nach oben

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Erschienen in:

04.07.2020

A neo-configurational institutional analysis of international venture capital attractiveness and performance: insights for Asia-Pacific

verfasst von: Amir Pezeshkan, Adam Smith, Stav Fainshmidt, Anil Nair

Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Prior research suggests that market-supporting institutions are attractive to international venture capital (IVC), yet paradoxically VC firms increasingly invest in countries characterized by institutional weaknesses. In this study, we explore the institutional contexts that make countries attractive to IVC investment and favorable to IVC performance, thus illuminating the implied risk-reward tradeoffs in IVC firm location choice and ability to navigate institutional weaknesses. Utilizing fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), we find four distinct configurations of institutions associated with IVC attractiveness. Each configuration allows for some institutional weaknesses, enabling us to elaborate theory on institutional complementarities and substitutions that drive IVC investment. Further, we find that IVC firms have performed well even in countries with pervasive institutional weaknesses, suggesting that IVC firms may uniquely contribute to the success of new ventures in such institutional contexts. We discuss implications for theory and offer policy and managerial recommendations particularly relevant to IVC activity in the Asia-Pacific region.

Nächster Artikel The moderate-reputation trap: Evidence from a Chinese cross-border business-to-business e-commerce portal

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

It should be noted that, when there is data contradicting these easy counterfactuals, the data always takes priority.

Acs, Z. 2006. How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth?, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(1): 97-107.CrossRef

Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2006. Venture capital in emerging economies: Networks and institutional change. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2): 299-320.CrossRef

Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. 2007. Venture capital in China: Past, present, and future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(3): 247-268.CrossRef

Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. 2004. FDI and economic growth: The role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, 64(1): 89-112.CrossRef

Autio, E. 2005. GEM Report on High-Expectation Entrepreneurship. Wellesley: London Business School, Mazars and Babson College.

Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., & Aguilera, R. V. 2014. Corporate governance and investors perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1): 301-320.CrossRef

Black, B. S., & Gilson, R. J. 1998. Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: Banks versus stock markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(3): 243-277.CrossRef

Bosworth, B., & Collins, S. M. 2008. Accounting for growth: Comparing China and India. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1): 45-66.CrossRef

Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. 2008. Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 747-767.CrossRef

Bozkaya, A., & Kerr, W. R. 2014. Labor regulations and European venture capital. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 23(4): 776-810.CrossRef

Brander, J. A., Amit, R., & Antweiler, W. 2002. Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(3): 423-452.CrossRef

Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2): 233-259.CrossRef

Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Puky, T. 2009. Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5): 762-778.CrossRef

Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Singh, K. 2002. The impact of the institutional environment on the venture capital industry in Singapore. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 4(3): 197-218.CrossRef

Carney, M. 2005. Globalization and the renewal of Asian business networks. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(4): 337-354.CrossRef

Cardis, J., Kirschner, S., Richelson, S., Kirschner, J., & Richelson, H. 2001. Venture Capital: The Definitive Guide for Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Practitioners. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Carpenter, R. E., & Petersen, B. C. 2002. Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. The Economic Journal, 112: F54-F72.CrossRef

Chemmanur, T. J., Hull, T. J., & Krishnan, K. 2016. Do local and international venture capitalists play well together? The complementarity of local and international venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5): 573-594.CrossRef

Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. 2016. Governmental venture capital for innovative young firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1): 10-24.CrossRef

Cumming, D., & Dai, N. 2010. Local bias in venture capital investments. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17(3): 362-380.CrossRef

Cumming, D., Knill, A., & Syvrud, K. 2016. Do international investors enhance private firm value? Evidence from venture capital. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3): 347-373.CrossRef

Dai, N., Jo, H., & Kassicieh, S. 2012. Cross-border venture capital investments in Asia: Selection and exit performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(6): 666-684.CrossRef

Dau, L. A. 2012. Pro-market reforms and developing country multinational corporations. Global Strategy Journal, 2: 262-276.CrossRef

Demirbag, M., & Glaister, K. W. 2010. Factors determining offshore location choice for R&D projects: A comparative study of developed and emerging regions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8): 1534-1560.CrossRef

Devigne, D., Vanacker, T., Manigart, S., & Paeleman, I. 2013. The role of domestic and cross-border venture capital investors in the growth of portfolio companies. Small Business Economics, 40(3): 553-573.CrossRef

Dossani, R., & Kenney, M. 2002. Creating an environment for venture capital in India. World Development, 30(2): 227-253.CrossRef

Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. 2013. Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4): 564-580.CrossRef

Fainshmidt, S., Judge, W. Q., Aguilera, R. V., & Smith, A. 2018. Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries. Journal of World Business, 53(3): 307-322.CrossRef

Fainshmidt, S., Smith, A., & Judge, W. Q. 2016. National competitiveness and Porter's diamond model: The role of MNE penetration and governance quality. Global Strategy Journal, 6(2): 81-104.CrossRef

Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M.A., Aguilera, R.V., Verbeke, A. 2020. The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51: 455–466.CrossRef

Fiss, P. C. 2011. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 393-420.CrossRef

Fiss, P.C., Cambre, B., & Marx, A. 2013. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research. London: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRef

Florida, R. L., & Kenney, M. 1988. Venture capital-financed innovation and technological change in the USA. Research Policy, 17(3): 119-137.CrossRef

Gao, C., Zuzul, T., Jones, G., & Khanna, T. 2017. Overcoming institutional voids: A reputation-based view of long-run survival. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11): 2147-2167.CrossRef

García-Castro, R., Aguilera, R. V., & Ariño, M. A. 2013. Bundles of firm corporate governance practices: A fuzzy set analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(4): 390-407.CrossRef

Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. 2004. The Venture Capital Cycle. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gornall, W. & Strebulaev, I. A., 2015. The economic impact of venture capital: Evidence from public companies. Research paper No. 15-55, Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford, California.

Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. 2014. Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 43(9): 1523-1543.CrossRef

Guler, I., & Guillén, M. F. 2010a. Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 185-205.CrossRef

Guler, I., & Guillén, M. F. 2010b. Home country networks and foreign expansion: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2): 390-410.CrossRef

Hain, D., Johan, S., & Wang, D. 2016. Determinants of cross-border venture capital investments in emerging and developed economies: The effects of relational and institutional trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(4): 743-764.CrossRef

Hall, J., & Hofer, C. W. 1993. Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1): 25-42.CrossRef

Hassink, R., & Lagendijk, A. 2001. The dilemmas of interregional institutional learning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19(1): 65-84.CrossRef

Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. 2002. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Finance, 57(1): 169-197.CrossRef

Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. 2008. Competencies and institutions fostering high-growth firms. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 5(1): 1-80.CrossRef

Heritage Foundation. 2018. Vietnam. https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2018/countries/vietnam.pdf, Accessed May 01, 2020.

Hochberg, Y.V., Ljungqvist, A. & Lu, Y. 2007. Whom you know matters: venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance, 62(1): 251–301.CrossRef

Hotho, J. 2014. From typology to taxonomy: A configurational analysis of national business systems and their explanatory power. Organization Studies, 35(5): 671-702.CrossRef

Jääskeläinen, M., Maula, M. & Seppä, T. 2006. Allocation of attention to portfolio companies and the performance of venture capital firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2): 185–206.CrossRef

Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. 2008. Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 540-561.CrossRef

Jandl, T. 2013. Vietnam in the global economy: The dynamics of integration, decentralization, and contested politics. United Kingdom: Lexington Books.

Jeng, L. A., & Wells, P. C. 2000. The determinants of venture capital funding: Evidence across countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(3): 241-289.CrossRef

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75: 41-48.

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2005. Spotting Institutional Voids in Emerging Markets. Watertown, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. 2005. Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6): 4-19.

Kim, H. G., Gaur, A. S. and Mukherjee, D. 2020. Added cultural distance and ownership in cross-border acquisitions. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-01-2020-0003.

Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. 2000. Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(4): 674-692.CrossRef

Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. 2005. Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions? The contractual channel in private equity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1): 223–246.

Li, Y., Vertinsky, I. B., & Li, J. 2014. National distances, international experience, and venture capital investment performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4): 471-489.CrossRef

Li, Y., & Zahra, S. A. 2012. Formal institutions, culture, and venture capital activity: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1): 95-111.CrossRef

Lu, Q., & Hwang, P. 2010. The impact of liability of foreignness on international venture capital firms in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 81-97.CrossRef

Lundvall, B. Å. 1999. National business systems and national systems of innovation. International Studies of Management & Organization, 29(2): 60-77.CrossRef

Luo, J. D., Rong, K., Yang, K., Guo, R., & Zou, Y. 2019. Syndication through social embeddedness: A comparison of foreign, private and state-owned venture capital (VC) firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(2): 499-527.CrossRef

Madhavan, R., & Iriyama, A. 2009. Understanding global flows of venture capital: Human networks as the “carrier wave” of globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8): 1241-1259.CrossRef

Mäkelä, M. M., & Maula, M. V. 2005. Cross-border venture capital and new venture internationalization: An isomorphism perspective. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 7(3): 227-257.CrossRef

Mäkelä, M. M., & Maula, M. V. 2008. Attracting cross-border venture capital: the role of a local investor. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(3): 237-257.CrossRef

Mair, J., & Marti, I. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5): 419-435.CrossRef

Maula, M. & Mäkelä, M. 2003. Cross-border venture capital. In A. Hyytinen, & M. Pajarinen (Eds.). Financial Systems and Firm Performance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives: 269-291. Helsinki: Taloustieto.

Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A., 1991. Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 46(3): 879-903.CrossRef

Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. 2017. Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management. 43(1): 255-282.CrossRef

Mukherjee, D., Makarius, E. E., & Stevens, C. E. 2018. Business group reputation and affiliates’ internationalization strategies. Journal of World Business, 53(2): 93-103.CrossRef

Muzyka, D., Birley, S., & Leleux, B. 1996. Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4): 273-287.CrossRef

Nahata, R., Hazarika, S., & Tandon, K. 2014. Success in global venture capital investing: Do institutional and cultural differences matter? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(4): 1039-1070.CrossRef

Olavarrieta, S., & Villena, M. G. 2014. Innovation and business research in Latin America: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 67(4): 489-497.CrossRef

Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. 2015. Sourcing for the base of the pyramid: Constructing supply chains to address voids in subsistence markets. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34: 60-70.CrossRef

Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(4): 321-336.CrossRef

Pezeshkan, A., Smith, A., Fainshmidt, S., & Sedeh, A. A. 2016. National business systems and firm innovation: A study of developing economies. Journal of Business Research, 69(11): 5413-5418.CrossRef

Pezeshkan, A., Smith, A., Fainshmidt, S., & Zhang, J. (2019). Risk, capabilities, and international venture capital syndication in China. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 25(8): 1671-1684.CrossRef

Pinkham, B. C., & Peng, M. W. 2017. Overcoming institutional voids via arbitration. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3): 344-359.CrossRef

Plagmann, C., & Lutz, E. 2019. Beggars or choosers? Lead venture capitalists and the impact of reputation on syndicate partner selection in international settings. Journal of Banking & Finance, 100: 359-378.CrossRef

Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets & Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Sahlman, W. A. 1990. The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 473-521.CrossRef

Sapienza, H. J., Manigart, S., & Vermeir, W. 1996. Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(6): 439-469.CrossRef

Scalera, V. G., Mukherjee, D., & Piscitello, L. 2020. Ownership strategies in knowledge-intensive cross-border acquisitions: Comparing Chinese and Indian MNEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37: 155–185.CrossRef

Scheela, W., Isidro, E., Jittrapanun, T., & Trang, N. T. T. 2015. Formal and informal venture capital investing in emerging economies in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3): 597-617.CrossRef

Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. 2012. Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Sheng, H. 2010. Institution formation, imitation, and borrowing: Zhongguancun as a case study on mechanisms of institutional change. In X. Huang (Ed.). The Institutional Dynamics of China's Great Transformation: 52-70. New York: Routledge.

Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. 2015. Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3): 308-331.CrossRef

Su, Z. 2020 The co-evolution of institutions and entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09703-y.

Viswanathan, M., Sridharan, S., Gau, R., & Ritchie, R. 2009. Designing marketplace literacy education in resource-constrained contexts: Implications for public policy and marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28(1): 85-94.CrossRef

Wang, L., & Wang, S. 2011. Cross-border venture capital performance: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(1): 71-97.CrossRef

Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. 1999. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1): 27-56.CrossRef

Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. 2005. Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3): 335-350.CrossRef

World Bank (2018). GDP growth (annual %). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG.

World Economic Forum. 2010. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2005-2010. World Economic Forum (WEF), Geneva, Switzerland.

Wright, M., Lockett, A., & Pruthi, S. 2002. Internationalization of Western venture capitalists into emerging markets: Risk assessment and information in India. Small Business Economics, 19(1): 13-29.CrossRef

Wright, M., Pruthi, S., & Lockett, A. 2005. International venture capital research: From cross-country comparisons to crossing borders. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3): 135-165.CrossRef

Zhang, J., & Pezeshkan, A. 2016. Host country network, industry experience, and international alliance formation: Evidence from the venture capital industry. Journal of World Business, 51(2): 264-277.CrossRef

Zhelyazkov, P. I., & Gulati, R. 2016. After the break-up: The relational and reputational consequences of withdrawals from venture capital syndicates. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1): 277-301.CrossRef

Titel: A neo-configurational institutional analysis of international venture capital attractiveness and performance: insights for Asia-Pacific
verfasst von: Amir Pezeshkan
Adam Smith
Stav Fainshmidt
Anil Nair
Publikationsdatum: 04.07.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09727-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Do the rich give more? The effects of family wealth and entrepreneurial effort on firm philanthropy and growth.

Empowering leadership: employee-related antecedents and consequences

Correction to: Cross-border acquisition activity by Chinese multinationals and domestic-productivity upgrading

Parent-subsidiary linkage: How resource commitment and resource similarity influence firm performance

Do internationalizing business group affiliates perform better after promarket reforms? Evidence from Korean SMEs

Buffering and bridging: How firms manage the burden of celebrity

Premium Partner