nach oben

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Erschienen in:

06.07.2020

Talking about group (but not individual) process aids group performance

verfasst von: Deanna Kuhn, Noel Capon, Hueiyi Lai

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The discourse of small groups of 3–4 adults enrolled in a graduate business course was audio-recorded as they participated in a computer-supported simulation in which the group represented a firm and worked over a series of eight sessions in making a series of decisions. Discourse transcripts were analyzed using a coding scheme that classified utterances expressed during group interaction as types of topic-talk (constituting a part of the activity itself) vs. meta-talk (reflecting on the activity). Supporting our hypothesis regarding the importance of meta-level discourse about group process in a group’s achieving coordinated action and a successful outcome, analysis suggested that discourse about the group’s process, but not discourse about individuals’ actions, was associated with superior group outcomes.

Vorheriger Artikel Regulating self-organized collaborative learning: the importance of homogeneous problem perception, immediacy and intensity of strategy use

Nächster Artikel Does collaborative learning design align with enactment? An innovative method of evaluating the alignment in the CSCL context

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Duhigg, C. (2016). Smarter faster better: The transformative power of real productivity. New York: Random House.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.CrossRef

Goldstone, R. L., Roberts, M. E., & Gureckis, T. M. (2008). Emergent processes in group behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 10–15.CrossRef

Graesser, A., Fiore, S., Greiff, S., et al. (2018). Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244.

Hogan, M., Dwyer, C., Harney, O., Noone, C., & Conway, R. (2016). Metacognitive skill development and applied systems science: A framework of metacognitive skills, self-regulatory functions and real-world applications. In A. Pena-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundamentals, applications, and trends (pp. 75–106). New York: Springer.

Jacobson, M., Kapur, M., & Reimann, P. (2016). Conceptualizing debates in learning and educational research: Toward a complex systems conceptual framework of learning. Educational Psychologist, 51, 210–218.CrossRef

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51.CrossRef

Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.CrossRef

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.CrossRef

Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44, 46–53.CrossRef

Kuhn, D. (2019). Why is reconciling divergent views a challenge? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 27–32.CrossRef

Kuhn, D., & Modrek, A. (2018). Do reasoning limitations undermine discourse? Thinking and Reasoning, 24, 97–116.CrossRef

Kuhn, D., Ramsey, S., & Arvidsson, T. S. (2015). Developing multivariable thinkers. Cognitive Development, 35, 92–110.CrossRef

Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition & Instruction, 31, 456–496.CrossRef

Macagno, F. (2016). Argument relevance and structure: Assessing and developing students’ uses of evidence. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 180–194.CrossRef

Morris, M., Savani, K., & Fincher, K. (2019). Metacognition fosters cultural learning: Evidence from individual differences and situational prompts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 48–68.CrossRef

Osiurak, F., & Reynaud, S. (2019). The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/SO140525X19003236.

Pease, M., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem-based learning. Science Education, 95, 57–86.CrossRef

Pifarre, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 237–253.

Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 483–520.CrossRef

Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4), 186–193.CrossRef

Siqin, T., van Aalst, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2015). Fixed group and opportunistic collaboration in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 161–181.

Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P., Janssen, J., & Jaspers, J. (2012). Successfully carrying out complex learning-tasks through guiding teams' qualitative and quantitative reasoning. Instructional Science, 40, 623–643.CrossRef

Sloman, S., & Rabb, N. (2019). Thought as a determinant of political opinion. Cognition, 188, 1–7.CrossRef

Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I. et al. (2017) Socio-Cognitive Scaffolding with Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 477–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7

Yoon, S., Park, M., & Anderson, E. (2018). Identifying reflective and non-reflective group consensus strategies for evidence-based scientific argumentation. London: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences.

Titel: Talking about group (but not individual) process aids group performance
verfasst von: Deanna Kuhn
Noel Capon
Hueiyi Lai
Publikationsdatum: 06.07.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1556-1607
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-1615
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09321-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Advocating for group interaction in the age of COVID-19

Does collaborative learning design align with enactment? An innovative method of evaluating the alignment in the CSCL context

Capturing the participation and social dimensions of computer-supported collaborative learning through social network analysis: which method and measures matter?

Regulating self-organized collaborative learning: the importance of homogeneous problem perception, immediacy and intensity of strategy use

Premium Partner