Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics 3/2023

08.08.2022

Observed-data DIC for spatial panel data models

verfasst von: Ye Yang, Osman Doğan, Süleyman Taşpınar

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 3/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In spatial panel data modeling, researchers often need to choose a spatial weights matrix from a pool of candidates, and decide between static and dynamic specifications. We propose observed-data deviance information criteria to resolve these specification problems in a Bayesian setting. The presence of high dimensional latent variables (i.e., the individual and time fixed effects) in spatial panel data models invalidates the use of a deviance information criterion (DIC) formulated with the conditional and the complete-data likelihood functions of spatial panel data models. We first show how to analytically integrate out these latent variables from the complete-data likelihood functions to obtain integrated likelihood functions. We then use the integrated likelihood functions to formulate observed-data DIC measures for both static and dynamic spatial panel data models. Our simulation analysis indicates that the observed-data DIC measures perform satisfactorily to resolve specification problems in spatial panel data modeling. We also illustrate the usefulness of the proposed observed-data DIC measures using an application from the literature on spatial modeling of the house price changes in the US.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
There is a growing literature on the spatial panel data models dealing mainly with the estimation and testing approaches. The estimation methods considered in the literature include (i) the (quasi) maximum likelihood (ML) methods, (ii) the generalized method of moments (GMM) and IV-based approaches, (iii) the M-estimation approach, and (iv) the Bayesian estimation approaches. Among others, see Yu et al. (2008), Lee and Yu (2010a, 2010b), Elhorst (2005), Baltagi et al. (2014), Qu et al. (2017) on the (quasi) ML-based estimation approaches, see Lee and Yu (2014), Kapoor et al. (2007), Fingleton (2008) on the GMM and IV-based estimation approaches, see Yang (2018), Li and Yang (2020, 2021) on the M-estimation approach, and see Han and Lee (2016), Parent and LeSage (2010, 2011, 2012), Han et al. (2017), LeSage (2014) for the Bayesian estimation approaches. There is also a growing literature on the testing spatial parameters in spatial panel data models, e.g., among other, see Yang (2021b), Süleyman et al. (2017), Baltagi and Yang (2012, 2013), Baltagi et al. (2007b), Baltagi et al. (2003, 2007a), Robinson (2008), Bera (2019), Kelejian and Piras (2016). Our approach based on the observed-data DIC is an alternative to usual testing approaches.
 
2
These transformations are based on the decomposition of \(\textbf{J}_n=\left( \textbf{I}_n-\frac{1}{n}\varvec{l}_n\varvec{l}^{'}_n\right) \) and \(\textbf{J}_T=\left( \textbf{I}_T-\frac{1}{T}\varvec{l}_T\varvec{l}^{'}_T\right) \), where \(\textbf{I}_n\) is the \(n\times n\) identity matrix and \(\varvec{l}_n\) is the \(n\times 1\) vector of ones. See Lee and Yu (2010b) for the details.
 
3
There are also some other approaches for the specification problems in the spatial econometric literature. One strand of the literature focuses on the model averaging approaches to account for the model uncertainty associated with the choice of spatial weights matrices (LeSage 2014). Another strand of the literature focuses on how the elements of spatial weight matrices can be estimated. Finally, instead of selecting a spatial weights matrix from a pool of candidates, there are some studies focusing on a modeling approach for specifying the elements of an endogenous spatial weight matrix (Han and Lee 2016; Qu et al. 2017).
 
4
See Kelejian and Prucha (2010) for the details.
 
5
Note that these conditions are relatively restrictive since they provide upper bounds on the conditions in \((1^a)\) and \((2^a)\) respectively.
 
6
The MAP estimates can be approximated by the posterior draws of tuples \((\varvec{\Phi },\varvec{\Psi })\) that yield the largest value for \(p({\textbf{Y}}|\varvec{\Phi },\varvec{\Psi })p(\varvec{\Phi })p(\varvec{\Psi })\), where \(p(\varvec{\Phi })\) and \(p(\varvec{\Psi })\) are the prior density functions.
 
7
Han and Lee (2016) and Han et al. (2017) use similar AM algorithms to generate draws for the spatial parameters in spatial panel data models. Their results show that the AM algorithm can perform satisfactorily.
 
8
Alternatively, in Step 2, after rejecting the candidate \({\tilde{\varvec{\Psi }}}\) that does not satisfy the stability condition, the tuning parameter can be adjusted before drawing a new candidate.
 
9
In Sect. D of “Appendix”, we provide some additional simulation results by considering a wider set of spatial weights matrices. We generate the candidate weights matrices based on (i) the 5-nearest neighbors scheme (K5), (ii) the 10-nearest neighbors scheme (K10), (iii) the group interaction scheme (Group), (iv) the rook scheme (Rook), and (v) the queen scheme (Queen).
 
10
We use the hyperparameter values given in Sect. 4. The estimation results are based on 10,000 draws with 5000 draws discarded as burn-ins.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aquaro M, Bailey N, Hashem Pesaran M (2021) Estimation and inference for spatial models with heterogeneous coefficients: an application to US house prices. J Appl Econom 36(1):18–44CrossRef Aquaro M, Bailey N, Hashem Pesaran M (2021) Estimation and inference for spatial models with heterogeneous coefficients: an application to US house prices. J Appl Econom 36(1):18–44CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baldoni E, Esposti R (2021) Agricultural productivity in space: an econometric assessment based on farm-level data. Am J Agric Econ 103(4):1525–1544CrossRef Baldoni E, Esposti R (2021) Agricultural productivity in space: an econometric assessment based on farm-level data. Am J Agric Econ 103(4):1525–1544CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi BH, Yang Z (2012) Standardized LM tests for spatial error dependence in linear or panel regressions. Econom J 16(1):103–134CrossRef Baltagi BH, Yang Z (2012) Standardized LM tests for spatial error dependence in linear or panel regressions. Econom J 16(1):103–134CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi BH, Yang Z (2013) Standardized LM tests for spatial error dependence in linear or panel regressions. Econom J 16(1):103–134CrossRef Baltagi BH, Yang Z (2013) Standardized LM tests for spatial error dependence in linear or panel regressions. Econom J 16(1):103–134CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi BH, Song SH, Koh W (2003) Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation. J Econom 117(1):123–150CrossRef Baltagi BH, Song SH, Koh W (2003) Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation. J Econom 117(1):123–150CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi BH, Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2007) A Monte Carlo study for pure and pretest estimators of a panel data model with spatially autocorrelated disturbances. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 87/88:11–38CrossRef Baltagi BH, Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2007) A Monte Carlo study for pure and pretest estimators of a panel data model with spatially autocorrelated disturbances. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 87/88:11–38CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi BH et al (2007) Testing for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects using panel data. J Econom 140(1):5–51CrossRef Baltagi BH et al (2007) Testing for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects using panel data. J Econom 140(1):5–51CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi BH, Fingleton B, Pirotte A (2014) Estimating and forecasting with a dynamic spatial panel data model. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 76(1):112–138CrossRef Baltagi BH, Fingleton B, Pirotte A (2014) Estimating and forecasting with a dynamic spatial panel data model. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 76(1):112–138CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baltagi BH, Egger PH, Kesina M (2015) Sources of productivity spillovers: panel data evidence from China. J Prod Anal 43(3):389–402CrossRef Baltagi BH, Egger PH, Kesina M (2015) Sources of productivity spillovers: panel data evidence from China. J Prod Anal 43(3):389–402CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bera AK et al (2019) Robust LM tests for spatial dynamic panel data models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 76:47–66CrossRef Bera AK et al (2019) Robust LM tests for spatial dynamic panel data models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 76:47–66CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berg A, Meyer R, Jun Yu (2004) Deviance information criterion for comparing stochastic volatility models. J Bus Econ Stat 22(1):107–120CrossRef Berg A, Meyer R, Jun Yu (2004) Deviance information criterion for comparing stochastic volatility models. J Bus Econ Stat 22(1):107–120CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Celeux G et al (2006) Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Anal 1(4):651–673CrossRef Celeux G et al (2006) Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Anal 1(4):651–673CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan JCC, Grant AL (2016) Fast computation of the deviance information criterion for latent variable models. Comput Stat Data Anal 100:847–859CrossRef Chan JCC, Grant AL (2016) Fast computation of the deviance information criterion for latent variable models. Comput Stat Data Anal 100:847–859CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chan JCC, Grant AL (2016) On the observed-data deviance information criterion for volatility modeling. J Financ Econom 14(4):772–802 Chan JCC, Grant AL (2016) On the observed-data deviance information criterion for volatility modeling. J Financ Econom 14(4):772–802
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, Peng Y, Guanyi Yu (2020) The influencing factors and spillover effects of interprovincial agricultural carbon emissions in China. PLoS One 15(11):1–17CrossRef Chen W, Peng Y, Guanyi Yu (2020) The influencing factors and spillover effects of interprovincial agricultural carbon emissions in China. PLoS One 15(11):1–17CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ehlert A, Oberschachtsiek D (2014) Does managed care reduce health care expenditure? Evidence from spatial panel data. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 14(3):207–227CrossRef Ehlert A, Oberschachtsiek D (2014) Does managed care reduce health care expenditure? Evidence from spatial panel data. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 14(3):207–227CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elhorst JP (2005) Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of linear and log-linear dynamic models for spatial panels. Geogr Anal 37(1):85–106CrossRef Elhorst JP (2005) Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of linear and log-linear dynamic models for spatial panels. Geogr Anal 37(1):85–106CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fingleton B (2008) A generalized method of moments estimator for a spatial panel model with an endogenous spatial lag and spatial moving average errors. Spatial Econ Anal 3(1):27–44CrossRef Fingleton B (2008) A generalized method of moments estimator for a spatial panel model with an endogenous spatial lag and spatial moving average errors. Spatial Econ Anal 3(1):27–44CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gelman A et al (2003) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science, Boca RatonCrossRef Gelman A et al (2003) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science, Boca RatonCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gori Maia A et al (2021) The economic impacts of the diffusion of agroforestry in Brazil. Land Use Policy 108:105489CrossRef Gori Maia A et al (2021) The economic impacts of the diffusion of agroforestry in Brazil. Land Use Policy 108:105489CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guliyev H (2020) Determining the spatial effects of COVID-19 using the spatial panel data model. Spatial Stat 38:100443CrossRef Guliyev H (2020) Determining the spatial effects of COVID-19 using the spatial panel data model. Spatial Stat 38:100443CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haario H, Saksman E, Tamminen J (2001) An adaptive metropolis algorithm. Bernoulli 7(2):223–242CrossRef Haario H, Saksman E, Tamminen J (2001) An adaptive metropolis algorithm. Bernoulli 7(2):223–242CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRef Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Han X, Lee L-F (2016) Bayesian analysis of spatial panel autoregressive models with time-varying endogenous spatial weight matrices, common factors, and random coefficients. J Bus Econ Stat 34(4):642–660CrossRef Han X, Lee L-F (2016) Bayesian analysis of spatial panel autoregressive models with time-varying endogenous spatial weight matrices, common factors, and random coefficients. J Bus Econ Stat 34(4):642–660CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Han X, Hsieh C-S, Lee L (2017) Estimation and model selection of higherorder spatial autoregressive model: an efficient Bayesian approach. Reg Sci Urban Econ 63:97–120CrossRef Han X, Hsieh C-S, Lee L (2017) Estimation and model selection of higherorder spatial autoregressive model: an efficient Bayesian approach. Reg Sci Urban Econ 63:97–120CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Horn RA, Johnson CR (2013) Matrix analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Horn RA, Johnson CR (2013) Matrix analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang L et al (2021) Identifying the driving factors of NO\(_2\) pollution of one belt one road countries: satellite observation technique and dynamic spatial panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(16):20393–20407CrossRef Jiang L et al (2021) Identifying the driving factors of NO\(_2\) pollution of one belt one road countries: satellite observation technique and dynamic spatial panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(16):20393–20407CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor M, Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (2007) Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. J Econom 140(1):97–130CrossRef Kapoor M, Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (2007) Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. J Econom 140(1):97–130CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kelejian HH, Piras G (2016) A J test for dynamic panel model with fixed effects, and nonparametric spatial and time dependence. Empir Econ 51(4):1581–1605CrossRef Kelejian HH, Piras G (2016) A J test for dynamic panel model with fixed effects, and nonparametric spatial and time dependence. Empir Econ 51(4):1581–1605CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (2010) Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. J Econom 157:53–67CrossRef Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (2010) Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. J Econom 157:53–67CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Lee YH (2021) Development of a win production function and evaluation of cross-sectional dependence. J Sports Econ 22(4):412–431CrossRef Lee J, Lee YH (2021) Development of a win production function and evaluation of cross-sectional dependence. J Sports Econ 22(4):412–431CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee L, Yu J (2010) A spatial dynamic panel data model with both time and individual fixed effects. Econom Theory 26(02):564–597CrossRef Lee L, Yu J (2010) A spatial dynamic panel data model with both time and individual fixed effects. Econom Theory 26(02):564–597CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee L, Yu J (2010) Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. J Econom 154(2):165–185CrossRef Lee L, Yu J (2010) Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. J Econom 154(2):165–185CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee L, Yu J (2014) Efficient GMM estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with fixed effects. J Econom 180(2):174–197CrossRef Lee L, Yu J (2014) Efficient GMM estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with fixed effects. J Econom 180(2):174–197CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat LeSage JP (2014) Spatial econometric panel data model specification: a Bayesian approach. In: Spatial statistics 9. Revealing intricacies in spatial and spatio-temporal data: papers from the spatial statistics 2013 conference, pp 122–145 LeSage JP (2014) Spatial econometric panel data model specification: a Bayesian approach. In: Spatial statistics 9. Revealing intricacies in spatial and spatio-temporal data: papers from the spatial statistics 2013 conference, pp 122–145
Zurück zum Zitat LeSage JP, Sheng Y (2014) A spatial econometric panel data examination of endogenous versus exogenous interaction in Chinese province-level patenting. J Geogr Syst 16(3):233–262CrossRef LeSage JP, Sheng Y (2014) A spatial econometric panel data examination of endogenous versus exogenous interaction in Chinese province-level patenting. J Geogr Syst 16(3):233–262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Yang Z (2020) Estimation of fixed effects spatial dynamic panel data models with small T and unknown heteroskedasticity. Reg Sci Urban Econ 81:103520CrossRef Li L, Yang Z (2020) Estimation of fixed effects spatial dynamic panel data models with small T and unknown heteroskedasticity. Reg Sci Urban Econ 81:103520CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Yang Z (2021) Spatial dynamic panel data models with correlated random effects. J Econom 221(2):424–454CrossRef Li L, Yang Z (2021) Spatial dynamic panel data models with correlated random effects. J Econom 221(2):424–454CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li Y, Yu J, Zeng T (2017) Deviance information criterion for model selection: justification and variation. Working Paper, Singapore Management University Li Y, Yu J, Zeng T (2017) Deviance information criterion for model selection: justification and variation. Working Paper, Singapore Management University
Zurück zum Zitat Li Y, Jun Y, Zeng T (2020) Deviance information criterion for latent variable models and misspecified models. J Econom 216(2):450–493CrossRef Li Y, Jun Y, Zeng T (2020) Deviance information criterion for latent variable models and misspecified models. J Econom 216(2):450–493CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li F et al (2021) How do non-farm employment and agricultural mechanization impact on large-scale farming? A spatial panel data analysis from Jiangsu Province, China. Land Use Policy 107:105517CrossRef Li F et al (2021) How do non-farm employment and agricultural mechanization impact on large-scale farming? A spatial panel data analysis from Jiangsu Province, China. Land Use Policy 107:105517CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Millar RB (2009) Comparison of hierarchical Bayesian models for overdispersed count data using DIC and Bayes’ factors. Biometrics 65(3):962–969CrossRef Millar RB (2009) Comparison of hierarchical Bayesian models for overdispersed count data using DIC and Bayes’ factors. Biometrics 65(3):962–969CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econom J Econom Soc 69–85 Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econom J Econom Soc 69–85
Zurück zum Zitat Parent O, LeSage JP (2010) A spatial dynamic panel model with random effects applied to commuting times. Transport Res Part B Methodol 44(5):633–645CrossRef Parent O, LeSage JP (2010) A spatial dynamic panel model with random effects applied to commuting times. Transport Res Part B Methodol 44(5):633–645CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parent O, LeSage JP (2011) A space-time filter for panel data models containing random effects. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(1):475–490CrossRef Parent O, LeSage JP (2011) A space-time filter for panel data models containing random effects. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(1):475–490CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Parent O, LeSage JP (2012) Spatial dynamic panel data models with random effects. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(4):727–738CrossRef Parent O, LeSage JP (2012) Spatial dynamic panel data models with random effects. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42(4):727–738CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qu X, Lee L, Yu J (2017) QML estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with endogenous time varying spatial weights matrices. J Econom 197(2):173–201CrossRef Qu X, Lee L, Yu J (2017) QML estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with endogenous time varying spatial weights matrices. J Econom 197(2):173–201CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts GO, Rosenthal JS (2009) Examples of adaptive MCMC. J Comput Graph Stat 18(2):349–367CrossRef Roberts GO, Rosenthal JS (2009) Examples of adaptive MCMC. J Comput Graph Stat 18(2):349–367CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson PM (2008) Correlation testing in time series, spatial and cross-sectional data. J Econom 147(1):5–16CrossRef Robinson PM (2008) Correlation testing in time series, spatial and cross-sectional data. J Econom 147(1):5–16CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Song Y, Liu D, Wang Q (2021) Identifying characteristic changes in club convergence of China’s urban pollution emission: a spatial-temporal feature analysis. Energy Econ 98:105243CrossRef Song Y, Liu D, Wang Q (2021) Identifying characteristic changes in club convergence of China’s urban pollution emission: a spatial-temporal feature analysis. Energy Econ 98:105243CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Spiegelhalter DJ et al (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 64(4):583–639CrossRef Spiegelhalter DJ et al (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 64(4):583–639CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Süleyman T, Osman D, Bera AK (2017) GMM gradient tests for spatial dynamic panel data models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 65:65–88CrossRef Süleyman T, Osman D, Bera AK (2017) GMM gradient tests for spatial dynamic panel data models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 65:65–88CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang Z (2018) Unified M-estimation of fixed-effects spatial dynamic models with short panels. J Econom 205(2):423–447CrossRef Yang Z (2018) Unified M-estimation of fixed-effects spatial dynamic models with short panels. J Econom 205(2):423–447CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang CF (2021) Common factors and spatial dependence: an application to US house prices. Econom Rev 40(1):14–50CrossRef Yang CF (2021) Common factors and spatial dependence: an application to US house prices. Econom Rev 40(1):14–50CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang Z (2021) Joint tests for dynamic and spatial effects in short panels with fixed effects and heteroskedasticity. Empir Econ 60:51–92CrossRef Yang Z (2021) Joint tests for dynamic and spatial effects in short panels with fixed effects and heteroskedasticity. Empir Econ 60:51–92CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yu J, de Jong R, Lee L (2008) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large. J Econom 146(1):118–134CrossRef Yu J, de Jong R, Lee L (2008) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large. J Econom 146(1):118–134CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Observed-data DIC for spatial panel data models
verfasst von
Ye Yang
Osman Doğan
Süleyman Taşpınar
Publikationsdatum
08.08.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02286-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2023

Empirical Economics 3/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner