun, S.: Evaluating user privacy in bitcoin. In: International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (2013)CrossRef
41.
Möser, M.: Anonymity of bitcoin transactions. In: Münster Bitcoin Conference, pp. 17–18 (2013)
42.
Dingledine, R., Mathewson, N., Syverson, P.: Tor: the second-generation onion router. Technical report, Naval Research Lab Washington DC (2004)
43.
Wüst, K., Gervais, A.: Do you need a blockchain? IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive (2017)
44.
Dubovitskaya, A., Xu, Z., Ryu, S., Schumacher, M., Wang, F.: Secure and trustable electronic medical records sharing using blockchain. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1709.​06528 (2017)
45.
46.
Ben-Or, M., Goldwasser, S., Wigderson, A.: Completeness theorems for non-cryptographic fault-tolerant distributed computation. In: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (1988)
47.
Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., et al.: Decentralizing privacy: using blockchain to protect personal data. In: Security and Privacy Workshops (2015)
48.
Syta, E., Tamas, I., Visher, D., Wolinsky, D.I., Jovanovic, P., Gasser, L., Gailly, N., Khoffi, I., Ford, B.: Keeping authorities “honest or bust” with decentralized witness cosigning. In: Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 526–545, May 2016
49.
Kuo, T.T., Kim, H.E., Ohno-Machado, L.: Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(6), 1211–1220 (2017)CrossRef
50.
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., Jiang, W.: Healthcare data gateways: found healthcare intelligence on blockchain with novel privacy risk control. J. Med. Syst. 40, 218 (2016)CrossRef
51.
52.
Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J.D., Lippman, A.: A case study for blockchain in healthcare “MedRec” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data (2016)
53.
Calvaresi, D., Schumacher, M., Marinoni, M., Hilfiker, R., Dragoni, A.F., Buttazzo, G.: Agent-based systems for telerehabilitation: strengths, limitations and future challenges. In: Montagna, S., Abreu, P.H., Giroux, S., Schumacher, M.I. (eds.) A2HC/AHEALTH -2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10685, pp. 3–24. Springer, Cham (2017). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-70887-4_​1CrossRef
54.
Dubovitskaya, A., Urovi, V., Barba, I., Aberer, K., Schumacher, M.I.: A multiagent system for dynamic data aggregation in medical research. BioMed. Res. Int. (2016)
55.
Taveter, K.: Agile engineering of B2B automation systems. ERCIM News 50, 60–61 (2004)
56.
Taveter, K., Du, H., Huhns, M.N.: Engineering societal information systems by agent-oriented modeling. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 4(3), 227–252 (2012)
Metadaten
Titel
Multi-Agent Systems and Blockchain: Results from a Systematic Literature Review
verfasst von
Davide Calvaresi
Alevtina Dubovitskaya
Jean Paul Calbimonte
Kuldar Taveter
Michael Schumacher
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Advances in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Complexity: The PAAMS Collection

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94579-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-94580-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94580-4_9

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise