Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cognitive Computation
Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation 1/2016

01.02.2016

Applying a Handwriting Measurement Model for Capturing Cognitive Load Implications Through Complex Figure Drawing

verfasst von: Sara Rosenblum, Gil Luria

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the application of a computerized handwriting model for characterizing complex figure-drawing performance. We posit that spatial, temporal, and pressure measures that reflect figure-drawing behavior will differ significantly under two mental workload conditions, and that both drawing and handwriting process measures will predict the quality of what is drawn and/or written. Thirty participants copied the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT). They then reproduced it from memory and finally copied a paragraph on a digitizer that is part of the Computerized Penmanship Evaluation Tool (ComPET) system. Results indicated that certain computerized measures of the ROCFT copying significantly correlated with those of the paragraph-copying behavior (r = .38–.75). Significant differences were found between the spatial and temporal computerized measures of performance in the ROCFT copying and drawing-from-memory tasks. Stepwise regressions indicated that mean pressure predicted 12 % of the variance of the ROCFT and paragraph-copying quality scores and 6 % of the ROCFT drawing-from-memory score. Furthermore, 52 % of the variance of the ROCFT drawing-from-memory score was predicted by the mean velocity. The benefits and significance of obtaining computerized measures of the drawing process for better insight about human performance characteristics are discussed, and applications are suggested.
Vorheriger Artikel Linguistic Interval Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Decision Making
Nächster Artikel Dynamics in Four-Neuron Bidirectional Associative Memory Networks with Inertia and Multiple Delays

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Squartini S, Hu S, Liu Q. Advances on brain inspired computing. Cogn Comput. 2013;5:161–3.CrossRef
2.
Zhao Z, Chen Z, Chen Y, Wang S, Wang H. A class incremental extreme learning machine for activity recognition. Cogn Comput. 2014;6:423–31.CrossRef
3.
4.
Cambria E, Hussain A. Sentic computing: techniques, tools, and applications. Springer briefs in cognitive computation. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.
5.
Hussain A, Niazi M. Toward a formal, visual framework of emergent cognitive development of scholars. Cogn Comput. 2014;6:113–24.CrossRef
6.
TraviesoCM, Alonso JB. Special issue on advanced cognitive systems based on nonlinear analysis. Cogn Comput. 2013;5:397–8.
7.
McClelland JL. Is a machine realization of truly human-like intelligence achievable? Cogn Comput. 2009;1:17–21.CrossRef
8.
Stone JV. Learning perceptually salient visual parameters using spatiotemporal smoothness constraints. Neural Comput. 1996;8:1463–92.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Malik ZK, Hussain A, Wu J. Novel biologically inspired approaches to extracting online information from temporal data. Cogn Comput. 2014;6:595–607.CrossRef
10.
Faundez-Zanuy M, Hussain A, Mekyska J, Sesa-Nogueras E, Monte-Moreno E, Esposito A. et al. Biometric applications related to human beings: there is life beyond security. Cogn Comput. 2013;5:136–51.
11.
Squartini S, Esposito A. CO-WORKER: toward real-time and context-aware systems for human collaborative knowledge building. Cogn Comput. 2012;4:157–71.CrossRef
12.
Kandel S, Valdois S. Syllables as functional units in a copying task. Lang Cogn Proc. 2006;21:432–52.
13.
Longstaff MG, Heath RA. The influence of motor system degradation on the control of handwriting movements: a dynamical systems analysis. Hum Mov Sci. 2003;22:91–110.
14.
Poon KW, Li-Tsang CWP, Weiss TPL, Rosenblum S. The effect of a computerized visual perception and visual-motor integration training program on improving Chinese handwriting of children with handwriting difficulties. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31:1552–60.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Werner P, Rosenblum S, Bar-On G, Heinik J, Korczyn A. Handwriting process variables discriminating mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61:228–36.CrossRef
16.
Rosenblum S, Dekel T, Gurevitz I, Werner P, Heinik J. Handwriting process variables among elderly people with mild major depressive disorder: a preliminary study. Aging-Clin Exp Res. 2010;22:141–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Luria G, Rosenblum S. A computerised multidimensional measurement of mental workload via handwriting. Behav Res Meth. 2012;44:575–86.CrossRef
18.
Luria G, Kahana A, Rosenblum S. Detection of deception via handwriting behaviors using a computerized tool: toward an evaluation of malingering. Cogn Comput. 2014;6(4):849–55.
19.
Sesa-Nogueras E, Faundez-Zanuy M, Mekyska J. An information analysis of in-air and on-surface trajectories in online handwriting. Cogn Comput. 2012;4:195–205.
20.
Rey A. L’examenpsychologiquedans les casd’encephalopathietraumatique. Arch Psychol. 1941;28:286–340.
21.
Osterrieth P. The test of copying a complex figure: a contribution to the study of perception and memory. Arch Psychol. 1944;30:206–356.
22.
Caffarra P, Vezzadini, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A. Rey–Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2002;22:443–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ. Working memory. In: Bower GH, editor, The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press; 1974. pp. 47–89.
24.
Baddeley AD. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:829–39.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Longstaff MG, Heath RA. A nonlinear analysis of the temporal characteristics of handwriting. Hum Mov Sci. 1999;18:485–524.CrossRef
26.
Chartrel E, Vinter A. The impact of spatio-temporal constraints on cursive letter handwriting in children. Learn Instr. 2008;18(6):537–47.CrossRef
27.
Cegarra J, Chevalier A. The use of Tholos software for combining measures of mental workload: Toward theoretical and methodological improvements. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(4):988–1000.
28.
Wickens CD. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2002;3(2):159–77.CrossRef
29.
Luria G, Rosenblum S. Comparing the handwriting behaviors of true and false writing with computerized handwriting measures. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2010;24:1115–28.CrossRef
30.
Bi S, Salvendy G. Analytical modeling and experimental study of human workload in scheduling of advanced manufacturing systems. Int J Hum Factor Man. 1994;4:205–34.CrossRef
31.
Sheridan TB. Risk, human error, and system resilience: fundamental ideas. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):418–26.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Cassenti DN, Kelley TD, Carlson RA. Modeling the workload-performance relationship. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE; 2010. Vol. 54, No. 19, pp. 1684–8.
33.
Reason J. How necessary steps in a task get omitted: revising old ideas to combat a persistent problem. Cogn Technol. 1998;3:24–32.
34.
Cahill SM. Where does handwriting fit in? Strategies to support academic achievement. Interv Sch Clin. 2009;44(4):223–8.CrossRef
35.
Chervinsky A, Mitrushina M, Satz P. Comparison of four methods of scoring the Rey–Osterrieth complex figure drawing test on four age groups of normal elderly. Brain Dysfunction. 1992;5(5–6):267–87.
36.
Waber D, Holmes JM. Assessing children’s copy productions of the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1985;7:264–80.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Waber D, Holmes JM. Assessing children’s memory production of the Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986;8:563–80.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Guerin F, Ska B, Belleville S. Cognitive processing of drawing abilities. Brain Cogn. 1999;40:464–78.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Rosenblum S, Parush S, Weiss PL. Computerized temporal handwriting characteristics of proficient and poor hand writers. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(2):129–38.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Erez N, Parush S. The Hebrew handwriting evaluation. School of Occupational Therapy. Faculty of Medicine. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; 1999.
41.
Fastenau PS, Denburg NL, Hufford BJ. Adult norms for the Rey–Osterrieth complex figure test and for supplemental recognition and matching trials from the extended complex figure test. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;13(1):30–47.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Repovs G, Baddeley A. The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience. 2006;139(1):5–21.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Kelley CM, McLaughlin AC. Individual differences in the benefits of feedback for learning. Hum Factors. 2012;54(1):26–35.
44.
Smits-Engelsman BCM, Van Galen GP. Dysgraphia in children: lasting psychomotor deficiency or transient developmental delay? J Exp Child Psychol. 1997;67:164–84.CrossRefPubMed
45.
McEvoy LK, Smith ME, Gevins A. Dynamic cortical networks of verbal and spatial working memory: effects of memory load and task practice. Cereb Cortex. 1998;8:563–74.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging. 2002;17(2):299.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Froese T, Suzuki K, Ogai Y, Ikegami T. Using human–computer interfaces to investigate ‘mind-as-it-could-be’ from the first-person perspective. Cognit Comput. 2012;4:365–82.CrossRef
48.
Rosenblum S, Livneh-Zirinsky M. Handwriting process and product characteristics of children diagnosed with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27:200–14.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Sesa-Nogueras E, Faundez-Zanuy M, Mekyska J. An information analysis of in-air and on-surface trajectories in online handwriting. Cogn Comput. 2012;4:195–205.
50.
Lei H, Govindaraju V. A comparative study on the consistency of features in on-line signature verification. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2005;26:2483–89.
51.
Guest R. Age dependency in handwritten dynamic signature verification systems. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2006;27(10):1098–104.CrossRef
52.
Mailah M, Lim BH. Biometric signature verification using pen position, time, velocity and pressure parameters. Jurnal Teknologi 2012;48(1):35–54.
53.
Perlovsky LI, Levine DS. The drive for creativity and the escape from creativity: neurocognitive mechanisms. Cogn Comput. 2012;4:292–305.CrossRef
54.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Tucha O, Mecklinger L, Thome J, Reiter A, Alders GL, Sartor H, Naumann M, Lange KW. Kinematic analysis of dopaminergic effects on skilled handwriting movements in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm. 2006;113:609–23.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Tucha O, Mecklinger L, Walitza S, Lange KW. The effect of caffeine on handwriting movements in skilled writers. Hum Mov Sci. 2006;25(4–5):523–35.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Heinik J, Werner P, Dekel T, Gurevitz I, Rosenblum S. Computerized kinematic analysis of the clock drawing task in elderly people with mild major depressive disorder: an exploratory study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22:479–88.
58.
Mohan V, Morasso P, Sandini G, Kasderidis S. Inference through embodied simulation in cognitive robots. Cogn Comput. 2013;5:355–82.CrossRef
59.
Zhang S, He B, Nian R, Wang J, Han B, Lendasse A, Yuan G. Fast image recognition based on independent component analysis and extreme learning machine. Cogn Comput. 2014;6:405–22.CrossRef
60.
Zeuner KE, Peller M, Knutzen A, Holler I, Münchau A, Hallett M et al. How to assess motor impairment in writer’s cramp. Mov Disord. 2007;22(8):1102–9.
61.
Dreiseitl Stephan, Ohno-Machado Lucila. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform. 2002;35(5):352–9.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Subirats, José L., et al. Multiclass pattern recognition extension for the new C-Mantec constructive neural network algorithm. Cogn Comput. 2.4 (2010):285–290.
Metadaten
Titel
Applying a Handwriting Measurement Model for Capturing Cognitive Load Implications Through Complex Figure Drawing
verfasst von
Sara Rosenblum
Gil Luria
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cognitive Computation / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-015-9343-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Cognitive Computation 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Linguistic Interval Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Decision Making

OriginalPaper

Emotion: A Unified Mechanistic Interpretation from a Cognitive Architecture

OriginalPaper

Classification of Chinese Texts Based on Recognition of Semantic Topics

OriginalPaper

A Real-Time Active Pedestrian Tracking System Inspired by the Human Visual System

OriginalPaper

Cognitively Inspired 6D Motion Estimation of a Noncooperative Target Using Monocular RGB-D Images

OriginalPaper

Gender Classification by Means of Online Uppercase Handwriting: A Text-Dependent Allographic Approach

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise