nach oben

International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing

Erschienen in:

07.01.2020 | Original Article

Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: discovering origins, exploring current and future trends

verfasst von: Luís Farinha, João Renato Sebastião, Carlos Sampaio, João Lopes

Erschienen in: International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Nonprofit sector integrates an important part of the economy, which serves as a critical factor for social change. Social innovation and social entrepreneurship are of paramount importance for the nonprofit sector aiming to solve social needs. The purpose of this paper is, through bibliometric mapping techniques, based on 2695 documents, to understand thematic evolution of social innovation and social entrepreneurship. The main conclusion is that, from the analysis, we can see that the scientific production in this field of knowledge has intensified in recent years, but the centrality and the search density undergo major changes. New paths for future research are outlined.

Vorheriger Artikel How to measure the impact of social innovation initiatives?

Nächster Artikel The social innovation Momentum: a qualitative analysis of governance and funding processes

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adams, D., & Hess, M. (2010). Social innovation and why it has policy significance. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 21(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/103530461002100209.CrossRef

Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C. (2017) Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959-975, Elsevier.

Austin, J., Stevenson, H., Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Emprendimiento Comercial y Social 2006.pdf. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. Retrieved from https://www.clearlyso.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Social-and-Commercial-Entrepreneurship-Same-Different-or-Both.pdf CrossRef

Belz, F.-M. (2013). Shaping the future: Sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship. Social Business, 3(4), 311–324.CrossRef

Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 317–339.CrossRef

Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008.CrossRef

Calic, G., & Mosakowski, E. (2016). Kicking off social entrepreneurship: How a sustainability orientation influences Crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201.CrossRef

Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research - the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155–205.CrossRef

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166.CrossRef

Conway Dato-on, M., & Kalakay, J. (2016). The winding road of social entrepreneurship definitions: A systematic literature review. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-06-2015-0016.CrossRef

Crutchfield, L. R., & Grant, H. M. (2012). Forces for good: The six practices of high-impact nonprofits. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Dacin, P., Dacin, M., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950.CrossRef

Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social Enterprise. Nonprofit Managment and leadership, 14(4), 411–424. Doi: 10.1002/nml.43.CrossRef

Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2002). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs (Vol. 186). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Dover, G., & Lawrence, T. B. (2012). The role of power in nonprofit innovation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 991–1013.CrossRef

Drucker, P. (2012). Managing the non-profit organization. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Eadie, D. C. (1997). Changing by design: A practical approach to leading innovation in nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.CrossRef

Eurostat. (2019). Living conditions in Europe - social participation and integration - Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Living_conditions_in_Europe_-_social_participation_and_integration#Policy_context, Accessed on Novembre 29, 2019.

Faber, D., & McCarthy, D. (2005). Foundations for social change: Critical perspectives on philanthropy and popular movements. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Jaskyte, K. (2017). Board effectiveness and innovation in nonprofit organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(5), 453–463.

Jaskyte, K., Amato, O., & Sperber, R. (2018). Foundations and innovation in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 47–64.CrossRef

Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: A new stage in innovation analysis? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The International handbook on social innovation collective action, social learning and Transdisciplinary research (pp. 110–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809993.00020.CrossRef

Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10–25.CrossRef

Lasprogata, G. A., & Cotten, M. N. (2001). Contemplating enterprise: The business and legal challenges of social entrepreneurship. American Business Law Journal, 41(1), 67–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0024-8.CrossRef

Lettice, F., & Parekh, M. (2010). The social innovation process: Themes, challenges and implications for practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.033133.CrossRef

Light, P. C. (1998). Sustaining innovation: Creating nonprofit and government organizations that innovate naturally. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014561796.CrossRef

McDonald, R. E. (2007). An investigation of innovation in nonprofit organizations: The role of organizational mission. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 256–281.CrossRef

Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, said business school, Oxford University, the Young Foundation, working paper.

Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? - proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x.CrossRef

Osborne, S. P. (2013). Voluntary organizations and innovation in public services. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Pearce, J. A., Fritz, D. A., & Davis, P. S. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of religious congregations as predicted by rational choice theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 219–248.CrossRef

Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007.CrossRef

Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group and Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560063.CrossRef

Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.

R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

Ranucci, R., & Lee, H. (2019). Donor influence on long-term innovation within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(5), 1045–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019843346.CrossRef

Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4.CrossRef

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682.CrossRef

Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529.CrossRef

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265–269.CrossRef

Stone, M. M., Bigelow, B., & Crittenden, W. (1999). Research on strategic management in nonprofit organizations: Synthesis, analysis, and future directions. Administration & Society, 31(3), 378–423.CrossRef

van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007.CrossRef

Zhu, H., Wang, P., & Bart, C. (2016). Board processes, board strategic involvement, and organizational performance in for-profit and non-profit organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 311–328.CrossRef

Titel: Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: discovering origins, exploring current and future trends
verfasst von: Luís Farinha
João Renato Sebastião
Carlos Sampaio
João Lopes
Publikationsdatum: 07.01.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1865-1984
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1992
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00243-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

How to measure the impact of social innovation initiatives?

Physical activity level as a booster of entrepreneurial intention: a social innovation approach

Social innovation: a systematic literature review and future agenda research

I-ENTRE-U: an individual entrepreneurial orientation scale for teachers and researchers in higher education institutions

The social innovation Momentum: a qualitative analysis of governance and funding processes

Web disclosure of institutional information in nonprofit organizations: an approach in Portuguese charities