Skip to main content

2010 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

21. Thinking Through Complex Values

verfasst von : Maria Cerreta

Erschienen in: Making Strategies in Spatial Planning

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter explores how ‘thinking through complex values’ can support the structuring of integrated decision-making by orienting it towards the elaboration of strategic goals and actions able to create new values from the plurality of knowledge and the specificity of the context. With its normative, spatial, temporal, cultural, social and cognitive features, the context becomes the frame in which planning responses and behaviours can be shaped.
In its first part, this chapter explores the connection between values, knowledge and strategies, focusing on their interdependencies. The second part of the chapter discusses the role of evaluation within an integrated perspective, which is seen as an ‘opportunity’ to elaborate strategies and ‘organize hopes’ in spatial planning; the integrated perspective considers evaluation as an activity embedded in the planning process and supporting many other activities in that process, each time playing a different role. The third part of the chapter focuses on three case studies, in which the evaluation process was structured in an integrated perspective guided by complex value-focused thinking and based on a ‘combinatorial philosophy’. The three cases represent different attempts to identify complex values as premises for the process at hand and to exploit the plurality and diversity of knowledge in order to identify situated strategies. Finally, this chapter reflects the strengths and weaknesses of integrated approaches and highlights the need to view evaluation and planning as reciprocally embedded, mutually shaping activities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ackoff, R. L. (1979). The future of operational research is past. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(2), 93–104. Ackoff, R. L. (1979). The future of operational research is past. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(2), 93–104.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander, E. R. (1998). Conclusion: Where do we go from here? Evaluation in spatial planning in the post-modern future. In N. Lichfield, A. Barbanente, D. Borri, A. Khakee, & A. Prat (Eds.), Evaluation in planning: Facing the challenge of complexity (pp. 355–374). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Alexander, E. R. (1998). Conclusion: Where do we go from here? Evaluation in spatial planning in the post-modern future. In N. Lichfield, A. Barbanente, D. Borri, A. Khakee, & A. Prat (Eds.), Evaluation in planning: Facing the challenge of complexity (pp. 355–374). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander, E. R. (Ed.). (2006). Evaluation in planning. Evolution and prospects. Aldershot: Ashgate. Alexander, E. R. (Ed.). (2006). Evaluation in planning. Evolution and prospects. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and meta-governance: The new spatial planning in the Thames gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–633.CrossRef Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and meta-governance: The new spatial planning in the Thames gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–633.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2006). Territory, identity and space: Planning in a disunited kingdom. London: Routledge. Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2006). Territory, identity and space: Planning in a disunited kingdom. London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Bana e Costa, C. A., & Vansnick, J. C. (1999). The MACBETH approach: Basic ideas, software and an application. In N. Meskens & M. Roubens (Eds.), Advances in decision analysis (pp. 131–157). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Bana e Costa, C. A., & Vansnick, J. C. (1999). The MACBETH approach: Basic ideas, software and an application. In N. Meskens & M. Roubens (Eds.), Advances in decision analysis (pp. 131–157). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bana e Costa, C. A., de Corte, J. M., & Vansnick, J. -C. (2005). On the mathematical foundation of MACBETH. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: The state of the art surveys (pp. 409–442). New York: Springer. Bana e Costa, C. A., de Corte, J. M., & Vansnick, J. -C. (2005). On the mathematical foundation of MACBETH. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: The state of the art surveys (pp. 409–442). New York: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbanente, A., & Khakee, A. (2005). Scenarios as an exploratory evaluation approach. Some experiences from southern mediterranean. In D. Miller & D. Patassini (Eds.), Beyond benefit cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation (pp. 225–247). Aldershot: Ashgate. Barbanente, A., & Khakee, A. (2005). Scenarios as an exploratory evaluation approach. Some experiences from southern mediterranean. In D. Miller & D. Patassini (Eds.), Beyond benefit cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation (pp. 225–247). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Bina, O. (2007). A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 585–606.CrossRef Bina, O. (2007). A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 585–606.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bina, O. (2008). Context and systems: Thinking more broadly about effectiveness in strategic environmental assessment in China. Environmental Management, 42, 717–733.CrossRef Bina, O. (2008). Context and systems: Thinking more broadly about effectiveness in strategic environmental assessment in China. Environmental Management, 42, 717–733.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bond, R., Curran, J., Kirkpatrick, C., & Lee, N. (2001). Impact assessment for sustainable development: A case study approach. World Development, 29(6), 1011–1024.CrossRef Bond, R., Curran, J., Kirkpatrick, C., & Lee, N. (2001). Impact assessment for sustainable development: A case study approach. World Development, 29(6), 1011–1024.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, H. (2002). Planning: An idea of value. Town Planning Review, 73(3), 271–288.CrossRef Campbell, H. (2002). Planning: An idea of value. Town Planning Review, 73(3), 271–288.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsson-Kanyama, A. K., Dreborg, H., Moll, H., & Padovan, D. (2007). Participative backcasting: A tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures, 40, 34–46.CrossRef Carlsson-Kanyama, A. K., Dreborg, H., Moll, H., & Padovan, D. (2007). Participative backcasting: A tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures, 40, 34–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cats-Baril, W. L., & Huber, G. P. (1987). Decision support systems for Ill-structured problems: An empirical study. Decision Sciences, 18(3), 350–372.CrossRef Cats-Baril, W. L., & Huber, G. P. (1987). Decision support systems for Ill-structured problems: An empirical study. Decision Sciences, 18(3), 350–372.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Checkland, P. (1981). System thinking, system practice. Chichester: Wiley. Checkland, P. (1981). System thinking, system practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of system thinking for the 1990s. Journal of the Operations Research Society, 36(9), 757–767. Checkland, P. (1985). From optimizing to learning: A development of system thinking for the 1990s. Journal of the Operations Research Society, 36(9), 757–767.
Zurück zum Zitat Checkland, P. (1999). Soft system methodology: A 30-year retrospective. Chichester: Wiley. Checkland, P. (1999). Soft system methodology: A 30-year retrospective. Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Checkland, P. (2001). Soft system methodology. In J. Mingers & J. Rosenhead (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (pp. 61–89). Chichester: Wiley. Checkland, P. (2001). Soft system methodology. In J. Mingers & J. Rosenhead (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (pp. 61–89). Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Cascio, S., & Munda, G. (2000). Combining participative and institutional approaches with multi-criteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issue in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34(2), 267–282.CrossRef De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Cascio, S., & Munda, G. (2000). Combining participative and institutional approaches with multi-criteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issue in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34(2), 267–282.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Roo, G., & Visser, J. (2004). Slimme Methoden voor Milieu en Ruimte. Een Analyse van Zestien Toonaangevende Milieubeschouwende Methoden ten Behoeve van Planologische Keuzes. [Methods for the Integration of Environment in Spatial Planning]. Groningen: Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Groningen University. de Roo, G., & Visser, J. (2004). Slimme Methoden voor Milieu en Ruimte. Een Analyse van Zestien Toonaangevende Milieubeschouwende Methoden ten Behoeve van Planologische Keuzes. [Methods for the Integration of Environment in Spatial Planning]. Groningen: Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Groningen University.
Zurück zum Zitat Deakin, M., Mitchell, G., Nijkamp, P., &Vreeker, R. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable urban development. The environmental assessment methods (Vol. 2). London: Routledge. Deakin, M., Mitchell, G., Nijkamp, P., &Vreeker, R. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable urban development. The environmental assessment methods (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, T. B. (2007). Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: Towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan. Fischer, T. B. (2007). Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: Towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
Zurück zum Zitat Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning. Boston: MIT Press. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning. Boston: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Funtowicz, S. O., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & Ravetz, J. (2002). Multi-criteria-based environmental policy. In H. Abaza & A. Baranzini (Eds.), Implementing sustainable development (pp. 53–77). Cheltenham: UNEP/Edward Elgar. Funtowicz, S. O., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & Ravetz, J. (2002). Multi-criteria-based environmental policy. In H. Abaza & A. Baranzini (Eds.), Implementing sustainable development (pp. 53–77). Cheltenham: UNEP/Edward Elgar.
Zurück zum Zitat Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1991). A new scientific methodology for global environmental issue. In R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability (pp. 137–152). New York: Columbia University Press. Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1991). A new scientific methodology for global environmental issue. In R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability (pp. 137–152). New York: Columbia University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusco Girard, L. (1987). Risorse Architettoniche e Culturali: Valutazioni e Strategie di Conservazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Fusco Girard, L. (1987). Risorse Architettoniche e Culturali: Valutazioni e Strategie di Conservazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., & De Toro, P. (2005). Integrated planning and integrated evaluation. Theoretical references and methodological approaches. In D. Miller & D. Patassini (Eds.), Beyond benefit-cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation (pp. 175–205). Aldershot: Ashgate. Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., & De Toro, P. (2005). Integrated planning and integrated evaluation. Theoretical references and methodological approaches. In D. Miller & D. Patassini (Eds.), Beyond benefit-cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation (pp. 175–205). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., & De Toro, P. (2008). Valutazione Spaziale Integrata. Il Puc di San Marco dei Cavoti. In F. D. Moccia (Ed.), Urbanistica Digitale (pp. 469–487). Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane. Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., & De Toro, P. (2008). Valutazione Spaziale Integrata. Il Puc di San Marco dei Cavoti. In F. D. Moccia (Ed.), Urbanistica Digitale (pp. 469–487). Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., De Toro, P., & Forte, F. (2007) The human sustainable city: Values, approaches and evaluative tools. In M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, & P. Nijkamp, & R. Vreeker (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. The environmental assessment methods (Vol. 2, pp. 65–93). London: Routledge. Fusco Girard, L., Cerreta, M., De Toro, P., & Forte, F. (2007) The human sustainable city: Values, approaches and evaluative tools. In M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, & P. Nijkamp, & R. Vreeker (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. The environmental assessment methods (Vol. 2, pp. 65–93). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusco Girard, L., Forte, B., Cerreta, M., De Toro, P., & Forte, F. (Eds.). (2003). The human sustainable city. Challengers and perspectives from the Habitat Agenda. Aldershot: Ashgate. Fusco Girard, L., Forte, B., Cerreta, M., De Toro, P., & Forte, F. (Eds.). (2003). The human sustainable city. Challengers and perspectives from the Habitat Agenda. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusco Girard, L., & Nijkamp, P. (1997). Le Valutazioni per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile della Città e del Territorio. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Fusco Girard, L., & Nijkamp, P. (1997). Le Valutazioni per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile della Città e del Territorio. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusco Girard, L., & Nijkamp, P. (2004). Energia, Bellezza e Partecipazione: la Sfida della Sostenibilità. Valutazioni Integrate tra Conservazione e Sviluppo. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Fusco Girard, L., & Nijkamp, P. (2004). Energia, Bellezza e Partecipazione: la Sfida della Sostenibilità. Valutazioni Integrate tra Conservazione e Sviluppo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Zurück zum Zitat Giampietro, M., Allen, T. F. H., & Mayumi, K. (2006). Science for governance: The implications of the complexity revolution. In A. Guimaraes-Pereira, S. Guedes-Vaz, & S. Tognetti (Eds), Interfaces between science and society (pp. 82–99). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing. Giampietro, M., Allen, T. F. H., & Mayumi, K. (2006). Science for governance: The implications of the complexity revolution. In A. Guimaraes-Pereira, S. Guedes-Vaz, & S. Tognetti (Eds), Interfaces between science and society (pp. 82–99). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Healey, P. (2008). Knowledge flows, spatial strategy-making, and the roles of academics. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(5), 861–881.CrossRef Healey, P. (2008). Knowledge flows, spatial strategy-making, and the roles of academics. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(5), 861–881.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 313–327.CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 313–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision-making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision-making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking. Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 537–549.CrossRef Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking. Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 537–549.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khakee, A. (2003). The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice. Evaluation, 9(3), 340–352.CrossRef Khakee, A. (2003). The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice. Evaluation, 9(3), 340–352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirdar, Ü. (2003). A better and stronger system of human governance. In L. Fusco Girard, B. Forte, M. Cerreta, P. De Toro, &F. Forte (Eds.), The human sustainable city. Challengers and perspectives from the habitat agenda (pp. 225–234). Aldershot: Ashgate. Kirdar, Ü. (2003). A better and stronger system of human governance. In L. Fusco Girard, B. Forte, M. Cerreta, P. De Toro, &F. Forte (Eds.), The human sustainable city. Challengers and perspectives from the habitat agenda (pp. 225–234). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Krönert, R., Steinhardt, U., & Volk, M. (Eds.). (2001). Landscape balance and landscape assessment. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Krönert, R., Steinhardt, U., & Volk, M. (Eds.). (2001). Landscape balance and landscape assessment. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Larner, W., & Le Heron, R. (2002). The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: A situated exploration of method. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 753–774.CrossRef Larner, W., & Le Heron, R. (2002). The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: A situated exploration of method. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 753–774.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leknes, E. (2001). The role of EIA in the decision-making process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(4), 309–334.CrossRef Leknes, E. (2001). The role of EIA in the decision-making process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21(4), 309–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lichfield, N. (1996). Community impact evaluation. London: UCL Press. Lichfield, N. (1996). Community impact evaluation. London: UCL Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Liew, A., & Sundaram, D. (2009). Flexible modelling and support of interrelated decisions. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 786–802.CrossRef Liew, A., & Sundaram, D. (2009). Flexible modelling and support of interrelated decisions. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 786–802.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marinoni, O., & Hoppe, A. (2006). Using the analytic hierarchy process to support the sustainable use of geo-resources in metropolitan areas. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 15(2), 154–164.CrossRef Marinoni, O., & Hoppe, A. (2006). Using the analytic hierarchy process to support the sustainable use of geo-resources in metropolitan areas. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 15(2), 154–164.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matthiesen, U. (2005). KnowledgeScapes. Pleading for a knowledge turn in socio-spatial research. Working Paper, Leibniz-Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner. Matthiesen, U. (2005). KnowledgeScapes. Pleading for a knowledge turn in socio-spatial research. Working Paper, Leibniz-Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer, I., van Daalen, S., Els, C., & Bots, P. W. G. (2004). Perspectives on policy analyses: A framework for understanding and design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(2), 169–191.CrossRef Mayer, I., van Daalen, S., Els, C., & Bots, P. W. G. (2004). Perspectives on policy analyses: A framework for understanding and design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(2), 169–191.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medda, F., & Nijkamp, P. (2003). A combinatorial assessment methodology for complex transport policy analysis. Integrated Assessment, 4(3), 214–222.CrossRef Medda, F., & Nijkamp, P. (2003). A combinatorial assessment methodology for complex transport policy analysis. Integrated Assessment, 4(3), 214–222.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, D. & Patassini, D. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond benefit cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation. Aldershot: Ashgate. Miller, D. & Patassini, D. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond benefit cost analysis. Accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multi-methodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509.CrossRef Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multi-methodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489–509.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley. Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), 662–677.CrossRef Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), 662–677.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Munda, G. (2008). Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef Munda, G. (2008). Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Partidario, M. R. (2000). Elements of an SEA framework. Improving the added-value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 647–663.CrossRef Partidario, M. R. (2000). Elements of an SEA framework. Improving the added-value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 647–663.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), 595–616.CrossRef Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(6), 595–616.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson, T. (2005). Environmental assessment and planning theory: Four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 341–365.CrossRef Richardson, T. (2005). Environmental assessment and planning theory: Four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 341–365.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rinner, C., & Bird, M. (2009). Evaluating community engagement through argumentation maps: A public participation GIS case study. Environment and Planning B, 36(4), 588–601.CrossRef Rinner, C., & Bird, M. (2009). Evaluating community engagement through argumentation maps: A public participation GIS case study. Environment and Planning B, 36(4), 588–601.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRef Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenhead, J. (Ed.). (1989). Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley. Rosenhead, J. (Ed.). (1989). Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenhead, J. (2005). Controversy on the streets: Stakeholder workshops on a choice a carnival route. In J. Friend & A. Hickling (Eds.), Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach (pp. 298–302). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Rosenhead, J. (2005). Controversy on the streets: Stakeholder workshops on a choice a carnival route. In J. Friend & A. Hickling (Eds.), Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach (pp. 298–302). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M., & Vellinga, P. (2000). An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 265–276.CrossRef Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M., & Vellinga, P. (2000). An integrated planning tool for sustainable cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 265–276.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Runhaar, H., Driessen, P. P. J., & Soer, L. (2009). Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B, 36(3), 417–431.CrossRef Runhaar, H., Driessen, P. P. J., & Soer, L. (2009). Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B, 36(3), 417–431.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process for decision in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process for decision in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (1992). Multi-criteria decision-making. The analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. Saaty, T. L. (1992). Multi-criteria decision-making. The analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic network process: Decision-making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. Saaty, T. L. (1996). The analytic network process: Decision-making with dependence and feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (2001). Creative thinking, problem solving and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Creative thinking, problem solving and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T. L. (2004). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangibles and for decision-making. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: The state of the art surveys (pp. 346–408). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Saaty, T. L. (2004). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangibles and for decision-making. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: The state of the art surveys (pp. 346–408). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II. Mongrel cities of the 21st century. New York: Continuum. Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II. Mongrel cities of the 21st century. New York: Continuum.
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable controversies. New York: Basic Books. Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. A. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Simon, H. A. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, K. (2008). Re-Engaging with rationality in economic geography: Behavioural approaches and the importance of context in decision-making. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(2), 137–156.CrossRef Strauss, K. (2008). Re-Engaging with rationality in economic geography: Behavioural approaches and the importance of context in decision-making. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(2), 137–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds.). (1999). The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 381–392.CrossRef Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 381–392.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wiek, A., & Walter, A. (2009). A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 360–370.CrossRef Wiek, A., & Walter, A. (2009). A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 360–370.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zeleny, M. (1998). Multiple criteria decision-making: Eight concepts of optimality. Human Systems Management, 17(2), 97–107. Zeleny, M. (1998). Multiple criteria decision-making: Eight concepts of optimality. Human Systems Management, 17(2), 97–107.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeleny, M. (2005). Human systems management: Integrating knowledge, management and systems. Hackensack: World Scientific Publishers.CrossRef Zeleny, M. (2005). Human systems management: Integrating knowledge, management and systems. Hackensack: World Scientific Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zeleny, M. (2006). Knowledge-information autopoietic cycle: Towards the wisdom systems. International Journal Management and Decision-Making, 7(1), 3–18.CrossRef Zeleny, M. (2006). Knowledge-information autopoietic cycle: Towards the wisdom systems. International Journal Management and Decision-Making, 7(1), 3–18.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Thinking Through Complex Values
verfasst von
Maria Cerreta
Copyright-Jahr
2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3106-8_21