Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 3/2014

01.05.2014 | Review Article

Surgical process modelling: a review

verfasst von: Florent Lalys, Pierre Jannin

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Surgery is continuously subject to technological and medical innovations that are transforming daily surgical routines. In order to gain a better understanding and description of surgeries, the field of surgical process modelling (SPM) has recently emerged. The challenge is to support surgery through the quantitative analysis and understanding of operating room activities. Related surgical process models can then be introduced into a new generation of computer-assisted surgery systems.

Methods

In this paper, we present a review of the literature dealing with SPM. This methodological review was obtained from a search using Google Scholar on the specific keywords: “surgical process analysis”, “surgical process model” and “surgical workflow analysis”.

Results

This paper gives an overview of current approaches in the field that study the procedural aspects of surgery. We propose a classification of the domain that helps to summarise and describe the most important components of each paper we have reviewed, i.e., acquisition, modelling, analysis, application and validation/evaluation. These five aspects are presented independently along with an exhaustive list of their possible instantiations taken from the studied publications.

Conclusion

This review allows a greater understanding of the SPM field to be gained and introduces future related prospects.
Vorheriger Artikel An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants with integrated force sensing capability

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Cleary K, Chung HY, Mun SK (2005) OR 2020: the operating room of the future. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 15(5):495–500CrossRef
2.
Rattner WD, Park A (2003) Advanced devices for the operating room of the future. Semin Laparosc Surg 10(2):85–88PubMed
3.
Satava RM, Carrico CJ (1996) Advanced simulation technologies for surgical education. Bull Am College Surg 81(7):71–77
4.
Taylor C, Draney MT, Ku JP, Parker D, Steele BN, Wang K, Zarins CK (1999) Predictive medicine: computational techniques in therapeutic decision making. Comput Aid Surg 4:231–247CrossRef
5.
MacKenzie CL, Ibbotson AJ, Cao CGL, Lomax A (2001) Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 10(3):121–128CrossRef
6.
Jannin P, Raimbault M, Morandi X, Seigneuret E, Gibaud B (2001) Design of a neurosurgical gestures model for multimodal image guided surgery. Comput Assisted Radiol Surg 1230:102–107
7.
Münchenberg J, Brief J, Raczkowsky J, Wörn H, Hassfeld S, Mühling J (2000) Operation planning of robot supported surgical interventions. Int Conf Intell Robots Syst 1:547–552
8.
Jannin P, Raimbault M, Morandi X, Riffaud L, Gibaud B (2003) Model of surgical procedures for multimodal image-guided neurosurgery. Computer Aided Surg 8(2):98–106CrossRef
9.
Jannin P, Morandi X (2007) Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery. Neuroimage 37(3):783–791PubMedCrossRef
10.
Neumuth T, Trantakis C, Eckhardt F, Dengl M, Meixensberger J, Burgert O (2007) Supporting the analysis of inter-vention courses with surgical process models on the example of fourteen microsurgical lumbar discectomies. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2(1):436–438
11.
Cao CGL, MacKenzie CL, Payandeh S (1996) Task and motion analysis in endoscopic surgery. In: ASME dynamic systems, 5th annual symposium on haptic interface for virtual environment and teleoperation
12.
Ibbotson JA, MacKenzie CL, Cao CG, Lomax AJ (1999) Gaze patterns in laparoscopic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 7:154–160
13.
Lo B, Darzi A, Yang G (2003) Episode classification for the analysis of tissue-instrument interaction with multiple visual cues. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 1:231–237
14.
Lin HC, Shafran I, Yuh D, Hager GD (2006) Towards automatic skill evaluation: detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions. Computer Aided Surg 11(5):220–230CrossRef
15.
Bhatia B, Oates T, Xiao Y, Hu P (2007) Real-time identification of operating room state from video. AAAI 2:1761–1766
16.
Hu P, Ho D, MacKenzie CF, Hu H, Martz D, Jacobs J, Voit R, Xiao Y (2006) Advanced Visualization platform for surgical operating room coordination. Distributed video board system. Surg Innov 13(2):129–135
17.
Sandberg WS, Daily B, Egan MT, Stahl JE, Goldman JM, Wiklund RA, Rattner D (2005) Deliberate perioperative systems design improves operating room throughput. Anesthesiology 103:406–418PubMedCrossRef
18.
Xiao Y, Hu P, Hu H, Ho D, Dexter F, Mackenzie CF, Seagull FJ (2005) An algorithm for processing vital sign monitoring data to remotely identify operating room occupancy in real-time. Anesth Analg 101(3):32–823CrossRef
19.
Ahmadi A, Sielhorst T, Stauder R, Horn M, Feussner H, Navab N (2006) Recovery of surgical workflow without explicit models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9(1):420–428PubMed
20.
James A, Vieira D, Lo BPL, Darzi A, Yang GZ (2007) Eye-gaze driven surgical workflow segmentation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 10(2):110–117PubMed
21.
Katic D, Sudra G, Speidel S, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Eggers G, Dillman R (2010) Knowledge-based situation interpretation for context-aware augmented reality in dental implant surgery. Med Imaging Augment Real 6326:531–540
22.
Klank U, Padoy N, Feussner H, Navab N (2008) Automatic feature generation in endoscopic images. Int J Comput Assisted Radiol Surg 3(3,4):331–339
23.
Lalys F, Riffaud L, Bouget D, Jannin P (2012) A framework for the recognition of high-level surgical tasks from video images for cataract surgeries. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(4):966–976
24.
Nara A, Izumi K, Iseki H, Suzuki T, Nambu K, Sakurai Y (2011) Surgical workflow monitoring based on trajectory data mining. New Frontiers Artif Intell 6797:283–291CrossRef
25.
Padoy N, Horn M, Feussner H, Berger M, Navab N (2007) Recovery of surgical workflow: a model-based approach. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2(1):481–482
26.
Padoy N, Blum T, Feuner H, Berger MO, Navab N (2008) On-line recognition of surgical activity for monitoring in the operating room. Conf Inno App Art Intell 3:1718–1724
27.
Padoy N, Blum T, Ahmadi SA, Feussner H, Berger MO, Navab N (2010) Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow. Med Image Anal 16(3):632–641PubMedCrossRef
28.
Qi J, Jiang Z, Zhang G, Miao R, Su Q (2006) A surgical management information system driven by workflow. IEEE Conf Serv Oper Logist Inf 1014–1018
29.
Suzuki T, Yoshimitsu K, Tamura M, Muragaki Y, Iseki H (2012) Video information management system for information guided neurosurgery. Computer Aided Surg 3(3):75–82CrossRef
30.
Thiemjarus S, James A, Yang GZ (2012) An eye-hand data fusion framework for pervasive sensing of surgical activities. Pattern Recognit 45(8):2855–2867CrossRef
31.
Blum T, Padoy N, Feussner H, Navab N (2008) Workflow mining for visualization and analysis of surgeries. Int J Comput Assisted Radiol Surg 3(5):379–386CrossRef
32.
Bouarfa L, Jonker PP, Dankelman J (2011) Discovery of high-level tasks in the operating room. J Biomed Inform 44(3): 455–462
33.
Fischer M, Strauss G, Burgert O, Dietz A, Trantakis C, Meixensberger J, Lemke HU (2005) ENT-surgical workflow as an instrument to assess the efficiency of technological developments in medicine. Comput Assisted Radiol Surg 1281:851–855
34.
Ko SY, Kim J, Lee WJ, Kwon DS (2007) Surgery task model for intelligent interaction between surgeon and laparoscopic assistant robot. J Robot Mechatron 8(1):38–46
35.
Lemke HU, Trantakis C, Köchy K, Müller A, Strauss G, Meixensberger J (2004) Workflow analysis for mechatronic and imaging assistance in head surgery. Int Congress Ser 1268:830–835CrossRef
36.
Malarme P, Wikler D, Warzée N (2011) Intraoperative capture of surgical workflow. Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6:S146–S147
37.
Ahmadi A, Padoy N, Rybachuk K, Feussner H, Heining SM, Navab N (2009) Motif discovery in OR sensor data with application to surgical workflow analysis and activity detection. M2CAI workshop, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv
38.
Nomm S, Petlenkov E, Vain J, Belikov J, Miyawaki F, Yoshimitsu K (2008) Recognition of the surgeon’s motions during endoscopic operation by statistics based algorithm and neural networks based ANARX models. Proc Int Fed Automatic Control 17(1)
39.
Burgert O, Neumuth T, Lempp F, Mudunuri R, Meixensberger J, Strauß G, Dietz A, Jannin P, Lemke HU (2006) Linking top-level ontologies and surgical workflows. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(1):437–438
40.
Yoshimitsu K, Masamune K, Iseki H, Fukui Y, Hashimoto D, Miyawaki F (2010) Development of scrub nurse robot (SNR) systems for endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. Micro NanoMechatron Hum Sci 83–88
41.
Speidel S, Sudra G, Senemaud J, Drentschew M, Müller-Stich BP, Gun C, Dillmann R (2008) Recognition of risk situations based on endoscopic instrument tracking and knowledge based situation modeling. Progress Biomed Optics Imaging 9(1):35
42.
Sudra G, Speidel S, Fritz D, Möller-Stich BP, Gutt C, Dillmann R (2007) MEDIASSIST: MEDIcal ASSITance for intraoperative skill transfer in minimally invasive surgery using augmented reality. Progress Biomed Optics Imaging 8(2)
43.
Meng F, D’Avolio LW, Chen AA, Taira RK, Kangarloo H (2005) Generating models of surgical procedures using UMLS concepts and multiple sequence alignment. Am Med Inform Assoc Annu Symp Proc 520–524
44.
Neumuth T, Durstewitz N, Fischer M, Strauss G, Dietz A, Meixensberger J, Jannin P, Cleary K, Lemke HU, Burgert O (2006) Structured recording of intraoperative surgical workflows. SPIE Med Imaging PACS Surg 6145:61450A
45.
Agarwal S, Joshi A, Finin T, Yesha Y, Ganous T (2007) A pervasive computing system for the operating room of the future. Mobile Netw Appl 12(2,3):215–228CrossRef
46.
Forestier G, Lalys F, Riffaud L, Trelhu B, Jannin P (2012) Classification of surgical processes using dynamic time warping. J Biomed Inform 45:255–264
47.
Neumuth T, Schumann S, Strauss G, Jannin P, Meixensberger J, Dietz A, Lemke HU, Burgert O (2006) Visualization options for surgical workflows. Int J Comput Assisted Radiol Surg 1(1):438–440
48.
Neumuth T, Jannin P, Strauss G, Meixensberger J, Burgert O (2008) Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(1):72–82PubMedCrossRef
49.
Neumuth T, Loebe F, Jannin P (2012) Similarity metrics for surgical process models. Artif Intell Med 54(1):15–27PubMedCrossRef
50.
Neumuth T, Liebmann P, Wiedemann P, Meixensberger J (2012) Surgical workflow management schemata for cataract procedures. Process Model-based design and validation of workflow schemata. Methods Inf Med 51(4)
51.
Riffaud L (2010) Recording of surgical processes: a study comparing senior and junior neurosurgeons during lumbar disc herniation surgery. Neurosurgery. 67(2):325–332PubMed
52.
Kragic D, Hager G (2003) Task modelling and specification for modular sensory based human-machine cooperative systems. Int Conf Intell Robots Syst 3:3192–3197
53.
Haro BB, Zapella L, Vidal R (2012) Surgical gesture classification from video data. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 7510:34–41
54.
Lalys F, Bouget D, Riffaud L, Jannin P (2012) Automatic knowledge-based recognition of low-level tasks in opthalmological procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(1):39–49
55.
Miyawaki F, Masamune K, Suzuki S, Yoshimitsu K, Vain J (2005) Scrub nurse and timed-automata-based model for surgery. IEEE Ind Electron Trans 5(52):1227–1235CrossRef
56.
Neumuth T, Meissner C (2012) Online recognition of surgical instruments by information fusion. Int J Comput Assisted Radiol Surg 7(2):297–304
57.
Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Zornow MH, Paulus MP, Gaba DM, Dallen LT (1994) An objective methodology for task analysis and workload assessment in anesthesia providers. Anesthesiology 80(1):77–92PubMedCrossRef
58.
Reiley CE, Lin HC, Yuh DD, Hager GD (2011) Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation. Surg Endosc 25(2):356–366PubMedCrossRef
59.
Rosen J, Hannaford B, Sinanan M, Solazzo M (2001) Objective evaluation of laparoscopic surgical skills using hidden Markov models based on haptic information and tool/tissue interactions. Stud Health Technol Inform 81:417–423PubMed
60.
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N (2006) Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 193(2):140–149CrossRef
61.
62.
Dexter F, Epstein RH, Traub RD, Xiao Y (2004) Making management decisions on the day of surgery based on operating room efficiency and patient waiting times. Anesthesiology 101(6):1444–1453PubMedCrossRef
63.
Dexter F, Epstein RH, Lee JD, Ledolter J (2009) Automatic updating of times remaining in surgical cases using Bayesian analysis of historical case duration data and instant messaging updates from anesthesia providers. Anesth Analg 108:929–940PubMedCrossRef
64.
65.
Jannin P, Grova C, Maurer CR (2006) Model for defining and reporting reference-based validation protocols in medical image processing. Int J Comput Assist Interv 1(2):1001–1115
66.
Den Boer KT, de Wit LT, Davids PHP, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (2001) Analysis of the quality and efficiency of learning laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 15:497–503CrossRef
67.
Sjoerdsma W, Meijer D, Jansen A, den Boer KT, Grimbergen CA (2000) Comparison of efficiencies of three techniques for colon surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 10(1):47–53CrossRef
68.
69.
Bann MS (2003) Measurement of surgical dexterity using motion analysis of simple bench skills. World J Surg 27:390–394PubMedCrossRef
70.
Dosis A, Bello F, Moorthy K, Munz Y, Gillies D, Darzi A (2004) Real-time synchronization of kinematic and video data for the comprehensive assessment of surgical skills. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:82–88PubMed
71.
Mehta NY, Haluck RS, Frecker MI, Snyder AJ (2002) Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 16(2):280–285PubMedCrossRef
72.
Malik R, White P, Macewen C (2003) Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28:456–460PubMedCrossRef
73.
Claus GP, Sjoerdsma W, Jansen A, Grimbergen CA (1995) Quantitative standardised analysis of advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3:210–213PubMed
74.
Payandeh S, Lomax AJ, Dill J, Mackenzie CL, Cao CGL (2002) On defining metrics for assessing laparoscopic surgical skills in a virtual training environment. Stud Health Technol Inform 85:334–340PubMed
75.
Hager G, Vagvolgyi B, Yuh D (2007) Stereoscopic video overlay with deformable registration. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality
76.
Rosen J, Solazzo M, Hannaford B, Sinanan M (2002) Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents’ learning curve using hidden markov model. Comput Aided Surg 7(1):49–61PubMedCrossRef
77.
Rosen J, Brown JD, Chang L, Sinanan M, Hannaford B (2006) Generalized approach for modeling minimally invasive surgery as a stochastic process using a discrete Markov model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(1):399–413PubMedCrossRef
78.
Voros S, Hager GD (2008) Towards “real-time” tool-tissue interaction detection in robotically assisted laparoscopy. Int Conf IEEE Biomed Robot Biomechat. 562–567
79.
Radrich H (2008) Vision-based motion monitoring trough data fusion from a chirurgical multi-camera recording system. Diploma thesis, TUM, Munich
80.
Radrich H, Padoy N, Ahmadi A, Feussner H, Hager G, Burschka D, Knoll A (2009) Synchronized multimodal recording system for laparoscopic minimally invasive surgeries. M2CAI workshop, Med Image Comput Comput Interv
81.
Sielhorst T, Blum T, Navab N (2005) Synchronizing 3d movements for quantitative comparison and simultaneous visualization of actions. Int Symp Mix Augm Real 38–47
82.
Speidel S, Benzko J, Krappe S, Sudra G, Azad P, Müller-Stich BP, Gutt C, Dillmann R (2009) Automatic classification of minimally invasive instruments based on endoscopic image sequences. Progress Biomed Optics Imaging 10(1):37
83.
Winter A, Brigl B, Wendt T (2003) Modeling hospital information systems (Part 1): the revised three-layer graph-based meta model 3LGM2. Method Inf Med 42(5):544–551
84.
Wendt T, Häber A, Brigl B, Winter A (2003) Modeling hospital information systems (Part 2): using the 3LMG2 tool for modelling patient, record management. Methods Inf Med 43(3):256–267
85.
Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH (2006) Facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13(3):277–288
86.
Maruster L, van der Aalst W, Weijters T, van den Bosch A, Daelemans W (2001) Automatic discovery of workflows models from hospital data. BNAIC 183–190
87.
Sanchez D, Tentori M, Favela J (2008) Activity recognition for the smart hospital. IEEE Intell Syst 23(2):50–77
88.
Favela J, Tentori M, Castro LA, Moran EB, Martinez-Garcia AI (2007) Activity recognition for context-aware hospital applications: issues and opportunities for the deployment of pervasive networks. Mobile Netw Appl 12(2,3):155–171CrossRef
89.
Riley R, Manias E (2005) Governing time in operating rooms. J Clin Nurs 15(5):53–546
90.
Archer T, Macario A (2006) The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19:171–176PubMedCrossRef
91.
Houliston BR, Parry DT, Merry AF (2011) TADAA: towards automated detection of anaesthetic activity. Methods Inform Med 50(5):464–471CrossRef
92.
Seim AR, Meyer M, Sandberg WS (2005) Does parallel workflow impact anaesthesia quality. In: Am Med Inform Assoc Annu Symp Proc, 1053
93.
Schleppers A, Bender H (2003) Optimised workflow and organisation—from the point of view of an anaesthesiolo-g department. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 12(6):278–283PubMedCrossRef
94.
Decker K, Bauer M (2003) Ergonomics in the operating room. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 12(6):268–277PubMedCrossRef
95.
Gehbard F, Brinkmann A (2006) Management of an operating room in a university hospital. Zentralbl Chir. 131(4):341–346CrossRef
96.
Epstein RH, Dexter F (2012) Mediated interruptions of anaesthesia providers using predictions of workload from anaesthesia information management system data. Anaesth Intensive Care 40:803–812PubMed
97.
Tiwari V, Dexter F, Rothman BS, Ehrenfeld JM, Epstein RH (2013) Explanation for the near-contant mean time remaining in surgical cases exceeding their estimated duration, necessary for appropriate display on electronic white boards. Anesth Analg 117(2):487–493PubMedCrossRef
98.
Edwards FH, Peterson RF, Bridges C, Ceithaml EL (1995) 1988: Use of a Bayesian statistical model for risk assessment in coronary artery surgery. Updated in 1995. Ann Thorac Surg 59(6):1611–1612PubMedCrossRef
99.
Biagioli B, Scolletta S, Cevenini G, Barbini E, Giomarelli P, Barbini P (2006) A multivariate Bayesian model for assessing morbidity after coronary artery surgery. Crit Care 10(3):R94PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
100.
Verduijn M, Rosseel PM, Peek N, de Jonge E, de Mol BA (2007) Prognostic Bayesian networks II: an application in the domain of cardiac surgery. J Biomed Inform 40(6):619–649PubMedCrossRef
101.
Kuhan G, Marshall EC, Abidia AF, Chetter IC, McCollum PT (2002) A Bayesian hierarchical approach to comparative audit for carotid surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24(6):505–515PubMedCrossRef
102.
103.
Jalote-Parmar A, van Alfen M, Hermans JJ (2008) Workflow driven user interface for radiological system: A human factors approach. Comput Assisted Radiol Surg
104.
Morineau T, Morandi X, Le Moëllic N, Diabira S, Haegelen C, Hénaux PL, Jannin P (2009) Decision making during preoperative surgical planning. Hum factors 51(1):66–77CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical process modelling: a review
verfasst von
Florent Lalys
Pierre Jannin
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0940-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Quantification of changes in language-related brain areas in autism spectrum disorders using large-scale network analysis

Original Article

Co-registration of intra-operative brain surface photographs and pre-operative MR images

Original Article

Four-dimensional radiotherapeutic dose calculation using biomechanical respiratory motion description

Original Article

An automated insertion tool for cochlear implants with integrated force sensing capability

Original Article

Impact of model-based risk analysis for liver surgery planning

Editorial

Medical image computing and image-based simulation: recent developments and advances in Germany

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise