Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5/2013

01.06.2013 | SOCIETAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries

verfasst von: Sandra Aparcana, Stefan Salhofer

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Informal recycling is one of the most significant activities within waste management systems in low-income countries. The main aspect of a number of recently implemented waste management systems has been to organise the informal recycling sector. The implementation of formalisation is expected to eliminate social problems related to the informal sector, but this has not been precisely measured and evaluated. A lack of methodology to assess social impacts persists, as does the comparison of different formalisation approaches. The goal of this work is to develop a methodological procedure for assessing the contribution of formalised recycling systems in low-income countries in terms of social impacts, in comparison with informal systems.

Methods

Some existing social assessment approaches were evaluated by a review of literature. This investigation focuses on the development of the social life cycle assessment approach, the analysed social aspects, proposed indicators and characterisation models within this framework.

Results and discussion

This study proposes an approach for the social assessment of recycling systems based on formalisation approaches in low-income countries oriented towards the social life cycle assessment methodology (sLCA). The approach developed considers 3 social impact categories, 9 social subcategories and 26 semi-quantitative indicators for the assessment of the social impacts on formalised recyclers. It includes a characterisation procedure that takes into consideration the application of a score system and the calculation of average scores at both the indicator and subcategory levels.

Conclusions

This research shows that it would be feasible to apply a sLCA-based methodology to evaluate recycling systems based on formalisation of the informal sector. The impact categories and subcategories identified represent the social problems of informal recyclers. The 26 semi-quantitative indicators and the proposed characterisation approach attempt to measure the social impacts that currently are only qualitatively assumed. The applicability and validation of the indicators and characterisation procedure will be determined by further research. The methodology developed will be tested using data from three recycling systems in Peruvian cities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Brouwer R, Van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21CrossRef Brouwer R, Van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cozzensa M, Gastal A, Kriebel D (2006) Minor psychiatric disorders among Brazilian rag pickers: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health 5(17):1–10 Cozzensa M, Gastal A, Kriebel D (2006) Minor psychiatric disorders among Brazilian rag pickers: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health 5(17):1–10
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRef Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259CrossRef Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gamarra P, Salhofer S (2007) A comparison of waste management in Peru and some Latin-American countries: an overview of major problems, characteristics and needs in the Region. In: Diaz L, Eggert L, Savage G (eds) Management of solid wastes in developing countries. CISA Publisher, Cagliari. ISBN 978 88 6265 000 7 Gamarra P, Salhofer S (2007) A comparison of waste management in Peru and some Latin-American countries: an overview of major problems, characteristics and needs in the Region. In: Diaz L, Eggert L, Savage G (eds) Management of solid wastes in developing countries. CISA Publisher, Cagliari. ISBN 978 88 6265 000 7
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–113CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–113CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kijak R, Moy D (2004) A decision support framework for sustainable waste management. J Ind Ecol 8(3):33–50CrossRef Kijak R, Moy D (2004) A decision support framework for sustainable waste management. J Ind Ecol 8(3):33–50CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klöpffer W, Ciroth A (2011) Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? Answer to a letter to the editor. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:99–101CrossRef Klöpffer W, Ciroth A (2011) Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? Answer to a letter to the editor. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:99–101CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klang K, Vikman P, Brattebø H (2003) Sustainable management of demolition waste—an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resour Conserv Recy 38:317–334CrossRef Klang K, Vikman P, Brattebø H (2003) Sustainable management of demolition waste—an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resour Conserv Recy 38:317–334CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Medina M (2000) Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America. Resour Conserv Recy 31:51–89CrossRef Medina M (2000) Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America. Resour Conserv Recy 31:51–89CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60:498–508CrossRef Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60:498–508CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pimentel H, Countinho C (2005) Economic viability study of a separate household waste collection in a developing country. J Mater Cycles Waste 7:116–123CrossRef Pimentel H, Countinho C (2005) Economic viability study of a separate household waste collection in a developing country. J Mater Cycles Waste 7:116–123CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rathi S (2006) Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Waste Manag 26:1192–1200CrossRef Rathi S (2006) Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Waste Manag 26:1192–1200CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson D, Velis C, Cheeseman C (2006) Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat Int 30:797–808CrossRef Wilson D, Velis C, Cheeseman C (2006) Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat Int 30:797–808CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson D, Araba A, Chinwah K, Cheeseman C (2009) Building recycling rates through the informal sector. Waste Manag 29:629–635CrossRef Wilson D, Araba A, Chinwah K, Cheeseman C (2009) Building recycling rates through the informal sector. Waste Manag 29:629–635CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries
verfasst von
Sandra Aparcana
Stefan Salhofer
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0546-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe