Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Demography 2/2012

01.05.2012

The Proximate Determinants of Educational Homogamy: The Effects of First Marriage, Marital Dissolution, Remarriage, and Educational Upgrading

verfasst von: Christine R. Schwartz, Robert D. Mare

Erschienen in: Demography | Ausgabe 2/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper adapts the population balancing equation to develop a framework for studying the proximate determinants of educational homogamy. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth on a cohort of women born between 1957 and 1964, we decompose the odds of homogamy in prevailing marriages into four proximate determinants: (1) first marriages, (2) first and later marital dissolutions, (3) remarriages, and (4) educational attainment after marriage. The odds of homogamy among new first marriages are lower than among prevailing marriages, but not because of selective marital dissolution, remarriage, and educational attainment after marriage, as has been speculated. Prevailing marriages are more likely to be educationally homogamous than new first marriages because of the accumulation of homogamous first marriages in the stock of marriages. First marriages overwhelmingly account for the odds of homogamy in prevailing marriages in this cohort. Marital dissolutions, remarriages, and educational upgrades after marriage have relatively small and offsetting effects. Our results suggest that, despite the high prevalence of divorce, remarriage, and continued schooling after marriage in the United States, the key to understanding trends in educational homogamy lies primarily in variation in assortative mating into first marriage.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Our education classification captures the main education credential groupings in the United States and avoids categories with very small sample sizes. The odds of homogamy in the stocks and flows are quite similar using three-category (<12, 12, >12) and five-category (<10, 10–11, 12, 13–15, ≥16) education groupings.
 
2
Figure 1 summarizes the states that women may be in at any given age, but because we are interested in couples’ joint marital and educational characteristics, women may actually be in 1 of 40 states at any given time. When respondents are single (or divorced, separated, or widowed), they may be in 1 of 4 education categories; when they are first married (or remarried), they may be in 1 of 16 joint education categories. This means that a woman may be in one of 40 ([4 × 2] + [16 × 2]) states at any given age. Thus, our multistate life tables consists of a series of transition matrices (one for each year of wife’s age between 16 and 41) that are each 40 × 40, although not all transitions are possible (e.g., educational downgrades).
 
3
Differences between the raw data and the multistate life table data are further discussed in Online Resource 1. Tabular raw and multistate life table data sets are also available in Online Resources 2 and 3.
 
4
There is weak evidence for the statistical significance of age patterns of homogamy among prevailing marriages, but stronger evidence for the significance of these patterns among new first marriages (see Online Resource 1 for details). That there is weak evidence for the significance of age patterns among prevailing marriages is not problematic for our analysis because we are interested in how the flows shift the odds of homogamy upward or downward among a wide cross section of marriages, not how these flows contribute to changes in resemblance by wife’s age.
 
5
Because the percentage contribution of each flow is estimated from counterfactual marriage distributions using multistate life table data rather than sample data, traditional confidence intervals are invalid. Thus, we bootstrap 95% confidence intervals by taking 1,000 samples of female-respondent person-years with replacement of size n = 81,589 (the total sample size upon which the rates for the multistate life table are constructed). All analyses are run using these 1,000 samples; 95% confidence intervals are calculated as https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13524-012-0093-0/MediaObjects/13524_2012_93_Figh_HTML.gif , where https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13524-012-0093-0/MediaObjects/13524_2012_93_Figi_HTML.gif is the original sample estimate and \( s{{\widehat{e}}_{{1,000}}} \) is the bootstrapped estimate of the standard error of https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13524-012-0093-0/MediaObjects/13524_2012_93_Figj_HTML.gif from 1,000 samples (Efron and Tibshirani 1993:168–173).
 
6
The odds of homogamy among couples about to dissolve their first marriages are 84% those among prevailing marriages (2.29 / 2.74 = 0.84, Fig. 4), an estimate consistent with previous findings (Schwartz 2010a). The low volume of marital dissolutions relative to first marriages dampens the effects of these transitions on homogamy in the stock of marriages.
 
7
Based on the results shown in Fig. 4, we expected the impacts of later marital dissolutions and educational upgrades to be positive. If we omit the controls for changes in the distribution of educational attainment by wife’s age from Eq. 2, the impacts of both of these flows are positive and small (<0.5%), indicating that these results are sensitive to model specifications.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Becker, G. (1974). Theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82, S11–S26.CrossRef Becker, G. (1974). Theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82, S11–S26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–1187.CrossRef Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–1187.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275–302.CrossRef Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275–302.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: The Free Press. Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: The Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4(1), 105–132.CrossRef Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4(1), 105–132.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bumpass, L. L., & Call, V. R. A. (1989). The timing of marriage and education (National Survey of Families and Households Working Paper No. 10). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology. Bumpass, L. L., & Call, V. R. A. (1989). The timing of marriage and education (National Survey of Families and Households Working Paper No. 10). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology.
Zurück zum Zitat Bumpass, L. L., Castro Martin, T., & Sweet, J. A. (1991). The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 22–42.CrossRef Bumpass, L. L., Castro Martin, T., & Sweet, J. A. (1991). The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 22–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Castro Martin, T. (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 747–756.CrossRef Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Castro Martin, T. (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 747–756.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cancian, M., & Reed, D. (1999). The impact of wives’ earnings on income inequality: Issues and estimates. Demography, 36, 173–184.CrossRef Cancian, M., & Reed, D. (1999). The impact of wives’ earnings on income inequality: Issues and estimates. Demography, 36, 173–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Caspi, A., & Herbener, E. S. (1993). Marital assortment and phenotypical convergence: Longitudinal evidence. Social Biology, 40(1–2), 48–60. Caspi, A., & Herbener, E. S. (1993). Marital assortment and phenotypical convergence: Longitudinal evidence. Social Biology, 40(1–2), 48–60.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarkwest, A. (2007). Spousal dissimilarity, race, and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 639–653.CrossRef Clarkwest, A. (2007). Spousal dissimilarity, race, and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 639–653.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dean, G., & Gurak, D. T. (1978). Marital homogamy the second time around. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 559–570.CrossRef Dean, G., & Gurak, D. T. (1978). Marital homogamy the second time around. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 559–570.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández, R., Guner, N., & Knowles, J. (2005). Love and money: A theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 273–344. Fernández, R., Guner, N., & Knowles, J. (2005). Love and money: A theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 273–344.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández, R., & Rogerson, R. (2001). Sorting and long-run inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1305–1341.CrossRef Fernández, R., & Rogerson, R. (2001). Sorting and long-run inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1305–1341.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein, J. R. (1999). The leveling of divorce in the United States. Demography, 36, 409–414.CrossRef Goldstein, J. R. (1999). The leveling of divorce in the United States. Demography, 36, 409–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs, J. A., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (1986). Changing places: Conjugal careers and women’s marital mobility. Social Forces, 64, 714–732. Jacobs, J. A., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (1986). Changing places: Conjugal careers and women’s marital mobility. Social Forces, 64, 714–732.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalmijn, M. (1991a). Status homogamy in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 496–523.CrossRef Kalmijn, M. (1991a). Status homogamy in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 496–523.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalmijn, M. (1991b). Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 56, 786–800.CrossRef Kalmijn, M. (1991b). Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 56, 786–800.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalmijn, M. (1994). Assortative mating by cultural and economic status. The American Journal of Sociology, 100, 422–452.CrossRef Kalmijn, M. (1994). Assortative mating by cultural and economic status. The American Journal of Sociology, 100, 422–452.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–321.CrossRef Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–321.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalmijn, M. (2003). Union disruption in the Netherlands. International Journal of Sociology, 33, 36–64. Kalmijn, M. (2003). Union disruption in the Netherlands. International Journal of Sociology, 33, 36–64.
Zurück zum Zitat Karoly, L. A., & Burtless, G. (1995). Demographic change, rising earnings inequality, and the distribution of personal well-being, 1959–1989. Demography, 32, 379–405.CrossRef Karoly, L. A., & Burtless, G. (1995). Demographic change, rising earnings inequality, and the distribution of personal well-being, 1959–1989. Demography, 32, 379–405.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, S. K., & Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Non-Hispanic whites in the United States. Demography, 37, 29–40.CrossRef Lewis, S. K., & Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Non-Hispanic whites in the United States. Demography, 37, 29–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lichter, D. T. (1990). Delayed marriage, marital homogamy, and the mate selection process among white women. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 802–811. Lichter, D. T. (1990). Delayed marriage, marital homogamy, and the mate selection process among white women. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 802–811.
Zurück zum Zitat Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.CrossRef Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mortensen, D. (1988). Matching: Finding a partner for life or otherwise. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S215–S240.CrossRef Mortensen, D. (1988). Matching: Finding a partner for life or otherwise. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S215–S240.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing: Assortative mating under varying degrees of uncertainty. The American Journal of Sociology, 96, 405–432. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing: Assortative mating under varying degrees of uncertainty. The American Journal of Sociology, 96, 405–432.
Zurück zum Zitat Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2001). Demography: Measuring and modeling population processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2001). Demography: Measuring and modeling population processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Qian, Z. (1997). Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography, 34, 263–276.CrossRef Qian, Z. (1997). Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography, 34, 263–276.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qian, Z. (1998). Changes in assortative mating: The impact of age and education, 1970–1990. Demography, 35, 279–292.CrossRef Qian, Z. (1998). Changes in assortative mating: The impact of age and education, 1970–1990. Demography, 35, 279–292.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68–94.CrossRef Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Qian, Z., & Preston, S. H. (1993). Changes in American marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review, 58, 482–495.CrossRef Qian, Z., & Preston, S. H. (1993). Changes in American marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and forces of attraction by age and education. American Sociological Review, 58, 482–495.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raymo, J. M., & Xie, Y. (2000). Temporal and regional variation in the strength of educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 65, 773–781.CrossRef Raymo, J. M., & Xie, Y. (2000). Temporal and regional variation in the strength of educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 65, 773–781.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenfeld, M. (2008). Racial, educational, and religious endogamy in comparative historical perspective. Social Forces, 87, 1–32.CrossRef Rosenfeld, M. (2008). Racial, educational, and religious endogamy in comparative historical perspective. Social Forces, 87, 1–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schoen, R., & Standish, N. (2001). The retrenchment of marriage: Results from marital status life tables for the United States, 1995. Population and Development Review, 27, 553–563.CrossRef Schoen, R., & Standish, N. (2001). The retrenchment of marriage: Results from marital status life tables for the United States, 1995. Population and Development Review, 27, 553–563.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, C. R. (2010a). Pathways to educational homogamy in marital and cohabiting unions. Demography, 47, 735–753.CrossRef Schwartz, C. R. (2010a). Pathways to educational homogamy in marital and cohabiting unions. Demography, 47, 735–753.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, C. R. (2010b). Earnings inequality and the changing association between spouses’ earnings. The American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1524–1557.CrossRef Schwartz, C. R. (2010b). Earnings inequality and the changing association between spouses’ earnings. The American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1524–1557.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.CrossRef Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shafer, K., & Qian, Z. (2010). Marriage timing and educational assortative mating. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41, 661–691. Shafer, K., & Qian, Z. (2010). Marriage timing and educational assortative mating. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41, 661–691.
Zurück zum Zitat Smits, J., & Park, H. (2009). Five decades of educational assortative mating in 10 East Asian societies. Social Forces, 88, 227–256.CrossRef Smits, J., & Park, H. (2009). Five decades of educational assortative mating in 10 East Asian societies. Social Forces, 88, 227–256.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smits, J., Ultee, W. C., & Lammers, J. (1998). Educational homogamy in 65 countries: An explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review, 63, 264–285.CrossRef Smits, J., Ultee, W. C., & Lammers, J. (1998). Educational homogamy in 65 countries: An explanation of differences in openness using country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review, 63, 264–285.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Torche, F. (2010). Educational assortative mating and economic inequality: A comparative analysis of three Latin American countries. Demography, 47, 481–502.CrossRef Torche, F. (2010). Educational assortative mating and economic inequality: A comparative analysis of three Latin American countries. Demography, 47, 481–502.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tzeng, J. M., & Mare, R. D. (1995). Labor market and socioeconomic effects on marital stability. Social Science Research, 24, 329–351.CrossRef Tzeng, J. M., & Mare, R. D. (1995). Labor market and socioeconomic effects on marital stability. Social Science Research, 24, 329–351.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ultee, W. C., & Luijkx, R. (1990). Educational heterogamy and father-to-son occupational mobility in 23 industrial nations. European Sociological Review, 6, 125–149. Ultee, W. C., & Luijkx, R. (1990). Educational heterogamy and father-to-son occupational mobility in 23 industrial nations. European Sociological Review, 6, 125–149.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss, Y., & Willis, R. J. (1997). Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, S293–S329.CrossRef Weiss, Y., & Willis, R. J. (1997). Match quality, new information, and marital dissolution. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, S293–S329.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Proximate Determinants of Educational Homogamy: The Effects of First Marriage, Marital Dissolution, Remarriage, and Educational Upgrading
verfasst von
Christine R. Schwartz
Robert D. Mare
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Demography / Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0070-3370
Elektronische ISSN: 1533-7790
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0093-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

Demography 2/2012 Zur Ausgabe