1 Introduction
1.1 Related work
-
Signal distortion approaches (SDA): These techniques change the OOFDM signal before it is sent, to reduce the PAPR. Some of these SDA are companding (Zhang et al. 2016), peak windowing (Abed et al. 2015), and clipping and filtering (Wang and Chen 2014; Xu et al. 2014); ; . In companding techniques, the OFDM signal is changed in a way that is not linear to lower the PAPR values. But this nonlinearity operation breaks the orthogonality of OFDM, which means that the system performance is degraded. The clipping and filtering technique is based on the idea that high signal peaks don't happen very often, so these peaks can be clipped, which distorts the signal. These techniques are easy to use, but on the other side, they cause clipping distortion, which degrades the system BER performance.
-
Multiple signaling and probabilistic approaches (MSP): These approaches create multiple alternative signals with identical information, and the signal with the lowest PAPR is chosen for transmission. The most common probabilistic approaches are partial transmit sequences (PTS) (Niwareeba et al. 2022), selected mapping (SLM) (Niwareeba et al. 2022; Li et al. 2020); ; , and tone-reservation (TR) (Arvola et al. 2022). Most of these approaches lead to data rate loss as they need extra side information and degrade bandwidth efficiency.
-
Precoding approaches (PA): it is one of the most basic strategies for reducing PAPR. However, these approaches need more bandwidth and add complexity overhead but the inverse precoding approach (IPA) overcomes this issue. In Abdulwali et al. (2022), Mathur et al. (2022), Wang and Hou (2014) a discrete Hartley transform (DHT), discrete sine transform (DST), discrete cosine transform (DCT), and Walsh Hadamard transform are suggested to reduce the PAPR. Also, in Ahmad et al. (2020) a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) is introduced to reduce the PAPR in their proposed optical modulation scheme. The authors of Sharifi (2019b) proposed precoding based on a Vandermonde-like matrix (VLM) to lower the high PAPR of DCO-OFDM and ACO-OFDM. The authors of Radi et al. (2011), investigated precoding based on discrete Fourier transform (DFT).
2 Research main contributions
-
The PE-ASCO OFDM has been proposed which consists of different PA such as DHT, DST, DCT, and VLM, this approach has resulted in lower PAPR and high spectral efficiency over earlier explored alternatives without any degradation in the system BER performance.
-
The difference between the main contribution of the manuscript and the previously published work is that the previously published work is focusing on the PAPR over the RF OFDM systems. Whereas the concurrent research is focusing on the OFDM over the VLC as a new carrier or new technology that may be the most promising technique in 6G networks. As in 6G, the data rate becomes hundreds of megabits per second so, the PAPR problem must be tackled by taking into consideration the VLC constraints. The other PAPR reduction techniques are studied and investigated the effect of bipolar data on the system whereas, in our system we have to modify the data stream in a unipolar shape to follow the VLC data transmission constraints, so the PAPR will be more degraded because the system will have only one-sided (positive) pulses so we will suffer a huge effect of high PAPR so we have to think about how could we deal with such performance degradation and the challenge that comes from the characteristics of VLC transmission environment. In addition, there is a required high data rate transmission so the authors proposed the PE-ASCO OFDM that is based on E-ASCO OFDM system which has a high data rate with good system BER performance compared to other published systems as will be illustrated in the manuscript. Moreover the proposed PE-ASCO OFDM compromise between such a high data rate and good system BER performance.
-
This work provides a comprehensive performance analysis for the proposed PE-ASCO OFDM in terms of PAPR and BER.
-
The analytical expression for PAPR and simulation results for the proposed PE-ASCO are explained and analyzed.
3 Conventional E-ASCO system model
4 PAPR and precoding reduction techniques (PRT)
4.1 PAPR in OOFDM
4.2 Precoding reduction techniques (PRT)
4.2.1 Discrete hartly transform (DHT)
4.2.2 Discrete cosine transform (DCT)
4.2.3 Vandermonde like matrix (VLM)
4.2.4 Discrete sine transform (DST)
5 The proposed precoding E-ASCO (PE-ASCO) OFDM system
Symbols | \({S}_{0}\) | \({S}_{1}\) | \({S}_{2}\) | \({S}_{3}\) | \({S}_{4}\) | \({S}_{5}\) | \({S}_{6}\) | \({S}_{7}\) | \({S}_{8}\) | \({S}_{9}\) | \({S}_{10}\) | \({S}_{11}\) | \({S}_{12}\) | \({S}_{13}\) | \({S}_{14}\) | \({S}_{15}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({x}_{odd i}(k)\) | 0 | X(1) | 0 | X(2) | 0 | X(3) | 0 | X(4) | 0 | X*(4) | 0 | X*(3) | 0 | X*(2) | 0 | X*(1) |
\({x}_{odd j}(k)\) | 0 | X(5) | 0 | X(6) | 0 | X(7) | 0 | X(8) | 0 | X*(8) | 0 | X*(7) | 0 | X*(6) | 0 | X*(5) |
\({x}_{even}(k)\) | 0 | 0 | \({X}_{9}\) | 0 | \({X}_{10}\) | 0 | \({X}_{11}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | \({{X}^{*}}_{11}\) | 0 | \({{X}^{*}}_{10}\) | 0 | \({{X}^{*}}_{9}\) | 0 |
6 Numerical results and analysis
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Number of OFDM symbols | 1000 |
Modulation techniques | 4,16,…,4096-QAM |
FFT size (N) | 1024 |
Cyclic prefix length | N/4 |
Channel model | AWGN channel |
Precoding techniques | DCT, DST, DHT, and VLM |
-
If \({Eb/No }_{diff}\) = 0, there is no degradation in the system BER performance.
-
If \({Eb/No }_{diff}\) > 0, the system BER performance improves because less energy is required to accomplish the same BER.
-
If \({Eb/No }_{diff}\) < 0, the system BER performance degrades because more energy is required to achieve the same BER.$$E_{b} /N_{{o{ }diff}} = E_{b} /N_{{o{\text{ conventional E}} - {\text{ASCO}}}} - E_{b} /N_{{o{\text{ PE}} - {\text{ASCO}}}}$$(24)
6.1 PAPR results
Parameters | \({PAPR}_{o}\)(dB) | \({PAPR}_{gain}\) (dB) |
---|---|---|
PE-ASCO using DHT | 14.15 | 1.35 |
PE-ASCO using DCT | 14.04 | 1.46 |
PE-ASCO using DST | 13.38 | 2.12 |
PE-ASCO using VLM | 13.33 | 2.17 |
6.2 BER results
Parameters | \(Eb/N0\) (dB) | Eb/N0diff (dB) |
---|---|---|
PE-ASCO using DHT | ~ 17.4 | 0 |
PE-ASCO using DCT | ~ 17.4 | 0 |
PE-ASCO using DST | ~ 17.4 | 0 |
PE-ASCO using VLM | ~ 17.4 | 0 |
7 Comparison with other published works
References | System model | IFFT size | Modulation order | \({\mathrm{PAPR}}_{\mathrm{ gain}} (\mathrm{dB})\) | \({Eb/N0 }_{diff}\) (dB) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sharifi (2019a) | WHT-precoding OOFDM | 256 | 16-QAM | 0.5 | ~ 0 |
DCT-precoding OOFDM | 1.4 | ||||
Sharifi (2019b) | WHT-DCO OFDM | 256 | 16-QAM | 0.54 | N/A |
DHT-DCO OFDM | 0.99 | ||||
VLM-DCO OFDM | 1.87 | ||||
WHT-ACO OFDM | 0.93 | ||||
DHT-ACO OFDM | 1.27 | ||||
Guan et al. (2017) | ESACO | 128 | 16-QAM | ~ 1.2 | 1 |
OFDMa | 64-QAM | 2 | |||
256-QAM | 3 | ||||
Taha et al. (2022) | OFDM-based VLC with DCT | 128 | 4-QAM | 1.4 | 0 |
Proposed techniques | PE-ASCO OFDM using DHT | 1024 | 16-QAM | 1.35 | ~ 0 |
PE-ASCO OFDM using DCT | 1.46 | ||||
PE-ASCO OFDM using DST | 2.12 | ||||
PE-ASCO OFDM using VLM | 2.17 |