Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Software Quality Journal
Erschienen in: Software Quality Journal 4/2010

01.12.2010

Architecture analysis of enterprise systems modifiability: a metamodel for software change cost estimation

verfasst von: Robert Lagerström, Pontus Johnson, Mathias Ekstedt

Erschienen in: Software Quality Journal | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Enterprise architecture models can be used in order to increase the general understanding of enterprise systems and specifically to perform various kinds of analysis. The present paper proposes a metamodel for enterprise systems modifiability analysis, i.e. assessing the cost of making changes to enterprise-wide systems. The enterprise architecture metamodel is formalized using probabilistic relational models, which enables the combination of regular entity-relationship modeling aspects with means to perform enterprise architecture analysis. The content of the presented metamodel is validated based on survey and workshop data and its estimation capability is tested with data from 21 software change projects. To illustrate the applicability of the metamodel an instantiated architectural model based on a software change project conducted at a large Nordic transportation company is detailed.
Vorheriger Artikel How to get mature global virtual teams: a framework to improve team process management in distributed software teams
Nächster Artikel Quality specification and metrication, results from a case-study in a mission-critical software domain

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Aggarwal, K., Singh, Y., & Chhabra, J. K. (2002). An integrated measure of software maintainability. In Proceedings of the annual IEEE reliability and maintainability symposium.
Aier, S., Buckl, S., Franke, U., Gleichauf, B., Johnson, P., Närman, P., Schweda, C., & Ullberg, J. (2009). A survival analysis of application life spans based on enterprise architecture models, enterprise modelling and information systems architectures. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop EMISA.
Allen, R. (1997). A formal approach to software architecture. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
April, A., & Abran, A. (2008). Software maintenance management. Hoboken, New Jersey: IEEE Computer Society/John Wiley & Sons.
Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (1998). Software architecture in practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman/Software Engineering Institute.
Bengtsson, P. O. (2002). Architecture-level modifiability analysis. PhD Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology.
Boehm, B. (1981). Software engineering economics. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.MATH
Boehm, B., Abts, C., & Chulani, S. (2000). Software development cost estimation approaches—a survey. Annals of Software Engineering, 10, 177–205.
Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38, 275–280.
Brinkkemper, S. (2000). Method-engineering with web-enabled methods. In Informations Systems engineering—State of the art and research themes (pp. 123–133). Berlin: Springer.
Chan, T., Chung, S. L., & Ho, T. H. (1996). An economic model to estimate software rewriting and replacement times. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22.
Chulani, S., Boehm, B., & Steece, B. (1999). Calibrating software cost models using bayesian analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 573–583.
Conte, S., Dunsmore, H., & Chen, V. (1985). Software effort estimation and productivity. New York: Academic Press Inc.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. (2007). DoD architecture framework, version 1.5. Technical Report, Department of Defense, USA.
Fenton, N. E., & Pfleger, S. L. (1997). Software metrics: A rigorous and practical approach. Boston, MA: PWS Publishing Company.
Fischer, R., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2007). Enterprise modelling and information systems architectures. A Federated Approach to Enterprise Architecture Model Maintenance, 2, 14–22.
Franke, U., Flores, W. R., & Johnson, P. (2009a). Enterprise architecture dependency analysis using fault trees and bayesian networks. In Proceedings of 42nd annual simulation symposium (ANSS) (pp. 209–216), http://​www.​scs.​org.
Franke, U., Höök, D., König, J., Lagerström, R., Närman, P., Ullberg, J., Gustafsson, P., & Ekstedt, M. (2009b). EAF2—a framework for categorizing enterprise architecture frameworks. In Proceedings of 10th ACIS international conference on software engineering, Artificial intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (pp. 327–332).
Friedman, N., Getoor, L., Koller, D., & Pfeffer, A. (1999). Learning probabilistic relational models. In Proceedings of the 16th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 1300–1309).
Granja-Alvarez, J. C., & Barranco-Garcia, M. J. (1997). A method for estimating maintenance cost in a software project: A case study. Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 9, 161–175.
Grubb, P., & Takang, A. (2003). Software maintenance: Concepts and practice. Singapore: World Scientific.MATHCrossRef
Gustafsson, P., Höök, D., Ericsson, E., & Lilliesköld, J. (2009). Analyzing it impacts on organizational structure. In Portland international center for management of engineering and technology Conference Proceedings.
Halstead, M. H. (1975). Toward a theoretical basis for estimating programming effort. In ACM 75: Proceedings of the 1975 annual conference (pp. 222–224). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Harrison, W., & Cook, C. (1990). Insights on improving the maintenance process through software measurement. In Proceedings of the IEEE software maintenance Conference.
Höök, D., Nordström, L., & Johnson, P. (2009). An enterprise architecture based method for quantified analysis of ict system impact on maintenance management. In ICOMS asset management conference proceedings.
IEEE Standards Board. (1990). IEEE standard glossary of software engineering technology. Technical Report, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
International Organization for Standardization. (2001). Software engineering–product quality–part 1: Quality model. International standard ISO/IEC TR 9126–1:2001(E), International Organization for Standardization.
International Organization for Standardization. (2003a). Software engineering–product quality–part 2: External metrics. International standard ISO/IEC TR 9126–2:2003(E), International Organization for Standardization.
International Organization for Standardization. (2003b). Software engineering–product quality–part 3: Internal metrics. International standard ISO/IEC TR 9126–3:2003(E), International Organization for Standardization.
Jarzabek, S. (2007). Effective software maintenance and evolution: A reuse-based approach. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications, Taylor & Francis Group.MATHCrossRef
Jensen, F. (2001). Bayesian networks and decision graphs. New York, Secaucus, NJ, USA: Springer.MATH
Johansson, E. (2005). Assessment of enterprise information security—How to make it credible and efficient. PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Johnson, P., & Ekstedt, M. (2007). Enterprise architecture—Models and analyses for information systems decision making. Studentlitteratur.
Johnson, P., Lagerström, R., Närman, P., & Simonsson, M. (2007). Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams. Information Systems Frontiers, 9.
Jürjens, J. (2005). Secure systems development with UML. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.MATH
Kan, S. (2003). Metrics and models in software quality engineering (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Kazman, R., Asundi, J., & Klein, M. (2001). Quantifying the costs and benefits of architectural decisions. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on software engineering (pp. 297–306).
Kazman, R., Klein, M., & Clements, P. (2000). ATAM: Method for architecture evaluation.
König, J., & Nordström, L. (2009). Assessing impact of ict system quality on operation of active distribution grids. In IEEE PowerTech.
Kurpjuweit, S., & Winter, R. (2007). Viewpoint-based meta model engineering. In Enterprise modelling and information systems architectures (EMISA 2007).
Lagerström, R. (2007). Analyzing system maintainability using enterprise architecture models. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3, 33–41.
Lagerström, R., Chenine, M., Johnson, P., & Franke, U. (2008). Probabilistic metamodel merging. In Proceedings of the Forum at the 20th international conference on advanced information systems (Vol. 344, pp. 25–28).
Lagerström, R., Franke, U., Johnson, P., & Ullberg, J. (2009a). A method for creating enterprise architecture metamodels—applied to systems modifiability analysis. The International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 6, 89–120.
Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., & Höök, D. (2009b). Architecture analysis of enterprise systems modifiability—models, analysis and validation. submitted to journal.
Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., Höök, D., & König, J. (2009c). Software change project cost estimation—a bayesian network and a method for expert elicitation. In the International Workshop on Software Quality and Maintainability Proceeding.
Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., & Närman, P. (2007). Extended influence diagram generation. In Interoperability for enterprise software and applications conference.
Lagerström, R., Saat, J., Franke, U., Aier, S., & Ekstedt, M. (2009d). Enterprise meta modeling methods—combining a stakeholder-oriented and a causality-based approach. In Enterprise, business-process and information systems modeling, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol 29, pp. 381–393), Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. ISSN 1865-1348.
Laird, L., & Brennan, C. (2006). Software measurement and estimation: A practical approach. Hoboken, New Jersey: IEEE Computer Society/John Wiley & Sons.
Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise architecture at work. Heidelberg: Springer.
Matinlassi, M., & Niemelä, E. (2003). The impact of maintainability on component-based software systems. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE EUROMICRO conference “New Waves in System Architecture”.
Matson, J., Barrett, B., & Mellichamp, J. (1994). Software development cost estimation using function points. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 20, 275–287.
Moløkken-Østvold, K., Haugen, N. C., & Benestad, H. C. (2008). Using planning poker for combining expert estimates in software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 81, 2106–2117. New York, NY, USA: Elsevier Science Inc.
Närman, P., Johnson, P., & Nordström, L. (2007). Enterprise architecture: A framework supporting system quality analysis. In Proceedings of the international annual enterprise distributed object computing Conference.
Neapolitan, R. (2003). Learning bayesian networks. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Oman, P., Hagemeister, J., & Ash, D. (1992). A definition and taxonomy for software maintainability. Technical Report, Software Engineering Lab.
Pigoski, T. (1997). Practical software maintenance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Putnam, L., & Myers, W. (2003). Five core metrics. New York: Dorset House Publishing.
Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Simonsson, M. (2008). Predicting IT governance performance: A method for model-based decision making. PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Smith, D. (1999). Designing maintainable software. Berlin: Springer.MATH
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2009). Architecture analysis and design language (aadl) standard. Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University.
Tekinerdogan, B. (2004). ASAAM: aspectual software architecture analysis method. In Proceedings of the fourth working IEEE/IFIP conference on software architecture (pp. 5–14). IEEE Computer Society.
The IT Governance Institute. (2007). Control objectives for information and related technology (COBIT) 4.1. Technical Report, The IT Governance Institute.
The Open Group. (2009). The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)—version 9. The Open Group.
Ullberg, J., Lagerström, R., & Johnson, P. (2008). A framework for service interoperability analysis using enterprise architecture models. IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.
Warner, R. (2008). Applied statistics—From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2007). Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3, 7–18.
Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26, 276–292. Riverton, NJ, USA.
Zuse, H. (1997). A framework of software measurement. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Metadaten
Titel
Architecture analysis of enterprise systems modifiability: a metamodel for software change cost estimation
verfasst von
Robert Lagerström
Pontus Johnson
Mathias Ekstedt
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2010
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Software Quality Journal / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0963-9314
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1367
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-010-9100-0

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise