Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Disaster Risk Reduction and Civil Engineering—An Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Estimation of Local Site Effects in Indian Scenario: Lessons from Past Earthquakes, Current Practices, and Future Trends

verfasst von : C. Shreyasvi, K. Venkataramana

Erschienen in: Civil Engineering for Disaster Risk Reduction

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The incorporation of local site effects in seismic hazard analysis has evolved radically over the last few decades. Initially, the whole site characterization was expressed by a single scalar quantity known as soil factor. The advancement in technology has paved the way for more sophisticated techniques in estimating the site response. The new-age techniques of site characterization involve field investigation as well as laboratory testing of the soil samples. The study sites are modeled in more than one dimension, and the complex phenomena of site response such as basin effects and resonance in a valley are computationally simulated. The present article outlines the state-of-the-art practices in characterizing site/soil response to tectonically induced ground shaking. The article briefs about the different methods and provides a detailed description of the computational methods for estimating the site response. The existing methodologies, their applicability, and pitfalls are presented. Additionally, the scope for future work and the direction toward improving the existing methods have been discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Post-earthquake Reconnaissance: Theories Versus Observations
Nächstes Kapitel Disaster Resilient Properties: Built Environment Discourse
Literatur
1.
Anbazhagan P, Kumar A, Sitharam TG (2013) Seismic site classification and correlation between standard penetration test N value and shear wave velocity for Lucknow City in Indo-Gangetic Basin. Pure Appl Geophys 170(3):299–318
2.
Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008) Seismic microzonation of Bangalore, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):833–852
3.
Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2020) Site characterization and site response studies using shear wave velocity. J Seismol Earthq Eng 10(2):53–67
4.
5.
Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (2004) Nonlinear soil-site effects in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(6):2110–2123
6.
Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR, Suganthi A, Maheswari RU (2008) Seismic hazard assessment of Chennai city considering local site effects. J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):853–863
7.
Chandran D, Anbazhagan P (2020) 2D nonlinear site response analysis of typical stiff and soft soil sites at shallow bedrock region with low to medium seismicity. J Appl Geophys 179:104087
8.
Chatterjee K, Choudhury D (2013) Variations in shear wave velocity and soil site class in Kolkata city using regression and sensitivity analysis. Nat Hazards 69(3):2057–2082
9.
Chatterjee K, Choudhury D (2013) Variations in and soil site class in Kolkata city using regression and sensitivity analysis. Nat Hazards 2057–2082
10.
Chopra S, Kumar V, Choudhury P, Yadav RBS (2018) Site classification of Indian strong motion network using response spectra ratios. J Seismolog 22(2):419–438
11.
Choudhury D, Phanikanth VS, Mhaske SY, Phule RR, Chatterjee K (2015) Seismic liquefaction hazard and site response for design of piles in Mumbai city. Indian Geotech J 45(1):62–78
12.
Dikmen U (2009) Statistical correlations of and penetration resistance for soils. J Geophys Eng 6:61–72
13.
Gazetas G, Dakoulas P (1992) Seismic analysis and design of rockfill dams: state-of-the-art. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11(1):27–61
14.
Govindaraju L, Bhattacharya S (2012) Site-specific earthquake response study for hazard assessment in Kolkata city, India. Nat Hazards 61(3):943–965
15.
Hanks TC (1975) Strong ground motion of the San Fernando, California, earthquake: ground displacements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(1):193–225
16.
Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geo Environ 66:203–213
17.
Hashash YMA, Phillips C, Groholski DR (2010) Recent advances in non-linear site response analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical
18.
Hough SE, Roger B (2008) Site response of the Ganges basin inferred from re-evaluated macroseismic observations from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra, and 1934 Nepal earthquakes. J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):773–782
19.
Iglesia GR, Stiady JL (2010) Seismic site response analysis using spreadsheets. In: Proceedings of International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. Paper no. 10
20.
Imai T (1977) P- and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 2, pp 127–132
21.
Ishimoto M (1932) I2. Comparaison accélérométrique des secousses sismiques dans deux parties de la ville de Tôkyô
22.
Jafari MK, Asghari A, Rahmani I (1997) Empirical correlation between (Vs) and SPT-N value for south of Tehran soils. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on civil engineering, Tehran, Iran (in Persian)
23.
Jain SK (1998) Indian earthquakes: an overview. Indian Concr J 72:555–562
24.
Jaya V, Dodagoudar GR, Boominathan A (2012) Modulus reduction and damping curves for sand of south-east coast of India. J Earthq Tsunami 6(04):1250016
25.
Khan S, Meijde MVD, Werff HVD, Shafique M (2020) The impact of topography on seismic amplification during the 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Nat Hazard 20(2):399–411
26.
27.
Kitagawa Y, Matsushima Y (1984) Evaluation of dynamic ground characteristics and seismic microzoning. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 17(1):15–23
28.
Kondner RL (1963) A hyperbolic stress-strain formulation for sands. In: Proceedings of 2nd Panamerican conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Brazil, vol 1, pp 289–324
29.
Kottke AR, Rathje EM (2013) Comparison of time series and random-vibration theory site-response methods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(3):2111–2127
30.
Kramer SL, Paulsen SB (2004, March) Practical use of geotechnical site response models. In: Proceedings of international workshop on uncertainties in nonlinear soil properties and their impact on modeling dynamic soil response, p 10. University of California, Berkeley
31.
Kumar A, Mondal JK (2017) Newly developed MATLAB based code for equivalent linear site response analysis. Geotech Geol Eng 35(5):2303–2325
32.
Kumar A, Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2010, December) Shear wave velocity profiling for Lucknow urban centre using seismic refraction survey. In: Indian Geotechnical Conference, GEO. Trendz pp 167–170
33.
Lee SHH (1990) Regression models of shear wave velocities. J Chin Inst Eng 13:519–532
34.
Lemoine A, Douglas J, Cotton F (2012) Testing the applicability of correlations between topographic slope and VS 30 for Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(6):2585–2599
35.
Liu HL, Heaton T (1984) Array analysis of the ground velocities and accelerations from the 1971 San Fernando, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5):1951–1968
36.
Mahajan AK, Mundepi AK, Chauhan N, Jasrotia AS, Rai N, Gachhayat TK (2012) Active seismic and passive microtremor HVSR for assessing site effects in Jammu city, NW Himalaya, India—a case study. J Appl Geophys 77:51–62
37.
Mahajan AK, Slob S, Ranjan R, Sporry R, van Westen CJ (2007) Seismic microzonation of Dehradun City using geophysical and geotechnical characteristics in the upper 30 m of soil column. J Seismolog 11(4):355–370
38.
Mandal P, Chadha RK, Satyamurty C, Raju IP, Kumar N (2005) Estimation of site response in Kachchh, Gujarat, India, region using H/V spectral ratios of aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake. Pure Appl Geophys 162(12):2479–2504
39.
Matasovic N (1993) Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits, Los Angeles, Ph.D. thesis. University of California at Los Angeles, California, p 449
40.
Mohanty S, Patra NR (2016) Dynamic response analysis of Talcher pond ash embankment in India. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 84:238–250
41.
Mohanty WK, Walling MY, Nath SK, Pal I (2007) First order seismic microzonation of Delhi, India using geographic information system (GIS). Nat Hazards 40(2):245–260
42.
Nakamura Y (2019) What is the Nakamura method? Seismol Res Lett 90(4):1437–1443
43.
Nampally S, Padhy S, Trupti S, Prasad PP, Seshunarayana T (2018) Evaluation of site effects on ground motions based on equivalent linear site response analysis and liquefaction potential in Chennai, south India. J Seismolog 22(4):1075–1093
44.
Nath SK, Sengupta P, Srivastav SK, Bhattacharya SN, Dattatrayam RS, Prakash R, Gupta HV (2003) Estimation of S-wave site response in and around Delhi region from weak motion data. J Earth Syst Sci 112(3):441–462
45.
Nath SK, Sengupta P, Sengupta S, Chakrabarti A (2000) Site response estimation using strong motion network: a step towards microzonation of the Sikkim Himalayas. Current Sci 1316–1326
46.
Naveen BP, Sitharam TG, Sivapullaiah PV (2019) Seismic behavior and dynamic site response of municipal solid waste landfill in India. In: Recent challenges and advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering. IGI Global, pp 168–196
47.
Oldham RD (1899) Report of the great earthquake of 12th June, 1897. Office of the Geological Survey
48.
Parihar A, Anbazhagan P (2020) Site response study and amplification factor for shallow bedrock sites. Indian Geotech J 50(5):726–738
49.
Phanikanth VS, Choudhury D, Reddy GR (2011) Equivalent-linear seismic ground response analysis of some typical sites in Mumbai. Geotech Geol Eng 29(6):1109
50.
Phillips C, Hashash YM (2009) Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(7):1143–1158
51.
Pitilakis KD, Anastasiadis A, Raptakis D (1992) Field and laboratory determination of dynamic properties of natural soil deposits. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference earthquake engineering, Rotterdam, pp 1275–1280
52.
Puri N, Jain A, Mohanty P, Bhattacharya S (2018) Earthquake response analysis of sites in state of Haryana using DEEPSOIL software. Procedia Comput Sci 125:357–366
53.
Puri N, Jain A, Nikitas G, Dammala PK, Bhattacharya S (2020) Dynamic soil properties and seismic ground response analysis for North Indian seismic belt subjected to the great Himalayan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 103:447–478
54.
Putti SP, Satyam N (2020) Evaluation of site effects using HVSR microtremor measurements in Vishakhapatnam (India). Earth Syst Environ 4:439–454
55.
Seed HB, Sun JH (1989) Implication of site effects in the Mexico city earthquake of September 19, 1985 for earthquake-resistance-design criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. University of California, Berkeley
56.
Seed HB, Whitman RV, Dezfulian H, Dobry R, Idriss IM (1972) Soil conditions and building damage in 1967 Caracas earthquake. J Soil Mechan Found Div 98(8):787–806
57.
Sezawa K (1930) Possibility of the free-oscillations of the surface-layer excited by the seismic-waves. 東京帝國大學地震研究所彙報= Bull Earthq Res Inst 8(1):1–11
58.
Shreyasvi C, Venkataramana K, Chopra S (2019) Local site effect incorporation in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis—a case study from southern peninsular India, an intraplate region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 123:381–398
59.
Shreyasvi C, Venkataramana K, Chopra S, Rout MM (2019) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Mangalore and its adjoining regions, a part of Indian Peninsular: an intraplate region. Pure Appl Geophys 176(6):2263–2297
60.
Shreyasvi C (2019) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment and site characterisation of Southwest India. Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal
61.
Shreyasvi C, Venkataramana K (2020a) Seismic hazard estimation for Southwest India. In: Advances in computer methods and geomechanics. Springer, Singapore, pp 207–220
62.
Shreyasvi C, Rahmath NB, Venkataramana K (2020b) Influence of variabilities of input parameters on seismic site response analysis. In: Advances in computer methods and geomechanics. Springer, Singapore, pp 233–244
63.
Shreyasvi C, Venkataramana K, Chopra S (2020c) Influence of tectonic regime in the selection of ground motions for seismic site response analysis. In: Proceedings of 17th world conference on earthquake engineering, 17WCEE, Sendai, Japan, September 13th to 18th 2020. Paper ID 1d-0104
64.
Singh AP, Parmar A, Chopra S (2017) Microtremor study for evaluating the site response characteristics in the Surat city of western India. Nat Hazards 89(3):1145–1166
65.
Sitharam TG, Kolathayar S, James N (2015) Probabilistic assessment of surface level seismic hazard in India using topographic gradient as a proxy for site condition. Geosci Front 6(6):847–859
66.
Thaker TP, Rao KS, Gupta KK (2010) Ground response and site amplification studies for coastal soil, Kutch, Gujarat: a case study. Int J Earth Sci Eng 3(4):543–553
67.
Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N (2010) Empirical estimation of from in situ tests on soil formations in Greece. Bull Eng Geol Environ 291–297
68.
Uma Maheswari R, Boominathan D, Dodagoudar GR (2010) Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of and penetration resistance of Chennai soils. Geotech Geol Eng 28:119–137
69.
Vidale JE, Helmberger DV (1988) Elastic finite-difference modeling of the 1971 San Fernando, California earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78(1):122–141
70.
Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107
71.
Wald DJ, Allen TI (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(5):1379–1395
Metadaten
Titel
Estimation of Local Site Effects in Indian Scenario: Lessons from Past Earthquakes, Current Practices, and Future Trends
verfasst von
C. Shreyasvi
K. Venkataramana
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Buch
Civil Engineering for Disaster Risk Reduction

Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5311-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-5312-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5312-4_15