Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
NanoEthics
Erschienen in: NanoEthics 2/2007

01.08.2007

The Laboratory Revisited

Academic Science and the Responsible Development of Nanotechnology

verfasst von: Robert Doubleday

Erschienen in: NanoEthics | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

UK science policy now includes ‘upstream public engagement’ as an element in the responsible development of nanotechnology. This paper explores different understandings of the term upstream engagement before discussing in more detail a laboratory-based collaboration between social science and nanoscience aimed at exploring the social dimensions of nanotechnology. The paper concludes that concern with defining what counts as ‘upstream’ can obscure more critical questions about how to make public, and therefore accountable, deliberations about the interrelated social and technical aspects of nanoscience.
Vorheriger Artikel Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
In support of this claim the Demos pamphlet cites: Kay, L.E. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life? A history of the genetic code. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
 
2
Mark Welland interviewed by Matthew Kearns and Robert Doubleday, 1 October 2004.
 
Literatur
1.
Royal Society & RAE (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Royal Society and RAE, London
2.
Macnaghten P, Kearnes M, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27:1–24CrossRef
3.
Doubleday R (2007) Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9:211–227CrossRef
4.
Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton
5.
Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: coming to terms with ‘new’ scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci 36:299–320CrossRef
6.
Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London
7.
Wilsdon J, Wynne B, Stilgoe J (2005) The public value of science: or how to ensure that science really matters. Demos, London
8.
Wynne B (2006) Afterword. In: Kearnes M, Macnaghten P, Wilsdon J (eds) Governing at the nanoscale: people, policies and emerging technologies. Demos, London, pp 70–78
9.
DTI (2005) Response to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering report: “Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties”. HM Government, London
10.
Jackson R, Barbagallo F, Haste H (2005) Strengths of public dialogue on science-related issues. Crit Rev Int Soc Polit Philos 8:349–358CrossRef
11.
Joly PB, Kaufmann A (2007) Lost in translation? — the need for “upstream engagement” with nanotechnology on trial. Science as Culture (in press)
12.
Callon M (1994) Is science a public good? Sci Technol Human Values 19:395–424CrossRef
13.
Wynne B (1992) Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and the public uptake of science. Public Underst Sci 1:281–304CrossRef
14.
Wynne B (1993) Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Public Underst Sci 2:321–337CrossRef
15.
Giles J (2003) What is there to fear from something so small? Nature 426:750
16.
Moore A (2004) Waiter, there’s a nanobot in my martini! EMBO Rep 5:448–450CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Laboratory Revisited
Academic Science and the Responsible Development of Nanotechnology
verfasst von
Robert Doubleday
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2007
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
NanoEthics / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Elektronische ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0017-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

NanoEthics 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Nanotechnology – Steps Towards Understanding Human Beings as Technology?

Original Paper

Social and Ethical Interactions with Nano: Mapping the Early Literature

Original Paper

Nanotechnology Bound: Evaluating the Case for More Regulation

Original Paper

Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?

Original Paper

Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty: Experience, Trust, and Attitudes in a Swiss Nanotechnology Stakeholder Discussion Group

Original Paper

Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise