nach oben

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Erschienen in:

01.03.2013

Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US

verfasst von: Lei Wang, Kim T. Hinrichs, Leonel Prieto, Jon P. Howell

Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate differences between the US and China in (1) employees’ level of engagement in the five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) identified by Organ (1988), and (2) the effects of perceived distributive justice and perceived supervisor support on OCB. Results suggest that Chinese respondents have a higher level of sportsmanship and courtesy, but a lower level of civic virtue than the US respondents. In addition, perceived supervisor support is significantly related to all five OCB dimensions for the Chinese sample, whereas for the US sample, perceived distributive justice is significantly related to conscientiousness and sportsmanship and marginally related to altruism. A follow-up study was conducted in the US to examine the direct effects of such cultural factors as individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on each of the five OCB dimensions, and their moderating effects on the relationships of the five OCB dimensions with perceived supervisor support and perceived distributive justice. Results suggest an effect of individualistic/collectivistic orientation on the five OCB dimensions. No relationship was found between power distance orientation and OCB. Moreover, the results did not support our predictions regarding the moderating effects of individualistic/collectivistic orientation and power distance orientation on the relationships between OCB dimensions and perceived supervisor support or perceived distributive justice.

Vorheriger Artikel Strategic HR functions and firm performance: The moderating effects of high-involvement work practices

Nächster Artikel Perceptions of organizational context and job attitudes: The mediating effect of organizational identification

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adams, J. S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422–436.CrossRef

Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology: 267–299. New York: Academic.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182.CrossRef

Becton, J. B., & Field, H. S. 2009. Cultural differences in organizational citizenship behavior: A comparison between Chinese and American employees. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20: 1651–1669.

Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1997. Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10: 99–109.CrossRef

Chan, D. K. S. 1994. Colindex: A refinement of three collectivism measures. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications: 200–210. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chang, Y. N. 1976. Early Chinese management thought. California Management Review, 19: 71–76.CrossRef

Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. 2002. Loyalty to supervisor versus organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 339–356.CrossRef

Conway, L. G., III, Ryder, A. G., Tweed, R. G., & Sokol, B. W. 2001. Intranational cultural variation: Exploring further implications of collectivism within the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32: 681–697.CrossRef

Coyne, L., & Ong, T. 2007. Organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18: 1085–1097.CrossRef

Earley, P. C., & Erez, M. 1997. The translated executive: Why you need to understand how workers in other countries see the world differently. New York: Oxford University Press.

Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. 2002. Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 565–573.CrossRef

Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. 1987. Comparative analysis of goal setting strategies across cultures. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 658–665.CrossRef

Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 421–444.CrossRef

Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15: 241–253.CrossRef

Feldman, R. E. 1968. Response to compatriot and foreigner who seek assistance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10: 202–214.CrossRef

Felfe, J., & Yan, W. H. 2009. The impact of workgroup commitment on organizational citizenship behavior, absenteeism and turnover intention: The case of Germany and China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 15: 433–450.CrossRef

Fiske, A. P. 1991. Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.

Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. 1976. Resource theory of social exchange. In J. W. Thibaut, T. T. Spence & R. C. Carson (Eds.). Contemporary topics in social psychology: 99–131. Morriston, NJ: General Learning Press.

Gelfand, M. J., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Nishii, L. H., & Bechtold, D. J. 2004. Individualism and collectivism. In R. T. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman & V. Gupta (Eds.). Culture, leadership, and organization: 437–512. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. 1997. Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10: 153–170.CrossRef

Goodall, K., & Burgers, W. 1998. Frequent fliers. China Business Review, 25: 50–52.

Guion, R. M. 1998. Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hofstede, G. 1984. The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review, 9: 389–398.

Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. 2004. Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people?. Organization Science, 15: 232–240.CrossRef

Hui, C. H., & Tan, C. K. 1996. Employee motivation and attitudes in the Chinese workforce. In M. H. Bond (Ed.). Handbook of Chinese psychology: 364–378. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Hui, C. H., Triandis, H. C., & Yee, C. 1991. Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 30: 145–157.CrossRef

Koch, B. J., & Koch, P. T. 2007. Collectivism, individualism, and outgroup cooperation in a segmented China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2): 207–225.CrossRef

Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. 1996. Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organization Behavior, 17: 253–266.CrossRef

Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. 1994. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 656–669.CrossRef

Lai, J. Y. M., Lam, L. W., & Liu, Y. 2010. Do you really need help? A study of employee supplication and job performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3): 541–559.CrossRef

Lam, S. S. K., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. 1999. Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 594–601.CrossRef

Lau, D. C. 1979. Introduction. In L. Yu (Ed.). Confucius, the analects. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98: 224–253.CrossRef

McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. 1993. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114: 376–390.CrossRef

Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. 1998. Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24: 351–389.

Menches, J. 2004. The value of commitment: Companies must look beyond salaries to motivate and retain staff. South China Morning Post, 19: 4.

Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. 1995. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 127–142.CrossRef

Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 527–556.CrossRef

Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Organ, D. W. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10: 85–97.CrossRef

Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48: 775–802.CrossRef

Ouchi, W. G. 1981. Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Paine, J. B., & Organ, D. W. 2000. The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: Some preliminary conceptual and empirical observations. Human Resource Management Review, 10: 45–59.CrossRef

Pearce, J. L. 2001. Organization and management in the embrace of government. Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Peereboom, R. P. 2002. China’s long march toward rule of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1–28.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, K. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1: 107–142.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26: 513–563.CrossRef

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. 2002. Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ryan, J. J. 2001. Moral reasoning as a determinant of organizational citizenship behaviors: A study in the public accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 33: 233–244.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, 25: 1–65. San Diego, CA: Academic.

Schwartz, S. H. 1994. Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications: 85–119. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

Schwartz, S. H. 1999. A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48: 23–47.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H. 2007. Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38: 711–728.CrossRef

Shamir, B. 1996. Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. In R. M. Steers, L. W. Porter & G. A. Bigley (Eds.). Motivation and leadership at work: 149–165. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 653–663.CrossRef

Triandis, H. C. 1989. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96: 506–520.CrossRef

Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Betancourt, H., Bond, M., Leung, K., Brenes, A., Georgas, J., Huis, C. H., Marin, G., Setiadi, B., Sinha, J. B. P., Verma, J., Spangenberg, J., Tousard, H., & de Montmollin, G. 1986. The measurement of etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38: 257–267.CrossRef

Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. 1988. Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 323–338.CrossRef

Wagner, J. A., III. 1995. Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 152–172.CrossRef

Wagner, J. A., III, & Moch, M. K. 1986. Individualism-collectivism: Concept and measure. Group & Organization Studies, 11: 280–303.CrossRef

Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R., Wang, D. X., & Chen, Z. X. 2005. Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 420–432.CrossRef

Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

Wong, C.-S., Peng, K. Z., Shi, J., & Mao, Y. 2009. Differences between odd number and even number response formats: Evidence from mainland Chinese respondents. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9143-6.

Xie, H. 2004. Chinese embrace job-hop lifestyle: No more ‘iron rice bowls’ as Beijing drops job assignments and workers become more mobile and ambitious. The Straits Times, August 16.

Titel: Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US
verfasst von: Lei Wang
Kim T. Hinrichs
Leonel Prieto
Jon P. Howell
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9237-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Reliance and disclosure: How supervisory justice affects trust in supervisor and extra-role performance

Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility

Proactive and politically skilled professionals: What is the relationship with affective occupational commitment?

The effect of upper echelons’ compensation on firm internationalization

Are cultural values associated with organizational and union commitment and citizenship behavior? A study of Chinese manufacturing workers

Strategic HR functions and firm performance: The moderating effects of high-involvement work practices

Premium Partner