nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.04.2021 | Original Article

Exploring the emerging ICT trends in seismic hazard by scientometric analysis during 2010–2019

verfasst von: Kanika Saini, Sandeep K. Sood

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 8/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Earthquake is among the most disastrous natural hazards existing in the global economy. Large-scale earthquakes exhibit threats and challenges to the modern society, causing casualties and deaths, impeding socio-economic activities and causing massive economic losses throughout the world. Thus there is a need for an earthquake early warning, detection, and rescue system which can save lives of human, environment, and economy of the world. Tremendous growth in the use of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) applications has opened up new possibilities in characterizing infrastructure, risk area and disaster zones, planning and implementation of seismic hazard reduction measures etc. Furthermore, ICT provides an enormous opportunity for both disaster management systems and earthquake-related authorities (emergency responders, police, public health and seismology departments) to acquire state-of-the-art assistance and improved insights for precise and appropriate decision making. Consequently, it is now of paramount importance to transform from individual monitoring, prediction and decision-making frameworks to smart earthquake management systems which includes decision makers and earthquake affecting people equally with the assistance of recent technological advancements. Even though a significant number of earthquake or seismic hazard papers are published in international journals, there has been no quantitative assessment of information and communication technologies (ICT) in this literature yet encountered. Hence, this study is performed. This paper presents a bi-dimensional scientometric study of research from the perspective of various domains, research areas of seismic hazard and ICT trends over the last 10 years, as indexed in Scopus. The essence behind this study is to unveil the main influencing aspects that govern the publications and its citation structure using scientometric method. The publication pattern is analyzed first, along with related subject categories and contributing countries. Then, citation structure is analyzed which includes the distribution of citations over the years, citing journals, documents, authors and influential institutions along with their impact in terms of citations per paper. Furthermore, the keyword analysis is visualized using VOSviewer. Timeline review of keywords are exported from VOSviewer to pinpoint the hotspots and research trends. This paper provides in-depth understanding of existing seismic hazard research and indicates the emerging ICT trends in this research domain.

Vorheriger Artikel Assessment of declining groundwater levels due to excessive pumping in the Dhaka District of Bangladesh

Nächster Artikel Large-scale climate indices teleconnections with hydrochemical and isotopic characteristics of a karst spring using wavelet analysis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adeel A, Gogate M, Farooq S, Ieracitano C, Dashtipour K, Larijani H, Hussain A (2019) A survey on the role of wireless sensor networks and iot in disaster management. In: Geological disaster monitoring based on sensor networks. Springer, pp 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0992-25

Al-Akkad A, Zimmermann A, Birlinghoven S, Augustin S (2012) Survey: Ict-supported public participation in disasters. ISCRAM

Alphonsa A, Ravi G (2016) Earthquake early warning system by iot using wireless sensor networks. In: 2016 International conference on wireless communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET), pp 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1109/WiSPNET.2016.7566327

Asama H (2005) Service media using robotic technology in ubiquitous computing environment. In: IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts, pp 47–52.https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2005.1511617

Balaid A, Abd Rozan MZ, Hikmi SN, Memon J (2016) Knowledge maps: a systematic literature review and directions for future research. Int J Inf Manage 36(3):451–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.005CrossRef

Banerjee, A., Basak, J., Roy, S., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2019). Towards a collaborative disaster management service framework using mobile and web applications: a survey and future scope. In: Emergency and disaster management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global, pp 324–346. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6195-8.ch015

Bello OM, Aina YA (2014) Satellite remote sensing as a tool in disaster management and sustainable development:towardsasynergisticapproach. Proc Soc Behav Sci 120:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.114CrossRef

Caputo R et al (2005) Ground effects of large morphogenic earthquake.

de Moya-Anegón F, Chinchilla-Rodrıéguez Z, Vargas-Quesada B, Corera-Álvarez E, Munõz-Fernández FJ, González-Molina A, Herrero-Solana V (2007) Coverageanalysisofscopus:a journalmetricapproach. Scientometrics 73(1):53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4CrossRef

DesRoches R, Comerio M, Eberhard, M, Mooney W, Rix GJ (2011). Overview of the 2010 haiti earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 27(S1), S1–S21. https://doi.org/10.1193/3630129

Doocy S, Daniels A, Packer C, Dick A, Kirsch TD (2013) The human impact of earthquakes: a historical review of events 1980-2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Curr 5

Du HS, Ke X, Chu SK, Chan LT (2017) A bibliometric analysis of emergency management using information systems (2000–2016). Online Inf Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2017-0142CrossRef

Ellegaard O, Wallin JA (2015) The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics 105(3):1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-zCrossRef

Ellingwood BR (2001) Earthquake risk assessment of building structures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74(3):251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00105-3CrossRef

Erdelj M, Natalizio E (2016) UV-assisted disaster management: applications and open issues. In: 2016 international conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC), pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNC.2016.7440563

Fiedrich F, Gehbauer F, Rickers U (2000) Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Saf Sci 35(1–3):41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00021-7CrossRef

Ghaedi K, Ibrahim Z (2017) Earthquake prediction. Earthquakes Tecton Hazard Risk Mitig205–227. https://doi.org/10.5772/65511

Gorum T, Fan X, van Westen CJ, Huang RQ, Xu Q, Tang C, Wang G (2011) Distribution pattern of earthquake-induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 wenchuan earthquake. Geomorphology 133(3–4):152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.12.030CrossRef

Guikema S (2020) Artificial intelligence for natural hazards risk analysis: potential, challenges, and research needs. Risk Anal 40(6):1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13476CrossRef

Hashemi M, Alesheikh AA (2011) A gis-based earthquake damage assessment and settlement methodology. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(11):1607–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.114CrossRef

Houston JB, Hawthorne J, Perreault MF, Park EH, Goldstein Hode M, Halliwell MR, Turner McGowen SE, Davis R, Vaid S, McElderry JA et al (2015) Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters 39(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092CrossRef

Hu Q, Kapucu N (2016) Information communication technology utilization for effective emergency management networks. Public Manag Rev 18(3):323–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.969762CrossRef

Huang Y, Jiang X (2010) Field-observed phenomena of seismic liquefaction and subsidence during the 2008 wenchuan earthquake in china. Nat Hazards 54(3):839–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9509-6CrossRef

Ishag MIM, Ryu KS, Lee JY, Ryu KH (2018) Event detection in twitter: methodological evaluation and structural analysis of the bibliometric data. In: Modern approaches for intelligent information and database systems. Springer, pp 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76081-09

Jayasinghe K, Kenney CM, Prasanna R, Velasquez J (2020) Enacting “accountability in collaborative governance”: lessons in emergency management and earthquake recovery from the 2010–2011 canterbury earthquakes. J Public Budg Account Financ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2019-0143CrossRef

Kangi A (2015) Application of warning and rapid estimation of earthquake damage (wared) system in unprepared cities case study: Mashhad, north east of iran. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 13:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.004CrossRef

Kesavan A, John S, Herszberg I (2008) Structural health monitoring of composite structures using artificial intelligence protocols. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 19(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06073688CrossRef

Kruijff G-JM, Pirri F, Gianni M, Papadakis P, Pizzoli, M, Sinha, A, Tretyakov, V, Linder, T, Pianese, E, Corrao, S et al (2012) Rescue robots at earthquake-hit Mirandola, Italy: a field report. In: 2012 IEEE international symposium on safety, security, and rescue robotics (SSRR), pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSRR.2012.6523866

Kumar V, Rus D, Singh S (2004) Robot and sensor networks for first responders. IEEE Pervasive Comput 3(4):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2004.17CrossRef

Lien Y-N, Jang H-C, Tsai T-C (2009). A magnet based emergency communication and information system for catastrophic natural disasters. In: 2009 29th IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems workshops, pp 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW.2009.72

López-Illescas C, de Moya-Anegón F, Moed HF (2008) Coverageandcitationimpactofoncological journalsinthewebofscienceandscopus. J Inf 2(4):304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001CrossRef

Lwin KK, Murayama Y (2011) Web-based gis system for real-time field data collection using a personal mobile phone. J Geogr Inf Syst 3(4):382

Martıén-Martıén A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, López-Cózar ED (2018) Googlescholar,webofscience, and scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. J Inf 12(4):1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002CrossRef

Matsuno F, Tadokoro S (2004) Rescue robots and systems in Japan. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, pp 12–20.https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2004.1521744

Menoni S, Pergalani F, Boni M, Petrini V (2002) Lifelines earthquake vulnerability assessment: a systemic approach. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22(9–12):1199–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00148-3CrossRef

Michael N, Shen S, Mohta K, Mulgaonkar Y, Kumar V, Nagatani K, Okada Y, Kiribayashi S, Otake K, Yoshida K et al (2012) Collaborative mapping of an earthquake-damaged building via ground and aerial robots. J Field Robot 29(5):832–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40686-73CrossRef

Mingers J, Leydesdorff L (2015) A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. Eur J Oper Res 246(1):1–19CrossRef

Mohan P, Mittal H (2020) Review of ict usage in disaster management. Int J Inf Technol 12:955–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-020-00468-yCrossRef

Mori N, Takahashi T, Yasuda T, Yanagisawa H (2011) Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophys Res Lett 38(7).https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049210

Muralidharan S, Rasmussen L, Patterson D, Shin J-H (2011) Hope for haiti: an analysis of facebook and twitter usage during the earthquake relief efforts. Public Relations Rev 37(2):175–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.010CrossRef

Nagatani K, Kiribayashi S, Okada Y, Otake K, Yoshida K, Tadokoro S, Nishimura T, Yoshida T, Koyanagi E, Fukushima M et al (2013) Emergency response to the nuclear accident at the fukushima daiichi nuclear power plants using mobile rescue robots. J Field Robot 30(1):44–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21439CrossRef

Naghdi K, Mansourian A, Valadanzoej MJ, Saadatseresht M (2008) Evacuation planning in earthquake disasters, using rs & gis. Int Archiv Photogrammetr Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 24(1):1671–1676

Najafi M, Eshghi K, Dullaert W (2013) A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 49(1):217–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.09.001CrossRef

NGDC/WDS. (n.d.). Significant earthquake database. National Geophysical Data Center, noaa. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/form?t=101650%5C&s=1%5C&d=1

Nishiyama H, Ito M, Kato N (2014) Relay-by-smartphone: realizing multihop device-to-device communica- tions. IEEE Commun Mag 52(4):56–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2014.6807947CrossRef

Oh H-J, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 37(9):1264–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012CrossRef

Palen L, Anderson KM, Mark G, Martin J, Sicker D, Palmer M, Grunwald D (2010) A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters. ACM-BCS Vision Comp Sci 2010:1–12

Panakkat A, Adeli H (2007) Neural network models for earthquake magnitude prediction using multiple seismicity indicators. Int J Neural Syst 17(01):13–33. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065707000890CrossRef

Pollino M, Fattoruso G, Della Rocca A B, La Porta L, Curzio S L, Arolchi A, James V, Pascale C (2011) An open source gis system for earthquake early warning and post-event emergency management. In: International conference on computational science and its applications, pp 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21887-330

Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y (2012) Tweet analysis for real-time event detection and earthquake reporting system development. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng 25(4):919–931. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2012.29CrossRef

Sakurai M, Murayama Y (2019). Information technologies and disaster management—benefits and issues. Progr Disaster Sci 100012.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100012

Song Y, Gong J, Gao S, Wang D, Cui T, Li Y, Wei B (2012) Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-induced landslides using Bayesian network: a case study in Beichuan, china. Comput Geosci 42:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.011CrossRef

Spina R (2019) Big data and artificial intelligence analytics in geosciences: promises and potential. GSA Today 29(1):42–43. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG372GW.1CrossRef

Sun X, Liu H, Yang C, Wang N (2017) Virtual simulation-based scene modeling of helicopter earthquake search and rescue. AIP Conf Proc 1839(1):020140. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4982505CrossRef

Suzuki M, Saruwatari S, Kurata N, Morikawa H (2007) A high-density earthquake monitoring system using wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pp 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1145/1322263.1322301

Tralli DM, Blom RG, Zlotnicki V, Donnellan A, Evans DL (2005) Satellite remote sensing of earthquake, volcano, flood, landslide and coastal inundation hazards. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 59(4):185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.002CrossRef

Umar Z, Pradhan B, Ahmad A, Jebur MN, Tehrany MS (2014) Earthquake induced landslide susceptibility mapping using an integrated ensemble frequency ratio and logistic regression models in west sumatera province, indonesia. Catena 118:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.02.005CrossRef

Van Eck N, Waltman L (2010) Softwaresurvey:Vosviewer,acomputerprogramforbibliometricmapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3CrossRef

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2011). Text mining and visualization using vosviewer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.2058

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2014) Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Measuring scholarly impact. Springer, pp 285–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-813

Wang X, Liu PL-F (2006) An analysis of 2004 Sumatra earthquake fault plane mechanisms and Indian ocean tsunami. J Hydraul Res 44(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2006.9521671CrossRef

Winarni EW, Purwandari EP (2018) Disaster risk reduction for earthquake using mobile learning application to improve the students understanding in elementary school. Mediterr J Soc Sci 9(2):205–205CrossRef

Wright TJ, Parsons BE, Lu Z (2004) Toward mapping surface deformation in three dimensions using insar. Geophys Res Lett 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018827

Wu Y-M, Kanamori H, Kanamori H (2008) Development of an earthquake early warning system using real-time strong motion signals. Sensors 8(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8010001CrossRef

Yang C, Huang Q, Li Z, Liu K, Hu F (2017) Big data and cloud computing: innovation opportunities and challenges. Int J Digital Earth 10(1):13–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1239771CrossRef

Zheng L, Shen C, Tang L, Zeng C, Li T, Luis S, Chen S-C (2013) Data mining meets the needs of disaster information management. IEEE Trans Human Machine Syst 43(5):451–464. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2013.2281762CrossRef

Zhu H, Charlet J, Poffijn A (2001) Radon risk mapping in southern Belgium: an application of geostatistical and gis techniques. Sci Total Environ 272(1–3):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00693-3CrossRef

Titel: Exploring the emerging ICT trends in seismic hazard by scientometric analysis during 2010–2019
verfasst von: Kanika Saini
Sandeep K. Sood
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09597-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Water retention characteristics of unsaturated bentonite–sand mixtures under controlled-temperature

Studies of crosslinked biopolymer structure for environmental tools in terms of the rheological measurements: part B

Assessment of the HablehRood river water quality for drinking and irrigation purposes in Garmsar, Iran

Effect of galena contained in dust from Zn–Pb metallurgical processes on environment

Analytical solution of two-dimensional conservative solute transport in a heterogeneous porous medium for varying input point source

Assessment of declining groundwater levels due to excessive pumping in the Dhaka District of Bangladesh