nach oben

Journal of Materials Science

Erschienen in:

10.08.2020 | Review

A critical review of piezoresistivity and its application in electrical-resistance-based strain sensing

verfasst von: D. D. L. Chung

Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science | Ausgabe 32/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Piezoresistivity is an electromechanical effect characterized by the reversible change in the electrical resistivity with strain. It is useful for electrical-resistance-based strain/stress sensing. The resistivity can be the volumetric, interfacial or surface resistivity, though the volumetric resistivity is most meaningful scientifically. Because the irreversible resistivity change (due to damage or an irreversible microstructural change) adds to the reversible change that occurs at lower strains, the inclusion of the irreversible effect makes the piezoresistivity appear stronger than the inherent effect. This paper focuses on the inherent piezoresistivity that occurs without irreversible resistivity changes. The effect is described by the gage factor (GF), which is defined as the fractional change in resistance per unit strain. The GF can be positive or negative. Strong piezoresistivity involves the magnitude of the fractional change in resistivity much exceeding the strain magnitude. The reversible effect of strain on the electrical connectivity is the primary piezoresistivity mechanism. Giant piezoresistivity is characterized by GF ≥ 500. This critical review with 209 references covers the theory, mechanisms, methodology and status of piezoresistivity, and provides the first review of the emerging field of giant piezoresistivity. Piezoresistivity is exhibited by electrically conductive materials, particularly metals, carbons and composite materials with conductive fillers and nonconductive matrices. They include functional and structural materials. Piezoresistivity enables structural materials to be self-sensing. Unfortunately, GF was incorrectly or unreliably reported in a substantial fraction of the publications, due to the pitfalls systematically presented here. The most common pitfall involves using the two-probe method for the resistance measurement.

Vorheriger Artikel 1000 at 1000: The effect of electric field and pressure on the synthesis and consolidation of materials: a review of the spark plasma sintering method

Nächster Artikel Compaction self-assembly of a low-binder-content geopolymer material

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Chung DDL (2010) Functional materials. World Science Publisher, Singapore Ch. 2 and 3CrossRef

Chung DDL (2017) Carbon composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam Ch. 6CrossRef

Chen S, Li Y, Yan D, Wu C, Leventis N (2019) Piezoresistive geopolymer enabled by crack-surface coating. Mater Lett 255:126582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126582CrossRef

Yang H, Gong LH, Zheng Z, Yao XF (2020) Highly stretchable and sensitive conductive rubber composites with tunable piezoresistivity for motion detection and flexible electrodes. Carbon 158:893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.079CrossRef

Park JW, Jang J (2015) Fabrication of graphene/free-standing nanofibrillar PEDOT/P(VDF-HFP) hybrid device for wearable and sensitive electronic skin application. Carbon 87:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.039CrossRef

Sang Z, Ke K, Manas-Zloczower I (2019) Design strategy for porous composites aimed at pressure sensor application. Small 15(45):1903487. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201903487CrossRef

Liu X, Su G, Guo Q, Lu C, Zhou T, Zhou C, Zhang X (2018) Hierarchically structured self-healing sensors with tunable positive/negative piezoresistivity. Adv Funct Mater 28(15):1706658. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706658CrossRef

Daňová R, Olejnik R, Slobodian P (2020) Matyas J (2020) The piezoresistive highly elastic sensor based on carbon nanotubes for the detection of breath. Polymers (Basel, Switzerland) 12(3):713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030713CrossRef

Tai Y, Mulle M, Aguilar Ventura I, Lubineau G (2015) A highly sensitive, low-cost, wearable pressure sensor based on conductive hydrogel spheres. Nanoscale 7(35):14766–14773. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr03155aCrossRef

10.

Amjadi M, Kyung K, Park I, Sitti M (2016) Stretchable, skin-mountable, and wearable strain sensors and their potential applications: a review. Adv Funct Mater 26(11):1678–1698. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201504755CrossRef

11.

Abhang Y (2018) Review of different tactile sensors using piezoresistivity mechanism. J Mater Sci Eng 7(2):1000432/1–1000432/3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0022.1000432CrossRef

12.

Zhang B, Li B, Jiang S (2017) Poly(phenylmethylsiloxane) functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube/poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanocomposites with high piezoresistivity, low modulus and high conductivity. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28(9):6897–6906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6390-zCrossRef

13.

Al-Handarish Y, Omisore OM, Igbe T, Han S, Li H, Du W, Zhang J, Wang L (2020) A survey of tactile-sensing systems and their applications in biomedical engineering. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4047937CrossRef

14.

Ansari MZ, Gangadhara BS (2014) Piezoresistivity and its applications in nanomechanical sensors. Proc Mater Sci 5:1308–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.447CrossRef

15.

Jiang N, Namilae S, Unnikrishnan V (2020) Silicone/carbon nanotube sheet biofidelic piezoresistive sandwich composites. J Eng Mater Technol 142(1):11009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044649CrossRef

16.

Winkler C, Schaefer J, Jager C, Konnerth J, Schwarz U (2020) Influence of polymer/filler composition and processing on the properties of multifunctional adhesive wood bonds from polyurethane prepolymers II: electrical sensitivity in compression. J Adhes 96(1–4):185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2019.1652602CrossRef

17.

Lee W, Hong S, Oh H (2019) Characterization of elastic polymer-based smart insole and a simple foot plantar pressure visualization method using 16 electrodes. Sensors 19(1):44/1–44/10. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010044CrossRef

18.

Ahuja P, Ujjain SK, Urita K, Furuse A, Moriguchi I, Kaneko K (2020) Chemically and mechanically robust SWCNT based strain sensor with monotonous piezoresistive response for infrastructure monitoring. Chem Eng J (Amsterdam, Neth) 388:124174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124174CrossRef

19.

Fu X, Ramos M, Al-Jumaily AM, Meshkinzar A, Huang X (2019) Stretchable strain sensor facilely fabricated based on multi-wall carbon nanotube composites with excellent performance. J Mater Sci 54(3):2170–2180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2954-4CrossRef

20.

Penvern N, Langlet A, Gratton M, Mansion M (2020) Ait Hocine N (2020) Experimental characterization of the quasi-static and dynamic piezoresistive behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/elastomer composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 39(7–8):299–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684420901754CrossRef

21.

Liao Y, Duan F, Zhang H, Lu Y, Zeng Z, Liu M, Xu H, Gao C, Zhou L, Jin H et al (2019) Ultrafast response of spray-on nanocomposite piezoresistive sensors to broadband ultrasound. Carbon 143:743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.074CrossRef

22.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2000) Uniaxial tension in carbon fiber reinforced cement, sensed by electrical resistivity measurement in longitudinal and transverse directions. Cem Concr Res 30(8):1289–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00304-5CrossRef

23.

Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2015) Smart cement rheological and piezoresistive behavior for oil well applications. J Petrol Sci Eng 135:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.08.015CrossRef

24.

Tao J, Wang J, Zeng Q (2020) Comparative study on influences of CNT and GNP on piezoresistivity of cement composites. Mater Lett 259:126858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126858CrossRef

25.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2003) A comparative study of steel- and carbon-fibre cement as piezoresistive strain sensors. Adv Cem Res 15(3):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.2003.15.3.119CrossRef

26.

Dong W, Li W, Wang K, Han B, Sheng D, Shah SP (2020) Investigation on physicochemical and piezoresistive properties of smart WCNT/cementitious composite exposed to elevated temperatures. Cement Concr Compos 112:103675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103675CrossRef

27.

Segura I, Faneca G, Torrents JM, Aguado A (2019) Self-sensing concrete made from recycled carbon fibres. Smart Mater Struct 28(10):105045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab3d59CrossRef

28.

Dong W, Li W, Wang K, Luo Z, Sheng D (2020) Self-sensing capabilities of cement-based sensor with layer-distributed conductive rubber fibres. Sens Actuators A 301:111763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.111763CrossRef

29.

Dong W, Li W, Long G, Tao Z, Li J, Wang K (2019) Electrical resistivity and mechanical properties of cementitious composite incorporating conductive rubber fibres. Smart Mater Struct 28(8):85013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab282aCrossRef

30.

Zhang L, Ding S, Han B, Yu X, Ni Y (2019) Effect of water content on the piezoresistive property of smart cement-based materials with carbon nanotube/nanocarbon black composite filler. Compos A 119:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.010CrossRef

31.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2007) Electrical-resistance-based damage self-sensing in carbon fiber reinforced cement. Carbon 45(4):710–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.029CrossRef

32.

Chung DDL (2003) Damage in cement-based materials, studied by electrical resistance measurement. Mater Sci Eng R 42(1):1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-796x(03)00037-8CrossRef

33.

Ramirez M, Chung DDL (2016) Electromechanical, self-sensing and viscoelastic behavior of carbon fiber tows. Carbon 110:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.095CrossRef

34.

Wang H, Liu J, Gao X, Li Y, Cai J, Wang J (2019) Influence of salt freeze-thaw cycles on the damage and the following electrical and self-sensing performance of carbon nanofibers concrete. Mater Res Express 6(2):025705/1–025705/11. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaf094CrossRef

35.

Alsaadi A, Meredith J, Swait T, Curiel-Sosa JL, Jia Y, Hayes S (2019) Structural health monitoring for woven fabric CFRP laminates. Compos B 174:107048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107048CrossRef

36.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2006) Effects of strain and damage on the strain sensing ability of carbon fiber cement. J Mater Civ Eng 18(3):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:3(355)CrossRef

37.

Wang S, Kowalik DP, Chung DDL (2002) Effects of the temperature, humidity and stress on the interlaminar interface of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites, studied by contact electrical resistivity measurement. J. Adhes 78(2):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218460210384CrossRef

38.

Wang S, Chung DDL (2005) The interlaminar interface of a carbon fiber epoxy–matrix composite as an impact sensor. J Mater Sci 40:1863–1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1205-7CrossRef

39.

Fu X, Chung DDL (1998) Effects of water-cement ratio, curing age, silica fume, polymer admixtures, steel surface treatments, and corrosion on bond between concrete and steel reinforcing bars. ACI Mater J 95(6):725–734. https://doi.org/10.14359/417CrossRef

40.

Kim KD, Chung DDL (2005) Electrically conductive adhesive and soldered joints under compression. J Adhes Sci Technol 19(11):1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568561054950988CrossRef

41.

Wang S, Chung DDL (2006) Self-sensing of flexural strain and damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by electrical resistance measurement. Carbon 44(13):2739–2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.034CrossRef

42.

Zhu S, Chung DDL (2007) Analytical model of piezoresistivity for strain sensing in carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composite under flexure. Carbon 45(8):1606–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.012CrossRef

43.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2006) Self-sensing of flexural damage and strain in carbon fiber reinforced cement and effect of embedded steel reinforcing bars. Carbon 44(8):1496–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.009CrossRef

44.

Zhu S, Chung DDL (2007) Theory of piezoresistivity for strain sensing in carbon fiber reinforced cement under flexure. J Mater Sci 42(15):6222–6233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1131-3CrossRef

45.

Ueda M, Yamaguchi T, Ohno T, Kato Y, Nishimura T (2019) FEM-aided identification of gauge factors of unidirectional CFRP through multi-point potential measurements. Adv Compos Mater 28(1):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2017.1423531CrossRef

46.

Celebonovic V, Nikolic MG (2018) The Hubbard Model and piezoresistivity. J Low Temp Phys 190(3–4):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-017-1830-yCrossRef

47.

Nakamura K, Toriyama T, Sugiyama S (2011) First-principles simulation on piezoresistivity in alpha and beta silicon carbide nanosheets. Jpn J Appl Phys 50(6):06GE05/1–06GE05/6. https://doi.org/10.7567/jjap.50.06ge05CrossRef

48.

Ren X, Burton J, Seidel GD, Lafdi K (2015) Computational multiscale modeling and characterization of piezoresistivity in fuzzy fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int J Solids Struct 54:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.034CrossRef

49.

Hu B, Hu N, Li Y, Akagi K, Yuan W, Watanabe T, Cai Y (2012) Multi-scale numerical simulations on piezoresistivity of CNT/polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 7(1):402, 11pp

50.

Gong S, Wu D, Li Y, Jin M, Xiao T, Wang Y, Xiao Z, Zhu Z, Li Z (2018) Temperature-independent piezoresistive sensors based on carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposite. Carbon 137:188–195CrossRef

51.

Koo GM, Tallman TN (2020) Higher-order resistivity-strain relations for self-sensing nanocomposites subject to general deformations. Compos B 190:107907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107907CrossRef

52.

Kim I, Kim HS, Ryu H (2019) Piezoresistivity of InAsP nanowires: role of crystal phases and phosphorus atoms in strain-induced channel conductances. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 24(18):3249. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183249CrossRef

53.

Zhang T, Wang G, Wang C, Tang C, Zhang F, Luo Y (2019) Effect of AuNP-AuNP vdW interaction on the mechanics and piezoresistivity of AuNP-polymer nanocomposite. AIP Adv 9(5):055212/1–055212/8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5099523CrossRef

54.

Wang M, Gurunathan R, Imasato K, Geisendorfer NR, Jakus AE, Peng J, Shah RN, Grayson M, Snyder GJ (2019) Percolation model for piezoresistivity in conductor-polymer composites. Adv Theory Simul. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.201800125CrossRef

55.

Oskouyi AB, Sundararaj U, Mertiny P (2014) Tunneling conductivity and piezoresistivity of composites containing randomly dispersed conductive nano-platelets. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 7(4):2501–2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7042501CrossRef

56.

Gbaguidi A, Namilae S, Kim D (2019) Stochastic percolation model for the effect of nanotube agglomeration on the conductivity and piezoresistivity of hybrid nanocomposites. Computat Mater Sci 166:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.045CrossRef

57.

Oliva-Aviles AI, Aviles F, Seidel GD, Sosa V (2013) On the contribution of carbon nanotube deformation to piezoresistivity of carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Compos B 47:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.091CrossRef

58.

Ren X, Seidel GD (2013) Computational micromechanics modeling of inherent piezoresistivity in carbon nanotube-polymer nanocomposites. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 24(12):1459–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X12471442CrossRef

59.

Gong S, Zhu ZH (2015) Giant piezoresistivity in aligned carbon nanotube nanocomposite: account for nanotube structural distortion at crossed tunnel junctions. Nanoscale 7(4):1339–1348. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR05656FCrossRef

60.

Guan X, Wen M, Li H, Ou J (2019) The influence of firing procedures on strain sensitivity of thick-film resistors. Ceram Int 45(6):6836–6841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.177CrossRef

61.

Qiao Z, Ma Y, Chen X, Chen M, Hong K, Li Z, Lu G, Wang Z (2020) Mechanical and piezo-resistive properties of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes/styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene composites. Polym Compos 41(5):2082–2093. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25522CrossRef

62.

Devarajan U, Singh S, Esakki Muthu S, Kalai Selvan G, Sivaprakash P, Roy Barman S, Arumugam S (2014) Investigations on the electronic transport and piezoresistivity properties of Ni_2−xMn_1+xGa (x = 0 and 0.15) Heusler alloys under hydrostatic pressure. Appl Phys Lett 105(25):252401/1–252401/4CrossRef

63.

Sezen M, Register JT, Yao Y, Glisic B, Loo Y (2016) Eliminating piezoresistivity in flexible conducting polymers for accurate temperature sensing under dynamic mechanical deformations. Small 12(21):2832–2838. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201600858CrossRef

64.

Jheng L, Hsiao C, Ko W, Hsu SL, Huang Y (2019) Conductive films based on sandwich structures of carbon nanotubes/silver nanowires for stretchable interconnects. Nanotechnology 30(23):235201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab0483CrossRef

65.

Wang D, Chung DDL (2013) Through-thickness piezoresistivity in a carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composite for electrical-resistance-based through-thickness strain sensing. Carbon 60(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.005CrossRef

66.

Wang X, Chung DDL (1997) Sensing delamination in a carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite during fatigue by electrical resistance measurement. Polym Compos 18(6):692–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10322CrossRef

67.

Wang X, Chung DDL (1999) Fiber breakage in polymer-matrix composite during static and dynamic loading, studied by electrical resistance measurement. J Mater Res 14(11):4224–4229. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-503-81CrossRef

68.

Lekawa-Raus A, Koziol KKK, Windle AH (2014) Piezoresistive effect in carbon nanotube fibers. ACS Nano 8(11):11214–11224. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn503596fCrossRef

69.

Anike JC, Belay K, Abot JL (2019) Effect of twist on the electromechanical properties of carbon nanotube yarns. Carbon 142:491–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.067CrossRef

70.

Su S, Chen Y, Wu J, Chen W, Cheng W, Yao YD (2006) The straining effect on tunneling resistance of Co/AlO_x/Co/IrMn junctions. Appl Phys Lett 89(22):222510/1–222510/3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2399936CrossRef

71.

Lange D, Roca-Cabarrocas P, Triantafyllidis N, Daineka D (2016) Piezoresistivity of thin film semiconductors with application to thin film silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 145(Part_2):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.014CrossRef

72.

Thuau D, Begley K, Dilmurat R, Ablat A, Wantz G, Ayela C, Abbas M (2020) Exploring the critical thickness of organic semiconductor layer for enhanced piezoresistive sensitivity in field-effect transistor sensors. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 13(7):1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071583CrossRef

73.

Thanh N, Toan D, Riduan Md FA, Hoang-Phuong P, Tuan-Khoa N, Nam-Trung N et al (2019) Giant piezoresistive effect by optoelectronic coupling in a heterojunction. Nat Commun 10(1):4139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11965-5CrossRef

74.

Riyajuddin S, Kumar S, Gaur SP, Sud A, Maruyama T, Ali ME, Ghosh K (2020) Linear piezoresistive strain sensor based on graphene/g-C₃N₄/PDMS heterostructure. Nanotechnology 31(29):295501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab7b88CrossRef

75.

Yao Y, Duan X, Luo J, Liu T (2017) Two-probe versus van der Pauw method in studying the piezoresistivity of single-wall carbon nanotube thin films. Nanotechnology 28(44):445501/1–445501/10CrossRef

76.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2007) Piezoresistivity-based strain sensing in carbon fiber reinforced cement. ACI Mater J 104(2):171–179

77.

Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2019) Smart cement compressive piezoresistive, stress-strain, and strength behavior with nanosilica modification. J Test Eval 47(2):1479–1501. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170105CrossRef

78.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2006) Spatially resolved self-sensing of strain and damage in carbon fiber cement. J Mater Sci 41(15):4823–4831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0028-5CrossRef

79.

Wang D, Wang S, Chung DDL, Chung JH (2006) Sensitivity of the two-dimensional electric potential/resistance method for damage monitoring in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. J Mater Sci 41(15):4839–4846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0062-3CrossRef

80.

Zhang D, Ye L, Wang D, Tang Y, Mustapha S, Chen Y (2012) Assessment of transverse impact damage in GF/EP laminates of conductive nanoparticles using electrical resistivity tomography. Compos A 43(9):1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.012CrossRef

81.

Karhunen K, Seppaenen A, Lehikoinen A, Monteiro PJM, Kaipio JP (2010) Electrical resistance tomography imaging of concrete. Cem Concr Res 40(1):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.023CrossRef

82.

Reichling K, Raupach M, Klitzsch N (2015) Determination of the distribution of electrical resistivity in reinforced concrete structures using electrical resistivity tomography. Mater Corros 66(8):763–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201407763CrossRef

83.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2001) Electric polarization in carbon fiber reinforced cement. Cem Concr Res 31(2):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00382-3CrossRef

84.

Cao J, Chung DDL (2004) Electric polarization and depolarization in cement-based materials, studied by apparent electrical resistance measurement. Cem Concr Res 34(3):481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.003CrossRef

85.

Fu X, Ma E, Chung DDL, Anderson WA (1997) Self-monitoring in carbon fiber reinforced mortar by reactance measurement. Cem Concr Res 27(6):845–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)83277-2CrossRef

86.

Shirodkar N, Rocker S, Seidel GD (2019) Strain and damage sensing of polymer bonded mock energetics via piezoresistivity from carbon nanotube networks. Smart Mater Struct 28(10):104006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab3dcdCrossRef

87.

Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2017) Rheological properties of piezoresistive smart cement slurry modified with iron- oxide nanoparticles for oil–well applications. J Test Eval 45(6):2050–2060. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20150443CrossRef

88.

Sanli A, Kanoun O (2020) Electrical impedance analysis of carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposite-based piezoresistive strain sensors under uniaxial cyclic static tensile loading. J Compos Mater 54(6):845–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998319870592CrossRef

89.

Dong W, Li W, Shen L, Sheng D (2019) Piezoresistive behaviours of carbon black cement-based sensors with layer-distributed conductive rubber fibres. Mater Des 182:108012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108012CrossRef

90.

Cheng X, Wang L, Gao F, Yang W, Du Z, Chen D, Chen S (2019) The N and P co-doping-induced giant negative piezoresistance behaviors of SiC nanowires. J Mater Chem C 7(11):3181–3189. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC06623JCrossRef

91.

Patole SP, Reddy SK, Schiffer A, Askar K, Prusty BG, Kumar S (2019) Piezoresistive and mechanical characteristics of graphene foam nanocomposites. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2(3):1402–1411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b02306CrossRef

92.

Wang F, Zhang S, Wang L, Zhang Y, Lin J, Zhang X, Chen T, Lai Y, Pan G, Sun L (2018) An ultrahighly sensitive and repeatable flexible pressure sensor based on PVDF/PU/MWCNT hierarchical framework-structured aerogels for monitoring human activities. J Mater Chem C 6(46):12575–12583. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC04652BCrossRef

93.

Fu Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Huang P, Hu N, Fu S (2018) High-performance structural flexible strain sensors based on graphene-coated glass fabric/silicone composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(41):35503–35509. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b09424CrossRef

94.

Yu S, Wang X, Xiang H, Zhu L, Tebyetekerwa M, Zhu M (2018) Superior piezoresistive strain sensing behaviors of carbon nanotubes in one-dimensional polymer fiber structure. Carbon 140:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.028CrossRef

95.

Cruz S, Rocha LA, Viana JC (2017) Piezo-resistive behavior at high strain levels of PEDOT:PSS printed on a flexible polymeric substrate by a novel surface treatment. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28(3):2563–2573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5832-3CrossRef

96.

Li X, Chen S, Ying P, Gao F, Liu Q, Shang M, Yang W (2016) A giant negative piezoresistance effect in 3C-SiC nanowires with B dopants. J Mater Chem C 4(27):6466–6472. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC01882CCrossRef

97.

Zhao S, Li J, Cao D, Gao Y, Huang W, Zhang G, Sun R, Wong C (2016) Percolation threshold-inspired design of hierarchical multiscale hybrid architectures based on carbon nanotubes and silver nanoparticles for stretchable and printable electronics. J Mater Chem C 4(27):6666–6674. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC01728BCrossRef

98.

Zhang L, Wang Y, Wei Y, Xu W, Fang D, Zhai L, Lin K, An L (2008) A silicon carbonitride ceramic with anomalously high piezoresistivity. J Am Ceram Soc 91(4):1346–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02275.xCrossRef

99.

Wang S, Chung DDL (2000) Piezoresistivity in continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. Polym Compos 21(1):13–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.10160CrossRef

100.

Wang S, Wang D, Chung DDL, Chung JH (2006) Method of sensing impact damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by electrical resistance measurement. J Mater Sci 41(8):2281–2289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7172-9CrossRef

101.

Christ JF, Aliheidari N, Ameli A, Potschke P (2017) 3D printed highly elastic strain sensors of multiwalled carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. Mater Des 131:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.011CrossRef

102.

Huang K, Dong S, Yang J, Yan J, Xue Y, You X, Hu J, Gao L, Zhang X, Ding Y (2019) Three-dimensional printing of a tunable graphene-based elastomer for strain sensors with ultrahigh sensitivity. Carbon 143:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.008CrossRef

103.

Xu J, Zhang D (2017) Pressure-sensitive properties of emulsion modified graphene nanoplatelets/cement composites. Cem Concr Compos 84:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.025CrossRef

104.

Azizkhani MB, Kadkhodapour J, Rastgordani S, Anaraki AP, Shirkavand Hadavand B (2019) Highly sensitive, stretchable chopped carbon fiber/silicon rubber based sensors for human joint motion detection. Fibers Polym 20(1):35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-8662-0CrossRef

105.

Montazerian H, Dalili A, Milani AS, Hoorfar M (2019) Piezoresistive sensing in chopped carbon fiber embedded PDMS yarns. Compos B 164:648–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.090CrossRef

106.

Chung DDL (2020) Materials for electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Chem Phys 255:123587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123587CrossRef

107.

Hwang M, Kang L (2019) Analysis of important fabrication factors that determine the sensitivity of MWCNT/epoxy composite strain sensors. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 12(23):3875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12233875CrossRef

108.

Poudel A, Karode N, McGorry P, Walsh P, Lyons JG, Kennedy J, Matthews S, Coffey A (2019) Processing of nanocomposites using supercritical fluid assisted extrusion for stress/strain sensing applications. Compos B 165:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.098CrossRef

109.

Chung DDL (2005) Dispersion of short fibers in cement. J Mater Civ Eng 17(4):379–383. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561CrossRef

110.

Dong W, Li W, Tao Z, Wang K (2019) Piezoresistive properties of cement-based sensors: review and perspective. Constr Build Mater 203:146–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.081CrossRef

111.

Chung DDL (2002) Improving cement-based materials by using silica fume. J Mater Sci 37(4):673–682. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013889725971CrossRef

112.

Deng L, Ma Y, Hu J, Yin S, Ouyang X, Fu J, Liu A, Zhang Z (2019) Preparation and piezoresistive properties of carbon fiber-reinforced alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortar. Constr Build Mater 222:738–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.134CrossRef

113.

Zheng H, An W, Wu J, Zhao Z, Xiao S (2019) Piezoresistivity of polymer-matrix carbon fiber filament in plane stress state. Mater Res Express 6(8):85602 pp. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab1b7e

114.

Li W, Dong W, Shen L, Castel A, Shah SP (2020) Conductivity and piezoresistivity of nano-carbon black (NCB) enhanced functional cement-based sensors using polypropylene fibres. Mater Lett 270:127736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127736CrossRef

115.

Bai M, Zhai Y, Liu F, Wang Y, Luo S (2019) Stretchable graphene thin film enabled yarn sensors with tunable piezoresistivity for human motion monitoring. Sci Rep 9(1):18644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55262-zCrossRef

116.

Zhang H, Sun X, Hubbe M, Pal L (2019) Flexible and pressure-responsive sensors from cellulose fibers coated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl Electron Mater 1(7):1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.9b00182CrossRef

117.

Das S, Yokozeki T (2020) Polyaniline-based multifunctional glass fiber reinforced conductive composite for strain monitoring. Polym Test 87:106547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106547CrossRef

118.

Can-Ortiz A, Abot JL, Aviles F (2019) Electrical characterization of carbon-based fibers and their application for sensing relaxation-induced piezoresistivity in polymer composites. Carbon 145:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.108CrossRef

119.

Hao B, Ma Q, Yang S, Mader E, Ma P (2016) Comparative study on monitoring structural damage in fiber-reinforced polymers using glass fibers with carbon nanotubes and graphene coating. Compos Sci Technol 129:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.012CrossRef

120.

Fernberg P, Nilsson G, Joffe R (2009) Piezoresistive performance of long-fiber composites with carbon nanotube doped matrix. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 20(9):1017–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X08097387CrossRef

121.

Aly K, Li A, Bradford PD (2017) Compressive piezoresistive behavior of carbon nanotube sheets embedded in woven glass fiber reinforced composites. Compos B 116:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.002CrossRef

122.

Loyola BR, La SV, Loh KJ (2010) In situ strain monitoring of fiber-reinforced polymers using embedded piezoresistive nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45(24):6786–6798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4775-yCrossRef

123.

Tapeinos IG, Miaris A, Mitschang P, Alexopoulos ND (2012) Carbon nanotube-based polymer composites: a trade-off between manufacturing cost and mechanical performance. Compos Sci Technol 72(7):774–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.02.004CrossRef

124.

Dubey KA, Mondal RK, Kumar J, Melo JS, Bhardwaj YK (2020) Enhanced electromechanics of morphology-immobilized co-continuous polymer blend/carbon nanotube high-range piezoresistive sensor. Chem Eng J (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 389:124112 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124112

125.

Thaler D, Aliheidari N, Ameli A (2019) Mechanical, electrical, and piezoresistivity behaviors of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Smart Mater Struct 28(8):84004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab256eCrossRef

126.

Vicente J, Costa P, Lanceros-Mendez S, Abete JM, Iturrospe A (2019) Electromechanical properties of PVDF-based polymers reinforced with nanocarbonaceous fillers for pressure sensing applications. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 12(21):3545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213545CrossRef

127.

Thomas AJ, Kim JJ, Tallman TN, Bakis CE (2019) Damage detection in self-sensing composite tubes via electrical impedance tomography. Compos B 177:107276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107276CrossRef

128.

Dong W, Li W, Lu N, Qu F, Vessalas K, Sheng D (2019) Piezoresistive behaviours of cement-based sensor with carbon black subjected to various temperature and water content. Compos B 178:107488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107488CrossRef

129.

Jan R, Habib A, Khan ZM, Khan MB, Anas M, Nasir A, Nauman S (2017) Liquid exfoliated graphene smart layer for structural health monitoring of composites. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 28(12):1565–1574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X16672729CrossRef

130.

Tang Y, Guo Q, Chen Z, Zhang X, Lu C (2019) In-situ reduction of graphene oxide-wrapped porous polyurethane scaffolds: synergistic enhancement of mechanical properties and piezoresistivity. Compos A 116:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.10.025CrossRef

131.

Zheng Y, Li Y, Dai K, Liu M, Zhou K, Zheng G, Liu C, Shen C (2017) Conductive thermoplastic polyurethane composites with tunable piezoresistivity by modulating the filler dimensionality for flexible strain sensors. Compos A 101:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.003CrossRef

132.

Aguilar-Bolados H, Yazdani-Pedram M, Contreras-Cid A, Lopez-Manchado MA, May-Pat A, Aviles F (2017) Influence of the morphology of carbon nanostructures on the piezoresistivity of hybrid natural rubber nanocomposites. Compos B 109:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.057CrossRef

133.

Haghgoo M, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam MK, Ansari R (2020) A comprehensive evaluation of piezoresistive response and percolation behavior of multiscale polymer-based nanocomposites. Compos A 130:105735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105735CrossRef

134.

Maria Cruz A, Javier P (2020) Self-compacted concrete with self-protection and self-sensing functionality for energy infrastructures. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051106CrossRef

135.

Ke K, Sang Z (2020) Manas-Zloczower I (2020) Hybrid systems of three-dimensional carbon nanostructures with low dimensional fillers for piezoresistive sensors. Polym Compos 41(2):468–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25380CrossRef

136.

Chen L, Weng M, Zhou P, Huang F, Liu C, Fan S, Zhang W (2019) Graphene-based actuator with integrated-sensing function. Adv Funct Mater 29(5):1806057. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201806057CrossRef

137.

Tan W, Stallard JC, Smail FR, Boies AM, Fleck NA (2019) The mechanical and electrical properties of direct-spun carbon nanotube mat-epoxy composites. Carbon 150:489–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.118CrossRef

138.

Li M, Wang J, Wang S, Zuo T, Sun W, Gu Y, Zhang Z (2019) Effect of microstructure on the piezoresistive behavior of carbon nanotube composite film. Mater Res Express 6(2):025034/1–025034/10. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaee3eCrossRef

139.

Peng F, Chen K, Yildirim A, Xia X, Vogt BD, Cakmak MM (2019) Tunable piezoresistivity from magnetically aligned Ni(core)@Ag(shell) particles in an elastomer matrix. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(22):20360–20369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b04287CrossRef

140.

Paul SJ, Sharma I, Elizabeth I, Gahtori B, Titus SS, Chandra P, Gupta BK (2020) A comparative study of compressible and conductive vertically aligned carbon nanotube forest in different polymer matrixes for high-performance piezoresistive force sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(14):16946–16958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c01779CrossRef

141.

Ding S, Ruan Y, Yu X, Han B, Ni Y (2019) Self-monitoring of smart concrete column incorporating CNT/NCB composite fillers modified cementitious sensors. Constr Build Mater 201:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.203CrossRef

142.

Jeong C, Ko H, Kim H, Sun K, Kwon T, Jeong H, Park Y (2020) Bioinspired, high-sensitivity mechanical sensors realized with hexagonal microcolumnar arrays coated with ultrasonic-sprayed single-walled carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(16):18813–18822. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b23370CrossRef

143.

Wu Z, Wei J, Dong R, Chen H (2019) Epoxy composites with reduced graphene oxide-cellulose nanofiber hybrid filler and their application in concrete strain and crack monitoring. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 19(18):3963. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19183963CrossRef

144.

Shui X, Chung DDL (1996) Piezoresistive carbon filament polymer-matrix composite strain sensor. Smart Mater Struct 5:243–246. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/2/014CrossRef

145.

Guo C, Kondo Y, Takai C, Fuji M (2017) Piezoresistivities of vapor-grown carbon fiber/silicone foams for tactile sensor applications. Polym Int 66(3):418–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5275CrossRef

146.

Jambhulkar S, Xu W, Ravichandran D, Prakash J, Mada Kannan AN, Song K (2020) Scalable alignment and selective deposition of nanoparticles for multifunctional sensor applications. Nano Lett 20(5):3199–3206. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05245CrossRef

147.

Gong S, Zhu ZH (2014) On the mechanism of piezoresistivity of carbon nanotube polymer composites. Polymer 55(16):4136–4149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.024CrossRef

148.

Toprakci HAK, Kalanadhabhatla SK, Spontak RJ, Ghosh TK (2013) Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanofibers as soft printable sensors exhibiting strain-reversible piezoresistivity. Adv Funct Mater 23(44):5536–5542. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300034CrossRef

149.

Shi G, Zhao Z, Pai J, Lee I, Zhang L, Stevenson C, Ishara K, Zhang R, Zhu H, Ma J (2016) Highly sensitive, wearable, durable strain sensors, and stretchable conductors using graphene/silicon rubber composites. Adv Funct Mater 26(42):7614–7625. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201602619CrossRef

150.

Mahmood H, Dorigato A, Pegoretti A (2019) Temperature dependent strain/damage monitoring of glass/epoxy composites with graphene as a piezoresistive interphase. Fibers 7(2):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7020017CrossRef

151.

Wang L (2016) Pressure sensing material based on piezoresistivity of graphite sheet filled silicone rubber composite. Sens Actuators A 252:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2016.11.005CrossRef

152.

Zeng Z, Liu M, Xu H, Liu W, Liao Y, Jin H, Zhou L, Zhang Z, Su Z (2016) A coatable, light-weight, fast-response nanocomposite sensor for the in situ acquisition of dynamic elastic disturbance: from structural vibration to ultrasonic waves. Smart Mater Struct 25(6):065005/1–065005/12. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/6/065005CrossRef

153.

Wang L, Ding T, Wang P (2008) Effects of compression cycles and precompression pressure on the repeatability of piezoresistivity for carbon black-filled silicone rubber composite. J Polym Sci B 46(11):1050–1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.21438CrossRef

154.

Wang P, Ding T (2010) Conductivity and piezoresistivity of conductive carbon black filled polymer composite. J Appl Polym Sci 116(4):2035–2039. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.31693CrossRef

155.

Aviles F, Oliva-Aviles AI, Cen-Puc M (2018) Piezoresistivity, strain, and damage self-sensing of polymer composites filled with carbon nanostructures. Adv Eng Mater 20(7):1701159. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201701159CrossRef

156.

Namilae S, Li J, Chava S (2019) Improved piezoresistivity and damage detection application of hybrid carbon nanotube sheet-graphite platelet nanocomposites. Mech Adv Mater Struct 26(15):1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.1432812CrossRef

157.

Long Y, He P, Xu R, Hayasaka T, Shao Z, Zhong J, Lin L (2020) Molybdenum-carbide-graphene composites for paper-based strain and acoustic pressure sensors. Carbon 157:594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.083CrossRef

158.

Li M, Zuo T, Wang S, Gu Y, Gao L, Li Y, Zhang Z (2018) Piezoresistivity of resin-impregnated carbon nanotube film at high temperatures. Nanotechnology 29(36):365702/1–365702/12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aacc58CrossRef

159.

Xu S, Hu H, Ji L, Wang P (2019) Piezoresistive properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube/silicone rubber composites under cyclic loads with ac excitation. J. Phys. Conf Ser 1168:22075 pp. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/022075

160.

Wen S, Chung DDL (2007) Double percolation in the electrical conduction in carbon fiber reinforced cement-based materials. Carbon 45(2):263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.09.031CrossRef

161.

Li L, Chung DDL (1993) Effect of viscosity on the electrical properties of conducting thermoplastic composites made by compression molding of a powder mixture. Polym Compos 14(6):467–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750140604CrossRef

162.

Sang Z, Ke K, Manas-Zloczower I (2019) Elastomer composites with a tailored interface network toward tunable piezoresistivity: effect of elastomer particle size. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1(4):714–721. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00241CrossRef

163.

Sang Z, Guo H, Ke K, Manas-Zloczower I (2019) Effect of solvent on segregated network morphology in elastomer composites for tunable piezoresistivity. Macromol Mater Eng 304(9):1900278. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201900278CrossRef

164.

Cai J, Li J, Chen X, Wang M (2020) Multifunctional polydimethylsiloxane foam with multi-walled carbon nanotube and thermo-expandable microsphere for temperature sensing, microwave shielding and piezoresistive sensor. Chem Eng J (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 393:124805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124805CrossRef

165.

Feng D, Liu P, Wang Q (2019) Exploiting the piezoresistivity and EMI shielding of polyetherimide/carbon nanotube foams by tailoring their porous morphology and segregated CNT networks. Compos A 124:105463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.031CrossRef

166.

Yao Y, Luo J, Duan X, Liu T, Zhang Y, Liu B, Yu M (2019) On the piezoresistive behavior of carbon fibers: cantilever-based testing method and Maxwell–Garnett effective medium theory modeling. Carbon 141:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.043CrossRef

167.

Penev ES, Artyukhov VI, Yakobson BI (2015) Basic structural units in carbon fibers: atomistic models and tensile behavior. Carbon 85:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.067CrossRef

168.

Louis M, Joshi SP, Brockmann W (2001) An experimental investigation of through-thickness electrical resistivity of CFRP laminates. Compos Sci Technol 61:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00177-9CrossRef

169.

Sengupta D, Chen S, Michael A, Kwok CY, Lim S, Pei Y, Kottapalli Prakash AG (2020) Single and bundled carbon nanofibers as ultralightweight and flexible piezoresistive sensors. NPJ Flex Electron 4(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-020-0072-2CrossRef

170.

Zhao J, Wang G, Yang R, Lu X, Cheng M, He C, Xie G, Meng J, Shi D, Zhang G (2015) Tunable piezoresistivity of nanographene films for strain sensing. ACS Nano 9(2):1622–1629. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506341uCrossRef

171.

Manzeli S, Allain A, Ghadimi A, Kis A (2015) Piezoresistivity and strain-induced band gap tuning in atomically thin MoS₂. Nano Lett 15(8):5330–5335. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01689CrossRef

172.

Manzeli S, Dumcenco D, Migliato Marega G, Kis A (2019) Self-sensing, tunable monolayer MoS₂ nanoelectromechanical resonators. Nat Commun 10(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12795-1CrossRef

173.

Yang S, Zhang C, Chang X, Huang J, Yang Z, Yao J, Wang H, Ding G (2019) Effect of heat treatment atmosphere on the piezoresistivity of indium tin oxide ceramic strain sensor. Ceram Int 45(14):17048–17053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.256CrossRef

174.

Kwon H, Park Y, Kim C (2019) Strain sensing characteristics using piezoresistivity of semi-conductive silicon carbide fibers. Smart Mater Struct 28(10):105035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab3b2fCrossRef

175.

Nakata S, Uesugi A, Sugano K, Rossi F, Salviati G, Lugstein A, Isono Y (2019) Strain engineering of core-shell silicon carbide nanowires for mechanical and piezoresistive characterizations. Nanotechnology 30(26):265702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab0d5dCrossRef

176.

Xu X, Wang R, Nie P, Cheng Y, Lu X, Shi L, Sun J (2017) Copper nanowire-based aerogel with tunable pore structure and its application as flexible pressure sensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(16):14273–14280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b02087CrossRef

177.

Wu S, Zou M, Shi X, Yuan Y, Bai W, Ding M, Cao A (2019) Hydrophobic, structure-tunable Cu nanowire@graphene core-shell aerogels for piezoresistive pressure sensing. Adv Mater Technol (Weinheim, Germany) 4(10):1900470. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201900470CrossRef

178.

Ma Q, Hao B, Ma P (2020) Flexible sensor based on polymer nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotube foam derivated from cotton. Compos Sci Technol 192:108103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108103CrossRef

179.

Ran S, Glen TS, Li B, Zheng T, Choi I, Boles ST (2019) Mechanical properties and piezoresistivity of tellurium nanowires. J Phys Chem C 123(36):22578–22585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05597CrossRef

180.

Oliva AI, Ruiz-Tabasco L, Ojeda-Garcia J, Corona JE, Sosa V, Aviles F (2019) Effects of temperature and tensile strain on the electrical resistance of nanometric gold films. Mater Res Express 6(6):66407. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab0c43CrossRef

181.

Li Q, Luo S, Wang Q (2019) Piezoresistive thin film pressure sensor based on carbon nanotube-polyimide nanocomposites. Sens Actuators A 295:336–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.06.017CrossRef

182.

Jiang Y, Shen D, Liu M, Ma Z, Zhao P, Feng L, Zhang D (2019) Fabrication of graphene/polyimide nanocomposite-based hair-like airflow sensor via direct inkjet printing and electrical breakdown. Smart Mater Struct 28(6):65028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab18cbCrossRef

183.

Fu X, Al-Jumaily AM, Ramos M, Meshkinzar A, Huang X (2019) Stretchable and sensitive sensor based on carbon nanotubes/polymer composite with serpentine shapes via molding technique. J Biomater Sci 30(13):1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2019.1627649CrossRef

184.

Wang L, Nan M, Lei M, Ling Y, Lv D (2019) Space resolution improvement for pressure measurement by using a single conductive polymer composite sheet in area array. Sens Actuators A 295:324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.05.004CrossRef

185.

Maurizi M, Slavič J, Cianetti F, Jerman M, Valentinčič J, Lebar A, Boltežar M (2019) Dynamic measurements using FDM 3D-printed embedded strain sensors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 19(12):2661. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122661CrossRef

186.

Kim M, Jung J, Jung S, Moon YH, Kim D, Kim JH (2019) Piezoresistive behaviour of additively manufactured multi-walled carbon nanotube/thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 12(16):2613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162613CrossRef

187.

Bruot C, Palma JL, Xiang L, Mujica V, Ratner MA, Tao N (2015) Piezoresistivity in single DNA molecules. Nat Commun 6:8032. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9032CrossRef

188.

Fiorillo AS, Critello CD, Pullano SA (2018) Theory, technology and applications of piezoresistive sensors: a review. Sens Actuators A 281:156–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.07.006CrossRef

189.

Farcau C, Sangeetha NM, Moreira H, Viallet B, Grisolia J, Ciuculescu-Pradines D, Ressier L (2011) High-sensitivity strain gauge based on a single wire of gold nanoparticles fabricated by stop-and-go convective self-assembly. ACS Nano 5(9):7137–7143. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn201833yCrossRef

190.

Tanner JL, Mousadakos D, Giannakopoulos K, Skotadis E, Tsoukalas D (2012) High strain sensitivity controlled by the surface density of platinum nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 23(28):285501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/28/285501CrossRef

191.

Chung DDL (2017) Processing-structure-property relationships of continuous carbon fiber polymer–matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng R 113:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2017.01.002CrossRef

192.

Alamusi HN, Fukunaga H, Atobe S, Liu Y, Li J (2011) Piezoresistive strain sensors made from carbon nanotubes based polymer nanocomposites. Sensors 11:10691–10723. https://doi.org/10.3390/s111110691CrossRef

193.

Hu N, Karube Y, Arai M, Watanabe T, Yan C, Li Y, Liu Y, Fukunaga H (2010) Investigation on sensitivity of a polymer/carbon nanotube composite strain sensor. Carbon 48(3):680–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.012CrossRef

194.

Ding Y, Xu T, Onyilagha O, Fong H, Zhu Z (2019) Recent advances in flexible and wearable pressure sensors based on piezoresistive 3D monolithic conductive sponges. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(7):6685–6704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b20929CrossRef

195.

Yi W, Wang Y, Wang G, Tao X (2012) Investigation of carbon black/silicone elastomer/dimethylsilicone oil composites for flexible strain sensors. Polym Test 31(5):677–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.03.006CrossRef

196.

Kuwabara M, Matsuda H, Hamamoto K (1999) Giant piezoresistive effects in single grain boundaries of semiconducting barium titanate ceramics. J Electroceram 4(Supplement 1):99–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009958725603CrossRef

197.

Xi X, Chung DDL (2019) Capacitance-based self-sensing of flaws and stress in carbon-carbon composite, with reports of the electric permittivity, piezoelectricity and piezoresistivity. Carbon 146:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.062(Corrigendum to “Capacitance-based self-sensing of flaws and stress in carbon-carbon composite, with reports of the electric permittivity, piezoelectricity and piezoresistivity”. Carbon 158:545. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.023)CrossRef

198.

Meškinis S, Gudaitis R, Šlapikas K, Vasiliauskas A, Čiegis A, Tamulevičius T, Andrulevičius M, Tamulevičius S (2018) Giant negative piezoresistive effect in diamond-like carbon and diamond-like carbon-based nickel nanocomposite films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering of Ni target. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(18):15778–15785. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b17439CrossRef

199.

Xi X, Chung DDL (2020) Electret behavior of carbon fiber structural composites with carbon and polymer matrices, and its application in self-sensing and self-powering. Carbon 160:361–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.035CrossRef

200.

Niu M, Yao Y, Shi Y, Luo J, Duan X, Liu T, Guo X (2019) Multifunctional green sensor prepared by direct laser writing of modified wood component. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(24):10364–10372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00850CrossRef

201.

Ma B, Wang Y (2018) Fabrication of dense polymer-derived silicon carbonitride ceramic bulks by precursor infiltration and pyrolysis processes without losing piezoresistivity. J Am Ceram Soc 101(7):2752–2759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.15442CrossRef

202.

Xi X, Chung DDL (2020) Neutron-moderating graphite sensing its own strain by electrical resistance measurement. J Nucl Mater, submitted

203.

Xi X, Chung DDL (2019) Effect of nickel coating on the stress-dependent electric permittivity, piezoelectricity and piezoresistivity of carbon fiber, with relevance to stress self-sensing. Carbon 145:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.034CrossRef

204.

Xi X, Chung DDL (2019) Piezoelectric and piezoresistive behavior of unmodified carbon fiber. Carbon 145:452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.044CrossRef

205.

Wang X, Chung DDL (1997) Electromechanical behavior of carbon fiber. Carbon 35(5):706–709CrossRef

206.

Cao Y, Yang X, Zhao R, Chen Y, Li N, An L (2016) Giant piezoresistivity in polymer-derived amorphous SiAlCO ceramics. J Mater Sci 51(12):5646–5650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9866-yCrossRef

207.

Das Gupta T, Gacoin T, Rowe ACH (2014) Piezoresistive properties of Ag/silica nano-composite thin films close to the percolation threshold. Adv Funct Mater 24:4522–4527. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201303775CrossRef

208.

Terauds K, Sanchez-Jimenez PE, Raj R, Vakifahmetoglu C, Colombo P (2010) Giant piezoresistivity of polymer-derived ceramics at high temperatures. J Eur Ceram Soc 30(11):2203–2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.02.024CrossRef

209.

Fu X, Lu W, Chung DDL (1998) Ozone treatment of carbon fiber for reinforcing cement. Carbon 36(9):1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00115-8CrossRef

Titel: A critical review of piezoresistivity and its application in electrical-resistance-based strain sensing
verfasst von: D. D. L. Chung
Publikationsdatum: 10.08.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science / Ausgabe 32/2020
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05099-z

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 32/2020

Compressible sliver nanowires/polyurethane sponge metacomposites with weakly negative permittivity controlled by elastic deformation

Green synthesis of salt-tolerant gold nanoparticles for the rapid qualitative detection of Listeria monocytogenes in lateral flow immunoassay

1000 at 1000: The effect of electric field and pressure on the synthesis and consolidation of materials: a review of the spark plasma sintering method

Photo-induced synthesis of nanostructured Pt-on-Au/g-C3N4 composites for visible light photocatalytic hydrogen production

Assemble from 0D to 3D: anchored 0D molybdenum carbide on 3D octahedral amorphous carbon with excellent capacitive properties

Development of CNC-reinforced PBAT nanocomposites with reduced percolation threshold: a comparative study on the preparation method

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten