Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law 1/2011

01.03.2011

Argumentation mining

verfasst von: Raquel Mochales, Marie-Francine Moens

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Argumentation mining aims to automatically detect, classify and structure argumentation in text. Therefore, argumentation mining is an important part of a complete argumentation analyisis, i.e. understanding the content of serial arguments, their linguistic structure, the relationship between the preceding and following arguments, recognizing the underlying conceptual beliefs, and understanding within the comprehensive coherence of the specific topic. We present different methods to aid argumentation mining, starting with plain argumentation detection and moving forward to a more structural analysis of the detected argumentation. Different state-of-the-art techniques on machine learning and context free grammars are applied to solve the challenges of argumentation mining. We also highlight fundamental questions found during our research and analyse different issues for future research on argumentation mining.
Nächster Artikel A model of juridical acts: part 1: the world of law

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
In a binary classification, accuracy is the proportion of true results (both true positives and true negatives) in the population.
 
2
The results presented in Mochales and Moens (2007) were 90%, but the evaluation was done on a previous version of the ECHR corpus. The new version uses the same texts but with an improved human annotation, where a higher agreement between annotators is achieved.
 
3
The F 1 (or F-measure) is a measure of a test’s accuracy. It considers both the precision p and the recall r of the test to compute the score: p is the number of correct results divided by the number of all returned results and r is the number of correct results divided by the number of results that should have been returned. The F 1 can be interpreted as a weighted average of the precision and recall, where an F 1 score reaches its best value at 1 and worst score at 0.
 
Literatur
Aleven V, Ashley KD (1997) Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment
Ashley K (1990) Modeling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press, Cambridge
Ashley KD (1991) Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in HYPO. Int J ManMach Stud 34:753–796CrossRef
Ashley K (2006) Case-based reasoning. In: Oskamp A, Lodder A (eds) Information technology and lawyers. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–45
Barwise J (1977) An introduction to first-order logic. Handbook of mathematical logic, studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics. Amsterdam, North-Holland
Bench-Capon TJ, Atkinson K, McBurney P (2009) Altruism and agents: an argumentation based approach to designing agent decision mechanisms. AAMAS 2(2):1073–1080
Berger AL, Pietra VJD, Pietra SAD (1996) A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Comput Linguist 22(1):39–71
Besnard P, Hunter A (2008) Elements of argumentation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Branting LK (2000) Reasoning with rules and precedents: a computational model of legal analysis. Kluwer, Boston
Budanitsky E, Hirst G (2006) Evaluating WordNet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Comput Linguist 32:13–47CrossRef
Charniak E (1999) A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. Technical Report CS-99-12
Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):37–46CrossRef
Cohen R (1987) Analyzing the structure of argumentative discourse. Comput Linguist 13:11–24
Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77:321–357MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Hachey B, Grover C (2005) Automatic legal text summarisation: experiments with summary structuring. In: ICAIL ’05: proceedings of the 10th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 75–84
Johnson RH, Blair JA (2002) Informal logic and the reconfiguration of logic. In: Gabbay DM, Johnson RH, Ohlbach HJ, Woods J (eds) Handbook of the logic of argument and inference: turn towards the practical. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 340–396
Jurafsky D, Martin JH (2009) Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech recognition, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall (Series in Artificial Intelligence), February
Kirschner PA, Buckingham Shum SJ, Carr CS (2003) Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, London
Knott A, Dale R (1993) Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of rhetorical relations. Technical report, Discourse Processes
Levin B (1993) English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. The University of Chicago, Chicago
Mann WC, Thompson SA (1988) Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3):243–281
Manning CD, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Marcu D (2000) The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: a surface-based approach. Comput Linguist 26(3):395–448CrossRef
Mochales R, Moens M-F (2007) Study on sentence relations in the automatic detection of argumentation in legal cases. In: Lodder A, Mommers L (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems. Jurix 2007. IOS Press, Amsterdam
Mochales R, Moens M-F (2008) Study on the structure of argumentation in case law. In: Francesconi E, Sartor G, Tiscornia D (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems. Jurix 2008. IOS Press, Amsterdam
Moens M-F, Boiy E, Mochales R, Reed C (2007) Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts. In: ICAIL ’07: proceedings of the 11th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp 225–230
Negri S, von Plato J (2001) Structural proof theory. Cambridge University press, Cambridge
Rahwan I, Simari G (2009) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. X. 494 p. 100 illus., Hardcover
Reed C, Rowe G (2010) ARAUCARIA: ARGUMENT DIAGRAMMING AND XML, Araucaria: software for puzzles in argument diagramming and XML
Rissland E, Skalak D (1991) CABARET: statutory interpretation in a hybrid architecture. Int J ManMach Stud 34:839–887
Teufel S (1999) Argumentative zoning: information extraction from scientific text. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh
Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectic approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Voss JF, Van Dyke J (2002) Argumentation in psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Wagner J, Seddah D, Foster J, van Genabith J (2007) C-structures and F-structures for the British National Corpus. In: Butt M, King TH (eds) The proceedings of the LFG ’07 conference. University of Stanford, California, USA, pp 418–438
Walton DN (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Walton DN (1998) The new dialectic, conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Wigmore JH (1931) The principles of judicial proof. Little, Brown & Co, Boston
Metadaten
Titel
Argumentation mining
verfasst von
Raquel Mochales
Marie-Francine Moens
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Artificial Intelligence and Law / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0924-8463
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8382
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-010-9104-x

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise