Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics 7/2015

01.10.2015 | Original Paper

The patenting activity of German Universities

verfasst von: Johanna Glauber, Jutta Wollersheim, Philipp Sandner, Isabell M. Welpe

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Patents serve as indicators of a university’s knowledge base; consequently, information on the patent volumes and patenting activity of universities is crucial for scientific and industrial organizations and policy makers. By matching secondary patent data from PATSTAT with secondary data on German universities from the CHE research ranking, we provided a broad overview of the patenting activity of German universities. Specifically, we first introduced a patent ranking. Second, we analyzed a broad spectrum of different indicators of the patenting behavior of German universities. Third, we analyzed potential determinants of their patent output. Our data revealed that patenting activity varied not only among the 25 universities that had the highest overall number of patent applications between 2002 and 2011 but also among the 156 universities that filed at least one patent. Using a Heckman sample selection model for our regression analyses, we analyzed (1) the influence of university size, university type, technical university, and faculty profile on the probability that a German university was active in patenting (N = 328) and (2) the relationships between patenting experience, research breadth, and research quality and the patent output of German universities (N = 156). Our findings suggest that patent output at least partly depends on these determinants, thereby shedding light on the substantial performance differences in patenting activities that existed in our sample.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Journal of Business Economics

From January 2013, the Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB) is published in English under the title Journal of Business Economics (JBE). The Journal of Business Economics (JBE) aims at encouraging theoretical and applied research in the field of business economics and business administration, promoting the exchange of ideas between science and practice.

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
In the following, we use the term university as collective term for traditional universities, universities of applied sciences, and colleges of art and music.
 
2
We thank an anonymous reviewer for highlighting this difference.
 
3
The PATSTAT database is the EPO Worldwide Patent Statistical Database licensed by the OECD-EPO Task Force on Patent Statistics. We employed the April 2012 version for our analyses.
 
4
Please note that patent output was significantly lower in 1992-2001 relative to the period that we consider here (e.g., in our sample of 156 universities: number of patent families: M = 10,987, SD = 2.54 in 1992-2001 compared to M = 52,686, SD = 6.94 in 2002-2011; number of patent applications: M = 29,474, SD = 6.16 in 1992-2001 compared to M = 135,321, SD = 17.87 in 2002–2011).
 
5
In the following, we use the terms patent and patent application interchangeably.
 
6
We thank an anonymous reviewer for advising us to include the faculty profiles in our model.
 
7
A patent ranking of all 328 universities is available upon request.
 
8
We thank an anonymous reviewer for this valuable comment.
 
9
Note that a post hoc analysis based on data from 1992 to 2001 revealed that this explanation for the contradictory finding concerning patenting experience is valid for patent applications; however, for the other dependent variables (i.e., for patent families, PCT applications, and IPC4 breadth), our results were robust, indicating that there might be other reasons for the conflicting results.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Acosta M, Coronado D, León MD et al (2009) Production of university technological knowledge in European regions: evidence from patent data. Reg Stud 43:1167–1181CrossRef Acosta M, Coronado D, León MD et al (2009) Production of university technological knowledge in European regions: evidence from patent data. Reg Stud 43:1167–1181CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amabile TM, Hill KG, Hennessey BA et al (1994) The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. J Pers Soc Psychol 66:950–967CrossRef Amabile TM, Hill KG, Hennessey BA et al (1994) The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. J Pers Soc Psychol 66:950–967CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: from experience to knowledge. Organ Sci 22:1123–1137CrossRef Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: from experience to knowledge. Organ Sci 22:1123–1137CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2007) The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: demographics or opportunities? J Econ Behav Organ 63:599–623CrossRef Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2007) The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: demographics or opportunities? J Econ Behav Organ 63:599–623CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J Ind Econ 57:637–676CrossRef Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J Ind Econ 57:637–676CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baldini N (2009) Implementing Bayh-Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity. Res Policy 38:1217–1224CrossRef Baldini N (2009) Implementing Bayh-Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on university patenting activity. Res Policy 38:1217–1224CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Berghoff S, Federkeil G, Giebisch P et al (2008) Das CHE Forschungsranking deutscher Universitäten 2008. Arbeitspapier. Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung, Gütersloh Berghoff S, Federkeil G, Giebisch P et al (2008) Das CHE Forschungsranking deutscher Universitäten 2008. Arbeitspapier. Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung, Gütersloh
Zurück zum Zitat Blind K, Grupp H (1999) Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences. Res Policy 28:451–468CrossRef Blind K, Grupp H (1999) Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences. Res Policy 28:451–468CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2002) Patents, real options and firm performance. Econ J 112:C97–C116CrossRef Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2002) Patents, real options and firm performance. Econ J 112:C97–C116CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brockhoff K (1998) Patentierung von Hochschullehrererfindungen. In: Franke N, von Braun C-F (eds) Innovationsforschung und Technologiemanagement. Springer, Berlin Brockhoff K (1998) Patentierung von Hochschullehrererfindungen. In: Franke N, von Braun C-F (eds) Innovationsforschung und Technologiemanagement. Springer, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Carayannis EG, Alexander J (1999) The wealth of knowledge: converting intellectual property to intellectual capital in co-opetitive research and technology management settings. Int J Technol Manag 18:326–352CrossRef Carayannis EG, Alexander J (1999) The wealth of knowledge: converting intellectual property to intellectual capital in co-opetitive research and technology management settings. Int J Technol Manag 18:326–352CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carayol N, Matt M (2004) Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Res Policy 33:1081–1102CrossRef Carayol N, Matt M (2004) Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Res Policy 33:1081–1102CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsson B, Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB et al (2009) Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Ind Corp Change 18:1193–1229CrossRef Carlsson B, Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB et al (2009) Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Ind Corp Change 18:1193–1229CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Manag Sci 48:1–23CrossRef Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Manag Sci 48:1–23CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coupé T (2003) Science is golden: Academic R&D and university patents. J Technol Transf 28:31–46CrossRef Coupé T (2003) Science is golden: Academic R&D and university patents. J Technol Transf 28:31–46CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cuntz A, Dauchert H, Meurer P et al (2012) Hochschulpatente zehn Jahre nach Abschaffung des Hochschullehrerprivilegs. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 13. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Berlin Cuntz A, Dauchert H, Meurer P et al (2012) Hochschulpatente zehn Jahre nach Abschaffung des Hochschullehrerprivilegs. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 13. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Czarnitzki D, Glänzel W, Hussinger K (2009) Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Res Policy 38:26–34CrossRef Czarnitzki D, Glänzel W, Hussinger K (2009) Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Res Policy 38:26–34CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deci EL (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 18:105–115CrossRef Deci EL (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol 18:105–115CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dilger A (2010) Rankings von Zeitschriften und Personen in der BWL. Zeitschrift für Management 5:91–102CrossRef Dilger A (2010) Rankings von Zeitschriften und Personen in der BWL. Zeitschrift für Management 5:91–102CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dilger A, Müller H (2012) Ein Forschungsleistungsranking auf der Grundlage von Google Scholar. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 82:1089–1105CrossRef Dilger A, Müller H (2012) Ein Forschungsleistungsranking auf der Grundlage von Google Scholar. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 82:1089–1105CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhardt KM, Santos FM (2006) Knowledge-based view: a new theory of strategy? In: Pettigrew A, Thomas H, Whittington R (eds) Handbook of strategy and management. SAGE Publications Ltd, London Eisenhardt KM, Santos FM (2006) Knowledge-based view: a new theory of strategy? In: Pettigrew A, Thomas H, Whittington R (eds) Handbook of strategy and management. SAGE Publications Ltd, London
Zurück zum Zitat Fabrizio KR (2006) The use of university research in firm innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation Researching a new paradigm. Oxford Usniversity Press, New York Fabrizio KR (2006) The use of university research in firm innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation Researching a new paradigm. Oxford Usniversity Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Fabrizio KR, Di Minin A (2008) Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Res Policy 37:914–931CrossRef Fabrizio KR, Di Minin A (2008) Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Res Policy 37:914–931CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foltz JD, Kwansoo K, Barham B (2003) A dynamic analysis of university agricultural biotechnology patent production. Am J Agric Econ 85:187CrossRef Foltz JD, Kwansoo K, Barham B (2003) A dynamic analysis of university agricultural biotechnology patent production. Am J Agric Econ 85:187CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frietsch R, Schmoch U, Neuhäusler P et al (2010) Patent applications—structures, trends and recent developments. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Berlin Frietsch R, Schmoch U, Neuhäusler P et al (2010) Patent applications—structures, trends and recent developments. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem. Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI), Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Fritsch M, Slavtchev V (2006) Universities and innovation in space. Freiberg Working Paper. 15 Freiberg: Technical University Bergakademie Fritsch M, Slavtchev V (2006) Universities and innovation in space. Freiberg Working Paper. 15 Freiberg: Technical University Bergakademie
Zurück zum Zitat Geuna A, Nesta LJJ (2006) University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Res Policy 35:790–807CrossRef Geuna A, Nesta LJJ (2006) University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Res Policy 35:790–807CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Geuna A, Rossi F (2011) Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Res Policy 40:1068–1076CrossRef Geuna A, Rossi F (2011) Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Res Policy 40:1068–1076CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant RM (1996a) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ Sci 7:375–387CrossRef Grant RM (1996a) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ Sci 7:375–387CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant RM (1996b) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:109–122CrossRef Grant RM (1996b) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:109–122CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant RM (1997) The knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for management practice. Long Range Plan 30:450–454CrossRef Grant RM (1997) The knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for management practice. Long Range Plan 30:450–454CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant RM (2010) Contemporary strategy analysis. Wiley, Chichester Grant RM (2010) Contemporary strategy analysis. Wiley, Chichester
Zurück zum Zitat Hall BH (2007) Patents and patent policy. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 23:568–587CrossRef Hall BH (2007) Patents and patent policy. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 23:568–587CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J Econ 36:16–38 Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J Econ 36:16–38
Zurück zum Zitat Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product developing firm. Adm Sci Q 42:716–749CrossRef Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product developing firm. Adm Sci Q 42:716–749CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM et al (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev Econ Stat 81:511–515CrossRef Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM et al (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev Econ Stat 81:511–515CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Häussler C, Harhoff D, Müller E (2012) To be financed or not: The role of patents for venture capital-financing. Discussion Paper 09-003. ZEW—Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim Häussler C, Harhoff D, Müller E (2012) To be financed or not: The role of patents for venture capital-financing. Discussion Paper 09-003. ZEW—Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson R, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev Econ Stat 80:119–127CrossRef Henderson R, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev Econ Stat 80:119–127CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt-Dundas N (2012) Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Res Policy 41:262–275CrossRef Hewitt-Dundas N (2012) Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Res Policy 41:262–275CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hinze S, Reiss T, Schmoch U (1997) Statistical analysis on the distance between fields of technology. Report for Research Project “Innovation Systems and European Integration (ISI)” funded by the European Commission (DG XII). Fraunhofer Institute of Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe Hinze S, Reiss T, Schmoch U (1997) Statistical analysis on the distance between fields of technology. Report for Research Project “Innovation Systems and European Integration (ISI)” funded by the European Commission (DG XII). Fraunhofer Institute of Systems and Innovation Research (ISI), Karlsruhe
Zurück zum Zitat Huelsbeck M, Menno D (2007) German University Patenting and Licensing: Does Policy Matter? Paper for the 2nd Annual Conference of the EPIP Association 2007 Huelsbeck M, Menno D (2007) German University Patenting and Licensing: Does Policy Matter? Paper for the 2nd Annual Conference of the EPIP Association 2007
Zurück zum Zitat Huggins R, Johnston A, Steffenson R (2008) Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 1:321–340CrossRef Huggins R, Johnston A, Steffenson R (2008) Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 1:321–340CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi KD, Sarker S, Sarker S (2007) Knowledge transfer within information system development teams: examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decis Support Syst 43:322–335CrossRef Joshi KD, Sarker S, Sarker S (2007) Knowledge transfer within information system development teams: examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decis Support Syst 43:322–335CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keller RT (2012) Predicting the performance and innovativeness of scientists and engineers. J Appl Psychol 97:225–233CrossRef Keller RT (2012) Predicting the performance and innovativeness of scientists and engineers. J Appl Psychol 97:225–233CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy P (1992) A Guide to Econometrics. Blackwell, Oxford Kennedy P (1992) A Guide to Econometrics. Blackwell, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3:383–397CrossRef Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3:383–397CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J Int Bus Stud 34:516–529CrossRef Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J Int Bus Stud 34:516–529CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lach S, Schankerman M (2004) Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. J Eur Econ Assoc 2:252–264CrossRef Lach S, Schankerman M (2004) Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. J Eur Econ Assoc 2:252–264CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND J Econ 25:319–333CrossRef Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND J Econ 25:319–333CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marco AC (2007) The dynamics of patent citations. Econ Lett 94:290–296CrossRef Marco AC (2007) The dynamics of patent citations. Econ Lett 94:290–296CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Melo AI, Sarrico CS, Radnor Z (2010) The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities. Public Manag Rev 12:233–254CrossRef Melo AI, Sarrico CS, Radnor Z (2010) The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities. Public Manag Rev 12:233–254CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Minssen H, Wilkesmann U (2003) Lassen Hochschulen sich steuern? Soziale Welt 54:123–144 Minssen H, Wilkesmann U (2003) Lassen Hochschulen sich steuern? Soziale Welt 54:123–144
Zurück zum Zitat Monk AHB (2009) The emerging market for intellectual property: drivers, restrainers, and implications. J Econ Geogr 9:469–491CrossRef Monk AHB (2009) The emerging market for intellectual property: drivers, restrainers, and implications. J Econ Geogr 9:469–491CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mowery DC, Shane S (2002) Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer. Manag Sci 48:v–ixCrossRef Mowery DC, Shane S (2002) Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer. Manag Sci 48:v–ixCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN et al (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Res Policy 30:99–119CrossRef Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN et al (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Res Policy 30:99–119CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge creating company. Harv Bus Rev 69:96–104 Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge creating company. Harv Bus Rev 69:96–104
Zurück zum Zitat Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37CrossRef Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Nonaka I, Takeuchi H, Umemoto K (1996) A theory of organizational knowledge creation. Int J Technol Manag 11:833–845 Nonaka I, Takeuchi H, Umemoto K (1996) A theory of organizational knowledge creation. Int J Technol Manag 11:833–845
Zurück zum Zitat O’Shea RP, Allen TJ, Chevalier A et al (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Res Policy 34:994–1009CrossRef O’Shea RP, Allen TJ, Chevalier A et al (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Res Policy 34:994–1009CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Osterloh M (2010) Governance by numbers. Does it really work in research? Anal und Kritik 2:267–283 Osterloh M (2010) Governance by numbers. Does it really work in research? Anal und Kritik 2:267–283
Zurück zum Zitat Pellert A (1999) Die Universität als Organisation: Die Kunst. Experten zu managen. Böhlau, Wien Pellert A (1999) Die Universität als Organisation: Die Kunst. Experten zu managen. Böhlau, Wien
Zurück zum Zitat Perkmann M, Walsh K (2007) University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 9:259–280CrossRef Perkmann M, Walsh K (2007) University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 9:259–280CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perkmann M, King Z, Pavelin S (2011) Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Res Policy 40:539–552CrossRef Perkmann M, King Z, Pavelin S (2011) Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Res Policy 40:539–552CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Putnam J (1996) The value of international patent rights. Unpublished dissertation. Yale University Putnam J (1996) The value of international patent rights. Unpublished dissertation. Yale University
Zurück zum Zitat Ramello GB (2005) Intellectual property and the markets of ideas. Rev Netw Econ 4:69–88CrossRef Ramello GB (2005) Intellectual property and the markets of ideas. Rev Netw Econ 4:69–88CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ringelhan S, Wollersheim J, Welpe IM et al (2013) Work motivation and job satisfaction as antecedents of research performance: investigation of different mediation models. J Bus Econ (ZfB) 3:7–38 Ringelhan S, Wollersheim J, Welpe IM et al (2013) Work motivation and job satisfaction as antecedents of research performance: investigation of different mediation models. J Bus Econ (ZfB) 3:7–38
Zurück zum Zitat Santoro MD, Bierly PE (2006) Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: a knowledge-based perspective. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53:495–507CrossRef Santoro MD, Bierly PE (2006) Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: a knowledge-based perspective. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53:495–507CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sapsalis E, Van de la Pottelsberghe Potterie B, Navon R (2006) Academic versus industry patenting: an in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Res Policy 35:1631–1645CrossRef Sapsalis E, Van de la Pottelsberghe Potterie B, Navon R (2006) Academic versus industry patenting: an in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Res Policy 35:1631–1645CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sauermann H, Stephan P (2012) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science published online before print September 10, 2012 Sauermann H, Stephan P (2012) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science published online before print September 10, 2012
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoch U (2000) Rechtliche Situation von Patenten an Hochschulen. In: Schmoch U, Licht G, Reinhard M (eds) Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland. Fraunhofer IRB, Stuttgart Schmoch U (2000) Rechtliche Situation von Patenten an Hochschulen. In: Schmoch U, Licht G, Reinhard M (eds) Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland. Fraunhofer IRB, Stuttgart
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoch U, Schubert T, Jansen D et al (2010) How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: a balanced approach. Res Eval 19:2–18CrossRef Schmoch U, Schubert T, Jansen D et al (2010) How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: a balanced approach. Res Eval 19:2–18CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schoen A, Buenstorf G (2013) When do universities own their patents? An explorative study of patent characteristics and organizational determinants in Germany. Ind Innov 20:422–437CrossRef Schoen A, Buenstorf G (2013) When do universities own their patents? An explorative study of patent characteristics and organizational determinants in Germany. Ind Innov 20:422–437CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schulze A, Brojerdi G, von Krogh G (2014) Those who know, do. Those who understand, teach. Disseminative capability and knowledge transfer in the automotive industry. J Prod Innov Manag 31:79–97CrossRef Schulze A, Brojerdi G, von Krogh G (2014) Those who know, do. Those who understand, teach. Disseminative capability and knowledge transfer in the automotive industry. J Prod Innov Manag 31:79–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link A (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res Policy 32:27–48CrossRef Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link A (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res Policy 32:27–48CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: the influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Manag Sci 49:478–496CrossRef Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: the influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Manag Sci 49:478–496CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Spender J-C (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:45–62CrossRef Spender J-C (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:45–62CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang F, Mu J, MacLachlan DL (2010) Disseminative capacity, organizational structure and knowledge transfer. Expert Syst Appl 37:1586–1593CrossRef Tang F, Mu J, MacLachlan DL (2010) Disseminative capacity, organizational structure and knowledge transfer. Expert Syst Appl 37:1586–1593CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Looy B, Landoni P, Callaert J et al (2011) Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: an empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Res Policy 40:553–564CrossRef Van Looy B, Landoni P, Callaert J et al (2011) Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: an empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Res Policy 40:553–564CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Verspagen B (2006) University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems. J Econ Surv 20:607–626CrossRef Verspagen B (2006) University research, intellectual property rights and European innovation systems. J Econ Surv 20:607–626CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Von Ledebur S, Buenstorf G, Hummel M (2009) University patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What role did the professors’ privilege play? Jena Economic Research Paper 68 Von Ledebur S, Buenstorf G, Hummel M (2009) University patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What role did the professors’ privilege play? Jena Economic Research Paper 68
Zurück zum Zitat Wahab SA, Rose RC, Uli J, Abdullah H (2009) A review on the technology transfer models, knowledge-based and organizational learning models on technology transfer. Eur J Soc Sci 10(4). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1949149 Wahab SA, Rose RC, Uli J, Abdullah H (2009) A review on the technology transfer models, knowledge-based and organizational learning models on technology transfer. Eur J Soc Sci 10(4). Available at SSRN: http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​1949149
Zurück zum Zitat Wayne KT (2010) Determinants of commercial innovation for university technology transfer. J Behav Stud Bus 2:1–22 Wayne KT (2010) Determinants of commercial innovation for university technology transfer. J Behav Stud Bus 2:1–22
Zurück zum Zitat Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13:339–351CrossRef Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13:339–351CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The patenting activity of German Universities
verfasst von
Johanna Glauber
Jutta Wollersheim
Philipp Sandner
Isabell M. Welpe
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Economics / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0044-2372
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-8928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0748-y

Premium Partner